Geoengineering & Spraying Proven! Not A Conspiracy Theory Anymore!

James Kaufman, World News Report, today, March 26, 2025. God bless you and yours, no matter where you are in the world. Please subscribe, give us a thumbs up, ring that bell for critical future updates. The truth about geoengineering and spraying finally comes out. Not the conspiracy theory anymore. We had the CEO of one of the largest geoengineering companies in America come in and admit all of it. In the process of begging to continue to be able to conduct his operations over Florida after a new bill passed in Florida forbidding his company to do so. Ever wonder who's really behind weather modification? This guy is the CEO of one of the most powerful geoengineering companies in the world. He just showed up to defend cloud seeding, chemical spraying, and even electric weather manipulation. He's fighting to keep it going in Florida. Why is he pushing so hard? My name is Augustus Dorico. I'm the CEO and founder of Rainmaker. We're a cloud seeding company that is enhancing precipitation. We have advanced radar and also drones for the sake of supplementing water supplies for farms, cities, reservoirs, and wildlife throughout the United States. Enhanced radar. Just like we've been telling y'all all along. Our ultimate vision is to end water scarcity, and we've begun that mission already. I'm testifying to not oppose the spirit of this bill, which I think is well-founded, but the current configuration of the bill that I think would impede this mission for ending water scarcity and also for bringing the best-in-class technology to Florida and the rest of the United States. And so the first point that I'd like to make is the difference between solar radiation management and cloud seeding. And I'll see you. And so Senator Garcia did bring this up briefly. Solar radiation management is a very new technology. It's not something that's been tested at length. NOAA has done some very initial experiments on its efficacy. It is attempting to reduce the amount of solar radiation that makes it down to the planet by injecting reflective aerosols into the upper atmosphere. Once you inject these aerosols, they stay in the stratosphere for years. They have effects on the entire climate. The data from these experiments, because the experiments have been so few, is limited. And so the implications of them are not something that are well tested yet. Yeah. Um. Cloud seeding is altogether different. The only similarity is that it has... Well, we know all the heavy metals eventually end up falling to the ground and getting into our food supply and water supply, period. Although NOAA swore that nothing like that was occurring. Just the other day in an official statement, let's talk about your, well, water creation. It has to do with the atmosphere, it has to do with the low atmosphere. It's a mechanism, it's a tool that either freezes the water in existing clouds or condenses the droplets in existing clouds into bigger snowflakes or bigger droplets such that they fall onto your target watershed or farm. It's a technology that has existed for 80 years in the United States, it was patented by GE in 1946, but it hasn't been viable for a long time because we didn't have the appropriate To measure exactly what its effect is. I can tell you definitively that there is not cloud seeding going on in the state of Florida because you would be able to see its effect on radar. So the National Center for Atmospheric Research produced some great results from what's called the Snowy Campaign where they were able to verify cloud seedings effect and they saw tens of millions of gallons of precipitation occur from each of their interventions. And that was very, very easily distinguishable on radar. It also is worth saying that it's local in its scope and it is very short temporally. So if ever there is cloud seeding going on and you don't like the consequences of it, there are unintended consequences, and it's quite well characterized so the unintended consequences are minimal, you can stop whenever you like. So that point of differentiation between solar radiation management, which is something that I think the public should scrutinize more heavily, and cloud seeding, is important to make from the top. Then the second point I'd like to make is that, well, it has to do with the safety of cloud seeding, right? Because this has to do with environmental health, particularly pollution. Cloud seeding is conventionally done with a chemical called silver iodide. It's LD50, so it's lethal dose. It's 10 times higher than aspirin. About 50 grams per each operation, that's as much as can fit in the palm of your hand. That's less flour than is in a slice of bread. So the amount that accumulates into watersheds is in the parts per trillion after decades of operation, and we have data to prove that for programs that exist throughout the United States. This leads me into another point, which is the precedent that other states have set in cloud seeding permits. So in summary, it's toxic. permitting and licensing. So I think that. Per what I said at the top of my commentary, the spirit of this bill to protect Floridians, to protect Americans from environmental pollution, that is great. And I think that permitting and licensing absolutely should exist. It does exist in states like Texas and Utah and Idaho. So this isn't a blue state or red state issue. California has a process as well. New Mexico has a process. And we don't want anybody wantonly modifying the weather. My process, he means a contract. No permit needed, but he advocates for it. The Rainmaker Technology Corporation has engineers in all of the states that I mentioned that are actively modifying the weather, that are actively enhancing precipitation for farmers and reservoirs and cities that are undergoing drought. And that brings me to my third and closing point, this bill about what are we voting on here. Yes, this has to do with Florida, first and foremost. I don't think that... I don't think that we want to prevent Florida's access to best-in-class technology for their agriculture and their wildlife, but more than that, it has to do with the United States, both domestically and abroad. Okay, great. That sounds really good. No ifs, ands, or buts. Thank you. Thank you, you too. Mar-a-Lago exists here. Thank you very much. Florida is a very consequential state within the United States. Thank you, thanks a lot, thank you. Thank you. Thank you too, thanks a lot. Thank you, thanks a lot. And if weather modification is banned here, Thank you. Thank you too. that sets a precedent to deprive farmers Thank you. Thank you. in even more arid regions of the country All right, we'll give you a minute or so. Are you ready to get started? Yes, I'm ready. from getting access to water from cloud seeding. We'll bring the screen to you. Yes, you're welcome. All right, you have a minute. And so if only for the sake of other Americans, Okay, you'll be the first person to step in. Okay, all right. for other farming interests, for other cities, I'm going to give you a quick start. You want to be clear on the order of things? like Salt Lake, which is currently Yeah, a quick start. Yeah, okay. All right, good. Thank you. The weather, too, and that's not something that I, as a patriot, or I think anybody else in Florida would advocate for. So in closing, I think that permitting and licensing for cloud seeding, which is a technology that other states throughout the union have adopted and created, I advocate for wholeheartedly. But SRM is something altogether different. So whoever controls the weather controls the world? Is that what you're saying? He's here advocating. For cloud seeding, chemical spraying, and even electric weather manipulation. And again, what was his company? And here is his company, Rainmaker.com. This is the technology. They seed the clouds just like we knew they did. And I thought it was a conspiracy. And small water droplets that comprise clouds are attracted to the cloud seeds and condense and freeze onto them. The resulting water droplets, or ice crystals, grow at the expense of surrounding droplets, which creates the precipitation. So, in fact, they've been cloud seeding, he said, since 80 years, and I'd already done a report showing y'all the patent from GE in 1946 and the budgets of the U.S. government. The government's been up to the same thing for well over 75 years. God bless you and yours folks. You tell me what you think. Is it a conspiracy theory, or will we be right all the time? Share, subscribe, and always remember, anything's possible, bizarro world.