By Anietie Anii-Bassey
Iranian officials launched a flurry of diplomatic outreach across the Middle East on Wednesday as fears grew over a possible U.S. military strike, coming a month after nationwide protests erupted inside the country and were met with a sweeping and deadly crackdown by security forces.
The outreach comes amid heightened military tension in the region. The United States has deployed the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln along with several guided-missile destroyers to nearby waters, assets capable of launching strikes from the sea.
At the same time, two key Gulf states — Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates — have publicly signaled they would not permit their airspace to be used for any attack on Iran, underscoring the delicate balancing act facing regional governments anxious to avoid being drawn into a wider conflict.
President Donald Trump has not said whether he intends to authorize the use of force, but he has warned Tehran over what he described as two red lines: the killing of peaceful demonstrators and the prospect of mass executions of detainees arrested during the unrest.
Activist groups say the crackdown has already left thousands dead, with many more injured or imprisoned, figures that dwarf official government counts and have fueled international alarm.
Inside Iran, access to outside information remains sharply curtailed after authorities shut down much of the global internet weeks ago. State-run media, which routinely labels demonstrators as “terrorists,” has become the primary source of news for many residents.
Yet anxiety and anger continue to ripple through society as videos of shootings and beatings circulate via satellite connections and encrypted channels, and as economic conditions worsen under the strain of unrest and sanctions.
“I feel that my generation failed to give a better lesson to younger ones,” said Mohammad Heidari, a 59-year-old high school teacher in Tehran, speaking in a rare interview shared through contacts abroad. “The result of decades of teaching by my colleagues and me led to the deaths of thousands, and maybe more injured and prisoners.”
Diplomatic activity accelerated across the region as governments sought to prevent escalation. Egypt’s Foreign Ministry said its top diplomat, Badr Abdelatty, had separately spoken with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff in an effort to calm tensions and avert what Cairo described as new cycles of instability.
Iranian outlets reported that several third-party mediators were also attempting to broker dialogue, though Washington did not immediately confirm the conversations.
Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman held a phone call with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, according to statements released by both sides, reiterating that the kingdom would not allow its territory or airspace to be used for military action against Iran by any party.
The United Arab Emirates has made similar assurances. Both countries host U.S. forces and aircraft, making their positions particularly significant as Washington weighs its options.
Attention has also turned to Qatar, home to the massive Al Udeid Air Base, the forward headquarters of the U.S. military’s Central Command and the largest American installation in the region.
Iranian officials, including Araghchi and senior security figure Ali Larijani, reportedly held calls with Qatar’s prime minister, Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani. Doha confirmed at least one of the conversations but declined to provide details.
Al Udeid has previously been a focal point in the confrontation between Tehran and Washington. In June, Iran carried out an attack near the base after U.S. aircraft struck Iranian nuclear enrichment facilities, an episode that brought the two adversaries close to open conflict.
Speaking to reporters outside a Cabinet meeting in Tehran on Wednesday, Araghchi struck a defiant yet conciliatory tone. “Applying diplomacy through military threats cannot be effective or constructive,” he said.
“If they want negotiations to take shape, they must abandon threats, excessive demands, and the raising of illogical issues. Negotiations must be conducted on an equal footing, based on mutual respect, and for mutual benefit.”
Meanwhile, new figures released by human rights activists have intensified scrutiny of the Iranian government’s actions. The U.S.-based Human Rights Activists News Agency, which has tracked previous episodes of unrest in the country, said it had documented at least 6,221 deaths linked to the protests and the ensuing crackdown.
The group said the tally included 5,858 demonstrators, 214 members of government-affiliated forces, 100 children and 49 civilians who were not participating in protests. It also reported that more than 42,300 people had been arrested.
The organization said it verifies each case through a network of contacts inside Iran, though independent verification has been extremely difficult because of the communications blackout and restrictions on foreign media.
Iranian authorities have released far lower numbers, placing the death toll at 3,117 and saying most of those killed were civilians and members of the security services, while labeling others as militants or terrorists. In past waves of unrest, the government has faced accusations from international observers of undercounting casualties or withholding full details.
If activist estimates prove accurate, the scale of the violence would surpass that of any protest movement in Iran in decades and evoke comparisons to the turmoil surrounding the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
The demonstrations began on Dec. 28 after the Iranian rial plunged sharply in value, igniting public anger over inflation, unemployment and economic mismanagement.
What started as scattered protests quickly spread to cities and towns across the country, drawing in students, workers and middle-class families. Authorities responded with force, deploying security units and restricting communications in what has become the most sweeping internet shutdown in Iran’s history.
As regional diplomacy intensifies and U.S. military assets remain poised nearby, many Iranians are bracing for what could come next — uncertain whether the next chapter will bring negotiations, further repression, or a dangerous escalation that could ripple far beyond their borders.
Original article
Comments