Cherry movie review.

MovieFeelings
3 followers
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedAmber from The Film Magic reviews \"Cherry,\" a film directed by the Russo brothers based on Nico Walker's novel. Despite strong performances from Tom Holland and Ciara Bravo, the reviewer found the film disappointing due to poor pacing, an ineffective narrative style, and a lack of emotional depth, ultimately concluding that the film failed to execute its heavy subject matter.
Hey guys, it's Amber from The Film Magic and today I'll be reviewing Cherry.
Make sure to like, comment and subscribe if you want to see more film content.
So Cherry is a film directed by the Russo brothers and it's about a disenfranchised young man
who gets himself into an unfortunate series of events which inevitably leads him into debt and
he has to end up robbing banks to make money. So this film is an adaptation of the book Cherry
by Nico Walker and I feel like right off the bat that in itself gave the film so much potential
to be great but as you're going to hear I was disappointed by the film. So I would have to say
the highlight of the film was definitely the performances. There were still parts of the film
where I thought that the actors weren't given enough resources to allow their performances
to flourish like the dialogue and some of the editing styles and it kind of made me feel bad
for the actors especially Tom Holland because he has such a notorious role as Spider-Man so it's
difficult to escape that frame from the audience's eyes. Sierra Bravo's performance,
I feel like she was on the edge of giving a really great performance but the dialogue just
reeled her back in and it was just too flashy for the narrative she was trying to portray.
We appreciate some of the style choices they were trying to go for but they just weren't executed
well enough like for example the narration that Holland's character gives throughout the film.
At times it felt really patronising because I feel like narration is only effective when
the character is telling us something that we don't already know and in Cherry everything that
he tells us is so abundantly clear that that the audience just feels a bit belittled. Narration can
be done really well and it can help the audience gather some of the hints in the subtext. I'm
thinking of films like Fight Club and The Wolf of Wall Street where it made the characters even more
engaging but here it just it just didn't work. There are obviously some scenes in the film that
I did enjoy but they were just so outweighed by the other scenes that I felt the characters were
just talking and nothing was enticing or engaging and it just felt like it just felt like time was
going on forever and ever. The runtime is about two hours and 20 minutes. I don't have a problem
with longer films. Normally I can like sit through a three-hour film and watch it but this film by
like an hour and a half I felt like I needed to switch it off. There was nothing persuading me
to carry on watching it. The story just flopped from after he returned back from the war. It just
the film just fizzled out and it was just kind of like watching a series of events that didn't flow
together properly and weren't connected. Yeah the pace of the film didn't really feel natural and
it felt more like I was watching a like a series like an actual tv series and I was just binging
like 10 episodes the way that things weren't connected with each other. The tone kept jumping
from like a cynical tone to a tragedy to a resolution and it took that cyclical route
like over and over and over again and it was really just disorientating. I think the directors
had the right intention when making the film. I've seen interviews where they are discussing that
what they deal with in the film is a big issue and they wanted to explore it more and give it
more screen time because they don't really see it being dealt with on the film as much as they'd
like to but didn't really change their cinematic and stylistic approach from their MCU franchise
which I think is effective in that frame but in this film where they're dealing with heavier
subjects they needed to change it a bit. There are films that deal with the same issue in a cynical
and witty manner like Trainspotting for example. They have that contrast of banter and darkness
that gave severity to the situation without being overly flashy but I feel like Cherry missed that
mark and didn't find a common ground because it was overly extravagant and it left me feeling
really hollow and emotionally distant from the film. There were points where I could see what
the Russo brothers were trying to go for in terms of their cinematography and editing and there were
shots that I really visually appreciated but most of the time the style choices just left me feeling
dismal. And being honest I wouldn't really recommend this film to my friends or just other
people. I felt like I could have gone without watching it. It was interesting to see the next
step Tom Holland's career would take after his appearance in the Marvel films but I don't think
this film is anything that I haven't seen before and yeah again it wasn't well executed in its
final run. Thanks for watching this review on the film Cherry. Don't forget to like comment
and subscribe and let us know what review you'd like to watch next. Have a great day.
