Ex-CIA Agent Rates All The 'Mission: Impossible' Movies | How Real Is It? | Insider

Mission: Impossible
14 followers
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedFormer CIA officer Andrew Bustamante evaluates the realism of the *Mission Impossible* series, contrasting cinematic tropes with actual intelligence protocols. While praising certain physical stunts, he highlights significant inaccuracies in gear, tactical operations, and the daily reality of espionage, concluding that the films prioritize entertainment over authentic tradecraft.
Could somebody scale a building and infiltrate using, you know, a laser cutting glass thing?
Yes, it could be done, but no a**hole would do that in broad daylight.
My name is Andrew Bustamante and I am a former covert CIA intelligence officer.
I served with CIA for seven years in the National Clandestine Service
and now I'm the founder of Everyday Spy, where I teach spy skills to everyday people.
Today we're going to be looking at the Mission Impossible movies
and determining just how real they are.
So this, I think, is very apropos for the time,
because this was how we used to protect information.
They're downloading this NOC list, the NOC list.
It stands for non-official cover, meaning this is a list of assets and agents around the world
that are not protected by any kind of government cover backstopping.
You would have it on a standalone server in a standalone computer.
So they both have matching gloves on and that's not how it works in the real world.
In the real world, each individual part of a team has a completely different set of kit.
If they're captured separate from the operation, you don't want them to have matching kit.
Otherwise, that gives the police or the local law enforcement a chance to tie the two together.
Also, you'll see that Ethan is wearing a pair of glasses
and they're just normal glasses that hook over his ears.
In the real world, when you're on any kind of field operation,
you don't leave anything to chance.
His lenses would be custom made to fit his eyes,
but then they'd be actually strapped close around his face.
When it comes to this specific activity,
where Ethan is being lowered into a room from above,
we do learn how to belay each other.
We do learn how to work as counterbalances
and how to use some of these rope and pulley systems in different types of arenas.
The other thing that you see happening here is that
there's multiple people who are supporting Ethan.
You've got one person who's supporting him in the tech van,
and then you have another person who's actually belaying him from above.
Now, support elements are very realistic in spy operations.
You take away some of the little silly nuances.
I mean, this is a pretty solidly realistic representation
of what a field officer's capabilities are.
I would really give this about a 7 on a scale of 10.
Rock climbing is 100% a thing that CIA officers get into
because being alone is where we gather our energy,
we clear our minds, we get creative.
We might find ourselves in a position
where we would have to do this to escape out of a dangerous scenario.
So for those reasons, we do have advanced schools
to teach our officers how to do some pretty amazing things.
Even Ethan chuckles at that. Look at that.
So first, keep in mind that in the Mission Impossible movies,
Ethan Hunt works for an organization called IMF,
the Impossible Mission Force.
And the IMF is actually a contractor underneath the CIA.
If he was a full-fledged CIA officer,
he would not get a secret briefing or a classified briefing
anywhere except inside of a facility that houses
what's known as a SCIF,
Secure Compartmented Information Facility,
and most certainly not delivered through a shoulder-held rocket
from some strange guy in a helicopter.
That is, in our terminology, called a live drop.
You may select any two team members,
but it is essential that the third team member be Naya Nordol-4.
She is a civilian.
The fact that he's being given a team, that is very real.
Also, the fact that part of his team includes a professional thief,
not a professional intelligence officer.
That is also fairly accurate.
We oftentimes work with convicted felons
because felons and spies really aren't that different.
The difference is a spy is trained and given cover
and authority to break laws,
where a thief learns through the school of hard knocks.
This message will self-destruct in five seconds.
Nobody can think of Mission Impossible
without also thinking of that line that says,
this message will self-destruct.
Now, in real life, nothing self-destructs
because there has to be what's known as an audit trail.
In order for the government to be able to demonstrate
that they're spending those tax dollars
in a judicious and legitimate way,
I would give this about a seven in terms of accuracy
for how a true field operations officer
will go through essentially resetting themselves
before taking a new mission.
Spy cameras are something that has been
well-known about espionage for a long time.
But what people don't understand
is that the value of a spy camera
isn't necessarily in how it's concealed
as much as it's about the power
and accuracy of the camera itself.
