For over 60 years, the federal program from low-income families get ready for elementary school through early childhood education and related support services, like speech therapy and developmental screenings.
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services , that would cut the majority of the and would also give states more authority over how the is run.
This proposal comes after the Trump administration tried unsuccessfully . Funding freezes and the government shutdown in 2025 also caused many Head Start centers to . These closures caused some staff to resign and compelled some Head Start families to withdraw their children from the program.
The latest could alter the program’s day-to-day operations in various ways – whether that means no longer giving children or relaxing .
The new rules would also mandate that , regardless of the language children and their families speak at home.
Not the same program
Some Head Start participants, workers and advocates have that these changes would transform – from one that alleviates the effects of poverty to one that has a more generic emphasis on early childhood education.
As a , I’ve spent the past six years studying Head Start and its impact on local communities.
Head Start is a vital provider of childcare and other services for the poorest children and their families in rural, urban and suburban communities across the U.S. Reducing the number of federal rules governing Head Start will likely not enhance the quality or broaden the availability of the program to the children and families who need it most.
Understanding Head Start’s launch
is a free, nationwide year-round preschool program that serves more than 700,000 low-income children ages 3-5 and their families. It operates with a . Head Start providers are typically run by .
is generally determined based on household income, though there are some categories of children who are automatically eligible, such those who are unhoused or in foster care.
The majority of Head Start participants attend preschools run by one of the . are also offered to support families.
Head Start is notable among early childhood education programs because it provides more than just free childcare and education. Head Start is required to serve at least two meals per day to the young children who attend these schools, as well as offer speech therapy and other kinds of developmental support and health services when needed.
In some rural communities, Head Start’s ability to bring dentists and doctors to centers has .
have introduced or expanded their own free public preschool options in recent years. But Head Start continues to be an essential early childcare program for low-income children and their families across the country.
Head Start takes off
President Lyndon B. Johnson’s administration as an eight-week summer preschool program.
Over 500,000 low-income children participated in Head Start during this first summer. The program quickly proved popular and effective. the entire school year, .
The early childhood experts who designed Head Start understood that simply offering free education to low-income children was . They recognized the necessity of a comprehensive, whole-child approach, a philosophy that .
So while Head Start primarily provides education and childcare services, the program also requires parent-child activities and other activities that engage across their .
Since 1965, other programs have been introduced under the Head Start umbrella, including , which provides Head Start services to children from birth to 3 years old, as well as pregnant women.
Overall, have participated in Head Start since its launch.
Head Start’s impact on children
have analyzed how Head Start affects children who participate in the program, as well as their families.
Much of the research has found that Head Start’s positive effects on its participants are sustained through the end of third grade. These effects include significantly and .
Researchers have also found that participating in Head Start lowered the likelihood of being placed in special education or , and it , among other positive results.
Head Start’s longer-term impacts, meaning those measured over the course of a child’s lifetime, are less clear.
have found impacts that last well into adulthood, though some have not. These studies contribute to the debate over the benefits of Head Start “fading out” over time, and .
found positive effects for Head Start participants in cognitive, social-emotional and health outcomes, though few of these impacts lasted through the end of first grade.
Both the , a conservative think tank, and the Trump administration have cited this report to argue that Head Start is ineffective. However, it is important to note that many scholars have pointed to .
What’s next?
The Trump administration suggests that these changes will cut by 2031. Those savings would account for roughly 0.04% of any given year’s typical total federal budget.
I believe that these proposed changes fly in the face of Head Start’s goals, and changes to Head Start’s rules and standards will likely contribute to the across the country.
The Administration for Children and Families, an office within the Department of Health and Human Services, is accepting , as required by federal law. It will review the comments after the Oct. 6, 2026, deadline.
As of late September, there were , most expressing serious concern about these changes.
Original article
Comments