The 3 CRINGE Moments That LOST Andrew Wilson The Debate To Candace Owens!

Charlie responded with this, okay, great. Remind them that they are there for one person's security only because I'm somewhat worried the left is trying to kill me. That was a message sent September 9th. But he was not messaging people the day before saying, I'm gonna be murdered, they're coming after me, someone's going to kill me. He didn't say that. And I have his cell phone. Andrew Wilson, if you look at it with an objective mind that quote-unquote debate, it wasn't a debate. It was more of an argument because he kept interrupting her. It was like he was arguing with her instead of debating her. And he had to do that because he didn't have a leg to stand on. And so that's his great debate tactics. If you noticed, his debate tactics was to deflect and then pivot to something else and distract from the actual issue that they were talking about. He did that through the whole thing and he just kept interrupting and hectoring. And it was clear to me that that was his big debate tactic was to interrupt Hector. And he's great, his real talent is to deflect from what you're supposed to be talking about into something else and to put the onus on you. And so let's remember the onus was never on Candace to present a theory of who killed Charlie Kirk. The onus is on him because he believes in the narrative that the FBI, that's what he's pushing. Now, what all Candace has to do is poke holes in that narrative to show that it doesn't make sense. And that's why she's doing an investigation online to try to get evidence of who actually did it. So he tried to flip the burden of responsibility and I don't think she fell for it. At first, the first hour of the debate, I hated it because it felt like they were getting caught up in minutia. Like they talked about his tweet where he said overwhelming evidence. It turns out that wasn't a bad thing to talk about because he said there's overwhelming evidence. And then he said, I'm 75% to 80% sure that it was him, which I think is the legal definition of reasonable doubt. So that's not overwhelming. That is reasonable doubt. So, and he kept saying, well, that's what I conclude. That's not, that's your, that's like your opinion, man. That's not overwhelming evidence. Overwhelming evidence is a hundred percent and that anybody looking at it would conclude that. So anyway, I just wanted somebody who's this GLM or something tweeted this out about his foot. You could tell that he was crapping his pants the whole time because he knew, he didn't know anything about the case almost. He knew very, like he knew that Candace knew it backwards and forwards and he didn't. So he reveals that he's a lazy debater. He didn't prepare. And his foot will tell you that. Oh, you got to pull in here. Watch your ears, folks. Watch your ears. Is it on? Definitely not do it at all and be fine, right? But you still do. I would say that you are making a comparison that cannot be compared because Erica's husband was just assassinated in front of the world. Which makes sense. Why should we take the organization? No, it makes sense why you would go home to your kids. Just so you know. Wait a second. That's bizarre. So that's what he did through the entire, if you saw it, it was four hours. He did that probably for three and a half hours straight. If you condensed all the times his foot was doing that. Definitely not do it at all and be fine, right? But you still do. I would say that you are making a comparison that cannot be compared because Erica's husband. And somebody tweeted out, dude, I'd like to play poker with you. I think I know your tell. So that was great. But I want to show you there's three glaring cases of how you know Andrew Wilson is a shill and didn't believe anything he was saying. And that he's saying this for money because he got paid by TPUSA to go teach them how to debate. Remember we showed you that tweet of his. I haven't received any money from TPUSA minus the money they gave me to teach them to debate. I haven't been paid by TPUSA except for all the money they gave me under the guise of teaching them to debate. Hey, we're going to bribe you. We're going to give you some money to go out and push this false narrative to try to discredit Candace Owens. And we'll say that we're paying you to teach us to debate. So they can't really connect it to that we're paying you to go out and do a false narrative to try to discredit Candace Owens. How does that sound? And of all the jamokes in the world to try to get to bolster your case, Andrew Wilson is the last guy. He really got, at first, the first hour I was upset because he was distracting her and talking over her. And Patrick Beck David, who is a very strong character, I thought he would moderate more. He should have stopped Andrew from interrupting constantly and said, hey, Andrew, let Candace speak, and then you speak. That's just ---- about, you know