If you’re free to go you’re free to stay! This cop had no idea what law he was enforcing!

AO

This compelling video captures a citizen's encounter with the police while filming their vehicles in a public place. Discover your rights as a citizen journalist and learn about the ongoing debate surrounding police accountability.

As tensions escalate, the man asserts his knowledge of the law and his right to film in public spaces. But the police are skeptical and question him further. Should citizens be allowed to film the police? Is filming in public a protected right, or does it pose a threat to law enforcement?

This video offers a thought-provoking exploration of the limits of police power and the importance of citizen journalism. Watch now and join the discussion on the controversial topic of filming the police.

Are you ready for some critical analysis that's as entertaining as it is informative? Well, buckle up because we've got a wild ride for you today! We're diving into a video where a man films police vehicles in central London and ends up in a bit of a sticky situation.

First things first, let's talk PACE. The Police and Criminal Evidence Act is a cornerstone of police powers in the UK, and it's important to understand how it applies in this situation. When the police officer in the video asks for identification and a bank card, they're making lawful requests under PACE.

the video raises important questions about police powers and individual rights in the context of filming police officers and the legality of police requests for identification.

In the video, the police officer asks the man filming police vehicles for his identification and then his bank card, even though the man asserts that he does not have any identification on him.

It is not clear whether the police officer had reasonable suspicion to believe that the man had committed a crime or was about to commit a crime, which would justify the request for identification under Section 1 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE).

Under Section 1 of PACE, a police officer may require a person to provide their name and address if the officer has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit an offense. However, if the police officer has no reasonable suspicion, then the person is not obligated to provide their identification or other personal details.

Similarly, requesting a bank card may also be problematic from a legal standpoint, as the police officer would have to demonstrate that there was a reasonable basis for asking for this information.

In addition, the police officer's request for the man to leave the area raises questions about the officer's legal authority to make such a request.

If the man was not committing a crime or causing a disturbance, then the police officer would need a lawful basis for asking him to leave.

Overall, the video raises important questions about the balance between police powers and individual rights, and the importance of understanding one's rights when interacting with the police.

Police And Criminal Evidence Act 1984 - https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1128850/FINAL_Revised_PACE_Code_A_2023_-_SVROs__Annex_G_.pdf


PACE - https://www.gov.uk/guidance/police-and-criminal-evidence-act-1984-pace-codes-of-practice#pace-codes-of-practice