Federal officials argue the state’s zero-emission vehicle rules unlawfully regulate fuel economy and could raise costs for consumers nationwide.

By yourNEWS Media Newsroom

The Trump administration announced Thursday it has filed a federal lawsuit against California seeking to block the state’s electric vehicle mandate.

The legal challenge was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California and centers on regulations adopted by the California Air Resources Board that require a growing share of vehicles sold in the state to be zero-emission.

According to the administration’s federal complaint, the government argues that states do not have authority to impose rules that effectively regulate national fuel-economy standards.

Attorney General Pamela Bondi said the policy would impose higher costs on American consumers and conflict with federal law.

“Oppressive, expensive electric vehicle mandates drive up costs for American consumers and violate federal law. California is using unlawful policies from the last administration to create exorbitant costs for our citizens,” Bondi said in a statement released by the Justice Department, as detailed in the official announcement.

Under the California Air Resources Board regulations, at least 35 percent of new vehicles sold in the state for the 2026 model year must be zero-emission.

The requirement is scheduled to increase gradually until reaching 100 percent by 2035.

Federal officials contend the policy could have effects far beyond California because automakers would likely need to adjust production nationwide to meet the state’s standards.

Administration officials said the rules could drive up vehicle prices, reduce consumer options, and interfere with interstate commerce by imposing standards stricter than federal regulations.

The lawsuit seeks to block the mandate from taking effect while the legal challenge proceeds in federal court.

California officials have defended their policies as part of the state’s long-term strategy to reduce emissions and transition toward electric transportation.

The case sets up another legal confrontation between federal regulators and California over the state’s ability to impose its own environmental and vehicle standards.

Original article