Xi's highly publicized visit to North Korea may be masking a far bigger story unfolding in Beijing, where a series of elite personnel changes, media signals, and political developments suggest that the dominoes may already be falling.
Welcome back to FinalWar with Katherine Hu. For most observers, the Xi–Kim summit was the story. But what if the real story was never in Pyongyang?
In this episode, we examine a series of unusual developments that emerged before, during, and after Xi Jinping's visit to North Korea: • Why was the reception noticeably different from previous visits? • Why have official images raised so many questions? • What do the sudden personnel changes involving Cai Qi, Chen Xi, Wang Xiaohong, and Wei Xiaodong tell us? • Why did People's Daily unexpectedly highlight Hu Haifeng? • What political message may have been hidden inside China's 2026 Gaokao essay topic?
Viewed separately, these events may seem unrelated. Viewed together, they may point to something much larger.
As officials linked to Xi's political network come under increasing pressure, and as new signals emerge from Beijing's media and political system, the balance of power inside Zhongnanhai may be entering a new phase.
The Xi–Kim summit captured the world's attention. But the real story may be what Beijing is quietly signaling behind the scenes.
📌 Subscribe for more in-depth geopolitical analysis and insider perspectives on China, global power shifts, and elite political dynamics.
After vanishing from public view for 10 days,
she has finally appeared in North Korea.
But the visit raises more questions than answers.
Was that really she?
And while attention is focused on Pyongyang,
Beijing is quietly sending another message.
Something significant has already changed behind the scenes.
Welcome back to Final War with Catherine Hu.
This week, one story has dominated discussions
among China watchers around the world.
The Xi Kim summit in North Korea.
One detail drew particular attention.
For nearly two years,
China's first lady, Peng Liyuan,
had not accompanied Xi on any overseas trip.
Yet this time, the two appeared together on a foreign visit,
immediately sparking speculation and curiosity.
At first glance, the trip looked highly successful.
Television screens were filled with images of cheering crowds,
synchronized slogans,
and carefully staged scenes of welcome from North Korean citizens.
But a closer look tells a different story.
Compared with Xi's 2019 visit,
the reception was noticeably scaled back.
The massive street-lined welcome crowds were gone.
The giant mass gymnastics performances
involving tens of thousands of participants were absent.
Even the official welcoming ceremony was moved to Kim Il-sung Square,
rather than being held at the more prestigious
Kumsusan Palace of the Sun.
There must be some inside story behind this
that mainstream media cannot report.
For example, was it really Xi who visited North Korea this time?
And what major changes may be hidden behind
the recent wave of personnel reshuffles in Beijing?
That's what we're going to investigate today.
Let's begin with a single image.
What you're looking at is a screenshot from a CCTV television report
covering the meeting between Kim and Xi.
Take a closer look at Kim's expression.
During the meeting, Kim seemed to be looking at Xi
with a mixture of disdain and even ridicule.
And this was not an isolated moment.
Similar expressions surfaced repeatedly
throughout Xi's visit to North Korea.
Compare that with the look on Kim's face
when he met Xi during the September 2025 military parade.
The contrast is striking.
And it naturally raises a question about the true identity of the Xi
who appeared in North Korea during this visit.
Now let's look at another clip.
At a large evening performance in North Korea,
Xi appears to be thoroughly enjoying himself.
Smiling throughout the event.
But take a closer look.
What we see on the screen is a cheerful, easygoing elderly man
who seems to be under very little pressure.
Yet the Xi we have seen in the past
has usually projected a very different image.
Marked by a mixture of authority and gloom.
He also appears roughly 10 years older than the man seen here.
This photograph was published by the Korean Central News Agency.
It shows Xi wearing glasses while watching the performance.
That detail may seem insignificant at first.
But in mainland China's official propaganda system,
images like this have never been made public.
For Xi, appearance is carefully managed.
Photos of this kind are simply not supposed to be released.
What makes this even more unusual
is that North Korean state media has traditionally been careful
to follow the same reporting conventions
observed by Chinese official media.
This time, however, those conventions appear to have been ignored.
