The Worlds Largest Electric Aircraft Just Flew

Warship And Aircraft
72 followers
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedHart Aerospace is developing the world's largest electric aircraft to transform regional air travel. By utilizing simple electric motors and a hybrid battery system, the company aims to lower operating costs, reduce noise, and provide a sustainable alternative for short-haul flights, ultimately making air travel more accessible and environmentally friendly.
This is the largest electric airplane ever to fly. It's got a 100-foot wingspan,
a takeoff weight of 25,000 pounds, and the electricity to get it off the ground costs
just $5. Its successor, the ES-30, will fly up to 125 miles on battery alone,
up to 500 miles as a hybrid, and recharge in about 30 minutes.
It's the world's largest electric aircraft by about a factor two. It's the first clean-sheet
airliner to be flown in any category, electric or not, in the U.S. in the last 18 years.
This is Anders Forslund. He's the CEO of Hart Aerospace. Seven years ago,
Anders showed me this plane. It was a 3D-printed model you can hold in your hand.
It's surreal, yeah. I came to YC with that 3D-printed plane that was like this size,
and now it's, you know, a 100-foot wingspan hurtling down the runway doing taxi testing.
So how do you go from basically a toy model to this? I visited Hart Aerospace's headquarters
in L.A. to find out. I've worked with Anders since he came to YC seven years ago. Back then,
it was Anders and his co-founder Clara and that 3D-printed model. Today, it's a 40-person team
in L.A. building a real airliner. How would you describe Hart Aerospace in two sentences?
We build hybrid electric aircraft, but our mission is to reduce the cost of air travel,
and we're building the technology to support that.
With a relatively small team, they're going after something that Boeing and Airbus have
not been able to pull off. Hart's plane swapped the jet engine for electric motors.
You'd be holding a motor that weighed a few grams that you put on a drone and it has one
moving part, and then you look at the 400-kilowatt ones, it's just like scaled up. So it's this
really, really simple thing that has very few moving parts, so it means that you can produce
them a lot cheaper. They don't break because they don't really have combustion or fluid,
so you get basically zero wear. Let's break that down. A jet engine has thousands of parts
and burns fuel hot enough to melt metal. An electric motor has essentially only one moving
part, no combustion, and doesn't really wear out. When you're taxiing with a jet engine,
the rest of it is, by definition, it's noise. In this, you have a constant torque profile,
so you could spin it at like, you know, one-tenth of the speed. It's virtually silent if you stand
100 feet away from it. And the power source is eight battery packs laid across the floor
of the plane. It's eight packs that are like across the floor of the fuselage. It's actually
only about four Teslas for this one, carrying that $40 worth of fuel. To understand why this
is such a big deal, let's look at what's broken about the jet engine, especially when it comes
to short flights. It's as complex to build a jet engine for a 30-seater as it is for a 70-seater,
so it costs the same. It wears the same whether you fly 100 miles or 1,000 miles,
so it's pushing the industry into this direction of going larger and larger planes and longer and
longer routes. They're extremely inefficient at taxi. You can spend, you know, for a short flight,
you can spend 10% of your fuels just taxiing up to the runway. Takeoff is inefficient,
landing is inefficient. So that sort of segment of flying regionally is really badly served by
the technology that we have today. And there's already an existing market. Half of all flights
in the world are under two hours. There's a replacement market here that's not even driven
by cost. The aircraft that we're competing with are 40-year-old designs. Regional connectivity
is not about how far you fly, it's about how cheap you fly. This aircraft would be absolutely
best if it was flying the shortest possible route. Think island hopping in Hawaii or a Norwegian
fjord town that goes from being a six-hour drive to a 20-minute flight. In the last year,
gone from like being 33% better operating economics overall to 48% just because of this
increased price in oil. So why hasn't anyone built this before? It started in Sweden. And I grew up
right next to an air force base in Sweden. You saw like the Viggen fighter jets going over the
soccer field. And I was always super excited about that. Really into paper airplanes. Just
been fascinated with planes, you know, rockets and all these things. He did a PhD on jet engines
and ended up at MIT. That's where the idea found him 12 years ago. He comes to MIT, this is 12
years ago. Elon shows up and he's talking about electric planes. He says at one point that,
you know, eventually all modes of transportation will go electric, besides rockets. He's talking
about like 400 watt hours per kilogram and it kind of felt like a call to arms. Yeah.
