Federal records reveal that a multimillion-dollar development promoted by Democratic Senate nominee Adam Hamilton encountered securities violations, severe financial difficulties and an uncertain investor repayment process after raising millions from the public.
By yourNEWS Media Newsroom
LEAWOOD, Kan. — Democratic U.S. Senate nominee Adam Hamilton, the founding pastor of one of the nation’s largest Methodist churches, helped promote a multimillion-dollar real estate venture that later acknowledged violating Kansas and Missouri securities laws and warned investors it might not survive financially, according to federal filings examined ahead of Tuesday’s midterm elections.
The venture, COR Development LLC, was established in 2000 in connection with Hamilton’s Church of the Resurrection in Leawood, Kansas, which sought to acquire 47 acres for commercial development while obtaining approximately 15 acres for its expanding congregation. The company initially aimed to raise $16 million through a public securities offering but ultimately collected approximately $8.56 million before encountering regulatory violations, mounting debt and difficulties financing construction.
Hamilton, who is challenging Republican incumbent Sen. Roger Marshall in the Nov. 3 election, publicly championed the project as an innovative solution to the church’s land needs. However, he was not identified as a manager or signatory in the company’s securities filings, and the available documents do not establish that he personally participated in the violations.
The financial history of the development was detailed in a Nov. 2 investigation by Just the News, which reviewed Securities and Exchange Commission disclosures, historical reporting and court records. Hamilton’s campaign did not respond to the publication’s request for comment before its report was published.
The project originated during a period of rapid expansion for the Church of the Resurrection, which Hamilton founded in 1990. By September 2000, the congregation had grown to more than 8,000 members and was considering an ambitious new campus. With nearby land reportedly selling for approximately $250,000 an acre, church leaders pursued an unusual arrangement involving a separate for-profit company that would purchase the property, develop retail and office buildings and transfer a portion to the congregation.
In a September 2000 Reuters interview published by the Deseret News, Hamilton explained that church members were already being asked to support construction of a new sanctuary and were reluctant to contribute additional large donations for land acquisition. The investment offering was intended to attract funding while providing participants an opportunity to profit from commercial development.
“When I went to seminary, I never dreamed of helping to design a commercial real-estate project,” Hamilton said. “But this really is a means to another end.”
“We’ve said we want to be a ‘whatever it takes kind of church.’ The public offering is part of the whatever it takes.”
The arrangement attracted attention because it combined religious fundraising objectives with a commercial securities offering. Church member and attorney Art Fillmore, who helped structure the project, described the venture as a business enterprise created to address a charitable need. At least one prospective investor told Reuters that his interest was motivated more by supporting the church than by the expected financial return.
According to COR Development’s original SEC registration documents, the company planned to build commercial facilities on approximately two-thirds of the property and donate the remaining acreage to the church. The anticipated transfer was divided into an initial two-acre donation and a subsequent donation of approximately 13 acres in 2002, creating potential charitable tax benefits for investors.
The company’s prospectus also warned that the venture carried significant risks, including its lack of operating history, uncertain development costs, financing requirements and exposure to the commercial real estate market. Those warnings became particularly relevant as the project struggled to secure funding and complete construction.
The securities offering became effective in November 2000, with sales beginning in January 2001. When the offering ended May 7, 2001, COR had sold 254,850 common units and 601,416 preferred units at $10 each, generating $8,562,660. The proceeds were substantially below the original $16 million objective.
By 2003, the company faced serious financial problems and disclosed that its securities had been sold without satisfying state registration requirements. In its quarterly SEC filing for the period ending June 30, 2003, management acknowledged that neither the common nor preferred investment units had been registered in Kansas or Missouri and that the securities did not qualify for the exemptions relied upon when they were sold.
“As such, COR’s sale of the Common and Preferred Units in Kansas and Missouri appears to have violated both Kansas and Missouri securities statutes,” the company stated.
The disclosure exposed COR to potential investor repayment demands. Under a proposed rescission arrangement, eligible Kansas investors would be offered the opportunity to sell their units back to the company for their original investment plus 15% annual interest. Missouri investors also retained potential remedies arising from the registration violations.
COR reported that it had entered into a consent order with Kansas securities regulators requiring a $6,300 fine and $1,700 in additional fees. A separate Missouri settlement required a $2,000 contribution to the state’s investor education fund and notification of 36 Missouri purchasers.
The repayment obligations threatened an already precarious financial position. COR warned that a substantial number of investors demanding their money back could force the company to obtain additional loans, while its existing lender was unwilling to provide construction financing until the rescission process was completed.
Management acknowledged “substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.”
As of June 30, 2003, COR reported no cash or cash equivalents, approximately $5.08 million in bank debt and a $610,000 bank overdraft. Although the company continued pursuing commercial leases and property sales, its ability to finance the proposed development remained uncertain.
The company subsequently filed a Form 15 with the SEC, seeking to suspend its public reporting obligations. That decision limited the availability of subsequent financial information, leaving the final results of the proposed investor buyback program unclear. Just the News reported that it could not establish how many investors accepted rescission offers or whether all requested repayments were completed.
Further financial difficulties arose from a $2 million loan COR provided to Market Foods Limited LLC, which intended to operate a grocery store within the development. The borrower repaid only $37,905 before defaulting and entering Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in January 2005.
A 2006 federal court ruling involving the unpaid loan documented subsequent litigation involving COR, First National Bank of Olathe and individuals who had guaranteed the Market Foods debt. The dispute added to the financial complications associated with the original development.
Despite those setbacks, the commercial project eventually became Cornerstone of Leawood, a retail and office development near 135th Street and Nall Avenue. Portions of the property continue to be advertised for sale or lease, indicating that the development ultimately took physical shape even though its early financing and securities operations encountered substantial difficulties.
The Church of the Resurrection also continued expanding and eventually constructed a new church complex costing approximately $80 million. Hamilton remains its senior pastor and has become a nationally recognized Methodist leader.
His campaign for the U.S. Senate has emphasized political moderation, public service and his experience leading a large congregation. According to archived reporting about the original development, the unconventional investment structure was noteworthy even during the speculative economic climate of 2000, when technology offerings and alternative financing arrangements were attracting widespread interest.
The newly examined records raise questions about the church-backed project’s oversight, the risks communicated to investors and the ultimate financial consequences of the securities violations. However, the available filings distinguish Hamilton’s role as a public advocate from the responsibilities of COR Development’s formally designated managers.
No evidence presented in the reviewed records establishes that Hamilton personally violated securities laws, directed the improper sales or was charged in connection with the company’s financial problems. The documents also do not establish that every investor lost money or that the development was never completed.
The controversy has resurfaced as Hamilton seeks to unseat Marshall in a closely watched Kansas Senate race, placing his involvement in the decades-old venture under scrutiny. While COR Development acknowledged state securities violations and serious financial uncertainty, the ultimate financial outcome for its investors remains unclear from the public records examined.
Original article
Comments