Hakeem Jeffries Crumbles Defending His Meeting With Kushner!! #hakeemjeffries #Politicians #Career #Congress #uspolitics
Sep 17, 2026
Video Summary
AI GeneratedThe speaker vehemently criticizes Hakeem Jeffries for meeting with Jared Kushner, arguing that Jeffries is out of touch with the Democratic base. The speaker claims Jeffries is compromised by corporate lobbyists and AIPAC, suggesting his leadership serves elite interests rather than the people, and calls for his resignation in favor of more progressive leaders.
So Hakeem Jeffries went on ABC's This Week and he was asked about his meeting with Jared Kushner
and he tried in a very impotent and pathetic way to defend his meeting with Jared Kushner.
Let's listen and then we'll react.
A lot of Democrats had raised questions about the activities,
the private business activities of Jared Kushner. Was it a mistake for you to meet with him?
No, listen, I'm of the view that if we're going to be committed to actually solving
problems on behalf of the American people, including, by the way, passing the housing
affordability bill in this Congress that became law as a result of bipartisan work
led by Maxine Waters in the House and Elizabeth Warren in the Senate,
there are going to be times that you have to speak with people on the other side of the aisle.
Even individuals who you strongly disagree with on the overwhelming majority of issues.
That is an embarrassing answer. That is a ridiculous answer. Hakeem Jeffries should
step down. He should resign. He's in no position to lead the Democrats at a moment like this.
He's expecting you to believe that Jared Kushner gives a ---- about affordability
and he's working with Hakeem Jeffries on affordability and that that's what the
meeting was about, even though Jared is not an official member of the government.
He's not officially a member of the government. He's the president's son-in-law who is illegally
in an extrajudicial way making deals around the world to get rich off of foreign policy decisions.
And Hakeem Jeffries is meeting with him and telling you, look, you've got to speak with
people on the other side to get stuff done. Well, what stuff is getting done?
What stuff is getting done? There's nothing getting done. Listen, what he needs to understand
is very simple. It's no longer 1992. It's no longer 1996, okay? It's not even ******* 2012
anymore. In 2012, you could maybe barely argue for, oh, we got to meet with them on the other
side to get something done. But even then, it's like, not really. It's not going to really work
out. Now, let me say this as clearly as possible. There is absolutely, positively nothing you
should meet with Jared Kushner on. Nothing. Literally nothing. You know what he's interested
in? Self-enrichment. He took $2 billion from Saudi Arabia and allegedly illegally slipped them
classified information in return for that, okay? He's getting rich with all these ******* business
deals. He does not give a single solitary ---- about affordability or housing costs or literally
any other thing. But you know what? Hakeem Jeffries knows this, and he's lying to you.
He's lying to you. Because my guess is the real reason why he met with Jared Kushner is to make
a deal to rat-**** the left. I'm also afraid that Hakeem Jeffries met with Jared to let him know,
like, hey, everything we're going to do is for show. All of these investigations, all of these
hearings that we're going to do into various issues involving the White House and the crime
family and you, it's all kabuki theater. I fear that's what they met for. Or it was a deal to
rat-**** the left and pick the most hardcore diet maggot Democrats for key crucial positions
that will determine the, you know, the direction of Democratic priorities going forward. And by
the way, it was right after that meeting, what did Hakeem Jeffries do? He picked Jared Moskowitz,
one of the single worst and most right-wing Democrats in the country, to be on a super
important foreign policy committee and to lead that committee. So basically we now have a vote
that would be a veto on any Democratic movement to stop arming and funding Israel, for example,
to end the illegal war against Iran, for example. Hakeem Jeffries picked this guy probably because
of a meeting with Jared Kushner. And this is the result. This is the result. They're already
rat-******* the left. They're already doing it. There's more. You have Hakeem Jeffries has
condemned Hassan Piker, a Twitch streamer, on the left more aggressively and more consistently
than ******* Randy Fine. He endorsed Randy Fine in his primary, a guy who said,
nuke Gaza like Hiroshima and Nagasaki. So I'm sorry. I don't want to hear it. He is completely
and utterly out of lockstep with the Democratic base. Did you know that Hakeem Jeffries had signed
on to the Medicare for All bill? Then as soon as he became the leader of the Democrats, he dropped
his support for that bill. And now we won't say he supports Medicare for All. This is a guy who's
leading the Democrats. He doesn't have the Democratic position. He doesn't believe in
ending the genocide. He doesn't believe in cutting off weapons to Israel. He doesn't believe in
ending the Iran war, even though every now and then sometimes he pretends like he does. Why is
it that when Donald Trump was doing a military buildup right outside of Iran, Hakeem said nothing
about it. Chuck Schumer said nothing about it. The reality is they actually supported. Why? Because
he gets paid a lot of money from AIPAC. And so they look at it and they go, hey, it's a win-win.