This time I was like working on jet engines during the day. I was like tinkering with
drones at the kitchen table at night, becoming kind of obsessed with this. I was actually doing
research on this, being paid by the Swedish government to go around, speak to all the
airlines before I even had a company. It's established the relationships with the airlines
and the Nordics before I even like try to build something. When Anders got to YC, there was no
playbook for this. With YC, we were all focused on getting some like early interest from airlines.
We got some LOIs from SAS, Embraer and Lidre, the three Nordic airlines. We really had no technology.
Like I came to YC demo day with a little 3D printed model. So we went from having the LOIs
to them building like the 400 kilowatt motor, which was like the size of a small jet engine.
That in turn attracted actual, you know, pre-orders. And then they came from United and
then that attracted more capital. And then we started building and now we're building towards
the plane. If you're a founder listening to this, the learning that you should have is every time
you need more capital, it needs to be something material. Yeah. Ideally something physical that
you can touch. Yeah. That you can show that you made. Their first big airline customer
actually came out of the spam folder. United Airlines came through an inbound email through
our info email. Clara was looking at it and she was like, I think this might be a thing. Like he
was like cleaning out the spam. And that led us like through the front door. We just brought them
over, showed them the electric motor we built that was the size of the jet engines we tried to
replace. And they kind of immediately got it. And the design itself, most electric aircraft startups
try to look futuristic. Hart did the opposite on purpose. It looks very much like the turboprops
we're trying to replace. We're not trying to build a sports car. I'd rather build something that looks
very conventional, but it's kind of hiding its Superman cape under the hood. This is the first
one. We never even tested this one because we just realized that it wouldn't hold. And the new one
just goes all the way through to the bottom here. And like it's a big thing. So it's like really
sturdy. This is the pilot plant. Most of this plane is designed and built right here. This is a
cylinder body for the actuator. 6061 aerospace aluminum. There's about 15 machine components
in the actuator that we're working on developing in-house processes for. In traditional aerospace,
this would be a supplier. And you'd source it to get a year to get one. And now you could just
play around with it and test it. This is the same basic architecture for aileron, rudder,
landing gear extension, braking, even in the pitch of the propellers. If you want to build
something in-house, you should start with the things that you don't have to go to one supplier,
but you go to like eight different. So then it just scales with the number of technologies rather
than the number of suppliers. The whole plant is wired like one giant test bench. You can deconstruct
it like a Picasso painting. And here's the cockpit. Here's the cabin. Here's the tail. And
all of this is being fed, you know, 1.6 megawatts of power. You could keep the aircraft in the air
from just everything that's happening here. We're going to be testing fault injection. So
everything from like putting in programming error to cutting a wire, everything's got to work,
even if everything goes wrong. Like the first time you get into model three and you're like,
there's just one screen. I think that's a lot of the idea here. As the guy designing this,
he worked on the Dragon space capsule. You can fit up to 36 passengers, but most common,
probably going to be 30 passengers, which means everybody's going to get like six inches of extra
leg room. And the heart of the operation is the battery lab where the team is choosing the cell
for the next aircraft. This is the battery cell lab where we are trying to determine what our
cell is going to be. We have lots of different cells, which are on display here from Chinese,
American and Korean manufacturers. We can determine which one's going to have, you know,
the most flight cycles, best safety costs and energy density. We talked about Elon coming to
MIT 12 years ago and talking about like 400 watt hour per kilogram batteries. Do we have any cells
that are like 400 watt hour per kilogram? The highest thing that we have on this table right
now is above 370. One of the manufacturers is producing something at that 400 level that we're
expecting to have within the next couple of months. Easily meets our targets for the first generation
of the aircraft. So you've got the countdown timer there. 23 days. Inspired by YC demo day.
