The Bond Market Just Called Bessent’s Bluff
Host Joe Brown analyzes the recent collapse within the bond market as Treasury yields surge across the curve despite intervention attempts. The technical overview details how Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent executed a Treasury twist by increasing long-end bond buybacks while ramping up short-end borrowing. Facing hot inflation numbers and rising oil prices, the analysis highlights why bond buyers demand higher yields and explores the critical limitations of both the Treasury General Account and the Federal Reserve balance sheet during this fiscal challenge.
#HeresyFinancial #BondMarket #TreasuryYields ScottBessent #Macroeconomics #Inflation #FederalReserve #FinancialAnalysis #GovernmentDebt #PortfolioRisk
AI Generated·May contain errors
Well, the bond market is collapsing and it looks like Treasury Secretary Bessant has
completely lost control of treasury yields. We're seeing yields across the curve surge
over the last couple of weeks, from the 30-year, the 20-year, the 10-year, the 2-year, and the 1-year.
And we know that yields move the opposite way the bond prices do, so when yields are skyrocketing,
that means that bonds are getting dumped, they're getting sold off, and the prices of the bonds are
And this comes despite the fact that Scott Bessant has been intervening in the treasury market by
increasing buybacks to try and stop yields from rising. Just a couple of weeks ago,
Scott Bessant announced that he was going to be increasing the size of treasury buybacks
at the long end in order to stop yields from rising. But as you can see, that did basically
nothing and yields have just continued to go up. And it wasn't just the increase in buybacks from
a couple of weeks ago, it actually increased again once the buybacks came around. What started
as $2 billion and then increased to $4 billion ended up being $6 billion of buybacks. However,
that's facing a $32 trillion debt market. If you go to fiscaldata.treasury.gov, you can see the
treasury securities buyback schedule and you can see what has been recently announced. And you can
see that as of September 10th, the buyback that was announced was $6 billion. On this report,
you can see the maturity dates that are being purchased back. And interestingly, which we'll
talk about in a moment, you can see the interest rate that was getting paid on those bonds that
they are buying back to retire. Looking at the maturity dates of what is being bought back,
you can see they're all about 15 to 20 years until maturity. Now, it's also interesting that
you can see on September 9th, just a day before, there was a $12.5 billion buyback that was
announced. And you can see the maturity date on these is all relatively soon. This is debt that
matures in one to two years. Now, what you'll notice is the interest rate that the US government
has to pay on this debt that's getting bought back and retired, the interest rates are all
pretty low. And that's especially true of the long-term debt that is getting bought back.
You can see the coupon rate 1%, 1%, 2%, 1%, 2%, 2%, 2%. And yeah, some of it is higher,
like this one is 5%, but a lot of it 2.8%, 3%, 2.5%, 2.5%, 2.5%. So this is not due to the fact
that the United States government is saving money by buying back this debt. It's the exact opposite.
This is like using a credit card with a variable interest rate that changes every month, but you're
currently paying 3% to 5% on and paying down some of your mortgage debt that's not due for another
30 years that has a very low interest rate, like 2% or 3%. You're intentionally increasing your
debt costs by doing this. And so the purpose of these buybacks is not to lower the interest cost
on the debt that the government is paying right now. The purpose of this is to try and stop bonds
from getting sold off because the 10, 20, 30 year, they're all getting sold off right now.
But the amount of buybacks that the treasury can do by itself is just not sufficient for the
overwhelming size of the bond market. And that's why, despite the fact that the buybacks have been
increased so drastically lately, those bonds are still getting sold off way more than what the
treasury is buying back, causing yields to skyrocket. Part of the reason for this is because
oil has been surging. You can see that the price of oil is back up to the point where it was at,
kind of at the height of the fears of the war with Iran back from March to May of this year.