The fact that in this clip,
we're seeing a hidden camera inside of a beauty mirror,
but when you actually see the quality of the camera image,
it's relatively low.
That's actually the opposite
of what I would expect to see in the real world.
So instead, what you would most likely see
is a very high quality camera inside something heavier.
Oh my gosh.
We all joined CIA so that we can do what Ethan Hunt does.
Let's be honest.
It is true that a prosthetic can be created from 3D modeling,
but it's not really true that that 3D modeling
is gonna come through some sort of custom built
piece of photographic equipment,
like the powder kit that the agent was using in this.
You need to have all of the right angles
and all of the right depth of field
from each of those angles
so that you can create a proper model.
That's called a principle
or the impersonation of a principle,
which is dangerous for lots of reasons.
Voice, behavior, tonality.
We don't ever impersonate a principle.
What we try to do is we try to impersonate someone
who's within the circle of trust of a principle.
That way, the only person that we're really trying to trick
is the principle themselves.
Having a full face prosthetic to be that principle,
the risk is just compounded.
I'm gonna have to give this one
about a three out of 10 for accuracy.
I mean, everything in this clip is wrong.
According to CIA training,
during this entire negotiation,
Ethan is pleading,
which reinforces that the principle is the one in control.
Control is an incredibly important thing
in an intelligence operation.
You always wanna be the one in control.
This is called a hostile negotiation.
We're actually given a very specific script.
We'll repeat our name.
We'll repeat our social security number.
We'll repeat our cover.
We'll repeat whatever core truths are relevant to us
in that operation,
which is actually what happens when you threaten somebody.
They really do oftentimes fall
to this base level repetition.
I didn't do it.
So we're trained to mimic that repeating pattern
so that it protects us from giving away information.
None of that is being used here by Ethan in this example.
The only way you're gonna get what you want
is for you to-
The trick to any negotiation,
you always wanna cause as much stress as possible
to the other person
because the person under stress
is going to make poor strategic decisions
through the process of that negotiation.
And unfortunately, as I watched this clip,
I'm rooting for the bad guy
because he's the one doing this right.
It's not what I would expect
from a trained intelligence operative.
But in terms of reality,
I mean, I'm gonna give this an eight
in terms of what a true hostile negotiation
between violent people would look like.
I really like the disguise in this much better
than some of the other disguise work that we've seen.
A simple prosthetic nose and mustache piece
is exactly what we would use and prefer to use
because it reduces the amount of what can go wrong
unlike a full head prosthetic.
He doesn't speak, which is very wise.
That is actually very accurate
when you're wearing prosthetics
or when you're trying to appear as somebody
with an advanced disguise,
you're not going to speak
because there's no reason to add that extra layer
of potential risk into your operation.
That kind of tech is extremely difficult to make.
It's just not realistic.
The cost, the time, the risk
is all too great to create tech like that.
And then surprisingly,
the thing that holds most tech back in the field
is actually just the availability of battery power.
The larger a piece of tech is,
the more battery it requires.
So as nice as it is to fold the whole thing up
into a briefcase,
the battery that would be required to run that thing
would be a second like wheeling suitcase.
Now what you see Ethan do
is he goes from his disguise,
he rips away parts of his disguise
and essentially now he looks like a tourist
instead of looking like a Russian general.
That technique is called a gap act.
Now the difference between how Ethan did it
and how we do it in the field
is Ethan did it in like plain sight.
That's a very high risk place to transform.
In the real world,
you would find a place
where you have 15 to 30 seconds
with nobody observing you at all.
You wouldn't just discard
your hat and fake nose on the corner
like you saw him do.
He just ripped it off
and threw it off to the side
because that leaves evidence.
Instead, your kit would include
everything is reversible,
including a reversible bag
so that you would leave no trace behind
that you ever changed in the first place.
Insolidated insurance.
How may I help you?
A lot of really interesting stuff.
He picks up that phone
and he calls a number.
That number is what's known
as a backstop number.
When you hear the phone pick up
and say such and such insurance company,
that is also what's known
as a verbal parole.
That's how Ethan knows
he's talking to the right phone number.
He gives his paroles
or what's known as bona fides.