Yeah. Chrome extension. The hardest problem had nothing to do with the motor or the battery.
It's probably the biggest challenge we've had in the company. One in every thousand flights
in the U.S. gets diverted to another airport. You kind of need 45 minutes of loiter and then you
need to go to something that could be like a hundred miles away. Yeah. So if you build a
battery electric aircraft, you kind of have to carry two thirds of your battery needs to be for
reserves. And unlike jet fuels, batteries don't get lighter. Their answer is a hybrid engine.
We're basing it on a very simple turboprop engine. It's one of the most inexpensive ones.
We don't have to use it for most flights, but it's still adding about, I guess, 20% of the
upfront cost of the aircraft. And I think it's worth it. You can fly up to 125 miles all
electrically, and then you fly up to 500 miles with a hybrid system, operational range. That
call comes out of the philosophy that Anders borrowed from SpaceX about how you should treat
risk. Traditional aerospace is like, well, the impact is always catastrophic. So let's minimize
the probability. We don't know anything until we know everything. Whereas if you look at, hey,
how do we minimize impact to getting it wrong? Then you can select a process that's a lot cheaper,
that's a lot easier to iterate on. Planes don't crash these days because of a broken wing. They
crash because of broken logic. We want to build a software to find vehicles, the computer on wings.
Anders has heard all the doubts. For example, why not just build flying taxis first?
It's super cool. They're really trying to build a flying car. We're attacking not the helicopter
market, but the mainline airplane market. While these companies have three or four passengers,
we have 36. We're also operating from an infrastructure that is already there. There's
5,000 airports in the US. Another common question he gets is why not use hydrogen?
And the same with hydrogen. The great thing about using hybrid electric is that it's
already now at a significant negative green premium. So you're surfing in a much bigger
way. The planes we're trying to replace, they're 40 years old. It becomes an appreciating asset.
The plane will actually be better in 10 years than when you buy it. It becomes like buying a house.
36 seats is only the beginning. We'd love to build bigger planes. The large market is the
narrow bodies. The 737 is the A330. There's ridiculous backlogs. Somebody doing what SpaceX
did with rockets on airplanes just makes sense. Longer term, the plane's built for a world with
fewer pilots in the cockpit. A remote pilot that is supporting many aircraft, kind of like there's
remote operators of the way most. Then we're going to see autonomy happening in cargo, where there's
lower stakes, and then eventually making its way into aircraft. Obviously a lot less noise.
There's a lot less vibration as well. There's going to be more flights. They're going to be
cheaper ticket. So you're going to be able to go to your neighborhood airport and take a plane
in the way you actually could in the past. It's also why Hart is building it here in LA,
the new center of gravity for this kind of company. This is the ground zero, the most historic place
when it comes to aviation. You have the new space ecosystem that's kind of coming from SpaceX.
Companies don't build planes, people do. It's the moment of seeing it literally take off.
This is obviously a moment I've imagined for the last seven years.
And even seeing it going down the runway, it kind of gives me the goosebumps. So it's
hopefully I'll get a moment where I kind of start seeing the forest for all the trees kind of thing.
When this airs, you will have flown the largest electric airplane in the world.
Come a long way from demo day seven years ago. Oh man, I'm so grateful that you got that
opportunity. And now the day's here. It's going to be amazing. Seven years of hard work finally
led to this, their first flight on Wednesday, August 12th in Plattsburgh, New York. If you
start a new hardware startup today, everything that you know about building Hart and your entire
career, how would you get started? I'm a pretty good duck, right? Like I know a little bit how
to swim. I know a little bit how to fly. And I know a little bit how to walk. And that's enough
for me to know when I find somebody that's great. I would never start a company based on the fact
that I wanted to have a company or be a founder. I would start because I really enjoy, you know,
a problem. If we can get stuff that is lower emission, lower cost,
lower pollution, just better quality of life, we should be doing it.
