GUILTY: Naresh Bhatt convicted of murdering wife Mamta Kafle Bhatt

Fox - 5 DC
30 followers
Nov 11, 2026
All right, is there anything we need
to do before we bring in the jurors?
Thank you very much.
You
got
it.
Yes.
Welcome
back.
It's
my
understanding
that
you
have
reached
a
verdict.
All right, I'll have the clerk.
Members of the jury, have you reached a verdict in the case
that we've ordered? Yes. Is this your unanimous verdict? Yes.
Naresh.bot,
the Commonwealth
of Virginia versus
Naresh.bot.
CR 2400-2302-00, we the jury find
the accused Naresh Dot Bot guilty
of transporting, secreting,
concealing, or altering a dead body.
Signed for person juror number 79, dated November 10th,
2026.
Commonwealth of Virginia versus Naresh Dot Bot
In CR 2400-3076-00, the jury find the accused
Naresh Dot Bot, guilty of first-degree murder,
signed for person juror number 79, dated November 10, 2026.
Commonwealth of Virginia v.
Naresh Dot Bot in CR 2400-3077-00.
We, the jury, find the accused Naresh Dot Bot,
guilty of physically defiling a dead human body,
signed four-person juror number 79, dated November 10th, 2026.
All right, you can have a seat.
Any motions with regard to the jury verdict?
All right, ladies and gentlemen of the jury,
I want to thank you for your service. This has been
a very long period of time,
and you've done something that nobody else has been required
That's what I'm required to do, and that's to not...
Decompress by discussing what you've heard
with absolutely anybody for six weeks.
And I know that's a heavy ask and I know it takes its toll.
And I want to tell you how grateful I am for your service
and let you know that you are now free of that.
But, um.
With that comes the caveat.
It's not unusual for the lawyers to reach out
to jurors to find out what they were thinking.
I want you to know that you are absolutely free,
and they will respect it if you tell
them you don't want to talk to them, okay?
They're not doing anything wrong,
but you do not need to talk to anybody, and nobody's
going to hound you about that, right?
I'm going to have you return your jury badges here,
and Kim, if you want to hand them, what
else do you need to give them as they leave?
We appreciate your service, and you're free to go.
We do need to schedule a sentencing date.
How much time do you all expect
this to take?
Once we actually select a judge,
before these
That's right, Judge, I think a half day.
A half day? I can do that.
So normally a pre-sentence report
is going to take 3 months.
I understand that...
You had indicated that some of your
witnesses are looking to get back to Nepal.
If you need me to ask somebody to rush it, I can, but...
I cannot be ready to do the sentencing.
I have March at 1
o'clock. That's a Friday.
Or I can do March 11th. I would also do that at 1 o'clock.
You know, I normally do my Thursday sentencings at 9,
so I'd reserve the entire afternoon then for this.
I do have a jury March 1, 2, 3.
Um, that might go into four and then I have a jury March 9th,
10 to keep going to the 11th.
I'm happy to go on the 12th.
That's not my normal Friday, but I can do that. Does that
work? Commonwealth? No problem. I'll
Are we starting in the afternoon, Judge?
Yes. Uh, what I'll do is
I'll schedule that to start at one o'clock.
I'm going to go ahead and revoke any bond that Mr.
Mr. Bott may have otherwise had, you're going to need to.
Cooperate with the pre-sentence report.
I will, Ms. Lennox,
it's probably best if both of us contact probation
and let them know that he'll need
a Nepali interpreter for filling out that report.
We, of course, need Nepali interpreters available
for the hearing on March 12th.
Full contact probation officer.
Great.
Yes.
Long-form pre-sentence report.
All right, is there anything else we need to do?
All right, thank you.
President, orderly fashion, please.
And you were listening in to the sentencing,
Judge Kimberly Irving, scheduling sentencing
now Naresh Bhatt, convicted of first-degree murder
and other counts in the murder and dismembering
of his wife, Mamta Kafel.
Yeah, a case that had spanned six weeks
and that we had seen Naresh Bhatt take the stand
in his own defense.
And in closing arguments today, the prosecution saying he is a liar.
