Somehow JK Rowling Returned

Now that we're no longer going down my random freaking rabbit hole of, yeah, possible neurodivergence, and that's not the book I'm writing, that's also a rabbit hole of possible neurodivergence. If you want me to talk about the book I'm writing, then that's something I can do on a different episode. But, I mean, Chapter 1's made. I could maybe make the draft of that available to people if they wanted to read it. Anywho, anywho, speaking of books written by ostensible authors. Also, guys, Pernia may be in the process of working on a new channel playmat. For those of you who like Riftbound or League of Legends, this one will maybe speak to you when it is released. We'll see. We shall see. Alrighty. Oh, I see. I understand. So, yeah, speaking of people who are ostensibly authors, J.K. Rowling. Because, you know, that statement has never gone sideways before. J.K. Rowling issues, according to LGBTQ Nation, a surprising message of support for trans adults. Guys, can we make some predictions? What does a surprising message of support for trans adults look like? What does that sound like to you? Let's take some guesses real quick. I don't know in the comments section below, but, like, realistically. So, is her HBO series tanking? Now, it does note here, her message doesn't make up for her continuous financial support of the anti-trans movement, which is, yeah. Also, Sylvie, thank you for gifting tier 1's up to Taryn. J.K. Rowling, I don't think you should die. All right. Transphobic billionaire, Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling, issued an exceedingly rare statement of support for transgender. And let's go ahead and point out where the line is for her. Transgender adult and gender affirming care yesterday. Regardless, her comment doesn't make up for her continued anti-trans activism. In a response to a now-deleted comment on Twitter, Rowling wrote on August 19th, I've always believed that adults with intractable gender dysphoria may only find peace after surgery and taking hormones. I'm glad you're happy. Okay, so, um, ignore the random Bogwitch voice that I gave J.K. Rowling because that would be an insult to Bogwitches. Realistically, let's parse that statement out. 1. It's a little transmedicalist. It's a little transmed. It's like the most backhanded way of saying, maybe it's okay if you get gender affirming care. The mold is getting to her. It's a very backhanded way of granting gender affirming care. So, I've always believed that adults with intractable gender dysphoria, so, is not counting people who are trans through experiencing gender euphoria. She's only counting people who are trans due to suffering, which is not all trans people. There are people who are trans because being trans is simply your gender identity not matching with the thing you were assigned at birth. Dysphoria often correlates with it, but it is not always the case. Sylvie, thank you for giving me tier 1 sub to Clueless. Despite this and her past statements supporting gender affirming care for adults, she opposes allowing adult trans women into sex segregated spaces like women's restrooms, prisons, and abuse shelters. So, she's okay with you getting your titty skittles, but she would also like to statistically increase the chances that you get raped in a prison cell. Check this out. I want you to understand how pro-rape of trans women this actual series of thought processes are. Check it out. If you are not okay with trans people going to the women's bathroom, then, inadvertently, the trans woman has to go to the men's bathroom. Now, in the men's bathroom, there is a higher chance that she will be sexually assaulted because by saying the trans woman shouldn't go into the women's bathroom, you are automatically saying that there is a chance that men will try to rape women in a bathroom. So, by putting a woman in the man's bathroom, especially when her definition of woman that is trans is somebody who would pass, basically, you've increased the chances that person gets raped. What's the alternative? She goes to the woman's bathroom anyway, and you want to make that illegal so she ends up going to jail. Well, guess what? We know what V-coding is. We know what happens when a trans woman is in a prison and is not allowed to be in the women's part of the prison. She is instead told to be in the men's part of the prison. V-coding is when there is a very, very aggressive inmate, and to placate him, a trans woman is gifted to him by the prison guards. Now, all of this is obviously off the record. This is not something that you're going to find, generally speaking, somebody saying, yes, our policy is to find the most attractive trans woman and give them to the guy who's going to punch through concrete walls tomorrow if he doesn't get his fix. However, you can definitely go online and listen to some stories of trans women who have experienced V-coding and will tell you exactly what the **** happens. So we know statistically the chances of this person who you are trying to stop from getting hurt goes up when they go into the bathroom that you say they should be going to. And if they go to the other bathroom, they go to the prison where they will also have a higher chance of being harmed. I don't know how to tell this to you, but in every world, this is a position that reductio ad absurdum boils down to pro-rape of trans women. Now, obviously, there's other parts of this that need to be considered as well. The fact that if you are worried about women's safety in a bathroom and women feeling safe in a bathroom and a burly