Chairman Aguilar on CNBC's Squawk Box

House Democrats
164 followers
Nov 11, 2026
House Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar joined CNBC’s Squawk Box with hosts Andrew Ross Sorkin and Joe Kernen to discuss how Democrats will work to deliver lower costs and affordable healthcare in the majority while holding the Trump administration accountable for the corruption that’s costing American taxpayers.
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedHouse Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar discusses the Democratic strategy following the election of Jim Jordan as House GOP leader. Aguilar emphasizes a mandate to lower living costs and ensure government accountability, while debating the role of the Department of Justice and the distinction between defending administration policy and providing personal legal defense for the president.
Welcome back to Squawk Box.
Congressman Jim Jordan elected to be the next House GOP leader.
Democrats are gearing up for their own leadership election next week.
Joining us right now is House Democratic
Caucus Chair, Congressman Pete Aguilar.
He's running for House Majority Whip.
Good morning to you.
Thank you.
We've all been trying to understand sort of how
the Democrat playbook is going to play out
and what it means in terms of what
and how it's going to relate to Republicans.
Republicans, where do you see...
Some common ground.
Is there any common ground you see coming up here?
Look, if our Republican colleagues want to work with us
on delivering lower costs and affordable health care
and bringing real accountability to this administration,
then we're happy to engage and talk with them.
But that was the mandate that came out of this election,
is we're going to spend our time
and our focus on putting the American people first
and focusing on lowering the costs that people face.
And there are bipartisan proposals out there.
That have that have done this and I hope our Republican colleagues
are willing to work with us to lower the cost
that people face across this country. The burden is real.
Farmers and ranchers to people putting gasoline in their cars.
All of everybody is paying more and we want to bring relief to folks.
Do you think you can work with Jim Jordan?
What is that? What does that signal to you?
Jim Jordan has been one of the most extreme members
of the Republican conference, but
he is who they elected as their leader.
I respect that decision that they made.
Speaker Jeffries will have conversations with then-leader Jordan,
where we have commonality
and to keep the House moving,
but we're looking for ways to deliver real results for people.
That is what people voted for last week.
But if Jim Jordan wants to give speeches
and push back against Democrats, then he's comfortable doing that.
He's got a proven track record in doing that.
But we think the American people want better.
When you talk about results,
on one end there are economic results, policy results.
On the other end, there's this...
phrase accountability and that accountability is a result
and that there's a lot of Democrats
that may be asking for accountability
at the same time that there are concerns that
potentially the Democrats could spend too much time on that issue
and not enough on the results
when it comes to policy, the economy and other things.
How do you see that balance?
Look, this isn't an either-or discussion.
This is about delivering lower costs to people
and bringing true accountability.
But that accountability means lower costs for the American public.
And let's talk about that because, you know,
the rising gas prices that people are getting
pinched with is as a result of the Iran war.
And, you know, we need to bring real accountability
and ask tough questions to this administration
and hold them accountable
because our Republican colleagues haven't been willing to do that.
And so that is where, you know,
when the American public is paying over $800 more because of
rising gas prices, that number is probably even higher
in inland Southern California,
where I live.
Those are real results.
Those are real examples where people are paying more
because of the inept work that this administration
is doing.
Is that about...
Is that about holding Pete Hegseth accountable
and trying to impeach him?
Or is that about withholding money
so that there can't be a quote-unquote forever war?
What does that look like to you?
Again, this isn't an either-or situation.
This is about real results,
and that means we have to be willing to use the tools that we have
within the appropriations process to push back.
against reckless spending for this war,
but that also means we should be pushing back
and asking questions about no-bid contracts
that are coming out of the Department of Defense
that are lining the pockets of the president's friends and family.
And so we will ask those questions,
but this isn't about being punitive or petty.
This is about working for the American public
and ensuring that their tax dollars
are going to the highest and best use possible.
Why are healthcare costs rising when the president...
President keeps, you know, spending money on no-bid contracts.
Those, that's a direct, you know, through line to affordability.
And that's where we can hold them accountable
and deliver real results for the American public.
How much does the possibility of congressional hearings
and the accountability piece act as a chess piece for the Democrats
in terms of some of the policy objectives you have?
Our policy objectives are lowering the costs
and making health care more affordable.
The accountability piece is just something that we have to do.
It is in the Constitution. It is our role and responsibility.
Just because the American public haven't seen it
while Republicans have been in charge
doesn't mean that that isn't our job.
We have to do it all, and that's what we plan
to do under Speaker Jeffries
with a potentially 260 member.
House Democratic Caucus, we have the mandate,
but more importantly, we have the responsibility
to do both in lowering costs
and asking the administration tough and fair questions.
And I know they want to be sensitive about this.
And the Department of Justice thinks that they
are the president's personal attorneys.
And now today, the White House counsel
is acting like the president's personal attorney.
These are people who don't feel that they work
for the United States government.
They feel like they work for the wholly
owned subsidiary of Donald J. Trump.
That's wrong.
And we should be asking them tough questions about that.
And they shouldn't.
Can I ask you a question about that, Congressman,
because that is exactly what Republicans have
done.
Congressman, you've raised this issue before about
the Department of Justice representing
personnel inside the administration.
And the administration has come back and said,
look, for a very long time, the DOJ has represented
individuals inside the administration for Democrats and Republicans.
Is that not the case?
The Department of Justice is meant
to represent the United States of America
and to defend and uphold the Constitution.
Now, when the Department of Justice
is sending letters directly on behalf of this president,
that is where they've crossed the line.
They're not defending policies of this administration.
They are personally defending one person.
That's where, you know, Todd Blanch is acting like the president's
personal attorney, oh by the way, which he was,
rather than the United States Attorney
General, the Chief Law Enforcement Officer of this country.
That's the line, and this administration
crosses it time and time again.
Congressman, if we lived in a perfect world,
I'd be nodding, but do I need to mention
Merrick Garland, do I need to mention Eric Holder,
Janet Reno, who was on the plane with
Bill Clinton, Loretta Lynch, and Warren, Bill?
I mean, come on.
I mean, I love you.
I love you, Congressman, but...
Yeah, Joe, if you want to talk...
I mean, you know, but you delivered that with a straight face,
which is what I liked.
No.
And if you want to talk about, you know,
12-year-old conspiracy theories about planes,
that's fine, Joe.
The American people are getting crushed with cost, and they think...
Yeah, Joe, I think Eric Holder was Obama's wingman,
was President Obama's wingman who
said that.
I mean, that's what an attorney general does.
The Attorney General is nominated
by the President to represent the United States.
Now, Todd Blanche was Donald Trump's personal attorney.
Was he not?
Is he not acting like that now?
Joe, the American people see through this,
and that's exactly why they voted the way
that they did last week.
That's exactly why Democrats have 260 seats.
Andrew was right.
It's always.
It's always.
I'm with you, Andrew.
It's always been like that.
Thank you.
Thank you.
I'm with Andrew.
Sure.
Congressman, I want to thank you for the conversation, as always.
I look forward to talking to you a lot more very soon.
Thank you.
Spock Fox coming back.
Appreciate all the voices.