And that has directly contributed to the recent inflation numbers that came in much
hotter than expected. If you are a lender, which is a bond buyer is a lender to the U.S. government,
then you are going to demand a higher interest rate if inflation goes higher. Let's say to keep
numbers simple, you know inflation over the next 30 years is going to be 5%. Well, you're not going
to lend somebody money at 5% because you know that your actual return when you get your money back is
going to be zero. And so just in case inflation is a little bit higher than that, you're going to
demand a higher interest rate to make sure that the devaluation of your purchasing power is covered.
And so as inflation concerns and oil prices go up, bond investors are demanding a higher interest
rate. Hey real quick, if you are an active investor and your portfolio is not growing as
fast as you'd like, then I would like to give you a free gift. This is something I've been working
on for a long time. My team and I put together a portfolio stress test. We looked at the top
six risks that people are exposed to in their portfolios many times without even knowing it.
And most importantly, what you can do to fix it. So we built this really cool questionnaire quiz
on my website where you can input all the information about your portfolio, your investing
goals, and it's going to spit out for you a customized blueprint that shows you where you're
currently at and what you need to do to get to the next level. So no matter what is holding your
portfolio back and no matter what risks you're exposed to, maybe without even knowing, I want
to help you find and fix your vulnerabilities again completely free. Once you go through this
little one minute questionnaire on my website, it's going to send you a customized blueprint to
your email PDF you can download and you can keep it forever. And that's going to give you access
to all of my courses. I've created literally hundreds of hours worth of educational content
that I used to sell for hundreds, sometimes even thousands of dollars. This is now my free gift to
you. You can access it 100% completely free of charge. It's going to give you all the education,
all the strategies and tactics that you need in order to fix your portfolio. All you need to do
is go through the questionnaire, open up the email, save that PDF and get to work. So if you'd
like to take advantage of this, all you have to do is go to my website, heresy.financial.com
stress test. The link is in the description below as well. It's heresy.financial.com
stress test. Plug in your portfolio information and I'll send you your custom blueprint 100% free.
And it's been a very long time since the United States government has had to issue new debt
at prices that were this expensive. If you look at 30 year treasuries, you have to go all the way
back to May of 2004 until you see 30 year treasuries trading at this level. And even then
they only briefly touched it. You have to go all the way back to 2001, 2002 to see a time period
in which they were trading around here regularly. And it's the same thing with the 10 year as well.
We are approaching 5% yields on the 10 year treasury. We have to go all the way back to
2006 and 2007 before we find the time in which the 10 year was trading at these levels. Now,
it's a little bit funny that this is happening right now, especially the last couple of days,
because Scott Besant has recently been going around saying things that indicate
he's in control of the bond market. In fact, when he was talking about his intervention
with the yen, he literally said, I am the house now. He said, you can try to bet against me,
but I am the house. I'm acting with asymmetric insider information. So good luck trying to play
against me. And the bond market is right now calling his bluff. The bond market is selling
off despite the fact that he's saying, hey, I'm not going to let yields go higher. But looks like
as of right now, the treasury just doesn't have the firepower needed in order to stop this from
happening. And the reason for this is because the treasury by itself cannot issue new currency.
They can't print money. The only way they can buy debt off of the market is by issuing new debt.
Now, it is true that the treasury has something called the treasury general account. You can think
of this just like their checking account. And right now they've got close to a trillion dollars
in their checking account. But you can see this account regularly dips down pretty dramatically
close to zero every single time there's a government shutdown. And so the treasury likes
to have about a trillion dollars in this checking account of theirs because when the government
shuts down and they have to keep on paying for the things that they have to pay for,
but they cannot at that time borrow new money, they want to have a checking account
full of a rainy day fund so that they can last the time that takes Congress to get their act
together. So Besant has implied he's willing to drain the treasury general account in order to
buy back as many bonds as are necessary to suppress yields. But again, that's still just
a short-term game that cannot last forever. And even if he's willing to spend $800 billion out
of the treasury general account, that's still a drop in the bucket against a $32 trillion
treasury market. The bond market simply has much more firepower than what the treasury can absorb.
