BREAKING: Earl Spencer ATTACKS Royals' 'lack of care' for William and Harry at Diana's funeral

The story that obviously keeps giving, it's just not going away, is it? Princess Diana's brother claims King Charles went ballistic during a heated call days after her death. Speaking to the BBC's Laura Kunzberg about his new book, well he might have mentioned it a couple of times, Earl Spencer alleges that the then Prince snapped with forget her soon enough during a dispute over the funeral procession. Buckingham Palace responded stating grief can cloud reason And ranted for a while, I have no idea how long, but it was a significant period. And I just listened. And then he stopped and I thought, oh now, now he's going to pull himself together and say something more appropriate. And then he said, we'll forget her soon enough. After a stunned silence, I said, I cannot believe you just said that. And I hung up on him. Is he furious or is he embarrassed? Because I can tell you here and now, those are exactly the words he said. I've only ever had two calls on the line with Prince Charles at any stage of my life. Who are we to believe? Well, I'm telling the truth. And the thing is, will we ever know? Now loads of you are getting in touch straight away on this one. I love it. Gianna said the need for money can cloud judgment. I think you might have a point there. And Laucie said, Spencer, you make me feel physically sick listening to your lies. Well, Laucie, I mean, we don't know who's lying, do we? One of them is being potentially economical with the truth, I think is the best way to put it. Let's see if GB News Royal Correspondent Cameron Walker has any more updates for us. Cameron, what's the latest? Well, well, Dawn, we've got another extract from the book that has just dropped in the last few minutes and some breaking news. It is Earl Spencer's recollections of the day of Princess Diana's funeral. Apparently, there was a bit of disagreement inside Buckingham Palace just before Charles, William, Harry, Earl Spencer and indeed the late Duke of Edinburgh marched behind the coffin. Now, apparently, according to Earl Spencer, Charles wanted to be in the middle of the chief mourners with flanks by William and Harry, with Prince Philip and Earl Spencer on either side of him, front and centre, Earl Spencer says Charles wanted to be. And he alleges that the Duke of Edinburgh, Prince Philip, overruled him and said, no, it is Charles Spencer who should be in the middle as the blood, as the relative, and said that you need to be on the far side, you divorce Princess Diana. Now, of course, we weren't in the room, so it's hard to co-operate that. But that is what he alleged took place. And apparently Charles, then, of course, Prince Charles, was outranked by the Duke of Edinburgh, who was the Queen's husband. And therefore, the Duke of Edinburgh's word was final. And that is what we saw play out on the streets of London during that funeral cortege down to Westminster Abbey. He also alleges that Charles said this bizarre comment on the lake at Altrup, which is where Diana is buried. Of course, the cortege, of course, was taken from London to the Altrup estate. And that is where she was buried. And he said that everybody within on that lake, on that island in the lake, was a relative of Princess Diana, a blood relative of Princess Diana, apart from one figure, he said. And that was Charles, Charles as in Prince Charles. And he said, just ignore me, I'm a tree, which was a little bit odd, to say the least. So that is, that's kind of the allegations that have just come out in the last couple of minutes. Of course, Buckingham Palace have not responded to those latest allegations. I suspect they are going to. I think, I suspect they're not going to even. I think the only message we're going to get from Buckingham Palace is what we got just a couple of days ago, which was Earl Spencer, of course, sorry, which was the fact that Buckingham Palace said that Earl Spencer's judgments had been clouded by fraternal grief. So I just think this is going to go on and on, Dawn, to be perfectly honest, until this book is published on Tuesday. The book is actually published on Tuesday. So we've still got a good few days to go of these stories coming out. Golly gosh, it just carries on giving this story. Cameron, thank you so much for that update. I mean, what a story it really is. Using the internet without a VPN, a virtual private network, is a bit like taking to the road without car insurance. All it takes is one unlucky moment to cost you a lot of cash. This video's sponsor is Private Internet Access. They are the VPN to help keep you safe. Click the link in the description below to find out why over 30 million people have downloaded PIA to protect themselves online. A virtual private network is an app that hides your IP address and helps keep your data private. When you're browsing the internet at home, you give up a large amount of data to