So what are we supposed to make of that?
And take another look at the face in this photograph.
Does it really match the image of Xi that you have in mind?
How should those differences be explained?
There is another puzzle that remains unexplained.
Xi's seemingly elastic height.
This was Xi's meeting with Trump at Mar-a-Lago in 2017.
And this was Trump standing alongside Xi
during his visit to China in May of this year.
Has Xi somehow become taller in his 70s?
Then, how does one explain what appears to be
a difference of nearly 20 centimeters?
The same question arises when comparing Xi and Kim Jong-un.
According to official figures, Kim is 175 centimeters tall
and Xi is 178 centimeters tall.
Their height difference should be only 3 centimeters.
So why does the gap in these photographs
appear to be at least 10 centimeters?
How should that be explained?
On June 5th, Xi met with Laos President Thonglone Sisulid in Beijing.
Thonglone's official height is 173 centimeters.
Xi's is 178.
The difference should be only 5 centimeters.
So why does the gap in this photograph
appear to be at least 15 centimeters?
Perhaps these otherwise unexplained details
help explain why Kim's attitude towards Xi during this visit
appeared noticeably less deferential than in the past.
Meanwhile, information emerging from Beijing's
senior leadership circles is sending another signal.
This visit to North Korea may well have been
a farewell appearance by Xi and Peng.
At the end of May, during the Politburo meeting
that was not made public,
the Central Party decision-making and coordination body
had already forced a showdown with Xi's faction.
Major changes are now taking place
at the very top of Beijing's power structure.
In early June,
Tsai Chi assumed the position of president
of the Central Party School without any official announcement,
replacing Chen Xi, one of Xi's key political allies.
This development provides an important window
into the changing power structure
within Xi's political camp.
The change took place very suddenly.
As recently as May 15th,
Chen Xi was still attending events
as president of the Central Party School.
Just two weeks later,
Tsai Chi had taken over the position.
No public appointment or removal notice
was issued throughout the process,
breaking with established CCP practice.
The Central Party School is the CCP's highest institution
for training senior party and government officials.
Its president has traditionally been a member
of the Politburo Standing Committee,
with Chen Xi being the only exception.
Chen Xi, who was just removed from the position,
was Xi's bunkmate at Tsinghua University
and one of Xi's earliest political allies.
He was deeply trusted by Xi.
He served as head of the organization department
for 10 years,
helping build the backbone of Xi's political network.
He promoted large numbers of officials
from the Fujian province and Zhejiang factions
and played a key role in Xi's personnel arrangements.
He was the strategist behind Xi's camp.
Party insiders generally speculate
that Chen Xi's sudden removal
is linked to the Zhang Youxia-Liu Zhenli incident
that took place at the Central Party School
in January of this year.
Since the incident occurred at the Central Party School,
Chen Xi, as its president,
could hardly avoid responsibility.
More importantly, another core figure in Xi's camp,
Public Security Minister Wang Xiaohong,
is reportedly under investigation.
However, Wang is known
for his strong counterintelligence capabilities.
By contrast,
Chen Xi is a civilian official
with a scholarly background.
He is seen as a more likely breakthrough point
in the investigation,
potentially allowing investigators
to trace and further dismantle
Xi's broader political network.
Perhaps many people will ask another question.
Has Xi's power grown even larger?
My view is that although Xi's authority
appears to have expanded on the surface,
this is more likely a transitional arrangement
or even a fallback option for Xi himself.
In fact, it may be a signal
that his power is about to contract,
that he could step down as a Politburo,
Standing Committee member,
and as Director of the General Office
at the 5th Plenum later this summer.
Because Wei Xiaodong,
Xi's closest confidant in Beijing,
was officially announced to be under investigation
the day after Xi appeared in his new role
as president of the Central Party School.
In 2017,
Xi was transferred to Beijing,
where he served first as mayor
and later as party secretary.
During that period,
Wei Xiaodong, another Fujian native,
served as Xi's personnel chief in Beijing,
holding the positions of Beijing
Municipal Party Standing Committee member
and head of the organization department.