when you ever see people play chess and they have the timer? Like you each get, so if it's going to be a four hour debate, you each get two hours. And then when you talk, you hit yours. And then when the other person wants to talk, they hit theirs. And nobody can talk at the same time. Just like chess players can't move it to their pieces at the same. And that's how it should have been. And I was hoping that Patrick Beck David would say, hey, Andrew, stop the, whoa, whoa. If you don't let her talk and you keep interrupting her and hectoring her, then it's not a debate, it's an argument. It's we're watching two people argue, which is what most of it was because he kept interrupting and hectoring her and trying to distract from what Candace actually was trying to say. So I'm going to show you three instances that completely reveal Andrew Wilson to be a horrible debater and be a shill because he contradicts himself, tells blatant lies and then gets caught not knowing anything about the topic he's debating. So the first one is this. So he came on and he claimed to have a text that Charlie Kirk gave the night before he was killed that he said the leftists were trying to kill him. And I'm going to show you immediately why this is a lie, but let's watch. Share the message with you today, which is the first time this information has ever been publicly revealed. So according to him, TPUSA has been sitting on this text message, not the text message where he said he had to leave the Israel cause and that the Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes and he won't be bullied and he can no longer support the Israel cause. No, not that one. They let that one out, but this one they kept hidden up until almost a year later for some reason until Dilwad Shill decided to go and debate Candace Owens. So he's lying about this and I'll prove it to you, but let's watch. So this is the quote unquote text he claims he got from TPUSA that was on Charlie's phone. Ready? Here we go. Share the message with you today, which is the first time this information has ever been publicly revealed. On September 9th, Charlie's security team wrote to him. Yes, law enforcement has been fully supportive and agreed to a security plan and posture. Tomorrow's event will be covered by both my team and the campus PD. If additional support is required, patrol units will be available. I have 11 on site. Charlie responded with this. Okay, great. Remind them that they are there for one person's security only because I'm somewhat worried the left is trying to kill me. That was a message sent September 9th. Okay, so Jimmy, why do you say that he's lying about that? Well, because Erica Kirk completely contradicted him when she went on Glenn Beck's show right after the assassination. So I think who put this together? Dissident media put this together. So watch this and hang on to your phone because here we go. Charlie responded with this. Okay, great. Remind them that they are there for one person's security only because I'm somewhat worried the left is trying to kill me. That was a message sent September 9th. September 9th, the day before he was murdered, he was texting people he was afraid he's going to get murdered by the left. Well, according to Erica Kirk, who has his phone, she says this. But he was not messaging people the day before saying, I'm gonna be murdered, they're coming after me, someone's going to kill me. He didn't say that. And I have his cell phone. I guess King Dipshit didn't know that she said that. And nobody at TPUSA told him, hey, don't pretend to have these texts because Erica already said that she had his phone and he wasn't texting people the day before that he was afraid he was going to get murdered. You want to watch this again? Because this is- Charlie responded with this. Okay, great. Remind them that they are there for one person's security only because I'm somewhat worried the left is trying to kill me. That was a message sent September 9th. But he was not messaging people the day before saying, I'm gonna be murdered, they're coming after me, someone's going to kill me. He didn't say that. And I have his phone. And I have his cell phone. So it just blew up in their face. So the whole mission of TPUSA sending master debater, Andrew Wilson, who is not a master debater. If you saw that thing, he's a master at deflection, distraction, hectoring, and deflection. He's not a master debater. He's not. And that proves it. And that proves how lazy he was in getting prepared for this debate. There's another clip that shows that too. But he was then, and I'll show you that in a second. But the next thing I want to show you related to this clip is in his opening statement, he said this. Words, they don't have evidence. They seem to just make up evidence. And what did they make up? Well, in my opinion, kind of whatever lined the pockets. And I think it's ghoulish to profit off of the death of a good man. He's