JK Rowling : Super Empath Blast

J.K. Rowling, Super Empath Blast. Hello, I'm H.G. Tueller. Those of you who've been following my work for some time know that in order to understand the narcissistic dynamic, I talk naturally about both narcissists, but also their prime victims, empaths. I categorize empaths into schools and cadres. There are four schools, standard, codependent, contagion, and super. They have similarities, they also have differences. It's often the case that many people think that they're super empaths because, well, it sounds rather cool. It's invariably the case that those individuals are not. Some are unaware narcissists that believe they're super empaths because their narcissism takes them in that deluded direction. In other instances, they are empaths and it's an honest error that they've made, but they're not of the super category. I've spoken about certain behaviors of the super empath, and two of those behaviors are the fact that the super empath, when dealing with the narcissist or other people, will draw a line in the sand whereby, enough's enough, thank you very much. And they tend to do that at a much earlier juncture in the interactions. In other words, they tend to suffer fools less gladly compared to other types of empath. It's also the case that the super empath is prone to lash out with the super empath last. Not the empathic supernova, that's something separate, but as part of not suffering those fools, the super empath will speak their brains. Now, that's not just the preserve of the super empath. Other empaths can do it, but you're more likely to find it, and you're more likely to find it occurring at an earlier stage in the interaction, and to occur with a greater level of directness and bluntness. It isn't because the super empath is unkind or nasty, but it is because they may well have higher narcissistic traits which become exposed as a consequence of the fact that the super empath is engaging with someone who's causing the problem. In a way, it's a little bit like that in their day-to-day dealings, they're pleasant, and they're kind, and they're honest, and they're compassionate. But then, if someone should cause them to be triggered, not in the sense of a meltdown or a breakdown, but quite simply that their behavior results in that individual finding that they are insulted, dismayed, irritated by someone's behavior, it's as if all of a sudden the walls part, and they are suddenly looking down the barrel of a rather large gun, and that gives them a blast. That is what occurs. And it would appear that this super empath blast is what has emerged in relation to a spat between J.K. Rowling and the actress, Bella Ramsey. You might be familiar with Bella Ramsey. She was in Game of Thrones and played a reasonable part there, and then had a larger part in Last of Us where she did face some criticism in relation to the injection of certain ideals, and also she faced criticism because of her appearance being likened to a potato. Whilst one evidently sees that that's somewhat unfair to make comments about her physical appearance, it's probably linked to the fact that she's another of those that can't keep a gob shut and spout shite. And it would appear that this is also something that has occurred in relation to her involvement with J.K. Rowling. It's appeared all over social media, and, as ever, I'll leave it up to you to make a determination as to its veracity and whether it's actually occurred, but apparently Bella Ramsey has criticised J.K. Rowling, suggesting that she has been involved somehow in stopping her getting roles. Yes. She's not offered any direct evidence of this occurring, and it seems to smack more of suspicion, circumstance and paranoia to believe that somehow J.K. Rowling is operating like some eminence grease moving in between the corridors of power and operating between the lines to somehow ensure that she wants to make sure that Bella Ramsey doesn't get any acting roles. Part of this relates to the suggestion that she wants to play Spider-Man, or, because she subscribes to the they-them nonsense, Spider-Them. One wonders if the song would be Spider-Them, Spider-Them, does whatever a Spider-Them can. Well, remains to be seen. It's probably more to do with the fact that she's wholly unsuitable for the role, but, of course, in the twisted mind of certain attention seekers, that can't compute, and therefore somebody must have it in for them. And, if these reports are correct, Bella Ramsey believes that J.K. Rowling has got it in for her. As reported across social media, Bella Ramsey has accused J.K. Rowling of using her influence to block her from major acting roles. She claimed that opportunities repeatedly disappeared without explanation, describing a pattern of cancelled callbacks and abruptly closed conversations. She framed the issue as an abuse of power, rather than a professional disagreement, declaring, you are using your power to eliminate me. Quite how she makes the connection isn't explained, either because this is utter nonsense and hasn't occurred, or she has made the allegation, but hasn't drawn any comparison or link herself as part of her raging paranoia. Again, you can make your own mind up about that. But it would appear that, if reportage is correct, that as a consequence of this allegation made by Bella Ramsey towards J.K. Rowling, J.K. Rowling's response was, stop using gender issues to polish your name. Your acting is like ----. J.K. Rowling exposed what she called Bella Ramsey's fake image, saying Bella should go study acting instead of making foolish displays on social media. Comments attributed to J.K. Rowling about Bella Ramsey spread quickly online, igniting debate about celebrity responsibility and respectful disagreement. Well, as you know, J.K. Rowling has a polarizing influence. She has certain detractors and many, many supporters. Whether this has actually occurred, you can make your own mind up. But if it did, it would appear that Bella Ramsey's observations, which don't appear to actually be grounded in reality, are an attack against J.K. Rowling. Rather than her just take it. The super empath that she is, and if you've not watched my analysis of J.K. Rowling as to what she is and why, I'd encourage you to do so, means that her emotional empathy for Bella Ramsey reduces as a consequence of this attack, meaning that the walls open and out comes the barrel of a gun, which stares straight at Bella Ramsey and is fired with the response, stop using your gender issues to polish your name. Your acting is like ----, direct to the point and no nonsense, which is commensurate with the day that J.K. Rowling invariably operates. Many people would form the view that if this has happened and is true, she's perfectly entitled to respond in such a way with regard to the gratuitous assault through words that has come from Bella Ramsey. But it is also indicative, if true, that J.K. Rowling once again responds in the manner of the super empath by giving someone a blast who evidently thoroughly deserves it and, as you can see in the thumbnail, fires the lightning to roast the potato. I'm H.G. Tudor. Thank you for listening.