BOMBSHELL Testimony from Canada's Allison Inquiry - Covid Jab Injuries, State Propaganda & More!

The Allison Inquiry is still going on up in Canada. I'm covering it. It's day four of the Allison Inquiry. It's named after Dean Allison, a conservative MP who is sort of initiating or backing this inquiry, and I hope that that's actually the origins of the name. I'm fairly certain it is. The purpose of this inquiry is to listen to the stories, the testimony of those who have been impacted, or the more proper term would be injured, affected, harmed by the, won't say COVID pandemic, I will use the word pandemic, but the COVID pandemic response, the COVID jab, because I'm not going to use the term vaccine mandates. And this inquiry was put on by Sean Buckley, who's the same man that initiated the NCI, the National Citizens Inquiry, which was a citizen initiative to look at, assess, and ultimately admonish the government's response to the COVID pandemic. Because, people, the damage that was done from COVID was, I'll say, virtually entirely, if not entirely, in the government response. The economic, health, social consequences, all a result of the government's response, not the man-made virus out of a lab in Wuhan, China, that wreaked havoc on the world. And Sean Buckley did the NCI, the National Citizens Inquiry, it went on for a very long time, and they listened to everybody who was affected by government lockdowns, government mandates, all this other stuff. Now they've dedicated one called the Allison Inquiry to people who were injured by the vaccine, people whose lives were turned upside down by the mandates. And it's a shocking thing to listen to. Today they had Dr. Peter McCullough talk, they had Dan Hartman, who's the father of Sean Hartman, talking about him losing his son. What's the most shocking thing about it is the level of non-coverage by state-funded media. And it's remarkable, it's in your face. You literally have the CBC, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, which is a crown corporation, 33 steps away from where this is being held, not covering it. And it's almost deliberate. It's almost a conspiracy, except a conspiracy to inaction, some people still think is a little bit different than a conspiracy for action. And one of the speakers today was highlighting exactly why this would be the case. And the man's name is Rodney Palmer, journalist for decades, award-winning journalist, I think he was a producer at the CBC for some point in time. And he basically fleshed out, it's an amazing thing, it will explain just about everything, the difference between a public broadcaster and a state broadcaster. They're often confounded. And you'll have these state broadcasters referring to other state broadcasters as propaganda while referring to them as public broadcasters because, well, we serve the public. We serve the public because we're funded by public taxpayer funds via the government. But ultimately, what ends up happening in the land of propaganda in the North Koreas of the world is that you don't have public media, you have state media, because it doesn't serve the public's interest, it serves the state's interest. Listen to this clip, I'll pause it periodically. And it perfectly highlights exactly what we're witnessing in Canada, why nobody except for independent media is covering this Alison Inquiry, why it's not gaining, I don't say mainstream traction, why it's not being put on blast by state-funded media. And thus, the onus becomes one of the independent content creators, the independent analysts, to put this on absolute blast. You can go to alisoninquiry.com, two L's, to watch it live daily. You can watch the replays, you can fast forward and rewind from prior testimonies. This came from Rodney Palmer earlier today. What I observed very quickly during COVID was that the CBC morphed into the type of broadcaster that I witnessed in China, in Syria, in North Korea. It wasn't the public broadcaster that I had been trained as. I believe it's a state broadcaster. And I'm going to explain the difference between those two things. A public broadcaster engages in news gathering, which is defined in the Oxford Dictionary as the process of doing research on news items. And the way it works is from the bottom up. So a little reporter in a small town in Saskatchewan will do a story that's local, and maybe Western Canada becomes interested in it, maybe the nation does, and it goes up, and it becomes a national news story. That's a bottom up. That's how the apparatus is designed to work. That's a public broadcaster. Pause it. You recall the entire argument against defund the CBC. It's something that I've said. It's something that I deeply believe in. This is not a call to violence, and there's no pun there. This is just a joke. Defund it and lock the building doors. I was going to say burn it to the ground, but you could probably use those buildings to house the unhoused. Defund the CBC and make those scoundrels have to succeed on their own merit, not because they've got their hands in your back pocket to the tune of $1.6 billion a year. I say that a