So this is where a lot of people think the Federal Reserve is going to come in because
historically the Federal Reserve has stepped in to do quantitative easing during times like this.
But Kevin Warsh, who is now in control of the Fed, has explicitly stated many times that he doesn't
want to just do QE and he doesn't want the Fed to be stepping in and just buying bonds in a normal
market. He says that's reserved for some sort of economic crisis. And so the small amount of QE
the Fed is doing right now is reserved to T-bills and shorter term debt, which is really kind of the
exact opposite of what the United States Treasury really needs some big buyer to come in and buy.
There is demand at the short end of the curve. There's really no demand at the long end.
That's why the treasury is stepping in and buying that debt off of the long end.
And so Scott Besant is engaging in what he's calling the treasury twist right now,
which is essentially shifting a lot of that longer maturity debt over to the short end.
He's trying to buy back at the long end, but he's borrowing at the short end in order to do that.
He's shrinking the average maturity of the national debt. And this is called treasury
twist because the Federal Reserve has done something called an operation twist in the past
where they realign the composition of their balance sheet to more accurately represent
the outstanding treasury debt. For example, if they had all T-bills on their balance sheet,
but the United States government has borrowed a lot at the long end, maybe they would sell some
of their T-bills and buy up some of the long end. Unfortunately, the Federal Reserve cannot do
something like that right now. Right now on the Fed's balance sheet, they have about four and a
half trillion dollars worth of US treasuries held on their balance sheet. And if you take a look at
this chart, you can see the breakdown in maturities where you can see the most that they own is debt
that matures in over 10 years. And then the next category down is debt that matures in one to five
years. Next category down from there is debt that matures between one and five years. And then below
that is between five to 10 years. And this chart shows the average maturity distribution of United
States government outstanding debt. This goes back to 2000, but you can see right now the vast
majority of the maturity distribution of the government debt matures in under five years.
It's about 70%. So if you want to compare these apples to apples, you can take a look at these
pie charts and you can see that the Federal Reserve on their balance sheet holds about four
and a half trillion dollars worth of treasuries versus about 32 trillion dollars in outstanding
treasury debt on the market. Of the Fed's treasury holdings, about 2% of it will mature within 15
days. That's compared to 4.7% of all marketable treasury debt. You can see the Fed holds about
8.8% that matures within 16 to 90 days versus all marketable treasury debt. That number is 14%.
You can see the three months to one year category, the Fed holds about 11% of that on their balance
sheet versus the US government has about 14.8% outstanding. You can see the one to five year
category makes up about 31% of the Fed's balance sheet versus that same category makes about 35%
of all marketable debt. You can see the five to 10 year treasury category is about 10.4%
on the Fed's balance sheet versus about 13.3% of all marketable treasury debt. And you can see
that the over 10 year category is about 35% of the Fed's holdings versus about 18% of all
marketable treasury debt. When you compare these two side by side, you see the Federal Reserve
owns a smaller relative chunk of all of the shorter maturities and they own a much larger
chunk of the longer dated treasuries. Anything under 10 years, maturing in 10 years or less,
the Fed owns a much smaller chunk of that relative to what is outstanding on the market.
Anything over 10 years, the Fed actually owns a much larger percentage of that compared to
outstanding debt, which means the Federal Reserve cannot maintain a neutral balance sheet and help
the treasury out with this problem. If the Fed owned treasuries with each maturity basket roughly
matching what is outstanding on the open treasury market, they would have to sell off a bunch of
their long term treasuries and buy up more at the short end. Again, that's the opposite of what the
needs right now because everyone is dumping the long end. So right now, the biggest buyer of long
dated treasuries is the treasury itself. Now, at this point, I start to see questions come up like,
what is the plan here? It seems like the actions that are being taken are so ineffective at
accomplishing the stated goal that people start to think there must be some different goal. There
must be some secret plan. They must be playing 3D, 4D, 5D chess. And unfortunately, I don't
think any of that is true. Long term treasury yields are just a direct reflection of the
market's anticipation of growth versus inflation. That's it. And so the two biggest actions by the
government over the last couple of years that have the largest impact on growth and inflation
are tariffs and the war. If government spending would just significantly go down,
then growth expectations would go up and inflation expectations would go down,
yields could collapse. The treasury would get exactly what it wants. But it's fighting against
executive and congressional action that is directly at odds with what it wants.
