Wave of Social Revenge Spreads in China: Delivery Driver Poisons Thousands!

Shocking! China has entered hell mode. Delivery driver poisons thousands, 4,000 dead. Wave of social revenge spreads widely. Help the fallen, pay 19,000. When standing by and watching someone die becomes the norm, who will guard the conscience of the Chinese people? Tibet-Nepal 2-0, story mudslide. Thousands dead, China says 16. Truth harder to find than North Korea. Bromine leak at a chemical plant in Guangzhou, Fujian. Local netizens, sore throat and difficulty breathing. 100% public anger? Continuous loud explosions in Jiangsu. Locals expose military exercises, preparing for attack on Taiwan. Welcome to Red Wall, where we examine major world events with clarity, context, and thoughtful analysis. Shocking! China has entered hell mode. Delivery driver poisons thousands, 4,000 dead. Wave of social revenge spreads widely. Recently, cases of food delivery orders being poisoned in China have drawn high attention. Insiders have alleged that the poisoner was an internal employee of Mixue Ice City. Tertiary hospitals have suddenly seen a sharp rise in Paraquat poisoning patients. This year, according to one doctor's account, deaths have exceeded 4,000 and severe cases have surpassed 10,000. On August 26th, the overseas ex-blogger Luo Xiang, breaking the curtain and pushing the wall, forwarded a submission from a person claiming to be an internal Mixue Ice City employee. It discussed two matters. First, two people were arrested for extorting a store in Nanchang, Jiangxi. Second, the person who put poison into meals was an employee of that store and a victim of the Henan Village bank scandal. The whistleblower said that in mid-August, two people were arrested for extorting a Nanchang store. One was a single mother unemployed for several years. After the incident, she was detained for seven days. Two of her children at home starved to death, while the third was rescued by neighbors. Later, the mother took poison herself. The matter spread widely locally. Southern Metropolis Daily Times reported that from August 8th to 11th, two people in Nanchang ordered through delivery platforms, tore open the sealing film, inserted foreign objects, such as hair and flies, then resealed the packages. They then threatened to complain to regulators and headquarters and demanded tenfold compensation under the food safety law 1,000 yuan if the order was under 1,000 yuan. In four days, they committed five offenses, three succeeded, and two failed. On August 11th, the store spotted abnormalities and reported them. On August 14th, police opened an extortion case and criminally detained the two. Three details gave the stores away, the same person placing consecutive orders at different stores within minutes, photos that deliberately covered receipt information, and order times that did not match store records. On August 23th, the same blogger forwarded another submission from a Henan Village bank victim. In a debt collection group, he saw that one victim, living in hardship, had started delivering food. The person added substances to meals and milk tea for several thousand people and filmed videos calling on hundreds of others to copy him. In one video, the individual used a syringe to draw herbicide from a bottle of Paraquat. Read text on the screen read, Brothers, added the stuff again, continuously added to more than 7,000 orders, day 913 of delivering food. Paraquat is a fast-acting, non-selective herbicide, extremely toxic to humans and animals, with no specific antidote. Ingesting even five to 15 milliliters can be fatal. It attacks the lungs and causes progressive pulmonary fibrosis and respiratory failure. The blogger wrote that the nature of the act was too vile. Rights protection must go through legal channels. No matter what injustice one encounters, one must not drag innocent businesses and ordinary consumers into it, still less endanger food safety and other people's lives. Never let innocent people pay the bill for other people's conflicts. Netizens condemned it. This is using other people's lives and health as a tool to vent anger. Innocent consumers should not pay the bill for anyone's misfortune. Another comment went further. Forcing you people at the bottom to harm one another, this makes the ruling class happiest. On August 24, a mainland doctor who said he was internal staff at a tertiary hospital sent a tip. In the past year, the number of Paraquat poisoning patients we have admitted has suddenly surged. Previously, we