Iran gets attacked, which they like. And also it weakens Trump because his poll numbers go down.
So effectively, we're the winners in all of this. So he's not actually against the Iran war. He's
not actually against the genocide in Gaza. He gets paid a tremendous amount of money from AIPAC.
And he's not even for Medicare for All. I'm not even sure he's for raising taxes on the rich.
So how can you be the Democratic leader if you are fundamentally out of step
with Democratic voters? Democratic voters agree with Hassan Piker. Democratic voters
do not want you to talk to Jared Kushner. The thing I can't stand is when Democrats pretend
like this is just business as usual, like this is just standard operating procedure,
like nothing's different now versus a previous era. No, it is very different. The Trump regime
is ushering in fascism. They're bringing back old school colonialism and imperialism.
They're committing war crime after war crime after war crime. They are literally protecting
a cabal of pedophiles. OK, and you're meeting with them and you're casually talking with them
and you're pretending that you're trying to solve problems. How are you going to solve
problems with them when their life's mission is to ruin everything? There's nothing to meet
with them on. All you need to do is obstruct. All you need to do is obstruct and block *******
everything they try, everything, and hold them accountable and investigate them and go after
them legally like this obvious. And here he is ******* pissing on you and telling you it's
raining and saying, like, oh, sometimes you got to meet with people you disagree with, bro.
Enough. Enough with the ******* like podcast bro talking points of like, why can't we all just
talk, bro? Why can't we all just get along, bro? Why can't we all just like find a reasonable
middle ground and stuff, bro? Oh, I don't know. Maybe because there is no reasonable middle ground
between MAGA and sanity. If you split the difference between fascism and non-fascism,
you're saying I'm half fascist. Well, I got no interest in being half fascist. **** that. I got
no interest in finding the middle ground between giving Israel all of the money and the weapons
and giving them none. I just want you to fight for giving them none. Call me crazy. I don't want you
to fight to maybe steal a little bit less Venezuelan gold and oil. I want you to not plunder
and pillage and loot and exploit that country. Okay? I want you not to bomb a bunch of fishermen
in the Caribbean and the Pacific. I want you to stand for justice and freedom and liberty
and the correct position, the moral position. But he doesn't do it because he can't do it
because he's compromised. The reason Hakeem Jeffries is in his position is because he's
the Democrat who fund raises the best, which means he's cucked himself more to lobbyists and
big money groups. That's why he's the Democratic leader. It's got nothing to do with him representing
the base the best or being the most charismatic or the most interesting or the most clever or
creative. It is literally like he bent the knee to big tech. He bent the knee to the military
industrial complex and Wall Street and AI companies. He's the one who has these connections
and can raise money from them and the Israel lobby. And that's why he's in this position.
Everybody knows that. And now it's more clear than ever. Meeting with Jared Kushner in this
moment. I mean, it's insane. It's like saying, oh yeah, I met with Goebbels, but don't worry.
We were trying to figure out affordability. Like what is Jared doing now? Jared's whole plan right
now is to build a futuristic tech city right on top of the skulls of dead babies in Gaza. That's
what he's doing. Stealing the land of Gaza from Palestinians, building right on top of their
skulls that they were buried in mass graves because of Israel. And you have Hakeem Jeffries
going, oh yeah, I'm meeting with him to work together. Work together on what? The *******
final solution? You can't. You can't take these people seriously. This is gross. He needs to
resign. He needs to step down. And we need a Democrat who actually represents the will of
the people. Somebody like Mark Pocan or Ro Khanna or Pramila Jayapal. Somebody who actually will
fight for democratic positions, not whatever the **** this is.

