Rep. Massie reintroduces impeachment articles against Pete Hegseth

New York Post
106 followers
135 Video Views·Nov 9, 2026
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedThis transcript outlines the formal articles of impeachment against Secretary of Defense Peter Brian Hegseth. The primary accusation is that Hegseth committed high crimes and misdemeanors by directing U.S. armed forces into hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran without lawful congressional authorization or a valid national emergency, violating the War Powers Resolution of 1973.
Impeaching Peter Brian Hegseth,
Secretary of Defense for High Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Resolved that Peter Brian Hegseth, Secretary of Defense,
also referred to as Secretary of War by the administration,
is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors.
And that the following articles of impeachment
be exhibited to the United States Senate.
Articles of impeachment exhibited by the House
of Representatives of the United States of America.
In the name of itself and of the people of the United States
of America against Peter Brian Hegseth,
Secretary of Defense, in maintenance and support
of its impeachment against him for high crimes and misdemeanors.
Article 1, waging war in contravention
of the War Powers Resolution of 1973, Section 2C.
The Constitution provides that the House
of Representatives shall have the sole power of impeachment.
And that civil officers of the United States,
including the Secretary of Defense,
shall be removed from office on impeachment for and conviction
of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.
In his conduct, while Secretary of Defense, Peter Brian Hegseth,
in violation of his oath to support
and defend the Constitution of the United States,
and in violation of his constitutional duty
to take care that the laws be faithfully executed,
Especially with regard to the commission of war has abused the powers
of the Department of Defense in that the declare war clause
of the United States Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 11,
vests in Congress the exclusive initiatory powers of war,
while the military administrative and clemency clause
of the United States Constitution, Article 2, Section 2, Clause 1,
Establishes the President as the Commander-in-Chief
of the Armed Forces and vests
in him operational control over wars lawfully authorized by Congress.
In an effort to statutorily delineate the circumstances under
which the President may introduce United States Armed Forces
into hostilities absent congressional authorization,
The 93rd Congress of the United States enacted
into law House Joint Resolution 542,
the War Powers Resolution of 1973,
Public Law 93-148,
by overriding the veto of President Richard Nixon.
Peter Brian Hegseth, in his capacity as Secretary of Defense,
has executed unlawful orders in
contravention of Section 2C of the War Powers Resolution of 1973,
Section 1541C of Title
50 United States Code.
Section 2C provides that the constitutional powers of the president
as commander-in-chief to introduce United States Armed Forces
into hostilities or into situations where imminent involvement
in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances
are exercised only pursuant to, one,
A declaration of war, two, specific statutory authorization,
or three, a national emergency
created by an attack upon the United States,
its territories or possessions, or its armed
forces.
The War Powers Resolution further expressly provides
that nothing contained therein
shall be construed as granting any authority to the President
or to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities
which the President would not otherwise possess
in the absence of the Resolution.
Accordingly, the reporting
and termination procedures subsequently established by the Resolution
do not themselves constitute affirmative statutory authorization
to commence hostilities.
Rather, the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities
must rest upon one of the authorities or circumstances identified
in Section 2C in order for a conflict to be considered lawful.
With respect to the United States Armed Forces being introduced
into hostilities in the Islamic Republic of Iran,
On February 28th, 2026,
Secretary Hegseth directed and caused United States armed forces
to be introduced into hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Notwithstanding that,
Congress had not declared war against the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Congress had not enacted any specific statutory authorization
for the introduction of United
States armed forces into hostilities against
the Islamic Republic of Iran.
And, no national emergency had been created by an attack
by the Islamic Republic of Iran upon the United States,
its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.
Furthermore, no imminent attack upon the United States,
its territories or possessions, or its armed forces existed.
As affirmed in the March 17, 2026 resignation letter of Joe Kent,
then Director of the National Counterterrorism Center.
In which he stated, quote,
I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran.
Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, unquote.
The introduction of United States Armed Forces
into hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran,
therefore satisfied none of the circumstances expressly identified
in Section 2C of the War Powers Resolution.
And was undertaken from its inception without congressional
authorization or independent Article II authority, thereby rendering
both the initial introduction of the United States Armed Forces
into hostilities and all subsequent actions taken thereafter unlawful.
Secretary Hegseth nevertheless knowingly executed
and implemented the order to commence such hostilities,
employing the powers, personnel, weapons,
and resources of the Department of Defense
to initiate military action against another sovereign nation
in violation of Section 1541 of Title 50 United States Code.
