The Age of Reason by Thomas Paine, 1819, Part 1 Section 15 - miracles

Thomas Paine
3 followers
The Age of Reason, Part I. Being an Investigation of True and Fabulous Theology, by Thomas Paine.
London, Printed and Published by R. Carlyle, 55 Fleet Street, 1819.
Part I, Section 15 of The Age of Reason by Thomas Paine.
In every point of view in which those things called miracles can be placed and considered,
the reality of them is improbable and their existence unnecessary.
They would not, as before observed, answer any useful purpose, even if they were true.
For it is more difficult to obtain belief to a miracle than to a principle evidently moral without any miracle.
Moral principle speaks universally for itself.
A miracle could be but a thing of the moment, and seen but by a few.
After this it requires a transfer of faith from God to man, to believe a miracle upon man's report.
Instead, therefore, of admitting the recitals of miracles as evidence of any system of religion being true,
they ought to be considered as symptoms of its being fabulous.
It is necessary to the full and upright character of truth that it rejects the crutch,
and it is consistent with the character of fable to seek the aid that truth rejects.
Thus much for mystery and miracle.
As mystery and miracle took charge of the past and the present,
prophecy took charge of the future and rounded the tenses of faith.
It was not sufficient to know what had been done, but what would be done.
The supposed prophet was the supposed historian of times to come,
and if he happened, in shooting with a long bow of a thousand years,
to strike within a thousand miles of a mark, the ingenuity of posterity would make it point-blank,
and if he happened to be directly wrong, it was only to suppose, as in the case of Jonah and Nineveh,
that God had repented himself and changed his mind.
What a fool do fabulous systems make of man!
It has been shown, in a former part of this work,
that the original meaning of the words prophet and prophesying has been changed,
and that a prophet, in the sense of the word as now used, is a creature of modern invention,
and it is owing to this change in the meaning of the words
that the flights and metaphors of the Jewish poets and phrases and expressions
now rendered obscure by our not being acquainted with the local circumstances
have been erected into prophecies and made to bend to explanations
at the will and whimsical conceits of sectaries, expounders, and commentators.
Everything unintelligible was prophetical, and everything insignificant was typical.
A blunder would have served for a prophecy and a dishclout for a type.
If by a prophet we are to suppose a man to whom the Almighty communicated
some event that would take place in the future,
either there were such men or there were not.
If there were, it is consistent to believe that the event so communicated
would be told in terms that could be understood,
and not related in such a loose and obscure manner
as to be out of the comprehension of those that heard it,
and so equivocal as to fit almost any circumstance that might happen afterwards.
It is conceiving every irreverently of the Almighty
to suppose He would deal in this jesting manner with mankind,
yet all the things called prophecies in the book called the Bible
come under this description.
But it is with prophecy as it is with miracle.
It could not answer the purpose even if it were real.
Those to whom a prophecy should be told
could not tell whether the man prophesied or lied,
or whether it had been revealed to him, or whether he conceded it.
And if the thing that he prophesied or intended to prophesy
should happen, or something like it,
among the multitude of things that are daily happening,
nobody could again know whether he foreknew it,
or guessed at it, or whether it was accidental.
A prophet, therefore, is a character useless and unnecessary,
and the safe side of the case is
to guard against being imposed upon by not giving credit to such relations.
Upon the whole, mystery, miracle, and prophecy
are appendages that belong to fabulous and not to true religion.
They are the means by which so many
have been spread about the world,
and religion been made into a trade.
The success of one imposter gave encouragement to another,
and the quieting salvo of doing some good
by keeping up a pious fraud protected them from remorse.
Having now extended the subject to a greater length
than I first intended,
I shall bring it to a close by abstracting a summary from the whole.
First, that the idea or belief of a word of God
existing in print, or in writing, or in speech
is inconsistent in itself for reasons already assigned.
These reasons, among many others,
are the want of a universal language,
the mutability of language,
the errors to which translations are subject,
the possibility of totally suppressing such a word,
the probability of altering it or of fabricating the whole
and imposing it upon the world.
Secondly, that the creation we behold
is the real and ever-existing Word of God
in which we cannot be deceived.
It proclaims His power.
It demonstrates His wisdom.
It manifests His goodness and beneficence.
Thirdly, that the moral duty of man
consists in imitating the moral goodness and beneficence of God
manifested in the creation towards all His creatures.
That seeing as we daily do the goodness of God to all men,
it is an example calling upon all men
to practice the same towards each other,
and consequently that everything of persecution and revenge
between man and man
and everything of cruelty to animals
is a violation of moral duty.
I trouble not myself about the manner of future existence.
I content myself with believing,
even to positive conviction,
that the power that gave me existence
is able to continue it in any form and manner He pleases,
either with or without His body.
And it appears more probable to me
that I shall continue to exist hereafter
than that I should have had existence,
as I now have, before that existence began.
It is certain that, in one point,
all nations of the earth and all religions agree,
all believe in a God.
The things in which they disagree
are the redundancies annexed to that belief.
And therefore, if ever a universal religion should prevail,
it will not be believing any new thing,
but in getting rid of redundancies
and believing as man believed at first.
Adam, if ever there was such a man,
was created a deist.
But in the meantime,
let every man follow,
as he has a right to do,
the religion and the worship he prefers.
For more information, or to volunteer,
please visit LibriVox.org
Recorded for LibriVox by Joe Dickerson
February 2012