would not encounter more than a few cases in a whole year, but this year deaths have exceeded 4,000 and severe cases have surpassed 10,000. Most occurred after ordering food delivery. It is definitely manmade. We have no authority to investigate. The hospital simply seals the matter, does not discuss it, and does not exchange numbers with other hospitals. They say it has been reported upward. Perhaps they are afraid of panic and imitation. He added that police had come wave after wave, but it was going through the motions. One word, muddle. There is no funding and no willingness to investigate they have gone numb. Everything is in disorder. On August 26, the ex-blogger Makabaka posted that Mixiu Ice City stores in a certain province had added notes to orders. Pour out the milk tea and check for overflow. Look for small holes in the seal or lid. Check for strange odor. Check whether the color is bluish green. If any of those appear, do not drink it. China's economy has severely declined. Unemployment has soared, and living pressure has become enormous. Coupled with judicial injustice, popular resentment has boiled over. Some people who can no longer survive have turned to extreme retaliation, driving into crowds, hacking with knives, setting factories on fire, poisoning food. Malignant incidents keep appearing. When the bottom is forced to turn on the bottom, the Chinese Communist Party's ruling class is the one that benefits. Help the fallen, pay 19,000. When standing by and watching someone die becomes the norm, who will guard the conscience of the Chinese people? If an old man collapses on the street, do you pick him up? In China, that question has hung over people for 20 years. It should take no thought. It has become a bet that can wipe out a family. At about 12.50 p.m. on the 17th of August, 2026, an elderly man walked into a mahjong parlor in Qidong County, Hengyang, Hunan. He was not a customer. Chest tight, dizzy, he wanted shade. Owner Xiao Aihua sat him near the door. At 12 hours, 54 minutes, and 30 seconds, the camera shows him closing his eyes and pitching forward toward concrete. Xiao lunged. His weight pulled her down. She jammed her arm under his head and neck and took the hit herself. Other players helped carry him to the entrance. She called 120. The ambulance was there. At 1-1. He still had a weak breath. He died later of his own disease. Officials said there was no causal link to the rescue. Her dive had kept his skull off the floor. The family came in a group and demanded 100,000 yuan. The fall happened at your door, they said. If you had left him alone, it might not be your problem. You touched him, so you own it. They threatened to lay the body across the entrance and shut the shop. Xiao's family called the police. Officers and judicial staff watched the full tape, checked the hospital file, and still knew the couple owed nothing under the law. They did not run the family off. They ran the classic grassroots line. The dead come first. Spend money to avert disaster. If they camp at your door, you cannot sell a hand of cards. After two rounds at the station, Xiao's husband transferred 19,000 yuan. The remark line read, humanitarian compensation. Their son told reporters they took the deal because ordinary people do not have the time or strength to keep fighting. We can't afford to drag it out. Xiao broke down insomnia, no appetite, vertigo. The parlor, two years old with rent just renewed, is closing. Months earlier, in May, Xiangyang Hubei needed combines after days of rain. Wheat was lodging. A post, 2005 couple from Shangqiu, Henan Li Jiayu and Adi, left a 100-day-old baby with grandparents, drove a still-financed harvester more than 500 kilometers, and took a plot in Gaowangzhuang Village, Guyi Town, Xiangzhou District. Aunt Zhang first set a little over three mu. They settled orally at 4.2 mu, 100 yuan a mu, 400 yuan total. The field was a mud pit. Spillage on lodged grain is normal. When the machine stopped, Zhang and her husband turned. No 400 yuan. The land was five mu, they said. Pay one yuan a jin for what hit the ground. Local spoiled wheat was buying at four or five mao. The couple offered to work for free. Zhang wanted another 500 and blocked the road. Village cadres and police mediated the same way. The party secretary put up 200. The couple waived the fee and paid 100 more to leave. That night, they drove out of Hubei. Operators online coined a 2026 phrase, harvest the wheat and still pay for the dance. Many said they would rather idle