Rep. Brandon Gill Catches Jack Smith In Several Lies While Under Oath!

James Kaufman will report today. Representative Brandon Gill catching Jack Smith in several lies about illegal spying on Congress. Representative Brandon Gill brutally questioned Jack Smith in the House Judiciary Committee hearing. Representative Gill, Republican, Texas, destroyed former special counsel Jack Smith during a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Thursday, catching him in multiple lies and exposing his knowledge that he was illegally spying on Congress members during the Arctic Frost investigation. Joe Biden's FBI and later Jack Smith spied on 10 Republican senators and four Republican House members during the Arctic Frost investigation into January 6, Just days after then, Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy took over as Speaker. Jack Smith secretly subpoenaed McCarthy under a non-disclosure order, claiming that the sitting Speaker of the House was a flight risk. Gill brought the receipts. Mr. Smith, in January of 2023, did you subpoena then Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy's toll records? Yes, sir, we did. Yes, you did. And the subpoena covered the time period between November 2020 and January 2021. Is that right? I'm sorry, sir. Could you say that again? We're not going to delay like this. The subpoena covered the time period between November of 2020 and January 2021. How many days after Kevin McCarthy was sworn in as Speaker did you subpoena his records? I don't recall, but those two things had nothing to do with it. It was 16 days after becoming the highest ranking Republican in the House of Representatives, you subpoenaed his toll records. Do you agree that that might reasonably be considered a violation of the speech or debate clause i do not and i want to be clear that you were collecting months worth of phone data on the republican speaker of the house the leader of the opposition right after he got sworn in as speaker all around the time of a major vote that sounds like a flagrant violation of the speech or debate clause to me and i think most people agree with me and speaker mccarthy had no recourse did he because you issued a non-disclosure order ensuring that neither he nor any of the American people knew about these subpoenas. Is that right? The toll record, the non-content toll record subpoenas, we did secure non-disclosure orders for those subpoenas. You did. And let me ask you, Mr. Smith, at the time you secured those non-disclosure orders, was Speaker McCarthy a flight risk? The non-disclosure order was based on concerns. Was Speaker McCarthy a flight risk? He was not. He was not. Then why did your non-disclosure order refer to him as a flight risk it says right here the court finds reasonable grounds to believe that such disclosure will result in flight from prosecution or when securing a non-disclosure order uh the risks uh don't have to be associated you think that the speaker of the house is a flight risk question no this is not your time this is my time you think you think the speaker of the house is a flight risk you think he's going to hop on a plane and leave the country no no what i was trying to explain is with respect to a non-disclosure the risks aren't necessarily associated with the subscriber to the phone there's the risks of the investigation i think that you were using this was clearly in reference to to speaker mccarthy and you were using clearly false information to secure a non-disclosure order to hide from speaker mccarthy and from the american people the fact that you were spying on his toll records but i've got more more so let's move on in may of 2023 you also issued subpoenas for toll records of nine u.s senators and an additional representative is that right in may of 23 we did uh issue you did and there were non-disclosure orders in conjunction with those subpoenas as well right that's correct consistent with department policy right so again nobody would know what you were doing the senators wouldn't the representatives wouldn't the american people wouldn't know what you were doing is that right the toll records that we secured uh and the non-disclosure orders were consistent with policy and you knew whenever you were doing that that there was a risk you were violating the speech or debate clause is that right the toll record subpoenas that we secured were with the concurrence of the public integrity your own analysis says that you knew there was a risk you were violating the speech or debate clause i have it right here this is a an email from john keller at public integrity section to your team as you are aware quote as you are aware there is some litigation risk regarding whether compelled disclosure of toll records of a member's legislative calls violates the speech or debate clause in the dc circuit that's from your own analysis right there so you did know didn't you so with respect to the item you just put up on the screen the last sentence states uh oh we're going to get to the last sentence okay we're going to get to the last sentence and you cite case law in here quote the bar on compelled disclosure is absolute is right is that right or do you think that you didn't have to abide by that precedent to be clear this is not this statement is not from my office this is the statement this is this is your justification for those subpoenas and ndos that you ordered this was part of your analysis it's a cursory analysis i think it's worth noting let's get to that last sentence then well given my understanding of the low likelihood that any of the members listed below would be charged the litigation risk should be minimal here in other words you're using a novel legal theory which you knew was novel has never been tested by any court you're not charging any of these members nobody's going to know about it because you you issued NDOs nobody's going to sue about it so sue this so who cares we're going to do it anyways i mean you walked all over the constitution throughout this entire process the gentleman's time buying our members of congress and you know it it's absolutely disgraceful i yield back and that's not near the only time Mr. Smith got caught up lying and breaking every law in the book to try to hang Donald Trump. Trump has called for his imprisonment for lying under oath here already today. Let me know what you think about Jack Smith in the comments below. I think he's a I won't even say it Please give us a thumbs up, share, and subscribe. Always remember, anything's possible in Bizarro World