I Am NOT My Body!

Explore the Metaphysics of the Body
16 followers
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedThe speaker explores the disconnect between our internal sense of self and our physical appearance, comparing the disappointment of seeing a book character cast in a film to the struggle of recognizing oneself in the mirror. By viewing the body as a separate, randomly assigned vessel rather than a definitive identity, we can find liberation and deeper compassion for others.
A characteristic emotion on seeing
a favourite novel turned into a film is puzzlement. We
may not hate the actor playing a particular role –
we might find them rather beautiful
– it's just that they tend
not to be as we imagined they should be. We never thought
that Tolstoy's Anna Karenina or Ishiguro's Stevens
or Jane Austen's Marianne Dashwood
Or Scott Fitzgerald's Gatsby would look quite like.
When we originally read the novel,
we didn't necessarily even have any fixed idea of what
these characters should look like.
Their identities were free of the tyrannical requirement for
a face. We were liberated to see them in their unbounded entirety
because we didn't have
I have to visualise them concretely.
Their appearances were fluid and, when necessary,
hazy, so as better to allow their multiplicity
to take form. By not having to look a certain way,
they could be far more than just one
thing. The discomfort that we feel at the cinema reflects,
on a small scale, the pain
that we are likely to experience
with far greater force closer to home, in the bathroom
Through mirror and in relation to ourselves.
Here, too, we're prone to looking at the face in front of us
and thinking – even if we don't hate how we look,
though we probably do a bit – that our features
are in multiple ways extremely unfaithful to how it feels to be us.
As with a character in a novel,
we know ourselves in the comforting darkness of the inner mind,
where we don't place strict boundaries
or blunt conclusions on who we might be. We
give ourselves latitude.
We know we have a thousand moods, that we are a bewildering
mixture of the kind and the selfish,
the immoral and the good, the confused and the clear eyed.
We know that we harbour infinite possibilities,
that we are at once artists, ploughmen, accountants,
babies, presidents, lunatics, men, boys, girls,
women, dolphins, octopuses, jellyfish and ballerinas.
Pretty much any life form that has ever bubbled up
and breathed on the earth has some echo
Inside us.
How perplexing, therefore, to have to look in the mirror
and be obtusely presented with just one particular person,
with one predominant expression, one rather serious nose,
one set of sensible ears and one pair of cautious lips.
This perplexing feeling first descends in adolescence.
If we're frequently to be found a bit dazed
on the sofa at that age, or snappy towards our parents,
or melancholic dressed in some
sort of shapeless black tunic,
it's hardly a surprise given that we have recently – and
probably really for the first time –
become properly aware of how our bodies must look
To other people.
And what a cage we're condemned to inhabit,
having once blithely assumed that we might
be as free of definition as a cloud or an ellipsis.
Our face in the mirror may come
as no less of a surprise for us than would
for a reader the arrival of a random Hollywood
star in the space of a fictional persona.
Someone is playing us and we're really not
Not sure we like who's been cast.
We're sometimes given advice on how to cope at this point.
We must learn to love what has happened to us and who,
equipped with this new body, we have turned out to be.
We should consider ourselves with enthusiasm and gratitude
and interpret our bodies as a gift of nature.
We are, whatever we feel, beautiful. We should give ourselves a hug.
The advice may be well-meaning and in its place apt,
but there might be another, starker
philosophy to try out too.
We might look at the face in the mirror and pull an incensed
mutinous smile as if to say, that really isn't me and never will be.
Rather than attempting to overcome our initial discomfort,
we might hold on to it and make a sort of cult of it,
founding a major part of our identity on a gutsy
and insolent refusal to take on board the so-called gift
of nature we don't actually like very much.
Following the novelist Kingsley Amis
in his truculent description of his body
as a sort of idiot to which he was chained for 50 years,
we might consider our appearance as
a banal and ridiculous actor to whom some sort
of malevolent casting agent has mysteriously
decided to shackle us,
and to whom we owe no particular favours or loyalty.
We might think of our body as a sort of taxi
that the universe has rudely shoved us into,
Not a vehicle that we have carefully had
the opportunity to choose and to deserve.
Out of such insubordination can come a liberating lightness.
No longer do we have to worry whether or not we are our own faces.
We'll know for sure that, well, we aren't really.
We'll hint to the world that there are armies of people,
beings funnier and sadder, cleverer and simpler,
more masculine and more feminine, struggling to get out of us.
At the same time, we'll be able to bring
our knowledge of the radical disconnection
between outer form
and inner character to bear on our view of other people. We'll
cease taking their appearance as some sort of truth about them.
We'll know that they
are likely to feel as let down by their bodies and faces as we do.
We'll thereby come to see beauty where maybe
no one else has learnt to spot it,
because we're going to be looking with new and more penetrating sorts
of eyes beneath the surface of bodies and faces.
And most importantly,
we'll start to feel compassion for ourselves and other people
for the blatant injustice of the facial lottery
that we have all been compelled to play.
We're really honest. No one is as normal as they seem.
Play our card game to find out just how weird, or not, you are.
Follow the link now to learn more.