the machines than go back. Later, local farmers knelt in the rows. No one came. This did not start in Kedong. On the 20th of November, 2006, at Nanjing Shuixinmen Stop, 26-year-old Peng Yu helped 64-year-old Xu Shoulan after she fell and advanced more than 200 yuan at the hospital. A witness, Chen Erchen, said there was no collision. Xu's family sued for 136,000 yuan. On the 3rd of September, 2007, Gulu District Judge Wang Hao held that common sense made a collision relatively large, that a real good Samaritan would have chased the real culprit and left once family arrived. The line that stuck, if you didn't knock her down, why did you help her up? Peng was tagged with 40% fault and 45,876 yuan. For 20 years, that presumption of guilt has been the warning. Foshan, October 2011, two-year-old Yue Yue was run over. 18 people walked past in seven minutes before scavenger Chen Xianmei stopped, a second truck finished it. Wuhu, 2009, Jingui, 79, lay more than half an hour while crowds filmed. Wuhan, 2011, 88-year-old Zhou faced down at a market for more than an hour. People said, wait for a camera. He choked on his own blood. Hearts do not freeze on their own. Public power taught the lesson. After the Communist Party took power, it cut the old root fear of gods, Buddhas, and repayment and put social Darwinism in its place. When good is not repaid and rescue is billed, people pocket their sympathy. Coldness becomes the safest amulet. The 19,000 yuan was not a court order. It was the price of not being destroyed for doing what used to be ordinary. Tibet, Nepal, 2-0, story mudslide. Thousands dead, China says 16, truth harder to find than North Korea. A CCTV crew at Jirong Port in Tibet on August 30 measured the debris left by the flood at about 60 meters, the height of a 20-story building. The river channel was still torn open. That night, the Chinese Communist Party's count stood at 16 dead and 546 missing, including about 261 foreigners. Online, people looked at July motorcycle footage of the same crossing supermarkets, souvenir stalls, restaurants, hotels. A money changer offering 7,000 Nepalese rupees for 300 yuan and asked how many people those rows of shops had held when the wall of mud arrived. One commenter said he had helped with customs and could not reach the man in the video. Another said, do not delete it. The supermarket owner was his best friend. No missing persons list has been released. Videos and talk about the disaster have been cut. Families are hunting for names on whatever scraps still circulate. Nepal pulled thousands of people out in days. Chinese teams, according to people watching the official clips, did not reach the core of the port for several days. Rescuers were filmed picking their way across rivers on ropes, staging shots on unstable ground. No helicopters in those early scenes, no robots. The 72-hour window closed while the cameras rolled. State media then showed firefighters collapsing at 11 a.m. on the 30th and did not say who, if anyone, they had pulled out. Commenters asked what they had rescued that left them so tired and why men said to have gone days without sleep had clean uniforms, clean shoes, dry faces, and clean hands. At dawn on the 29th, the same crews were in the ruins, clearing concrete and rebar with bare hands, shouting, is anyone there? Toward a pile tens of meters thick. Port buildings were flat. Camera lines formed. People online called it procedure. Look right, film, photograph, shout. After two days under that mass, they said, a voice would not change the math. No detectors, no dogs. Where were the thermal cameras, the life sensors? The drone state television has advertised for years. Armed police clips showed small, slow shovel work that looked like posing. The fake digging is so lazy. Flags walked the frame. Real rescue, one comment ran, is results, not slow motion and red vests. Netties showed a mud-caked rabbit toy in the wreckage. The most liked reply was blunt. Treat people like human beings. How many fellow citizens have you found? Were any of them alive? That is what to report. Premier Lee Chiang inspected on the 27th. The shoes of the officials around him were clean. People asked whether he had walked the front or a marked path. The same slide hit two countries. Nepal flew more than 30 helicopters with cameras, dug by hand, kept medical teams close. Soldiers rolled in mud, carried rock, ran with the injured, while secondary slides were still a risk. Updates came three or four times a day. International reporters were let