lot, and I firmly believe it. It's eat what you kill in a moral sense, succeed or don't, but they do not have to succeed on their own merits because they've got a cash cow known as the Canadian citizens, whether you like it or not. The argument is always, well, if you defund the CBC, then who's going to cover the small story out of Regina of the local pigeon population getting decimated by, I don't know, some pesticide. Bad example, but you know what I'm talking about. They say if they don't get state funding, if they don't get funded to the tune of whatever, they're not going to have any financial incentive to cover these stories that are not profitable. My initial response to that is make it interesting. A, make it interesting. Get people to pay attention to it, not that it becomes profitable, so that it becomes sustainable. There's not a market for something until someone makes the market for something. There's not a market for anything until you make people understand, oh, I like that. I want some of that. I want more of that. Then someone else says, well, he's in that market. They want it. They want more of it. I'm going to come in with a better product or cheaper product. The olive oil market. I'm old enough now to remember there was never an olive oil market, at least not in Canada. Then it happened about a decade ago. You started getting your extra virgin olive oils. I started noticing that there was olive oils that I couldn't live without. I started noticing there's an actual difference between mozzola oil and sweet, delicious, extra virgin olive oil straight from the mountains of Italy. You can make these local stories very interesting. You think those town halls where you have some dude talking about offering masturbation facilities to the homeless, you don't think that's interesting to people, even though it's a purely local thing? Make it interesting, or don't, but then don't complain that you need someone to subsidize your lack of ability to make something interesting for the mainstream. It tells the story of the nation that holds us together and knits us together by telling our stories. I heard it becoming a state broadcaster. A state broadcaster works on propaganda. It uses the same apparatus, the same anchors, the same reporters, right down to that little reporter in Saskatchewan. What it does, it's defined in Oxford as the intentional manipulation of public opinion through lies and half-truths. You see, I might even just change it to intentional manipulation of public opinion, period. The intentional manipulation is different than people reacting to the news. I don't care if it's through half-truths, whole truth. If you are intentionally trying to manipulate, I guess you're no longer news, you might be editorial or commentary, which is also fine, but you wouldn't have state-funded editorials, state-funded editorializing, or state-funded, I mean, maybe you have state-funded commentary, because you understand it's coming from perspective and not from the objective of treating all citizens equal, irregardless of political orientation. But set that aside. Okay, fine. So this is a good definition of propaganda. It uses the same apparatus, but it comes from the top down. The government tells us, right down to that little reporter, and they all speak with a unified voice. You are flashing to those videos. We here at Station Valley, the thing about honest broadcasting, some of our stuff hasn't, and you have the whole flashing of the multiple squares. There's a difference between syndicated news and propaganda. We're going to get into propaganda, which is the CBC, state-funded media, putting out articles about the joys of snitching on One of the first things I noticed was a story on The National at CBC Television, The National News, with Adrienne Arsenault, one of the greatest broadcasters we have, by the way. She's amazing in the way that she is on camera, and she's very believable and trustworthy. This is going to blow your mind. These examples, which, I say, if my Twitter feed serves as nothing else other than a man's descent into madness as the world around him goes crazy, it's a diary. I'm going to keep it there so that we can memorialize the things that happened at the time as they happened. It's fun to go back and see, holy crap, we had no idea how right that was at the time. Listen to this. So when I saw this, I did not recognize it as news. So what do you do when this happens? A loved one, let's say it's your dad, drops into the family group chat with something he thinks is real. It's something about China manufacturing the coronavirus. There's a link to a site you've never heard of with a message calling it scary stuff. So what do you do with this? Do you ignore it? Do you call them out saying how ridiculous you think this is? So hold back on all that reactive talk. Maybe try something like this. Yeah, these are scary times. We're all a bit afraid, but let's be careful. What you're sharing is inaccurate, and it feeds into that fear we all feel. Fear was what they were selling here. It wasn't news. And more interestingly, on April 4th, 2020, CDC had