barrel chested ******* beard down to the groin guy walks in, says, my name's Dale and I've got a big meaty. And if you've watched Dragon Ball Z abridged, you know exactly where this joke is going. This is somebody who is a trans man, actually. And this trans man will trigger every single ******* fight or flight response from the cis woman in the restroom. You've basically created all the same ******* problems you were trying to avoid. You've just made it to where only the people who are in the gendered minority are actually suffering here. And also, no, there's a concerted effort to keep trans women out of women's prisons by people like JK Rowling. Anyway, the rhetoric vilifies trans women as dangerous sexual predators and encourages violence against them to protect women, even though Rowling has also admitted the majority of trans identified people not only pose zero threat to others, but are vulnerable. Ah, yes, these people pose zero threat to people. That's why I want to engineer the scenario where they will get hurt. Behold, the genius of a woman who can't write a book outside of the first seven she made about a wizard. Okay. Said Joanne is dangerous to the public. And then, of course, we have morals of moral chatter speaking in Spanish, thinking that I'm not going to run their ---- through a translator. Maybe people are tired of the crap about trans people. Ah, yes, I see. You too are also pro-rape because in response to, hey, trans women have a higher chance of getting raped in these scenarios. So why would we let that happen? You go, well, maybe people are tired of the trans thing. Ah, cool. Congratulations, you're a rapist. Because what do you call a rape enabler? Also a rapist. Thank you. I didn't need to out you. You outed yourself. Weird. Congratulations, you're a ******* idiot. Rowling opposes gender self-identification laws that let people change their legal sex without a medical diagnosis. Again, just saying. There are plenty of trans people who are trans because of gender euphoria, not dysphoria. But such opposition forbids anybody from identifying as trans without first having financial and physical access to gender-affirming doctors. Guess what? The conservative parties, like the right wing of Labour because Labour is increasingly getting taken over by right wingers. And of course, every other actually named conservative party in the UK right now is actively trying to defund the NHS. And by actively trying to defund the NHS, you force people to rely on private medical. And when you force people to rely on private medical, they have to pay out of pocket. Maybe you'll have to pay out of pocket for private medical. You decrease the amount of trans people who are able to actually get these diagnoses in the first place. So you're basically doing everything in your power to make it to where life is worse for trans people, but then saying, but I'm OK if they get titty skittles and look girl enough. Like, man, you understand that there is little difference between a non-passing trans woman and a not traditionally attractive cis woman who has PCOS. Like, if you had one of those people who like has the screen name, I am the clockinator. This person would not be able to tell the difference. Rowling is also outright denies the existence of trans children. Ma'am, what do you think grows up into a trans adult? Saying there's no trans kids, no child is born in the wrong body. Ah, yes, but magically Now they are weird. This is like saying no child experiences migraines. Only adults experience migraines. Once the body recognizes that it has hit the arbitrary age at which we have decided adult happens. This is now a migraine and no longer just something I'm trying to use as an excuse to get out of school. Don't worry, though. It's still an excuse for you to get out of work. So we're going to belittle you that way. Anybody, anyway. Now, I'm sure there's some weird, thirsty child predator libertarian in my chat. Well, hopefully not in my chat. If you are out yourself so I can ban you who heard arbitrary age and immediately got a stiffy, do yourself a favor. If you are that person and I want you to find a bridge and look longingly out into the middle distance and figure out what the **** you did with your life and turn it around. What did you think I was going to tell them to do? God, morbid motherfuckers. Anyways, in a July 2020 post, she called gender-affirming treatment for young trans people a new kind of conversion therapy, except it's not. J.K. Rowling uses her fortune to fund anti-trans legal attacks. Yep, she uses her vast wealth mostly accumulated through the success of Harry Potter and its many multimedia spinoffs to personally fund legal cases aimed at diminishing rights and protections for transgender women in the UK and Ireland. A spokesperson for Rowling confirmed that the author's J.K. Rowling Women's Fund, which, oddly enough, is worded like jerk-off, has been quietly operating since 2024, managing her ongoing financial support for legal cases involving women's rights and girls' sex-based rights, which is, of course, trying to deny trans people access to these things. The fund is just her latest effort to end trans rights in the UK. In February 2024, she pledged a 70,000 euro, which is fake money for $89,000 for Women's Scotland, the anti-trans organization behind the legal challenge that resulted in the UK Supreme Court's ruling that excluded trans women from the court's country law prohibiting sex-based discrimination. Said pound, not euro. Ah, you're right. I forgot. They excommunicated themselves from the Church of