By Gloria Ogbonna
The Iran-backed militant group Hezbollah, long known for embedding rocket launchers in civilian areas and launching mass missile barrages at Israeli population centers, is reportedly increasing its reliance on drone warfare.
According to regional analysts and Lebanese sources, the group has developed growing proficiency with unmanned aerial systems and is now using them to conduct more precise and sustained attacks against Israeli troops operating in southern Lebanon.
Mounir Shehadeh, a retired Lebanese Army general, told The National that while drones are not new to Hezbollah’s arsenal, their role has shifted dramatically in recent months. What was once considered a supplementary weapon has now become, in his words, “an almost daily tool in combat.” He described the group’s evolving tactics as a “transition from general heavy fire to precision fire and strategic attrition.”
Rather than relying primarily on large salvos of rockets — which are often inaccurate but effective when aimed broadly at civilian areas — Hezbollah is reportedly deploying inexpensive, mass-produced drones capable of targeting active military units with greater precision. These drones, analysts say, are cheaper than traditional missiles and can be sourced from various suppliers, not solely from Iran, whose ability to transport advanced weaponry into Lebanon may face logistical constraints.
The shift reflects a broader tactical recalibration. Rockets and missiles have historically been central to Hezbollah’s deterrence strategy against Israel, but their inaccuracy makes them less effective in direct battlefield engagements against mobile military forces. Drones, by contrast, offer surveillance capabilities and real-time targeting, allowing Hezbollah to conduct more focused harassment and attrition campaigns against Israeli troops.
Another factor driving the transition is propaganda value. Many of the drones used in these attacks are equipped with cameras, enabling Hezbollah to capture footage of explosive-laden drones striking Israeli targets. The group has frequently shared such videos online to project strength, boost morale among supporters, and undermine the perception of Israeli military superiority.
A Hezbollah official quoted by regional media indicated that the group’s strategy is aimed at “striking fear and heavy loss in enemy infantry,” particularly because Israeli soldiers often consider themselves well-protected by artillery, air support, and armored units. By using drones that can bypass or evade certain defenses, Hezbollah seeks to challenge that sense of security.
As the conflict continues, President Donald Trump weighed in on Israel’s response strategy. Speaking Wednesday, Trump said he had advised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to adopt a more targeted and restrained approach in dealing with Hezbollah.
“I told Netanyahu he has got to do it more surgically,” Trump said, emphasizing the importance of avoiding large-scale destruction of buildings. “It is too terrible and makes Israel look bad,” he added, underscoring concerns about international perception and humanitarian fallout.
Trump also placed responsibility for Lebanon’s instability on Hezbollah and its chief backer, Iran. He expressed hope that Lebanon could recover politically and economically once Hezbollah’s influence is neutralized. “When Iran gets taken out, Hezbollah automatically gets taken out,” he said, framing the group as an extension of Tehran’s regional ambitions.
The Trump administration has signaled that it would prefer a solution led by the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF), rather than a prolonged Israeli occupation of southern Lebanon to create a buffer zone. Israel has previously indicated that establishing such a zone could be necessary to prevent cross-border attacks, but U.S. officials appear to favor strengthening Lebanon’s national military to assume that responsibility.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio reiterated this position earlier in the week, affirming America’s support for Israel’s right to defend itself while outlining a longer-term vision for Lebanese sovereignty. Rubio argued that the ultimate resolution would involve empowering vetted units of the Lebanese Armed Forces with “the training, the equipment, and the capability” to dismantle Hezbollah’s infrastructure within Lebanon itself.
He stressed that Israel’s conflict is with Hezbollah rather than the Lebanese state, and suggested that Lebanon’s diverse religious communities — including Shiite Muslims, Sunni Muslims, and Christians — might increasingly recognize the destabilizing role Hezbollah has played in the country.
“There should be one government, one armed forces inside of Lebanon, and it should belong to the Lebanese Government,” Rubio said. “And that’s who we should be empowering.”
As Hezbollah refines its drone capabilities and Israel calibrates its response, the evolving battlefield underscores a broader transformation in modern asymmetric warfare — one in which relatively inexpensive unmanned systems are reshaping tactics, raising the stakes for regional security, and complicating diplomatic efforts to contain the conflict.
Source Breitbart
Original article
Comments