And clearly, the jury, after three hours,
four hours of deliberations, they started
at 1 p.m., they came back just about 5 o'clock this afternoon.
They did not believe that story.
And now he faces.
This is up to life in prison.
The judge had allowed for a secondary conviction,
if they wanted to, of second-degree murder
as opposed to first-degree, which would mean premeditated.
But as you heard there, the jury unanimously
convicting him of first-degree murder.
Homa Bash has been in court throughout the day.
She was in that courtroom as we saw
a stoic Naresh Bhatt receiving that information from the jury.
Homa.
Marina, Jim, it has been a long six weeks,
and in fact, it has been an even longer two-plus years
since Mamta Kafel was last seen.
And I can tell you, this courtroom, every single day of this
trial, has been packed with her family,
her friends, supporters of Mamta, people who didn't
know her but feel a connection to her story.
There have been so many family members that have
flown over from her home country of Nepal to be in this courtroom.
The judge had to call an end to
And to how many people could be allowed
in for this verdict, there were so many people
Many people gathered in the hallway just listening,
and they cheered when the jury convicted Naresh Bhatt
of first-degree murder.
As you said, he's also convicted now of defiling a corpse,
decomposing and concealing her body.
It was July 2024 when Mamta Kaful,
28-year-old nurse, went missing.
She left an 11-month-old baby at home just weeks away,
her baby daughter, Nima, from turning a year old
when Mamta was last seen.
And for two years, Naresh Bhatt
had said that he didn't know what happened to his wife
and in the last days of this trial
he took three days on the stand in his own defense
and he admitted that he cut up her
body, he disposed of her body in various trash cans, various dumpsters.
We saw throughout the course of this trial surveillance videos
and images of him putting
on gloves and throwing pieces of garbage,
what we now know were pieces of her body into
Into dumpsters around Prince William County.
And as you said, it took jurors only four hours.
To convict him in this case,
and so many people today are breathing a sigh of relief.
We'll see what that sentencing that is now,
for now, scheduled in March will hold, but
it has been a long time, a long emotional trial.
We heard some very gruesome details,
very grotesque details throughout this course.
We heard about his internet searches,
what happens when you divorce somebody, what happens
if you are able to donate your baby.
Those are some of the searches that we heard
the prosecution say Naresh Bhatt had been doing
In the months leading up to this,
Leading up to Mamta's disappearance
and today during their closing argument saying that
this was premeditated not just for weeks,
not just for days, but for months, months
before her disappearance.
And I don't know if you can hear behind me
right now, people are starting to file out
of that courtroom and they're cheering,
they're cheering this guilty verdict.
Homa, here's what we're going to do.
I know that's happening behind you right now.
We'll let you go get reaction if that's necessary.
And we'll check back in with you in a little bit.
In the meantime, we've had a whole team
of reporters covering this trial, including Artisha
Lewis, who's here in studio with us.
Last week, that moment where he admitted to dismembering,
which seemed it caught so many people off guard
that he admitted to that. That was an
extraordinary moment in this case.
Yeah, a huge pivot in this case. And you can hear
We hear the courtroom gasp when he had that admission,
and at the time we spoke with a
trial attorney who's familiar with the legal teams in this case,
when that happened, and
he called it an act of desperation, at least on Naresh Bhatt's behalf.
Part because for weeks and even years,
even he said he didn't know what happened to his wife.
He didn't know where she was. He, you know, had no answers.
And there were so many questions about what exactly took place.
And then last week he made that bombshell testimony,
admitting to dismembering Mamta Kapilibhatt in the couple's.
bathtub in their home next to their master bedroom.
And so obviously that was a huge
turning point in this case.
You know, I have been in the trial along with my colleagues,
Stephanie Ramirez and Homa on day one when they selected the jury.
I never saw a jury pool that
large. They had to narrow down the jury pool for someone
who could commit to seven weeks of this
trial. It looks like it's ending
a little bit earlier than it was initially planning to go.
No, but even so, guilty on all counts.
And it was 12 jurors. There were 17 alternates.
And it was really a melting pot of jurors in that courtroom
that were listening to testimony that was often very hard to listen to,
especially when you talk about.
