Suburban Chicago residents push back against Flock license plate cameras

Fox - 32 Chicago
8 followers
2 Video Views·Aug 17, 2026
AI Generated·May contain errors
People are pushing back against surveillance technology and their
neighborhoods. Flock cameras, boy they have become the talk of the town. They
read the license plate of every passing vehicle. Oftentimes officers use that as
a main tool when they're trying to solve crimes. Warrenville residents though say
they are concerned about block cameras and their privacy. Gabriella Primus is
joining us now and Gabby they plan to bring those concerns to City Council
tonight. Yeah Natalie and I was about to say you might have heard of these
cameras at home because they're gaining national attention even here in
Chicagoland. A lot of other suburban towns are talking about this. Like you
said, community members in Warrenville are rallying those concerned neighbors
to show up at City Council meeting tonight and demand an end to these
automatic license plate reader cameras in 2022 and again in 2023 Warrenville
approved contracts with a company called Flock Safety to install 14
cameras along major state and county routes. Organizers claim those original
deals were approved by City Council with very little notice or public or input
from the public. They point to a non appropriation clause in the city's
contract that would allow Warrenville to walk away without major financial
penalties. They argue the cameras are an overreach of government surveillance
and that infringes on personal privacy. So far 14 people have RSVP as going to
the meeting and 65 are interested. Now while flaw cameras are not explicitly
on tonight's formal City Council agenda, city officials are well aware of the
growing pushback in a recent post. The city and police department defended the
program calling the cameras an essential investigative tool to catch
criminals entering or leaving town. Officials emphasize that the cameras
only take still images of vehicles, not continuous video or audio and do not
use facial recognition technology. Police also note that data is deleted
after 30 days. So we reached out to the city of Warrenville to find out whether
the council will be discussing flaw cameras tonight, but we have not heard
back just yet. But the opposing group does tell us they still plan to attend
the meeting now. Yeah, I was discussing this with a law enforcement officer
downstate over the weekend and you know, I said, what's the deal with these
flock cameras? And he indicated that in their jurisdiction, like 90% of the
homicides, Gabby, that they have solved really been because of these flock
cameras kind of triangulating a person's whereabouts and connecting them
to the crime, which I thought was interesting. But the issue isn't
necessarily our police, you know, going to be pouring over this data and
determining where you were at what time. It's that third party that you
mentioned that flock organization or business. No one knows what happens to
the data once they get it and could they potentially sell that data for
profit and where would it go? And I was like, okay, that makes sense. I didn't
realize that itself was the issue. Yeah, I mean, it's obviously causing a lot
of conversation around our area. And like I said, there's other suburban
towns that are looking into this too. There's a growing list. Maybe I can
mention that in my next report here about some other municipalities that
are that are looking into getting rid of the flock cameras that they didn't
necessarily know were in their community. Interesting. Okay, Gabrielle
Primus live in the newsroom. Thank you, Gabby. And we'll have more good day
Chicago when we come back.