That makes sure that the person
on the other end of the line
knows that they're talking
to the right person.
And then he disposes of the phone
here in this little sewer grate
where nobody can retrieve it.
The verbal parole, the bona fides
and the disposal is all very accurate.
The first half of the clip
with all the tech
and the disguise stuff up front,
I would give that more like a 3 out of 10
in terms of reality.
But the back end of the clip,
that's a much more realistic clip.
I would give that closer to a 6 or a 7
in terms of reality.
50% of his tech fails him
and he still has to figure it out anyways.
That is so awesomely real.
Now, when he takes the glove off
and he throws it over his shoulder,
again, we've talked about this, Tom.
We don't discard our equipment in the field
because it leaves a trail of evidence.
When the tech fails,
what he would really do
is he would stash it away in his belt.
Could somebody scale a building
and infiltrate using, you know,
a laser cutting glass thing?
Yes, it could be done,
but no asshole would do that
in broad daylight.
A spy's best friend
is the concealment of night.
And the fact that he's executing this operation
in broad daylight
in the United Arab Emirates,
it's just not accurate.
It's really important to understand
that all of espionage is illegal.
What happens is your government
sanctions you to carry out illegal acts.
Ethan could very much be prosecuted
by an Emirati judge
or any neighboring allied country
if they were to capture him
engaging in the act of espionage
on behalf of the United States.
So what you see Ethan doing here
is he's breaking into a server room,
most likely because he's
sabotaging the server itself.
Now, this is an example of what we call
a human-enabled technical operation.
So here, Ethan is using human skills
to enable a technical operation
that otherwise would have been much harder
or potentially not feasible at all
without a human element.
So I'm going to give this about a five
out of 10 for accuracy overall.
Action sequence here.
Okay.
One of the things I love the most
about car scenes is having been trained
in how to actually tactically
and offensively drive a car.
We're taught at the agency
to use our vehicle as a weapon
as much as we use it as a defensive tool.
Whenever it comes to any kind of vehicle,
you're never using the front of the vehicle.
When Ethan runs over the motorcycle
directly in front of him,
a real combat driver
would have moved to one side of the alley
in the hopes that they'd be able to nick
or push the rear tire of the motorcycle
out of position
so that the motorcycle would tumble
without blocking the car itself.
There are a number of
not natural vehicle movements.
Handbrake turns are real
and handbrake turns are very useful things.
However, to do a handbrake turn,
you need to be moving on gravel terrain
or on terrain that is loose
or with bald tires.
You have to loosen the whole car's grip
with the ground.
Not only that,
but you need to actually have compression
on one side of the car or the other
so that you would actually get
the spinning motion
that you see them have there.
Driving in reverse
is a super powerful way to drive
because it protects your front engine
and it turns all the space behind you
into essentially weaponized space.
However, there's only one gear
when you drive in reverse.
So you really max out
at about 25 miles an hour.
So you see them collapse on their trunk
and that's when their airbags deploy,
which isn't how it would work.
There are high-speed chases
in foreign operations overseas.
In reality, they would have been driving
much, much slower than that.
High speed is really more like
25 to 30 miles an hour.
Vehicles around the world
are basically built
so that those front airbags will deploy
when there's a collision
between 12 and 25 miles an hour.
So when they rear-end that motorcycle,
that would have been the end of the scene
because the airbags would have deployed.
That was not very accurate.
So I would give that probably
like a two or a three out of 10.
This is out there.
Oh my gosh.
Could an assassination
be scheduled in an opera?
Absolutely.
It wouldn't be the way
that it's portrayed in this scene.
You've got this weird
sort of triangle of shooters.
So you generally don't try
to get multiple weapons
smuggled into an access-controlled area
because if one of them is captured,
then the security is increased
for all the others.
Usually you would just try
to have one person in there
or even better,
you would pre-place one weapon
and have one person
be in charge of capturing
or liberating that pre-placed weapon.
The fact that each of these weapons
was individually crafted
to look like something else,
that is completely unrealistic.
When you create a weapon,
especially a high-accuracy weapon,
even just aligning
your targeting elements
with the actual barrel of the weapon
is extremely difficult.