no idea that this didn't come from a lab. I covered the SARS outbreak in 2002 in Beijing, and I followed the World Health Organization, the virus hunters, determining who was patient zero. And I know that the amount of time that this takes, and it hadn't been determined yet. So how did they presume in that story, number one, that it wasn't from a lab? They presented no evidence. Oh, by the way, not only was it wrong that it was from a lab, it was racist to suggest it was from a lab, as per the New York Times. Not quite state-funded, but pretty close. Can you believe that that was something that CBC actually, like, hey, CBC, we're now not just a public news broadcaster, a state broadcaster. We're your new father. Hope you like us. There was no news gathering. And more importantly, they said, don't trust your dumb old dad. That's what the focus of this story was. Don't trust your family member. So this is another thing that state broadcasters do. They attempt to supplant themselves as the arbiters of truth and divide you from your standard, the person you seek as a true person, a wise person in your life, in this case, your father. So they had no evidence, and yet they did this. It's because this was propaganda. I recognized it instantly. Pause it, and we're going to end it here. I'll give you the link to this and put it on blast. It's not just that it was propaganda. And it's not just that they try to pretend that you should disregard your own father and that they knew better. This was part and parcel of the demoralizing, the destabilizing process, which is to separate you from your family, to separate you from the pillars of your individualism, religion, family, and information, to basically make sure that you are a good cult member, that you know who to go to for the actual information and who you should shun and disregard and who should become apostates to you. The government interfering with and supplanting itself in the place of religion, education, family. What more would a propaganda outlet want to do? So, Palmer breaks it down, and it's fantastic. And it's particularly astute. And then you start wondering, why haven't I heard about other stories? I mean, I've been covering Dan Hartman's story from the beginning. Dan Hartman, Sean Hartman's father. Sean Hartman was a 17-year-old boy who died 33 days after his first COVID shot. He was hospitalized four days after that shot. The media, I don't know that the media has still touched his story. He's still in the process of an appeals with the new vaccine impact program, whatever the hell they're calling it, the VIAP, vaccine impact something. It was VIAP program, vaccine impact assessment program, which used to be the Vaccine Injury Support Program. It went from the VISP to the VIAP because the corrupt organization that was originally handling this, the third party organization, couldn't do jack squat properly. His story still has not, it's gotten maybe more into the public limelight, but not because of the state-funded propagandists, because they, after all, don't want to encourage vaccine hesitancy. So you can't have people tell their stories if the potential risk of telling the truth of actually being a reporter for the people is that others not want to follow government protocol. Well, what's the difference between a public broadcaster and a state broadcaster? The state broadcasters were running the propaganda for the administration. And if telling the truth would compromise that or hinder it, well, then you got to bury it. August 25th, 2021, he has his one and only shot, which was a Pfizer. Can you share with us what happened? He went to a one-day vaccination clinic, come one, come all, at the community center and got one shot, and he was rushed to emergency four days later. He had brown circles around his eyes, rash all over his face and neck, and vomiting, and an extremely sore shoulder opposite to his injection shoulder, which I've been told by doctors could be a sign of heart problems. The doctor in emergency did not do any blood work whatsoever. He didn't do a de-dimer test. He didn't do a troponin test, which would have found blood clots or damage to his heart. So just slow you down here. So four days after the shot, a 17-year-old healthy hockey player is rushed to emergency because, so he's got the raccoon eye. So you're meaning where it's like really almost like bruised eyes, like designers. He's got a rash all over his neck and face. There's clearly something going on. He's vomiting, and his right shoulder is in extreme distress and pain, but his injection was in the left shoulder, and they don't even do blood work at the ER? Nope. They only gave him a prescription for a painkiller for his sore shoulder. That's it. And they sent him home. And they send him home. I won't play the rest because we know what happens. He does go on to mention that at some point, he got in an online back and forth with Dr. Drew, who immediately knew what the brown under his eyes was. It was serious. And they didn't do a de-dimer test. They didn't do a troponin test. They send the kid home. He dies a couple of weeks later. Dan