White House deputy chief of staff says U.S. position is that Greenland should become American territory, framing the issue as strategic rather than military.
By yourNEWS Media Newsroom
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said Monday that no country would militarily confront the United States over Greenland, as President Donald Trump renewed his public interest in bringing the semi-autonomous Danish territory under U.S. control.
Speaking in an interview with CNN, Miller described what he called the “formal position of the U.S. government,” arguing that Greenland should ultimately be part of the United States. His comments came amid repeated questioning about whether the administration would rule out the use of force.
WATCH:
“The United States should have Greenland as part of the United States,” Miller said, according to reporting by The Hill. “There’s no need to even think or talk about this in the context that you’re asking, of a military operation.”
Miller dismissed the notion of armed conflict over the Arctic island. “Nobody’s going to fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland,” he said.
He then questioned Denmark’s longstanding sovereignty over the territory. “The real question is, by what right does Denmark assert control over Greenland? What is the basis of their territorial claim? What is their basis of having Greenland as a colony of Denmark?” Miller asked.
Miller framed Greenland’s future as a strategic issue tied to U.S. leadership within NATO. “The United States is the power of NATO,” he said. “For the United States to secure the Arctic region to protect and defend NATO and NATO interests, obviously, Greenland should be part of the United States. And so that’s a conversation that we’re going to have, as a country.”
Trump echoed similar themes over the weekend, telling reporters aboard Air Force One that Greenland is critical to U.S. security. “We need Greenland from a national security situation. It’s so strategic,” Trump said in remarks shared online. “Right now, Greenland is covered with Russian and Chinese ships all over the place. We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security. And Denmark is not gonna be able to do it.”
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen responded cautiously but firmly to Trump’s comments. “I believe one should take the American president seriously when he says that he wants Greenland,” Frederiksen said, according to a Bloomberg translation. She warned, however, that any military action against a NATO member would have severe consequences. “If the U.S. chooses to attack another NATO country militarily, then everything stops, including NATO and thus the security that has been established since the end of the Second World War,” she said.
Greenland’s own leadership also rejected the idea of annexation. Late Sunday, Greenland Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen said, according to Reuters, that “threats, pressure, and talk of annexation have no place between friends.” He added, “Enough is enough. No more fantasies about annexation.”
The renewed debate underscores rising tensions over Arctic security and sovereignty, as the United States, Russia, and China expand their presence in the region and Greenland’s strategic importance continues to grow.
GOP Lawmakers Urge Trump to Dial Back Greenland Rhetoric as Denmark Warns NATO at Risk
Congressional Republicans are publicly urging President Donald Trump to temper his rhetoric about Greenland, warning that repeated references to acquiring the territory risk undermining relations with Denmark and other NATO allies at a moment of heightened geopolitical tension.
The pushback intensified this week after the White House declined to categorically rule out military action related to Greenland, comments that followed the administration’s recent military operation in Venezuela. Several GOP lawmakers said the language is unnecessary and potentially dangerous, even as Trump continues to argue that the Arctic territory is vital to U.S. national security.
Rep. Blake Moore of Utah, a member of House Republican leadership, issued a rare rebuke Monday night, criticizing what he described as administration “saber-rattling” over Greenland. Moore, along with Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland, co-chairs the bipartisan Friends of Denmark Caucus and emphasized the alliance implications in a joint statement.
“The Kingdom of Denmark is a NATO ally and one of America’s closest partners,” the lawmakers said. “An attack on Greenland — a crucial part of that alliance — would tragically be an attack on NATO.”
Trump has repeatedly said the United States “needs” Greenland for strategic reasons, citing increased Russian and Chinese activity in the Arctic. His remarks drew renewed scrutiny after White House adviser Stephen Miller suggested during a CNN interview that Denmark would not risk a military confrontation over the semi-autonomous territory.
“Nobody’s going to fight the United States militarily over the future of Greenland,” Miller said, comments that further fueled backlash on Capitol Hill.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota attempted to cool tensions Tuesday, telling reporters that military action is “not something that anybody’s contemplating seriously at this point.” Even so, several Republicans warned that continued public speculation is eroding trust with allies.
“There is no upside to demeaning our friends,” Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska wrote on social media, calling it embarrassing that Denmark and multiple European nations felt compelled to push back against U.S. rhetoric.
In Copenhagen, the reaction has been sharp. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned that any U.S. military move against Greenland would effectively end the NATO alliance, a statement reflecting deep concern within Europe about the durability of the postwar security order. Her remarks followed Trump’s renewed insistence that Greenland is essential to American security interests, particularly in the Arctic.
Frederiksen said Trump’s comments must be taken seriously, according to Reuters reporting, and cautioned that an attack on Greenland — part of the Kingdom of Denmark — would have sweeping consequences for transatlantic security.
Trump has not softened his stance, telling reporters that Denmark lacks the capacity to adequately defend the territory and suggesting that if Copenhagen cannot secure Greenland, others will. His comments were interpreted in Europe as signaling impatience with symbolic sovereignty unsupported by military capability.
The controversy was further amplified by a social media post from former Trump administration official Katie Miller, who shared an image of Greenland overlaid with American imagery and the word “SOON,” a post that, while unofficial, heightened unease among European officials.
Greenland’s leadership has sought to calm tensions, stressing that no immediate change in status is imminent. Still, the episode has highlighted Europe’s reliance on U.S. military power and the vulnerability felt by smaller allies amid renewed great-power competition.
The United States already maintains a significant military footprint in Greenland through the Pituffik Space Base, a Cold War-era installation critical to missile warning and space surveillance. Denmark has also expanded defense cooperation with Washington in recent years, including approving additional U.S. basing rights and purchasing American fighter jets.
Those steps have deepened military ties but now leave Denmark navigating a delicate balance: asserting sovereignty over Greenland while depending heavily on U.S. security guarantees. As Republican lawmakers warn, escalating rhetoric risks turning that tension into a broader alliance crisis.
Original article
Comments