Why Americans Aren't Paid Enough? In the United States, the perception of wage growth over recent decades can be misleading. In 1972, the average American worker earned about $3.88 per hour, a figure that rose to approximately $17.45 by 2023. At first glance, this seems like a substantial increase. However, when adjusting for inflation, the reality is starkly different: today's wages are only marginally higher by 12 cents compared to 1972, highlighting a significant stagnation in real wage growth over the past 50 years despite the apparent nominal increases.
This stagnation becomes even more pronounced when considering the productivity-wage gap. From 1979 to 2023, while worker productivity surged by 61.8%, wages only grew by 17.5%. This discrepancy indicates that workers have become significantly more efficient but have barely seen any relative increase in their earnings. The situation is worse for the bottom 90% of earners, whose wages grew by just 28.2%, whereas the top 1% and especially the top 0.1% saw their incomes skyrocket by 179.3% and 389.1%, respectively. This disparity has led to an expanding gap between the rich and the poor, exacerbating economic inequality.
Several factors contribute to this wage stagnation. The COVID-19 pandemic, for instance, brought about unexpected wage increases in certain sectors due to labor shortages, yet this was a temporary shift rather than a systemic change. Automation poses a significant threat, with predictions of millions of job losses by 2030, impacting even skilled professions. Globalization also plays a role, as American workers find themselves competing against lower-wage labor markets internationally.
The labor market dynamics further compound the issue. Many American workers are less inclined to switch jobs, partly due to a lack of better opportunities, contributing to wage suppression. Highly concentrated labor markets allow a few employers to dominate, reducing wage competition. Non-compete agreements and the decline of unions have also weakened workers' bargaining power. Although unionized workers earn significantly more than their non-unionized counterparts, union membership has halved since the early 1980s.
Policy interventions could potentially address these issues, but the challenges posed by technological advancement and globalization limit the effectiveness of such measures. Nonetheless, eliminating non-compete agreements for low-skilled jobs and leveraging remote work could mitigate some factors contributing to wage stagnation. Ultimately, achieving fair wages is crucial for the U.S. economy, promoting innovation and reflecting the true productivity and skills of American workers. Without addressing these underlying issues, the stagnation of wages could signal a decline in overall productivity and economic health.
CHAPTERS: 0:00 Why American Workers Aren't Paid Enough? 1:17 Wages Vs Productivity 1:57 Wage Stagnation 3:26 Automation Taking Away Jobs 4:42 Globalization 5:09 Labor Market 6:06 Non-Compete Agreements 7:02 Legislation Vs Wage Stagnation 7:28 Remote Work
Produced by: Samantha Harvey Edited by: Jacob Smith Animation: Charlotte Brown
While nominal wages in the U.S. have risen since 1972, inflation-adjusted real wages have remained nearly stagnant. Despite a massive increase in worker productivity, the financial gains have primarily benefited the top 1% of earners, widening the wealth gap and leaving low- and middle-income workers struggling to afford basic living costs.
Around $3.88 per hour.
That's what American workers earned on average in 1972.
Now in 2023, these same workers earn around $27.45 per hour.
Minimum wage on January 1st, it will go from $14.49 an hour to $15.74 an hour.
That's an increase of $1.25.
These figures might give the impression that wages in America have risen significantly in recent years.
However, when we take inflation into account, wages have remained practically identical
over the last 50 years, with today's workers earning only 12 cents more than in 1972.
More workers are rejecting the federal minimum wage.
That's according to an article from the New York Times, which found the federal wage floor
of $7.25 is becoming increasingly irrelevant.
But with inflation at its highest since 1981, Americans feel the impact of slow wage growth.
Petrol and housing costs in the U.S. have also jumped dramatically in recent weeks,
forcing millions of families to make tough choices.
Moreover, two-thirds of American workers claim that inflation outpaced any salary increases
in the last year.
So why aren't American workers paid enough, and what can be done about it?
Wages in the United States have stagnated since the early 1970s, but it was in 1979
when the gap between workers' productivity and their wages began to substantially increase.
Between 1979 and 2023, workers' wages grew by 17.5 percent, while productivity grew more
than three times faster, at 61.8 percent.
In other words, today's workers are 61.8 percent more efficient than workers 50 years ago,
yet they earn only a few cents more than back then.
People in Kentucky are struggling to make ends meet, and it has nothing to do with their
employment status.
Wage stagnation is worse for low- and middle-income workers, as the bottom 90 percent of American
workers saw their annual wages increase by only 28.2 percent from 1979 to 2023, while
the top 1 percent saw a 179.3 percent increase in wages.