Xi later helped move him
into the position of chairman of the Beijing CPPCC.
Wei Xiaodong's political identity is clear.
A close ally of Cai Qi,
a key figure in the Fujian faction,
and a member of Xi's inner political circle.
When someone with that background
is officially taken down,
the implications are obvious.
Whether it is Wang Xiaohong,
Chen Xi,
Wei Xiaodong,
or the many Fujian-born officials
once promoted by Chen Xi,
they are falling one after another like dominoes.
All of this points to a systematic purge
of the Fujian faction.
Like a layer-by-layer operation,
the pressure appears to be moving steadily upward.
Xi's core political power base,
the Fujian faction,
is undergoing a major political earthquake.
Xi may be facing the most dangerous moment
of his political career.
At the same time,
the other side in this ultimate power struggle
is signaling,
in a remarkably subtle way,
that it now holds the reins of power.
As we have often said,
the key to understanding political developments
in Zhongnanhai
is often hidden in places
that many people overlook.
That is where the most important political signals
are often found.
One example is the appearance of Hu Haifeng,
the son of former party leader Hu Jintao,
on a prominent People's Daily headline.
On June 7th,
a seemingly ordinary news report
appeared in an unusual position,
the lead headline on the homepage
of People's Daily Online
and the lead story on page 2
of the print edition of the People's Daily.
Its title was
Bringing Scientific Research Strength
to the Front Lines of Production.
And the sole focus of the report
was the Yangtze River Delta Research Institute
of Tsinghua University in Zhejiang,
located in Jiaxing,
the place where Hu Haifeng's political career began.
In the political language of CCP propaganda,
this is a direct endorsement of Hu Haifeng.
It suggests not only that he could be moved
into a more important political role,
it also suggests that the political position
of Hu Jintao
and the broader reformist camp is improving
while Xi's faction appears to be
in an increasingly unfavorable position
in the power struggle.
Otherwise,
such a signal would never have been released.
Another important indicator
concerns former heir apparent Hu Chunhua.
This signal is equally well-hidden
yet highly significant.
From June 7th to June 9th,
China held its annual
National College Entrance Examination.
Many people in the West may not realize
that this is a nationwide event
that attracts enormous public attention.
It is not only an examination
that determines the future
of millions of students,
but also an important pillar of social fairness.
Each year,
the essay questions often draw
on current social themes and issues.
This year's essay topics
contain some particularly intriguing signals.
The essay prompt reads,
Read the following material
and write an essay
according to the requirements.
The sun and moon never lose their essence.
Therefore, though obscured,
they shine again.
The Yangtze and Han rivers
never lose their source.
Therefore, though blocked,
they flow freely once more.
What thoughts and reflections
does this material inspire?
Write an essay based on the above material.
On the surface,
this looks like a standard essay
prompt about perseverance,
using the sun, the moon,
and rivers as metaphors.
But for Chinese people
who follow CCP politics,
the meaning behind it
is immediately clear.
The key passage
comes from Feng Su Tong Yi,
a work written during
the Eastern Han dynasty
nearly 2,000 years ago.
Its author was a scholar
writing in response to a crisis
facing the ruling order of his time.
But the passage
originally contained a third line
that does not appear
in this year's essay prompt.
A sage never loses his virtue.
Therefore, though cast aside,
he rises again.
For politically attentive
Chinese observers,
the answer to the riddle
is already coming into focus.
The character Wen in Wen Jiabao's name
contains the character for sun.
The character Hu in Hu Jintao's name
contains the character for moon.
Who and when are making a comeback?
The deposed heir apparent Hu Chunhua
will rise again,
symbolizing a return
to the succession line.
The essay topic is a mirror of its time.
It is never just an essay question.
Such an obvious political message
may suggest that the power struggle
inside Zhongnanhai
has reached a stage of resolution.
And that is the story
behind the much discussed Xi Kim summit.
Get the real story
behind the CCP's shifting power games
and see where U.S.-China relations
are headed next.
Support the vision of a new China
without communism.
Subscribe now and join us
in bringing the truth to light.