This is a loaded question. come and see why, and hear my opinion on the best 3d printing infill options!
Like and Subscribe!
Send me a gwei! (ether address, all donations accepted!) 0x95F4EaB8A738F4F27e7c04aEe1E10C8E666C2D0c send me a satoshi! (bitcoin address, all donations accepted!) 31zvj8ybxVVTLw6nPvAHYqu3qDVhC1sRqk
Hey folks, TechNibbers here. We're back with another Cura Questions video. Today's topic,
what is the best infill for your 3D prints? Stick around because it's going to get pretty
interesting and I'm probably not even really going to answer this question.
Hey folks, welcome back to Cura Questions. Today's question is a little bit more open
to interpretation and the answer is going to be very much opinion-based and subjective,
meaning it's going to depend on the situation and the person in that situation
what they offer forward is the best. You'll notice here I do have a lot of walls in this print,
in this slice and there's a reason for that. I will talk about that in a few minutes. For right
now, you can notice I have the triangle infill on and it's not that I'm particularly attached
to the triangles. It's just what I happen to switch to when I slice this. The thing we're
going to talk about is benefits to using different infills. Okay, different infills don't really have
different purposes structurally. Now, there's some debate as to which infill is the strongest.
If you're trying to make a part that is the strongest part you can make and the answer
to that is always to print it at about 98% and make it almost completely solid. Now,
you don't want to do 100%. In most cases, that will overextrude but if you're going for a solid
part, just print it solid. It doesn't matter what infill you pick. It's not going to be
a very big strength difference and there are videos on this that will explain to you
exactly why that is. But today, I do want to touch on a few other things.
There are reasons, obviously, to print your objects with infill instead of using all the
filament it would take to fill the interior cavity of the whole object. Okay, so what are
the benefits to using different ones if you have to use them? Obviously, we're going to be using
infill. Why would I want to pick one in particular over the other? Well, that's basically going to
come down to the pathing and the design of that particular infill. So, some of these are pretty
simple like the grid and some of them are pretty complicated like the cross 3D and gyroid. Now,
they do look... not gyroid. Gyroid is pretty simple. It's just a wavy line in both directions.
Concentric can get difficult. Quarter cubic and both of the crosses actually are time intensive
for doing the lines and the longer the path is to draw that infill pattern in there,
the longer your print is going to take. Okay, so that brings me to my point on how I'm judging or
determining the best infill pattern to use and that is for my purposes. Again, I said this video
subjective. My purpose is when it comes to the infill in particular, I don't want to see the
infill when the model is complete. I do want it to be there in some cases and when I do, it doesn't
matter to me what the pattern is. Now, in some cases, when you print, if you don't have enough
walls, your infill pattern is going to show through the print object and that can be less
than ideal. So, in that case, you're going to want to increase your walls by one layer at a time
until that artifacting kind of disappears. So, then at that point, it really shouldn't matter
what your pattern is. Whatever is getting you your print the fastest and having a quality exterior
using the right amount of infill and everything. So, the purpose of all of these extra walls here,
now obviously, in most cases, you're not going to need to go that thick. With the infill,
a lot of them, four, five layers at the most will usually cover them up. Sometimes,
you can get away with three. Here, I have several turned on and the reason for that is
there are models that in most cases can be sliced without any infill whatsoever, okay?
That means you're just printing the shell of the model. It doesn't mean you have to fill it up 100%
completely. Check out Joel Telling's video on this. He printed a big Pikachu without any interior
filling. I think it was a Pikachu. And I know there's several other videos on it as well. In
fact, I have one here on my channel. I really feel like digging it out. It wasn't the best
video. But the information is there and you can actually print without the interior in most cases
if you increase the walls to between 8 and 10 or more. And what that does is it allows the interior
to be built up around the interior of the shell and generally, it'll print the last wall of the
outer wall last. So, it has the most structure to adhere to and you get some really nice models
this way. Now, you might run into a problem with super flat top surfaces doing this. But for
objects where you have models that are like even miniatures and have figurines or have heads at the
top or rounded objects like that, it works really, really well. Diablo here would actually be a
decent candidate to try it out with. Let's get out of the preview and see if it's less laggy.
There we go. So, if I were to print this without infill,
the only real problems I would run into might be a small spot right in here.
But for the most part, we'll go back to preview mode and we're going to scroll down through this
really slowly. I want you to look at the walls and notice that for the most part,
none of those walls are not touching the layer below them or just kind of hanging out in the
middle of nowhere. So, let's see here. Okay, and you can kind of see how it works. Now,
imagine without the infill there that you would just be getting these walls and that will leave
you with a completely hollow model. But in most cases, saving that plastic works really well and
you don't really necessarily need the infill. It's kind of just a waste of space. It's used
for structural support for the tops of overhang models that are super flat on top. Obviously,
you can't print on nothing. One of the other interesting things that can save you time and
filament if you're interested in trying out the no infill technique is variable infill. You can
set it to print different amounts at different heights. So, it'll basically go the cone upwards
like this. So, it's using very little at the bottom and then getting wider and wider on top
of that and then that'll support your spaces and that uses a lot less filament than a full infill.
Now, you are going to use full infill on a lot of your models and in that case, I encourage you to
play around with in particular the grid and the gyroid because the gyroid is pretty static no
matter what. It's two wavy lines that cross each other but it's very straightforward with the back
and forth and the pathing is quick. When you get to like the cross and cross 3D, your time is going
to take a lot more time because it's making an intricate pattern that you're never going to see.
As far as structural integrity, again, I touched on those videos that are out there that will go
over this and you can definitely check for some of those on YouTube but for the most part, you're
not going to notice any difference in part strength simply because the orientation of the part
is going to be more important to its strength than the infill because of the way that 3D printing is
anisotropic. It's simply one layer on top of another layer on top of another layer so if
there's a shearing force that goes against those layers, it'll rip them apart regardless of how
they're attached in the middle. Now, certain infill patterns may have more connection points inside
and reduce the damage but none of them are really going to make the actual item stronger than the
layer adhesion between two layers. I hope this was helpful to you. I'm sorry I didn't give you
a definitive answer for which one is the best. I do try them all. I like making time lapses of
some of the more longer and intricate ones but for the most part, go with grid or lines or even
triangles or the gyroid down there just to save yourself some time. Infill is not necessarily
needed at this point and as printers get better and faster, it's going to be less of a thing.
That's going to be it for this. Guys, if you have any Kira questions, leave them in the comments
down below. I am dragging my tongue through this. I feel like I can't talk. I've had a couple days
off. We had an unscheduled vacation from YouTube, if any of y'all heard about that. Leave a like,
hit subscribe. We'll see you in the next video. If you got questions, let me know.
Stick around, guys. I got another YouTube recommended video for you right here and if
you haven't already, subscribe, subscribe, subscribe. Make sure that you smash that
like button. We'll see you in the next one. Tech Nibbers out.