So for that reason,
we would prefer to actually smuggle in
a fully functional weapon.
I would also say that,
you know,
the CIA experimented with these weapons
back in the 60s, the 50s,
the Cold War era.
Umbrellas that have been fabricated
to fire bullets, pens, lipsticks,
that's supposed to be carried out
in a natural course, right?
Like an umbrella is something
you would naturally point
on the way to, you know,
deploy it or open it.
You can see that they're trying to
cover some of the noise
that's coming from
these suppressed rifles.
Now it is possible to suppress rifles
up to a certain caliber,
but then there becomes
such a high caliber
that it just isn't feasible
to suppress it.
There's an incredible amount
of complexity here
that is well outside of the norm.
This is probably the worst performing
of all the clips
that we've seen so far.
I'm going to give this one
a generous 1 out of 10.
I owe CIA an eternal debt of gratitude
for teaching me
how much it honestly hurts
to get punched in a vulnerable spot.
We're trained in,
not even in mixed martial arts.
We're really trained
in a very simple
kinetic fighting system
that's designed
so that we don't get captured.
So one of the things
I really enjoyed about this scene
is that they highlighted
those vulnerable spots.
We saw a throat punch.
We saw using a briefcase
to hit somebody across the temple.
We saw solar plexus punches.
We saw solar plexus kicks.
Now some of the places
where it didn't really work,
how quickly people recovered
really only takes
one or two key strikes
before you are done.
The other thing I didn't really like
was both Ethan and his co-fighter
were taking turns.
We're specifically trained
not to take turns
when you're two on one an opponent.
That's something
that happens in the movies.
You both attack at the same time
to overwhelm your opponent.
Ethan just grabs the guy
and runs him into a wall.
There's the struggle
over the handgun at the end
and there's this resisting.
We're taught that
whenever there's a moment
of resistance like that,
you change tactics, right?
You steer the muzzle
away from yourself.
You use that as a chance
to break out of those locked moments
so that you can get back
to a place of tactical dominance.
I would give this probably
a four out of 10 for reality.
This is an interesting scene.
If Ethan is undercover
and the police officer
is not associated
with his cover operation,
he's not going to save her.
When you're undercover,
your mission takes priority
over everything.
So there's a couple of things here.
When the scene first starts,
how many weapons are pointed at Ethan?
None of them.
He would do a quick draw
and then he would actually go in order
of the other drawn weapons.
So he would shoot
the gentleman close to him.
He would shoot the guy on the right,
the guy on the left,
and then the guy with his hand
on his waistband last.
Not only that,
but when Ethan actually attacks,
he does one majorly wrong thing
as he continues to fire.
One, two, three,
all without moving.
Movement is the first thing
that we're taught
in any kind of counter-attack situation.
So Ethan would have actually moved
more like four to five feet.
So he would have shot,
shot again,
continued to move,
shot again, shot again.
So the fact that Ethan
waited so long to shoot
and then shot all four folks
from the same,
essentially, one foot area
kind of shows how this was made
for a camera
and not made for reality.
A really solid seven
in terms of reality.
And this is why nobody talks
about Mission Impossible.
You know, Tom Cruise did that stunt
and he didn't just do it once.
He did it multiple times
to get everything right.
CIA teaches us how to ride
a number of different
types of vehicles, right?
From four-wheel vehicles,
two-wheel vehicles,
motorized vehicles.
And the idea that, you know,
you would drive a perfectly
good motorcycle off a cliff,
that's not something
we're trained to do.
And then to be able
to deploy a parachute
and essentially base jump
from a motorcycle,
the battery is just thick
and it's awesome.
I would give this a 10.
That is a real man
riding a real motorcycle
off of a real ramp
into the air.
In the real world,
there is no Ethan Hunt.
For the most part,
a lucky CIA career
will have one moment of excitement
that even comes close
to what Ethan does.
One explosion,
one high-speed car chase,
one border crossing
where your disguise works.
My favorite spy show
is actually season one
of The Americans
because season one
of The Americans
was really an excellent example
of what true espionage looks like.
They kind of built that foundation
around real tradecraft,
real relationships,
deep cover.
If you enjoyed this video,
make sure you click
on the link above
to get the next.
