More than 200 California sheriff’s deputies are using ordinary department-issued smartphones to capture fingerprints through their cameras, bringing biometric identification once dependent on specialized scanners directly onto devices officers already carry.
By yourNEWS Media Newsroom.
A California sheriff’s office has begun turning standard smartphones into mobile fingerprint scanners, allowing deputies to capture biometric images through an ordinary phone camera and rapidly check identities against law-enforcement records without carrying separate fingerprint hardware.
More than 200 deputies with the Placer County Sheriff’s Office are now using the technology on county-issued iPhones, according to details of the deployment released this month.
The system, called CamraIB, uses smartphone cameras to photograph fingerprints without requiring a person to press a finger onto a conventional electronic scanner. Software processes those images into fingerprint records that can be submitted through the department’s identification system.
The technology represents a significant change in mobile biometrics. Portable fingerprint identification itself is not new, but previous systems generally required law-enforcement agencies to purchase and issue dedicated fingerprint-reading hardware. Placer County’s implementation shifts the capture process to a device deputies already carry every day.
The software was developed by Integrated Biometrics and incorporated into Placer County’s system with Sacramento-based Computer Deductions Inc., or CDI.
Using the iPhone’s normal camera, the system can generate fingerprint images at 500 pixels per inch from four-finger identification captures, according to the companies involved. Once fingerprints are captured and submitted, deputies can receive information on previous arrests, outstanding warrants and personal alerts directly on the phone.
The process should not be confused with remotely identifying someone by casually photographing a hand from across a room. The current system involves deliberately positioning a person’s fingers for biometric capture by the smartphone camera. It replaces physical contact with a fingerprint sensor, not the need to obtain a sufficiently clear view of the fingerprints.
Placer County’s technology staff integrated the application with the sheriff’s records-management system, enabling biometric searches without forcing deputies to move among several separate devices.
The system also uses facial biometrics as part of multi-factor authentication supplied by Okta. That authentication is designed to control access, record user activity and help the department comply with Criminal Justice Information Services security requirements.
Heather Pence, who oversees technology for the Placer County Sheriff’s Office, described the system as “cutting-edge, readily available, and easy to use.”
Demand among deputies was strong enough that the department deployed it to more than 200 personnel, funded through the Cal-ID Remote Access Network Board, according to reporting on the implementation.
The technology can be used when officers encounter someone whose identity cannot immediately be confirmed through identification documents. Placer County also says deputies can use it to identify uncooperative individuals or recently deceased people.
Developers are still working on limitations that can arise outside controlled fingerprinting environments.
Capturing high-quality fingerprints can be more difficult when a subject cannot position his hands normally, including when the person is handcuffed. The companies are also working to reduce instances in which the system fails to return an expected match and are considering broader database access beyond the records currently available to deputies.
Integrated Biometrics says its touchless technology can support traditional four-finger and individual-finger capture while using software to transform camera images into biometric records suitable for matching.
The development illustrates how advances in consumer-camera quality and mobile processing have narrowed the technological gap between ordinary smartphones and equipment once built exclusively for biometric identification.
Police departments have been moving toward mobile fingerprinting for nearly two decades, but the hardware historically looked very different.
British authorities began preparing for widespread deployment of dedicated handheld fingerprint readers by 2008. Contemporary reporting said police forces across the United Kingdom were being equipped with portable scanners that allowed officers to conduct identity checks on people encountered on the street.
Those units were described at the time as devices roughly comparable in size to the BlackBerry smartphones then widely used.
The core idea was similar to what departments are pursuing today: instead of transporting a person to a police station simply to establish identity, officers could capture fingerprints in the field and electronically compare them against government databases.
Other British departments subsequently began issuing mobile fingerprint scanners for roadside and street identification, further establishing portable biometrics as a routine law-enforcement tool.
American agencies followed a similar path.
In Colorado, the Colorado Bureau of Investigation partnered with the Thornton Police Department in 2013 to test MorphoIDent, a pocket-sized fingerprint device that allowed officers to submit biometric searches from the field.
The Colorado pilot program gave officers access to real-time identity information through fingerprint recognition, with the Colorado State Patrol also evaluating the devices.
Pennsylvania developed its own statewide mobile identification program. The Pennsylvania Chiefs of Police Association later demonstrated the technology in a 2018 presentation on portable fingerprint identification.
Its Mobile ID Program provides officers with handheld equipment that can capture fingerprints in the field and search them against available identification systems.
What distinguishes the newer Placer County deployment is the disappearance of that separate scanner.
Instead of a purpose-built biometric device connected to or carried alongside a smartphone, software turns the smartphone camera itself into the capture mechanism.
That can potentially reduce the number of devices officers must carry, simplify deployments across large departments and make biometric identification available to more officers without purchasing a separate scanner for each one.
It also expands the amount of sensitive law-enforcement functionality concentrated on a single mobile device.
A department-issued smartphone can already provide communications, photographs, records access and other digital tools. Adding biometric fingerprint capture means the same phone can also become an identity-search terminal connected to criminal-history and warrant information.
Placer County says security surrounding that access includes biometric authentication, activity logging and systems designed to comply with federal criminal-justice information standards.
The technology also raises broader questions that have accompanied mobile fingerprinting since its earliest deployments, including when officers may request or compel biometric identification, how records are retained and which databases can be searched.
Those questions are governed by applicable constitutional standards, state and federal law and individual department policy rather than by the fingerprint technology itself. The availability of a smartphone scanner does not independently create new legal authority for police to detain someone or compel fingerprints.
The technology is nevertheless becoming considerably easier to deploy.
A capability that once required police departments to purchase specialized portable scanners can now be added through software to cameras built into mass-market phones.
Integrated Biometrics began offering smartphone-based touchless fingerprint technology in 2021 and has continued developing mobile fingerprint and palm-print systems. The company is now exploring additional improvements, including browser-based implementations that could provide greater processing capacity in high-volume environments.
Placer County is also considering additional uses, including biometric identification during prisoner transfers and access to databases beyond its current local records.
For law enforcement, the practical attraction is speed: an officer encountering someone whose identity is uncertain can potentially move from fingerprint capture to records information without returning to a station or retrieving a dedicated biometric device.
For the technology industry, the Placer County rollout demonstrates something broader.
The smartphone camera has advanced from documenting fingerprints to producing biometric fingerprint images capable of automated law-enforcement searches.
Portable fingerprinting has existed for years. What is changing now is the equipment required to do it.
In Placer County, the fingerprint scanner is no longer another device on an officer’s belt. It is increasingly the phone already in his hand.
Comments