in. Independent posts kept moving. A foreign national list was compiled. They even saved a horse. Sympathy and help followed. China's official side of the same night, four helicopters, three-figure updates, a silence on the northern slope that critics called performance. As of 10 p.m., on the 30th, Nepal listed 734 dead, 2,498 missing, 7,514 rescued, revised at least 11 times. Zhirong's numbers barely moved. A WeChat account, Cities Geography, wrote that Nepal is small and had still met an international standard. BBC Chinese noted that foreign journalists need approval to enter Tibet. After a major event, the window for first images is short. Then the posts vanish. Tibetans who talk to reporters or contradict the official line can be detained. Relatives overseas still cannot confirm who is alive. A BBC reporter who had worked in North Korea said it was sometimes easier to reach a source in Pyongyang than in Lhasa. Ryan Fiorese of the International Campaign for Tibet said only the Chinese government controls the flow so people on the ground may stay quiet about trapped neighbors for fear of punishment. Two people were administratively punished for fabricating casualty numbers and distorting causes. A Lhasa tour bus driver using the name Suo told the Epoch Times that 15 drivers from Lhasa Transportation Industry Group were near the port, seven Tibetan, eight Han, several from Sichuan in 29-seat buses picking up or moving tourists. All 15 are missing. He guessed more than 100 vehicles in all, trucks and private cars included. Search, he said, has reached the center. Nepal has found people. On the Chinese side, not a single person has been found. A fellow villager missed the run because of a vehicle inspection in Lhasa. Fate, Suo called it. Zheng Hui from Sichuan last spoke to his brother, a logistics driver waiting at the checkpoint after road collapses in Nepal the day before. Then the phone went dead. Analysts describe the usual sequence in a heavily monitored country. Suppress, delay, refuse the problem, go after the people who ask, and months later, quietly adjust a death toll. The plateau has been blasted for roads, tunnels, dams, and military caves. The Himalayas are young and active. Tibet feeds rivers that reach nearly two billion people. Du Yijin of Taiwan AI Labs looked at pre-disaster aerials and wrote that the greatest sin is turning a man-made disaster into a natural one. Jirong Port, he said, sat on the channel like an illegal structure, pinching the flood path. Exile writer Sangye Gyatso warned in 2018 that reservoirs, hydropower, and mining in Tibet were a bomb over Tibetan heads. Lin Tinghui of the Taiwan Society of International Law noted that the crossing had carried Tang envoys and monks for more than 1,000 years, without a disaster of this scale until the recent years of flooding. An atheist party that believes man conquers nature, he said, will meet nature's answer. Jirong was not an accident. It was a preview. Bromine leak at a chemical plant in Guangzhou, Fujian. Local netizens, sore throat and difficulty breathing. On the afternoon of August 29, bromine escaped from a plant in the petrochemical park in Guanggang District, Guangzhou, Fujian. Orange-yellow smoke filled the yard and rode the wind into nearby homes. People online said their throats burned and their chests tightened. Really scary. The Guanggang Emergency Management Bureau called it a small leak inside the fence. Scope under control. Residents answered in one line, the whole park is in it. How is that small? Does it have to cover all of Guanggang before anyone uses a bigger word? Shaosheng Morning News placed the leak around 1 p.m. at a company in the Nanshan section of the park. Netizens named the firm Yuji New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. They said many of its lines run on hydrogen fluoride, the stuff workers call bone-dissolving water. A man on a construction site inside the park wrote that he could not breathe and his nose was blocked. Neighbors downwind said nobody warned them. Guanggang and Huian are basically finished. People with money buy a place and leave. People without money wait for their bodies to sound the alarm. Others were blunter. Living in Guanggang is the worst luck of a life. Plants dump toxic gas at night. Quanzhou has been too unsettled this year or there are too many accounts to settle. Liquid bromine is a listed hazardous chemical, highly toxic, highly corrosive. It flashes into reddish-brown vapor at room temperature. Inhaled, that vapor can kill. On