saying his opponents make up stuff, whatever lines their pockets, whatever makes them money. And he thinks it's ghoulish to profit off the death of a good man. So now remember that text message he pretended that Charlie Kirk sent the night before he died that Erica Kirk said he didn't? Well, boy, you think they would have coordinated a little better. How bad is TPUSA in public relations? You think they would have coordinated a little better on this. But now he's asked to show that text. Hey, you're reading it off your phone. Can we see it to make sure it's real? And here's what he says. I think that's important for the public. You shared it out of context. I'll do it on my show. I'll share the text. So you're gonna read it on my show, but not show it? Correct. Okay. I'll show it on my show, but that's what I'll do. I'll show it on my show. Can I ask why? Well, because I wanna drip out the evidence, you know. That's gotta drip out that evidence, keep people coming back for the show, right? So he wants to use the text of Charlie Kirk saying he was gonna get murdered so he could get views on his show, which means make money off the death of a good man. Let's remind you what he just said. And I think it's ghoulish to profit off of the death of a good man. But here he is admitting he's going to profit off the death of a good man. And he didn't show it, by the way, because it's made up. But let's watch it again. Let's watch him completely contradict himself. Do you hear that? I think that's important for the public. You shared it out of context. I'll do it on my show. I'll share the text. So you're gonna read it on my show, but not show it? Correct. Okay. I'll show it on my show, but that's what I'll do. I'll show it on my show. Ask why? Well, because I wanna drip out the evidence, you know? That's gotta drip out that evidence, keep people coming back for the show, right? I don't know if- How much more evidence do you need to know that this guy is low IQ, a bad debater, and a lazy preparer? He didn't prepare. And a liar, because that shows he's a liar. Erica Kirk, 100%. So either Erica Kirk is lying or he's lying. Put it that way. And then Candace figured it out right away, right? What's your- I'm not gonna use it, but I'll drip out that evidence, keep people coming back for the show. And then Candace says- I don't know if snark serves you so well. And it would have been nice if she had caught that in real time. Like, hey, didn't you say in your opening that it's ghoulish to profit off the death of a good man? But here you are saying you're gonna profit, you're not gonna show us this because you wanna use Charlie Kirk's apparent text the night before he died, saying he was gonna get murdered. You wanna use that so you can profit off the death of a good man. So, okay. So now let's see. Let me see what this is. Okay. So this goes to show you how little he actually knows about the case, how little he prepared for this debate, which was actually more of an argument because he kept hectoring her, interrupting her and trying to distract her and control the conversation. And he was trying to bully her and she would not be bullied, which was great. And so let's watch this. This shows you exactly what Candace says that you don't really care about this and you don't really know anything about it. Let's watch. Yeah, I'm fine with closings if you wanna do closings. I also would just, if I may ask a question, which one of the charges against, or all of them, do you think Tyler Robinson is guilty of? The specific charge? Specific charge? Is there a difference between the charge and a specific charge? You mean the thing I don't know? And by the way, he had his hand out on his face the whole time and his foot was going a million miles an hour, which tells that he's nervous and crapping his pants. And then he makes up stuff like, you mean the specific charge? Because he knows he doesn't know. And so let's watch. Yeah, I'm fine with closings if you wanna do closings. I also would just, if I may ask a question, which one of the charges against, or all of them, do you think Tyler Robinson is guilty of? The specific charge? Yeah. Yeah, so I think, what I think, is that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kerr. Yeah, that's not a charge. That's not a specific charge. That's not a vague charge. That's not a charge. And Candace calls him out. Yeah, but of the seven charges that he's being charged. Yeah, can we list them real quick? I'll tell you exactly which ones. We'll pull them up. Oh, sure. Well, do you know any of the charges that he's up for right now? Yeah, of course, but I wanna make sure. Yeah, of course I do. So he's lying because he doesn't know any of them. He doesn't know any of them. He didn't read the charging documents. Didn't read them. And she catches him. Watch this. And then watch him try to, this is what makes him a great debater, is you're gonna see that he's good at trying to