businesses, to shops, and indeed to social media giants too. Hackers have the ability to steal your personal data with ease, including sensitive information such as passwords, keystrokes, and even your personal photos. Private Internet Access helps protect your personal data by encrypting your internet connection to keep your data out of the hands of cybercriminals. And it's not just hackers either to be concerned about. Information can be censored too. When Canada passed their C18 bill, social media giants decided to ban news content on their platforms. But PIA can protect your ability to consume the news and content you love. Private Internet Access is available for Windows users, macOS, Android, Linux, iOS, and you can use one PIA subscription to protect an unlimited amount of devices. And we've got a huge GB News discount for you too. Click the link in this video's description and you'll get a massive 83% off PIA. That's under £2 a month, the price of a coffee, and you'll get an extra four months completely free on top. Also, there's a 30-day money-back guarantee too. Visit piavpn.com forward slash gbnews to start protecting yourself digitally today. Okay, let's see what the panel think of this one. Now, just when I feel, Bill, that I can't have any more of this story, then another line drops and it's like, wow. I'm getting to the stage though where I'm thinking, there is nothing that Charles Spencer won't say. And it's like arguing there about who was walking in what order. And I just feel it's all getting a bit petty and nasty. Yeah, I think overall it's fairly sad. And, you know, that last revelation, 30 years after the event, it's down to interpretation. Charles might have been wanting to stand in the middle of his two sons as they marched behind the coffin. Overall, I think it is sad. I mean, the context is that Charles Spencer, you know, this was 30 years ago. He was in the midst of trauma and grief and he probably arguably had a legitimate grievance against the then Prince Charles because of his conduct against his sister whilst they were married. But this is one person's word against the other. And I think the real question for me that I posed to Charles Spencer is why now 30 years after the event? You know, if, you know, you were really exercised about what the now King had said and done at that stage, why didn't you air it at that stage? And what's to be gained for him? And what does it do for his relationship with William and Harry? I think those are real concerns. And I'm not convinced that in the fullness of time, he might not regret having done that. I wonder. Well, I can tell you why he's doing it. Four marriages, two ruinous divorces, seven kids to support and he's having to flog off bits of his land. So I think he might be a Hugh Bob, to be honest with you. Well, I was just thinking, I remember the day Diana, Princess Diana passed away. Like most people, I came down, I was a kid, my mother was crying. And I remember 30 years ago, public enemy number one really was the royal family. You remember the mood at the time. And now look at the King today. And I think over the course of the 30 years, I think King Charles has actually won that public relations battle. I think instinctively today, yesterday, you can see people lining up on, you know, Team King over, you know, Team Spencer. I also defer to the royal correspondents and the people who are closest to the royal family because they sort of know, you know, what's really going on. And I've been struck over the last couple of days, listening to the prominent writers and Robert Hardman, among others. And they're saying, well, look, we were at the funeral. We didn't see this image of Prince Charles at the time, then Prince, obviously. We didn't see this portrayal of Charles that is now being presented to us. We saw a broken man who was clearly grieving. And I just, it looks to me as though, you know, the King is winning this public relations battle. The thing is, it is now, it's become a battle and it's like there's no in between. People are either, it's almost like Brexit in a way. You either think one way or think the other. And there's no in between. I mean, some of the messages that I've had today, Borsang, I don't believe Charles would have said that. I don't think any man. But that's what I mean. Is it 52-48? Or is it actually now 80-20 or even 90-10? I don't think the country's split down the middle on this one. I've got to be honest, I kind of feel a little bit in the middle on this. Because, you know, I've made clear, you know, there were real questions for Charles Spencer. Why after 30 years are you doing this? But when you look at that interview and him looking to the camera, he clearly believes what he's saying. And I've listened to him in the past and he is quite plausible. And his argument is there's going to be all sorts of stories on the 30th anniversary of the death of his sister. And he is going to be so much commentary, he would rather