skin and in the eyes it burns. Through the lungs or the skin, it hits the brain, liver and kidneys. This was not Quanzhou's first brush with the same family of chemicals and it is not China's. In May 2026, a Shanghai University lab was accused of a cyanogen bromide leak. Chat screenshots said two students ran an unreported experiment and put material in a shared cold room. Several people felt sick. Some were said to have abnormal liver and kidney numbers. The Chinese Communist Party has issued no public account of that case. On the 9th of May 2018, a tank tipped at Shandong Shouguang Yumen Chemical and threw a band of red-orange smoke. Officials said no one was hurt. On the 13th of March 2015, a kettle valve pipe burst at Waifeng Zhongyi bromide in the Binhai zone, again, officials said no casualties. On the 3rd of March 2015, Zhejiang Linhai Yongtai Technology lost bromine-bearing mix from a kettle. Red-brown cloud filled the plant. Two injured, one poisoned. On the 26th of May 2011, a porcelain jar cracked at Wuhan's Duoluoco wholesale market in Dongxihu district and dumped dozens of gin of bromine. One porter burned his feet. Eyes and throats stung in the street. The pattern is the same sentence after the cloud. Small, controllable, no serious harm until the people standing in it refuse the wording. In a year of messy accounts, a small-scale bromine release is what you call it when you do not intend to count who coughed. Those who can move will move. Those who cannot will wait, as they said, for the body to raise the alarm. 100% public anger? Continuous loud explosions in Jiangsu. Locals expose military exercises preparing for attack on Taiwan. For days, the sky over Yancheng, Jiangsu, has cracked open. Car alarms go off in parking lots. Glass in living rooms has split. Fish in ponds jump as if the water itself were hit. There is still no formal explanation from the Chinese Communist Party. On August 28, the ex-account Luo Xiang posted a string of tips. Another blast that day. Drills every few days since mid-August. The sender's guess. Preparation for an attack on Taiwan. Domestic anger has already reached 100%. Power seizure and protests are imminent. China, one note said, is sliding into cultural revolution, too ordinary rage, plus a fight over who gets used. An earlier tip fixed the night of August 25. A single boom across the city. Pains gone in some houses. Exercises, they said, had run since August 16. When will this end? Video shows the air popping and a whole school of fish leaving the water at once. Luo Xiang wrote that the noise threw fish into the air and that broken glass is not a stunt. This could easily endanger lives. This is typical disregard for human life. A local posting as SSHBS described the sequence. A buildup in the air, like a deep thunder god. Then the crack. The sound traveled through the sky. He had never heard that winding up note. Are the exercises never going to end? Others read the shattered windows as proof of power, new guns or missiles under test. Night after night, the ground shakes. Officials, they said, play deaf and treat people like dirt. No bulletin. The right to know what is rattling the glass is being stepped on. Yangtze Evening News and NetEase caught the civic version on August 25. Moments and homeowners' chats lit up. A deep, muffled blast over a wide stretch of the urban district. Windows hummed. Five nights earlier, on August 20, two or more bangs that residents took for sonic booms did the same. Glass vibrating, roadside alarms screaming. Live fire is not a rumor on the water. The Yancheng Maritime Safety Administration posted a warning. August 28 to 37 to 11 a.m. And 3 to 7 p.m. Shooting in parts of the Southern Yellow Sea. Stay out. Whether those rounds are the same noise that hits the city is exactly what no one in office will say. A SENA mobile piece on the August 20 blasts, which noted live fire notices and navigation warnings off Yancheng, Lianyungang, and the Southern Yellow Sea has been pulled. That deletion is the statement. A coastal city can hear the sky for two weeks, lose glass, watch fish, leave the pond, and still get silence. Residents fill the gap themselves. Taiwan, new munitions, another political campaign. We value your perspective. Let us know your thoughts in the comments. If you found this report meaningful, please share it with others. Your support helps us continue delivering independent, fact-based analysis on global affairs. Subscribe and like to stay informed with Redwall. Thank you for watching.