deflect, distract, and pivot, and change the subject, and put the onus back on the person, even after he's been exposed as not knowing anything. That, watch, this all happens right now. Watch. But we have them listed. Yeah, but, like, that's, can you name one? Because my general perspective is that you don't actually care about this case. Is that it? That's the question? You're just not following? And he's trying to laugh it off, because guess what that is? He knows it's true, that he doesn't actually care about the case, or know anything about it, and she's going to expose it. Only gonna know? It seems pretty, like, if you're gonna engage, and you're gonna say the evidence is overwhelming that Tyler Robinson is guilty, I just think that you should, can you tell me one charge that he's- Then let's do the counter. You can really, yeah, no, this is a great, gotcha. No, no, no, you just got to ask me, play clips out of context, put me in the hot seat, so please just answer the question. Name all seven since you've been following the case. So do you see how he tries to turn it back on her? Because he knows he doesn't know. So he's like, okay, go ahead, name all seven. No, no, no, she asked you if you knew. And he goes, okay, go ahead, name all seven. Do you see, so that's where he becomes, that's his skill as a debater. Not to actually debate facts and win, but his skill is to deflect, pivot, distract, and try to control and turn it back on the other person. But she doesn't fall for it. Let's watch. Okay, sure, you name one. Yeah, you name all seven. I'm happy to do that, but can you name one? I think he's been charged with murder. That's actually incorrect. Okay, great, now name all seven. So she just exposed that he doesn't know any of them, and he tries to very quickly, this is his debate tactic, tries to, okay, so go, okay, now you name all seven. Whoa, whoa, she just exposed, you just admitted, revealed that you don't know any of them, which is what she said, which actually proves her point that you don't actually care about this case, that you're doing this for money, that you're a shill because you got paid by TPUSA to take their point of view and try to discredit Candace Owens. That's what just got revealed 100% right there. And he doesn't want it, he doesn't, he's trying to distract you from what just happened and trying to put it back on her. That's his great debate, master debating technique, and she sees right through it, so let's watch. Doesn't even, this is like- Name all seven. And I- Can you name all seven? I can't. Then do it. The first charge is aggravated murder because that's what carries a death sentence in the state of Utah. Okay, so murder, next. No, that's not, that is literally- So he goes, okay, murder, like I said, no. Murder and aggravated murder are two totally separate charges. Ask, go ahead, ask ChatGBT or Grok. Ask any of them. Say, is murder and aggravated murder the same charge? Why do they separate them? And they will tell you because those are totally different. One is a death penalty and one is, could be just 15 years in prison. Those are two totally different charges. Murder and aggravated murder are two totally different charges, but you see he's trying to bully her. That's what he's good at, trying to bully women, talk over them, distract, pivot, and deflect, which is what he's doing. So I'll play it from the top and then I'll let it go all the way through and watch Candace Owens completely expose him and humiliate him. Yeah, I'm fine with closings if you want to do closings. I also would just, if I may ask a question, which one of the charges against, or all of them, do you think Tyler Robinson is guilty of? The specific charge? Yeah. Yeah, so I think, what I think, is that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk. Yeah, but of the seven charges that he's being charged. Yeah, can we list them real quick? I'll tell you exactly which ones and we'll pull them up. Well, do you know any of the charges that he's up for right now? Yeah, of course. But I want to make sure that we have them listed. Yeah, but can you name one? Because my general perspective is that you don't actually care about this case. You're not following it. Is that it? That's the question? You're just not following it enough? It seems pretty, like, if you're going to engage and you're going to say the evidence is overwhelming that Tyler Robinson is guilty, I just think that you should, can you tell me one charge that he's- Then let's do the counter. You can really, yeah, no, this is a great gotcha. No, no, no, you just got to ask me, play clips out of context, put me in the hot seat. So please just answer the question. This is fair. Name all seven since you've been following the case. Okay, sure. You name one. Yeah, you name all seven. I'm happy to do that, but can you name one? I think he's been charged with murder. Nope. That's actually incorrect. Okay, great. Now name all seven. He