And the only way for both short term and long term interest rates to come meaningfully down
is either to have it be done by the free market, in which you need growth expectations up and
inflation expectations down, or you need a new buyer to come in and just buy up all of that
debt anyway, which historically has been the Fed. But with the new leadership at the Fed,
that seems unlikely unless directly commanded to do so by the treasury or by Congress.
Now, I've talked before for a long time about bank deregulation, getting rid of the supplementary
leverage ratio, and that takes time for something like that to be done permanently. And so with
yields skyrocketing at the long end right now, we just don't have the time to wait for something
like that to happen. So what we could see is a temporary emergency suspension, another thing
that happened in 2020 to 2021, where it's temporarily suspended for a year, two years,
or even if they say indefinitely, just don't attach a deadline to it yet. But really, this is
just a big, hairy, complicated, and hard-to-solve problem. We're unlikely to get meaningful bank
deregulation in a short amount of time. We're unlikely to see the market just turn around and
just start buying up treasuries. We're unlikely to see inflation turn around anytime soon. We're
unlikely to see the Federal Reserve just change their mind and start to increase QE across the
curve again. And so it does look like yields are going to continue to go up, at least for the
foreseeable future, because buybacks, the treasury alone, cannot influence this enough. They don't
have the firepower. Now, there are a couple other small drops in the bucket that we could see happen
in order to try and solve this problem. Number one, it's possible that people start floating the
idea of ending the Federal Reserve's ability to pay interest on reserve balances held at the Fed.
Right now, banks hold trillions of dollars of their reserves at the Federal Reserve and they get paid
an interest rate on that. If the Fed is banned or no longer allowed to pay interest on overnight
reserves held at the Fed, then all that money would leave and be invested in T-bills instead.
And so we'd see significant demand for T-bills, which would shove the low end really, really far
down and potentially allow the U.S. government to temporarily just suspend all borrowing at the long
end, roll everything over into the short end because there's enough demand to do so, and then
kick that can down the road and wait to solve that problem of that debt maturing every single year or
two years. We'll solve that problem a year or two down the road. We'd also see direct intervention
and a changing of who controls what the Federal Reserve does with their balance sheet because
they've stated more and more about how their monetary policy and the thing that they are
independent in is most focused at controlling short-term interest rates. And so if Congress or
the Treasury directs the Fed outright to say, hey, you need to expand your balance sheet,
I don't know, that might be something that we could see. But either way, what's going on right
now with yields across the curve from the short end all the way to the long end is really not
pretty. Nobody likes this. And the higher they go, the more it hinders growth. At the same time,
though, the higher they go, the more likely it is we see some emergency action because they're
desperate and they need to force yields to go lower. One last note, if you're an active investor
and your portfolio is not growing as fast as you'd like, my team and I put together a completely free
gift for you. It's called the Portfolio Stress Test. All you have to do is answer some questions
about your portfolio and your investing goals, and then it will email you a custom blueprint
that will help you fix the vulnerabilities in your portfolio that you maybe didn't even know
were there. It's also going to give you access to all of my courses, hundreds of hours of education,
strategies, tactics on investing and trading that you need in order to fix your portfolio. Again,
this is all completely free stuff. I used to charge a lot of money for your gift free. To
access it, just go to heresy.financial.com. The link is in the description below. Fill out the
questionnaire, plug in your information. I'll send you that custom blueprint. You can get started.
As always, thank you so much for watching. Have a great day.