Him dismembering his wife's body and throwing it in trash bins across
northern Virginia and those plastic bags and hearing from the experts
and all of the blood that was found in the home.
There was so much overwhelming evidence.
And so when he came out last week, again,
with that alarming account of what happened
or what he says happened, saying that his wife,
Mamta, took her own life and then he
dismembered her body, obviously the jurors did not buy that narrative.
And it shows today with the verdict.
Yeah, a reasonable doubt, right?
That's the onus of the government.
And certainly he tried to show that there was doubt.
But again, there was not the through line here,
which was something that even the defense
Pence had tried to guide when they brought on a second.
A psychiatrist who tried to mount this case
that Naresh Bhatt was suffering from PTSD
after discovering his dead wife's body laying on the bed.
And somehow that is what led him.
To quite literally, which is what he described on the stand,
was chopping up his wife's body,
dismembering the top part from the legs and how he went about that.
And very gruesome and graphic details, which I think the jury tried
to sit with and not to talk about someone's behavior.
But that also said, just like we saw him stoic at the response
of that verdict, he was also incredibly stoic while on the stand.
And again, lawyers can now parse
together what worked, what didn't work.
But the government strategic and the.
In their seven weeks that they had proposed
to the judge of laying the coursework and
the groundwork for this trial,
they wanted to have 100 government witnesses, the judge
at times saying, that's not going to work,
that's too much, condense this trial, prove
your case, make it happen, and they so were effective,
as we saw with the convictions
today.
You were having these conversations on the DMV zone
in the afternoon all throughout the
course of the trial.
I'm thinking back to when she first went missing
and how you had a very concerned community,
friends, family members.
members, they were searching
For him, or for her, rather,
and there was a question about what he knew and when he knew it,
but the reality is, for a long while,
and I know you covered this angle of the story, Tisha,
I mean, this was personal for so many people
to get these answers, and as it turns out,
you know, he was right in front of them the whole time.
He knew all along, and that's what the prosecution pointed to,
especially after last week's testimony.
They painted him as a liar, and they
Named and listed all of the people that he lied to,
and I think that that was a powerful moment for the jury to hear
and to see and to understand that while the community was grieving
and while the community was searching for this young mother,
this pediatric nurse, her husband knew the whole time what happened
to her and was promoting this lie that he was promoting.
And I think that that is...
Something that was really tough for the jury to reconcile.
Right, absolutely.
When the investigators first showed up at that home,
and we've seen that body cam footage so many times,
when they knock on the door and he alleges that his wife is missing,
that maybe she's traveled out of the state
because they were having relationship issues,
and then they come back and he tells a different story,
and time and time again, when investigators try
to piece together a timeline
of this missing mother, a missing woman, a 28-year-old mother,
A father who all friends had said would never.
Leave her daughter.
And yet he could never provide the same answer.
It was always something else.
And now we know what happened and who killed Montecolfo.
When we heard towards the end the sentencing,
there was always the back and forth.
Any trial, you have the back and forth
of when they can get the sentencing done.
As you just saw on screen, March 12th is when that is slated for.
And in terms of what sort of punishments he'll see,
I mean, first degree murder, it's as tough as it gets.
Yeah, life in prison is the maximum sentence.
Those lesser charges, right, the defiling,
the dismembering of the body, some of the defense.
attorneys that I'd spoken with on the DMV zone had said
to concede to that would say,
well, if we can plant reasonable doubt
on that top murder charge, on that murder one,
then he won't spend the rest of his life behind bars.
But if he concedes those two lesser charges
up to 10 years per charge,
then maybe give and take with good behavior, it's less than 20 years.
And for someone who's middle-aged,
that means that you could still have freedom at some point
in your life. But clearly, the jury not buying that story.
And with that first-degree murder
charge,
which they could have also convicted on a second-degree murder charge,
They have now presented the avenue
for that life behind bars for Naresh Bhatt.
And we saw and we heard from the judge trying
to figure out a date on the calendar.
And so many of the family members there
of Mamta traveling from Nepal for this case,
hoping to be here for the sentencing.
But that now will get extended into the spring of 2027.