Hartman tried to sue the doctor for malpractice. Didn't go anywhere. And this is the free health care system in Canada. The story that we saw the other day from the other gentleman whose mother died two days after the shot, also equal neglect from the health care system. Now you don't want to put that on blast because then it might cause people to think that there's something wrong up in Canada with the government and the health care system. And there is. But as they said, you know, disinformation, misinformation, and malinformation and the role of the state-funded propagandists is to conceal the malinformation because malinformation is information that's real, but that might produce bad side effects if people know it. And if people know that the government is poisoning them, the government is killing them, the government is neglecting them in the health care system, the government is implementing policy, immigration and other, that is severely impacting their quality of life, sending billions of dollars to foreigners. Well, you don't want to put that on blast because that is malinformation. Though true, it will be negatively impacting the state that the media represents, the interests and the agenda that state-funded media represents. This is Peter McCullough talking about what went down during COVID at the Allison Inquiry. You better go and watch his entire presentation. I got through the better part of it before going live. It's not just well worth the watch. It should be mandatory viewing for everyone on earth, which means that it's going to be mandatory suppression for the state-funded media up in Canada, the CBC, Connie Broadcasting Corporation. One or two shots. It's because they're genetic and it's because the protein is gain-of-function research. It was designed to kill. In fact, people who have taken these vaccines in many ways are lucky to be alive because their library of antibodies directed against the spike protein must be perfectly neutralizing it. That's the only explanation that exists right now. Now, there's variation in the vaccine lots. Some lots probably had very little messenger RNA in it. Some were hyper-loaded. There's a website called howbadismybatch.com. One can sort this out. It's in the peer-reviewed literature. One is able to evaluate what the risk is with their batch. Each person has their own genetics. It's been my clinical experience after examining thousands of patients that if anyone has any little flaw in their genetics, in their epigenetics, or in their baseline condition, the vaccine seems to strike at that flaw. For example, if someone has a proclivity to blood clotting, they take the vaccine. Boom. We've seen the biggest blood clots we've ever seen in medical history. A blood clot in the leg before the pandemic was about an inch long. I have patients where the entire leg is a solid blood clot, even extending up to the inferior vena cava. We are seeing anyone who has a polymorphism, a genetic difference in their contractile proteins in the heart, the sarcomere, the other cysteine proteins, the non-sarcomere proteins, to be the ones who are hit with myocarditis, for an example. It's a multifactorial Venn diagram of who's going to end up with a vaccine injury and who's going to be spared. And now I would encourage everyone to go, that is coming from Natasha Montreal, her Twitter feed. And why I like that angle better than the other one is because the other one from the Allison inquiry was the slides of his presentation. But I like looking at the individual as they talk. Go put that one on blast. That is Natasha Montreal covering this. My brother is there as well. You've got, I say a number of the independent journalists there who are covering this. But you don't have the CBC state funded propaganda there for obvious reasons. They can't highlight the damage they've caused. They can't highlight their negligence. They can't highlight their own complicitness. Complicity? Their own being complicit in the wholesale destruction of society as we knew it. And I'm not being hyperbolic. It's actually shocking what they did during COVID in terms of turning neighbor against neighbor, family member against family member. And the Allison inquiry is memorializing it, giving the victims finally a time to speak up about it and share their stories. And the state funded propagandists are doing everything in their power to not cover it, not amplify it. I won't say censor it because they're not actively censoring it, but they are suppressing it through lack of coverage. They serve the people. That's what they're supposed to do, public broadcasting. And yet they have unilaterally decided this is not of sufficient interest to cover because it might put our bosses at risk and we might lose our $1.6 billion in funding when people realize we were active players, not reporters, players in the wholesale destruction and that which caused the deaths of tens of thousands of people. That's what's going on in Canada, Allison inquiry. If you're watching this on ComiTube afterwards, snip, clip, share away. And you know, now you know, and knowing is half the battle.