Meanwhile, the top 0.1 percent experienced a staggering 389.1 percent growth.
This means that the gap between the rich and the poor has widened over the last 50 years.
Growing gap between rich and poor Americans is one of the biggest challenges facing the
country.
Get this, the richest 1 percent controls more wealth now than at any time in more than a
half century.
Real wages, adjusted for inflation, haven't changed much since the late 1970s.
However, inequality increased during most of this period.
In 2019, during the disruption in the U.S. labor market caused by the pandemic, there
were surprising wage increases in various industries.
In fact, there was a significant acceleration in wage growth of around 16 percent, especially
for low-wage workers.
This was due to a labor market shortage caused by excessive demand in the United States,
immigration restrictions, early retirements and, of course, illnesses or fatalities.
There is a shortage of skilled tradespeople throughout the U.S.
economy, a persistent problem that started well before the pandemic.
Automation is another explanation for wage stagnation in the United States.
The McKinsey Global Institute predicts that 45.3 million workers will lose their jobs
due to technological advances by 2030.
Automation has been a significant factor so far, especially in manufacturing jobs.
For example, in the past, cars were built using machines.
But there was a lot of hands-on work.
Now, much of that is done with machines, and workers need many more skills to operate them,
resulting in the disappearance or underpayment of many routine jobs.
As wages in such jobs have decreased by about 12 percent in recent years.
There's no question artificial intelligence will remake the workplace.
Recent analysis from investment firm Goldman Sachs looked at the global impact and found
AI could replace 300 million full-time jobs, including positions in the legal and engineering
fields.
Over the next two or three decades, many economists believe there will be significant
disruption in the labor market due to new automation.
Even workers with university education, such as financial assistants and accountants,
and even some diagnostic medical roles, will be performed by machines with artificial
intelligence, posing competition for many Americans.
Globalization is another reason for wage stagnation, forcing domestic workers to
compete against unfair competition, where workers in many countries are paid much less.
BBC investigation found evidence that workers were being exploited.
Women at the factory which makes home textiles for the brands said that they were forced
to work excessive hours and weren't even allowed toilet breaks.
The BBC also heard claims of poor working conditions from staff at an Indian supplier
to Ralph Lauren.
Economists suggest that labor market dynamics played a more significant role than expected.
About 35 percent of American workers today change jobs less frequently than before,
although job changes lead to strong net wage growth.
While about 43 percent of Americans do not change jobs for the sake of stability, the
other 22 percent cannot do so because there is nowhere else to go.
In many local markets, companies use the lack of competition to suppress the wages of their
workers.
About 60 percent of U.S. labor markets are considered highly concentrated, meaning a
few employers compete for local workers.
Just 10 percent more workers in an area can lead to a 1 percent reduction in wages.
In a booming market like ours, just about every industry is looking for high skill
employees who can get into a career quickly right now.
Companies can also play a direct role in stifling competition with methods like
non-compete agreements.
Approximately half of private sector companies in the United States that responded to the
EPI survey said at least some of their employees are subject to non-compete agreements,
meaning around 36 to 60 million private sector workers in America are subject to these
agreements.
Similarly, unions that originally fought for higher compensation have drastically lost
their power over the years.
Union membership in the U.S.
dropped from 20 percent of American workers in 1983 to only 10.3 percent in 2023.
Workers in unions usually earn higher wages, around 10.2 percent more, compared to similar
non-unionized workers, thanks to methods like collective bargaining.
It is expensive to live here in California, and a new statewide campaign launched today
hopes to help with affordability.
It's called Living Wage for All.
At issue is California's $15.50 minimum wage.
The campaign is pushing for that to go higher.
Legislation could help address some of the major issues causing wage stagnation in the
United States.
However, there is a limit to what can be done through policy when there are significant
changes in technology and globalization.
But policy can address other aspects, such as non-compete agreements, as these contribute
to wage stagnation, as they are often applied to low-skilled jobs.
On the other hand, the increase in remote work could also be beneficial for wage growth
in local markets, as some employers prefer their employees to work remotely.
In a way, remote work reduces the monopoly power of U.S.
companies, as talented workers could work for any company worldwide remotely, earning
a higher salary.
Before COVID, only 23% of professionals worked remotely.
Today, 59% are working remotely most or all of the time, as according to data from the
Pew Research Center.
Achieving a fair wage for all Americans is vital to ensuring the success of the U.S.
economy.
Similarly, fair wages promote innovation and make the economy productive.
Therefore, wages truly reflect the productivity and skills of American workers.
So, if wages stagnate for a lot of people, it could be an indicator that productivity
in the country is falling, which could affect the economy and all Americans in the future.