Kevin Reddington Speaks About Jury

TMZ
9 followers
3 Video Views·Sep 3, 2026
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedA defense attorney objects to the court's handling of a deadlocked jury, arguing that one juror refuses to follow the legal definition of \"reasonable doubt.\" While the defense requests the juror's removal to avoid a mistrial, the prosecution and the judge maintain that the current instructions are sufficient and that judicial interference in deliberations is inappropriate.
I appreciate the fact, your honor,
that you're allowing us to be heard in public
rather than at the sidebar.
The juror, the court has an instruction
from the foreperson of that juror
that's been working for a week now
saying that there's one juror
who refuses to listen to the law
that you've given him or her on reasonable doubt.
And I suggest respectfully that the soft instruction
that you gave them saying at the sidebar,
can you listen to the law as I instruct you,
does not focus on the issue.
It is the question is not sufficient enough.
It does not allow any foundation
for a motion to remove the juror
who refuses to accept your instructions on the law
on reasonable doubt.
And if we come back here in a half an hour
with a mistrial because of a juror
that has just spurned the instructions of this court,
it's a shame, it's a real shame.
And that's why I object to the court's ruling.
I request that we have further inquiry.
I request that my motion is to remove this juror
that refuses to listen to your instruction
on reasonable doubt.
Coma.
Thank you, your honor.
We have the note from the jury.
There's no way to determine what the deliberations are,
who's correct, who's incorrect,
nor should we attempt to
because that's part of deliberations.
I think what your honor has done
by asking each juror if they're able to follow the law
and then giving a general instruction
on reasonable doubt is appropriate
under Commonwealth versus Ralph.
So we do not have an objection
to what the questions or the re-instruction.
All right.
Well, I'm sure as parties understand
they see the discharge of deliberating juror
is a sensitive undertaking.
I was just specifically responding
to the specific question that was asked.
I don't feel that it is proper for me to side
with one side or the other of the deliberations.
I don't feel it's appropriate for me to say,
I agree with one juror or 11.
At this point, I've asked
if they are able to follow my instructions.
According, they swore earlier that they could.
They've said to that at this point that they can.
That was specifically addressed
towards the specific question.
And that's what I'm doing.
So the defendant's objection is noted
and we will be in recess on this at this time.
Thank you.