doesn't even, this is like- Name all seven. And I- Can you name all seven? Now, it would have been great had PBD, Patrick Bette Davis, said, hey, hey, hey, hold on, Andrew, let her talk. But he didn't. And so then it became just an argument and a guy hectoring and trying to bully, but she still rises above it. I can't- Then do it. The first charge is aggravated murder because that's what carries a death sentence in the state of Utah. No, that's not, that is literally not murder. The second charge is the felony discharge of a weapon. Oh, wait a minute, this is the wrong, okay, oh, let me go here. The question. You're just not following it enough? It seems pretty, like, if you're gonna engage and you're gonna say the evidence is overwhelming that Tyler Robinson is guilty, I just think that you should, can you tell me one charge that he's- Then let's do the counter. You can really, yeah, no, this is a great- No, no, no, you just got to ask me, play clips out of context, put me in the hot seat, so please just answer the question. This is fair. Name all seven since you've been following the case. Okay, sure, you name one. Yeah, you name all seven. I'm happy to do that, but can you name one? I think he's been charged with murder. That's actually incorrect. Okay, great, now name all seven. He doesn't even, this is like- Name all seven. And I- Can you name all seven? I can't. Then do it. Sure, you don't have to- Do it, no, do it, I'll count them, go ahead. You don't have to put your fingers up. Okay, I'll name them. The first charge is aggravated murder because that's what carries a death sentence. So murder? No, that's not, that is literally not murder. Okay, next. And so just for people, no, don't, I don't have to do it in a time limit. There's nothing going on. And just to explain to people the difference of why that really matters and shows that he doesn't actually care about this at all is because aggravated murder, it's narrowly defined and because it carries a death sentence. I'm not, I'm going to answer the question. Okay. I'm just going to recognize- It would have been nice if PBD told him, hey, why don't you shut up? She's making a point, but he did it. Is that your strategy of thinking that people are intimidated when you try to put a time constraint doesn't work and you'll be better the next time you debate someone. I got it, I got it. Give me the other ones. The more you cut me off, the longer I'll take. Do you want to just wait for me to finish of why that's a big difference? So that people don't walk away. No, I just want you to list the charges. Yeah, I'm gonna- No, I don't want you to, I don't want to give you time to explain why I was 100% wrong about what I just said and reveal that I don't know anything about the case. That I don't, no, no, I don't want you to do that. I want you to do what I want. So he's trying to bully her and control her and doesn't work. Do that. You just don't get to pretend that there's a time constraint for me to do that. Well, how long does it take you to list seven charges? Because I'm speaking, you just got to- It sounds like you're just delaying it because you don't know them. I know all seven of them and I'm going to say again, because you're going to get embarrassed. You don't have to rush this. I'm also showing an example of a very flawed debate strategy. I actually am under no time constraint. I got one. Great. The second charge is the felony discharge of a weapon. The next two charges are for obstruction of justice. The next two charges are for witness tampering. And the final- What's the specific charges though? That is them. Obstruction of justice, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, witness tampering. Okay. And there's no other specifics to them. So he's proving over and over. He doesn't know what the charges are. What do you mean specific? What are the specific charges? Those are the specific charges. Those are the charges specifically. And he's like, well, what are the specific ones? Showing that he doesn't know what the charges are. How many more times can he show in this exchange that he doesn't know anything? This is like the fourth thing he's done now to show he doesn't know anything. Okay. I can tell you why he's being charged with it. No, no, no. Just the charges and then seven? Yeah. See, the bad thing is when you try to be an a-hole and it doesn't work. What's the seventh? The last charge is violence in front of a minor. Okay. Got it. So then he's being charged with murder. You just say aggravated murder. That's the distinction. You just want to. It's a massive. It's like, you can't even, you cannot say murder versus aggravated. Got it, Matt. So he just, all he can do is talk over her and try to pretend that she's not making a point that everybody can see who knows anything about the case is a huge point. Got it. Okay. Got it. Yeah, okay. I'm a hundred percent wrong, but I'm talking over you and I'm trying to bully