Europe. Since late 2024, she has also used jerk-off to offer financial legal support to cisgender women, who have, quote, lost their livelihoods or are facing tribunals due to their anti-trans beliefs. Ah, yes. I'm so pro-trans person that I am protecting and helping and aiding and abetting the people who are actively harming other trans people. Exo says, Pound! Like what I did to your mom? Oh my god. God, I love when I'm reminded of just incredibly good memes. Excuse me? Are you British? Yes, papa. Oh, no. Oh, no, no, no, no, no. The only pounds I need are me pounding your mom. Anywho. The way I already knew what it was. I mean, look. Very simple. I'm a very simple man. Anyways, um, I don't know why, but I don't want to talk about JK Rowling right now. So here's more Hatsune Miku. By the way, Hatsune Miku wrote Harry Potter and you can't prove otherwise. All Mikus are canon. The Miku that survived a bomb is in fact canon. Which means she would be the only one surviving if we decided to do a, you know, just the thing we did in the World War again. Hatsune Miku would survive it. So, you know. Great. Fantastic. New horror unlocked. Anyways. Rowling will serve as an executive producer for the HBO series. Casey Boyes, HBO's gay CEO, has repeatedly dismissed concerns about her toxic transphobia, saying that she's entitled to her personal political views. And if you want to debate her, you can go to Twitter. I mean, so. On the one hand, I want to say, hey, maybe you should stand up to her. At the exact same time, I understand that capitalism does a capitalism and says that, hey, maybe I should be protecting my financial interests instead of doing the morally right thing. If you ever want to know why I'm a socialist, not a capitalist, this is exactly the **** why. See here, according to The Guardian, the Harry Potter franchise is worth $25 billion. In May 28, a Blue Sky Post British barrister, John Mogum, wondered how much of Rowling's fortune would be spent oppressing minority groups. She didn't like. So I'm glad I saw this post on Blue Sky and I saw a bunch of people jumping on it, saying like, oh my God, what the **** is vanity or not Vanity Fair, but LGBT Nation doing? What the **** is wrong with them for posting this article? And look, I'm sorry to tell you that Blue Sky is made up of a bunch of ******* Facebook moms. They do the same goddamn thing as Facebook moms, where they just read the title of an article and then don't do anything else. And then either post their support or being against the article based on the title alone. My God. Anywho, I saw this on there and went, OK, I'm going to read the article, see what it actually says. And it turns out it's completely against her, which, you know, it should be because most moral people are against JK Rowling. If you want to watch the HBO series, I'm just going to say right now, the high seas exist. That is an option. I'm also going to say I think there are other ways we should be stealing money from JK Rowling. I wish we could force hemorrhaging money out of her the same way that we're able to do with ******* LLMs. But, you know, maybe don't watch the series on HBO. Maybe don't give them the traction that tells them that the show is functioning over there. Let the one guy that wants to watch the show and pirate it to actually support JK. I don't know if you saw that Hogwarts Legacy, the one person who was like the biggest JK stand, but like stole the game and made it available to everybody for some reason. That was weird. Let that person pirate it and do what they will. But maybe maybe don't give them the numbers they need. That post the complete audio book on YouTube that I misheard LLM and hurt MLM the first time and I thought pyramid schemes than Yowie that would account of stealing money if I play my landlord's thing of Hogwarts Legacy from Steam family sharing. Genuine question. I mean, I don't think that borrowing a video game is stealing money. I mean, taking her net worth from $25 billion down to $25. That's what I want. That's what I think would need to happen. But, you know, that one probably not happening. Anyway, we're going to go ahead and translate the words done by a person who inadvertently came out in favor of rape of trans people. I guess the political party that never seems to work in real life, no matter how many you get a sound and how good you make it sound in theory. Boy, howdy. I wonder if socialism is something you can actually define. I wonder. Because, like, the idea of workers owning the means of production has been done several ******* times to success. And all socialism is is that. But everywhere, a worker co-op does, in fact, work. Therefore, taking a worker co-op, taking that idea and expanding it out. There is no reason that shouldn't work at scale. But go ahead and keep being the person that said, no, it never works. I will never define what it is, but it never works. Mwa ha ha. Or whatever the **** you do. I don't know. I'm making you sound like a weird villain child. And I feel like maybe that's an insult to villains and also children. And again, J.K. Rowling is an insult to women. So, you know, what are you going to do? Hey, you made it to the end. I want to give an extra thanks to the patrons who allow me to do this full time. I want to thank Aaron Rail, Astral, Ritzkrieg, Jemption, Poundini, Red Joker, Victoria, Jonas, Craig, Tariqa, Fire Shard, Smiling GM, John, Dren Hadamada, Creeper, Sajita, you know, I'm not saying that last part. Sylvie Snow, Valus of Serath, Ottoman Angel, Rooster Rachel and Fire Panda, who are all my $20 and up patrons.