give his version of events. Now, I'm not sure I wholly accept that, but there's a plausibility to it. But beneath that, you know, my ultimate concern is what does this do for his relationship with his two nephews who were, you know, the love of Diana's life? And, you know, would she really want this to be happening to them on the 30th anniversary of her death? Honestly, I don't think, I mean, I'm old enough to, luckily, to have interviewed Diana and when the boys were little, I've told this story before, but when the boys were little and it was children of courage, so we were talking about children, and I said, you know, how are the boys doing, et cetera, like you do. And she goes, I really love the way William looks after his baby brother. And I thought that, I keep going back to that conversation a long time ago now, obviously it was in the 80s. I keep going back to that conversation and thinking, A, I don't think any of this would have happened if Diana would still have been with her. I think the boys would still be friends. And I just think this would be absolutely breaking her heart. I don't think, Matt, that she would be at all happy with what her brother's doing, especially when you consider that her and Charles Spencer weren't talking for the last year of her life. I think more generally, she'd be devastated at what's happened to the family. There are some things that perhaps are a little unsurprising, right? It was widely known that King Charles and Diana were not really in love. It wasn't, you know, we all know the story. We know now Queen Camilla was the woman he was in love with. We know, you know, what's happened since. But I think she'd be devastated at the distance between William and Harry and she'd be devastated at the breaking of that bond. And, you know, all parents out there can relate. Ultimately, we're talking about a family. Yes, a royal family, but still a family. All parents out there will have some experience of siblings falling out with one another. And, you know, you want them to stay together. But yeah, I think she'd be she'd be devastated. How damaging do you think it is to the monarchy at a whole, Bill? I mean, given that obviously the queen could do no wrong. Everyone loved the queen. But since she's gone, it has been a catalogue of disasters. Yeah, I'm not sure this one will be significantly impacting in terms of duration. There's been lots worse stuff, for example, around the then Prince Andrew that's really hit the monarchy and the royal family. I'm not sure this one will be lasting. You know, there's going to be a frenetic press freeding frenzy over the next few days until the book is published. But there's no way of proving this. And that's why, you know, I'm not sure where this goes. But I do agree. And you've got that memory of Diana. I've got another one. If you recall, when she and Charles, I think, had gone on a trip to the South Seas and arrived back after about three weeks and the boys had been at home. And in typical royal family fashion, Charles walked off the boat and kind of stood there to attention, expecting them to do it. And she just run and hugged them. And, you know, she was a mother and that came across really strongly. And I agree with Matt, she'll be turning in her grave that this is happening and the distance between her boys. Yeah, no, I really think so. Do you think it's damaged the royal family, Matt? I do. Yeah, I do. And I think there are lots of people in this country who just think, for goodness sake, can we just move on? Can we just move forward? You know, because now we've got the Harry and the Meghan saga coming back again. And goodness, I think everyone out there is just sick of it, aren't we? Well, I mean, Alistair has said, I think it's despicable that Spencer is trying to get fame and money off of his dead sister. Meanwhile, Shazza on the other side says, I think Earl Spencer, I believe Earl Spencer, Charles is a woke, arrogant, selfish king. Charles would have done anything to marry that woman. I mean, this is, we keep coming back to the Camilla thing. People that are on the side of Charles Spencer are on the side of Charles Spencer because of Camilla. Yeah, but look, OK, I'm going to be blunt. Go on, be blunt, that's what you're here for, Bill. It was an arranged marriage and, you know, there wasn't a genuine connection from the outside. It didn't appear that there was love on either side. And, you know, that was the way, I'm not sure that's the way the royal family would operate in this day and age, but that was the way the royal family and the monarchy operated in those days. Interesting. Never Say Die said, very damaging, hopefully. That's not very nice, is it? And Woken Up says, I'm getting fed up with this excessive child stuff. He's an awful king and a disgrace to his mother's memory. Lots of very strong opinions on this one. Do keep them coming in. GBNews.com forward slash your say. OK, we are moving on for now, though, coming up.