you to try to pretend like I'm actually in control. Master debater. Massive distinction. Murder, this gets to the entire crux of why him being up for the death sentence. And I actually find the defense's filing about why this is not aggravated to be very compelling of why it's not aggravated murder. I actually think that the state was going to even try to pull this off. They should have charged him with just murder. And then I do also, again, want to stress to audiences that that debate strategy, it's some sport. I think he thinks it's a blood sport. It's not, it's about being right and being principled when you're engaging and you can make mistakes. I make mistakes all the time, but at least be genuine in pretending that you care about this case enough to know one of the seven charges that are up against Tyler Robinson when you say the evidence is overwhelming that he's guilty. If you would like to move to final statements, I'm fine. I want to make sure Andrew has had the time that he has requested. I think your team would like to pull up the seven charges that he just asked you about. If you guys want to pull that up just to confirm the seven you went through. Can you guys zoom in a little bit? Aggravated murder, felony discharge of a firearm, obstruction of justice, which is counts three and four, five and six, tampering with a witness, and count seven, I said offense in the presence of a minor. Yeah, so five, six, tampering witness, third degree felony. Now I did notice something, I just was. And so he immediately, his great master debate technique is to try to pivot and distract from the fact that she just named all seven perfectly, he didn't know one of them, and now he wants to quickly pivot. And let's watch. Curious about, I'm just wondering, when you pulled out your phone just before you asked that question, did somebody by chance text you that question? You can check my phone. I'm just curious. No, you can absolutely not. I have not had one communication. So that's him trying to change the subject. Hey, look, I just got revealed for being a know-nothing. Candace just cleaned my clock, and now I'd like to change the subject. Let's change the subject. Did somebody text you that? And then she clobbers him again. A single person, not even my producers who are in there this whole time we were here. You want to check my phone? I'm happy to do it, because you're just going to get double embarrassed. Where's my phone? You should do it. You want to see it? I'm just curious. You can literally do that. Here you go, PBD. You're the moderator, take it. Let's see it. Anyone was texted at all during this debate. All right. About the violent charges or anything. I'm looking through this. You give me permission. You have full permission to go through my phone. I don't need to cheat. So the last one has nothing to do with it. It's just a compliment. I haven't even read my text messages. That's a compliment. He's reading them. You're okay. You'll give me permission. I'm just going to read three of them to 1132, because after that, I don't need to read it. Any other texts? Could have been telegram, could have been something else. All I have is signal. You can check that too. I only have signal. Telegram I used in Russia. And that was it. I downloaded it from Russia. I'll take your word for it. Yeah. I don't need to like, I deeply care about this case. I don't need to pretend to know stuff that I don't know. If you deeply care about the case, I just, you know, I have, my other question is about the steakhouse receipt. And my next question is, I would like, again, I'd like to change the subject again. I want to change the subject. I want to deflect. I want to distract. I want to bully. I want to interrupt. I want to Hector. That's his great debate technique. So those would be the three instances that completely reveal him as being a charlatan. I have one more clip. Candace wanted to ask him a question and he refused to let her even ask him a question. So let's watch this. This was from Sandy. She caught this. Let's watch. While they're looking for that, do you want to continue? Yeah. I mean, can I ask the question? I know it's been, or like, can I ask the question? Not really. I'm just gonna, we're going to hold to the actual contract itself. The contract does not say that you are allowed to just question me without me being able to respond to you. I've never said you can respond. Or have a conversation. You've been able to respond to every question I've asked you. And by the way, the other thing is. So she said, can I just ask you a question? And he said, no. So again, that's just like a bonus clip from Sandy. Can I ask you a question? No. Hey, come see me do a live celebrity panel, August 30th in Burbank, California. Then stand up in New York City at Village Underground, September 13th. And then in Chicago, September 18, 19, and 20 in Rosemont and Chicago. Go to JimmyDore.com for a link for tickets.