This is a audio recording/book of Chinese Sketches, Chapter 5 - Literature by Herbert Allen Giles. From 1876.
Herbert Giles was in the diplomatic service in China from 1867 to 1893. His frank observations on Chinese culture and people form the basis of these short essays, published in 1876. On his retirement, he returned to England and served as the Chair of Chinese at Cambridge for 35 years.
Copyright 2022. Classic Audio Books. All Rights Reserved. Audio content is a Librivox recording. All Librivox recordings are in the public domain. For more information or to volunteer visit librivox.org.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate and an affiliate with other select companies we earn from qualifying purchases. Your purchases through affiliate links help to generate revenue for this channel. Thank you for your support.
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI Generated
The speaker challenges the romanticized notion that Chinese literature contains a hidden treasury of profound wisdom. While acknowledging its vastness, the author argues that much of this perceived value is based on superstition or exaggeration, urging for more rigorous translations to replace vague enthusiasm with factual evidence.
Section 5. Literature.
It is an almost universally received creed that behind the suicidal prejudices
and laughable superstitions of the Chinese, there is a mysterious fund of solid learning
hidden away in the uttermost recesses, far beyond the ken of Occidentals.
Of that terra incognita, Chinese literature.
Synologues darkly hint at elaborate treatises on the various sciences,
impartial histories and candid biographies, laying at the same time extraordinary stress
on the extreme difficulty of the language in which they are written, and carefully
mentioning the number, sometimes fabulous, of the volumes of which each is composed.
Hence, probably, it results that few students venture to push their reading beyond novels,
and remain during the whole of their career in a state of darkness as to the literary
wealth of China, which enthusiasts delight to compare with her unexplored mines of metal and
coal. Inasmuch, however, as it is not absolutely necessary to read a book from beginning to end,
to be able to form a pretty correct judgment as to its value, so, many students who are
sufficiently advanced to read a novel with ease, and without the help of a teacher,
might readily gain an insight into a large enough number of the most celebrated scientific,
or historical works, to enable them to comprehend the true worth of the whole of
this vast literature. For vast it undoubtedly is, though our own humble efforts to appraise it
justly, in comparison, of course, with the other literatures of the world, brought upon us in the
first hours of discovery the mortifying conviction that some years of assiduous toil had been
positively thrown away. Sir W. Hamilton, if we recollect rightly, said that by so many more
languages as a man knows, by so many more times is he a man, an apothegum of but a shallow kind,
if all he meant to convey was that an Englishman who can speak French is also a Frenchman by
virtue of his knowledge of the colloquial. The opening up of new fields of thought,
through the medium of a new literature, is a result more worthy the effect of acquiring a
foreign language than sparkling in a salon with the purest imaginable accent. And herein Sir W.
Hamilton counted without Chinese. The greater portion of the Chinese, cherished tomes to which
China thinks even now she owes her intellectual supremacy over the rest of the world, is open
through Dr. Legge's translation to all Englishmen, and those who run may read, weighing it in the
balance and determining its status among the ethical systems, either of the past or present.
Had we found as much that is solid in other departments of Chinese literature,
as there is mixed up with the occasional nonsense and obscurity of the four books,
our protest would have taken a milder form. As it is, we think it right to condemn any and all
random assertions which tend to strengthen in the minds of those who have no opportunity of judging
the belief that China is possessed of a vast and valuable literature, in which, for aught anyone
knows to the contrary, there may lie buried gems of purest ray serene. Can it be supposed that,
if true, nothing of all this has yet been brought to light? There have been, and are now,
foreigners possessing a much wider knowledge of Chinese literature than many natives of education,
but, strange to say, such translations as have hitherto been given to the world
have been chiefly confined to plays and novels. We hold that all those whom tastes or circumstances
have led to acquire a knowledge of the Chinese language have a great duty to perform, and this
is to contribute each something to the scanty quota of translations from Chinese now existing.
Let us see what the poets, historians, and especially the scientific men of China,
have produced to justify so many in speaking, as they have done, and still do speak, of her
bulky literature. Many, we think, will be deterred by the grave nonsense or childish superstitions
which they dare not submit to foreign judges as the result of their labors in this fantastic field.
But to withhold such is to leave the public where it was before, at the mercy of unscrupulous or
crazed enthusiasts. We were led into this train of thought by an article in the North China Daily
News of 10th July, 1874, in which the writer speaks of China as a luxuriant mental oasis
among the sterility of Eastern Asia, and possessing a literature in vastness and antiquarian value
surpassed by no other. He goes on to say that the translations hitherto made have
conveyed to us a faint notion of the compass, variety, solidity, and linguistic beauties of
that literature. Such statements as these admit, unfortunately, of rhetorical support,
sufficient to convince outsiders that at any rate there are two sides to the question,
a conviction which could only be effectually dispelled by placing before them a few thousand
volumes translated into English, and chosen by the writer of the article himself.
When, however, our enthusiast deals with more realizable facts, and says that in China there
is no organized book trade, nor publisher's circulars, nor Quatrech's catalogs, nor any
other catalogs whatever of old or new books for sale, we can assure him he knows nothing at all
about the matter. That there is now lying on our table a very comprehensive list of new editions
of standard works lately published at a large book-shop in Wunchangfu, with the price of each
work attached, and that Mr. Wiley, in his Notes on Chinese Literature, devotes five entire pages to
the enumeration of some thirty well-known and voluminous catalogs of ancient and modern works.
End of Section 5