"The Greens are more extreme than mainstream Palestinian opinion." | The News Agents

Global - The News Agents - Vertical
1 follower
Oct 12, 2026
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedThe speaker criticizes a Green Party resolution that supports \"armed struggle\" and defines Zionism as racism. He argues that the party has moved beyond mainstream Palestinian and international positions, aligning instead with extremist views that call for the eradication of Israel and potentially targeting Jewish cultural and religious institutions.
By all available means, they mean armed struggle.
So in this resolution, they have moved now beyond the position,
which I think is still probably
the majority position of the Palestinian people.
It's the position of Fatah and of the Palestinian Authority,
the position carved out by Yasser Arafat, which is,
we are no longer in the business of armed struggle,
of violence, of terrorist violence.
We're now in the business of politics and diplomacy.
No, the Greens are further to the, if you want to call it the left,
they're more extreme than mainstream Palestinian
opinion they're saying violence is now legitimate
i mean the mainstream Palestinian position
mainstream international position is two states
two states in terms they spell out they want
the elimination the eradication of one of those
the Jewish one the Israeli one
and they are happy to see that achieved by violence now that's a huge
deal but the Green Party of all parties
is no longer a party of peace they're a party of of
extreme violence uh called for by only a minority
of Palestinian people the minority trend or strain
represented by Hamas uh they don't talk about
for example the self-determination being decided by
the people uh in the on the territory they say specifically it has
to be a Palestinian state
it's up to the Palestinians to decide what happens
to seven eight nine million Jews what this motion
does do is, I guess, directly impact green Jewish members
who are just going about their daily
cultural, spiritual, religious needs.
The Green Party obviously says it's incompatible to be a
Green and a member of a racist organization.
We couldn't do that. They have now branded any
organization aligned with Zionism as racist.
You wouldn't struggle to find a synagogue in the world
that wouldn't be defined on their own terms as Zionists,
not in the sense that the Greens think,
which means supporting the Israeli government or the war in Gaza,
but just in terms of an orientation towards Israel and towards Zion,
because that's in the resolution.
It's in the prayers, frankly.
It's literally in the prayers, all through the prayer books.
It says Zion, Israel, every other page.
Now, does that mean that the prayer book
is falling foul of this Green resolution?
It's racist.
It's racist because it's Zionist.
This is the morass they've got themselves into because
the word Zionism does not mean to Jews what they think it means,
but they've decided to define it.
This doesn't just extend to members of the Green Party.
This will have an effect on British Jewish life.
It sounds fanciful until you reflect that the proposer
of this motion just two months ago said synagogues
in Britain need to be, quote, confronted, unquote.
This is a very dark development.
