‘Don’t PATRONISE ME!’ | Dawn Neesom PUTS DOWN Labour MP over Piddington migrant hotel fears

We're three adults, well I kind of, sorry, I kind of include myself in that, sitting talking about this, but last night on Patrick's show we broke the exclusive about the village of Piddington, tiny little village, 250 population there, 46 kids live there and the migration camp that were going to be built on the Dongle Strip, 1,250 undocumented young men free to roam in this village and the kids of this village actually wrote to the Prime Minister. Shall we have a look or a listen to what these children had to say? To Andy Burnham, I like my village exactly how it is and I don't want it to be changed. Dear Prime Minister, I love the park in Piddington. And Andy, there was one heartbreaking letter from seven-year-old Rex who wrote, Dear Andy, to the Prime Minister, we like our village because I and my family walked down to my sister's grave to see her. I worry I won't be able to do that anymore. My family has lived here for over 100 years. These are children, we're talking about their future, Barry, we're not talking about our futures. We're, I mean, a present company except Joy is younger than both of us, Barry, but these children's futures, the kids, they're 7, 9, 11 years old, they're worried about their future and I honestly do not see anything being done about it. You keep quoting figures to me. Okay, net migration is down. The point of a news program, Dawn, is to impart facts. You're patronising me by saying you quote figures. Because you're not giving me honest figures, are you? I am giving you the honest figures. You're talking about net migration, we're talking about illegal migration. These kids are worried about the young men coming across the Channel in these boats. Women and girls are worried about these men coming across the Channel. Let's talk about the children because you know as well as I do that children don't just write to the Prime Minister. What happens is adults, and I saw the piece where the parents explained, and the mother was very good, she explained that they had tried to do it in an age-appropriate way to tell the children about what they feared and what was going to happen but I don't think actually it's right to use children in that way. You think the children were being used by their parents to make political point? What I'm saying is I don't think it's right to get your children to write to the Prime Minister about an issue which is of real concern to you because obviously they are influenced by what the parents say. Now as I say, give the mother credit, she did it in an age-appropriate way but you know that the children don't have full possession of the facts. I think that's incredibly factual because I had a similar situation. Using the internet without a VPN, a virtual private network, is a bit like taking to the road without car insurance. All it takes is one unlucky moment to cost you a lot of cash. This video's sponsor is Private Internet Access. They are the VPN to help keep you safe. Click the link in the description below to find out why over 30 million people have downloaded PIA to protect themselves online. A virtual private network is an app that hides your IP address and helps keep your data private. When you're browsing the internet at home you give up a large amount of data to businesses, to shops and indeed to social media giants too. Hackers have the ability to steal your personal data with ease including sensitive information such as passwords, keystrokes and even your personal photos. Private Internet Access helps protect your personal data by encrypting your internet connection to keep your data out of the hands of cyber criminals. And it's not just hackers either to be concerned about. Information can be censored too. When Canada passed their C18 bill, social media giants decided to ban news content on their platforms. But PIA can protect your ability to consume the news and content you love. Private Internet Access is available for Windows users, macOS, Android, Linux, iOS and you can use one PIA subscription to protect an unlimited amount of devices. And we've got a huge GB News discount for you too. Click the link in this video's description and you'll get a massive 83% off PIA. That's under two pounds a month, the price of a coffee and you'll get an extra four months completely free on top. Also there's a 30-day money-back guarantee too. Visit piavpn.com forward slash gbnews to start protecting yourself digitally today. Situation like this, I had a migrant accommodation was going to come in and it was right next to a school and the children were terrified. The children, when I would go and speak to the school, they would tell me when they saw somebody sleeping rough or they noticed everything. And you know what? These mothers don't want their daughters to be raped or molested. A bunch of young men coming near a school, 100% I agree with them. I fought tooth and nail to stop that migration accommodation coming in because it was right near a school. My residents didn't want it. I fought it every inch of the way. I said we don't have the ability to take them in. You're denying social housing to people who have been here their whole lives, who should be getting that social housing. That should go to hard working British people who've been waiting for that social housing their whole lives. But no, it's going to go to a bunch of migrants. Those children are absolutely right. They want to protect their way of life. That's what I was fighting for in Farnham Common to stop the accommodation coming in. And it's right that they protect their schools, that they protect their children. I want to protect children walking home, playing in the garden, going to see the grave of their child, of their brother. Those 1250 people at the moment, they're already in our communities. They may not be in your community, certainly in my community. I have hotels in my constituency where asylum seekers are currently. And the government is trying to do what it's promised to do, what this programme demanded the government did, which was to get them out of hotel accommodation. That's what we're doing by putting them into ex-army barracks. Now, you now say, well, you can't possibly put a thousand men into what was an army barracks, which, of course, originally would have housed a thousand men. Some of these men are coming from places like Afghanistan where they treat women like vermin. They treat them, they rape them. And how are we going to combat that? Are we just going to roll over for the sake of multiculturalism and say it's fine that our children are raped, that they don't feel safe walking home from school? What is the breaking point? Also, we need to deal with the situation. If someone commits a crime and you're a foreign national, you need to be deported. There's none of this, oh, you're taking up prison space. You just need to go. And we have allowed this kind of insane level of, oh, let's just put everybody in. Everyone will be fine. There's parts of London that are happy and diverse, but there are other parts of the UK that have never had any diversity. And thrusting this upon them will ruin the whole character of the area. The actual people will be cast aside. I get it, Joy. I get it. It's all right for my constituents, but it's not all right for yours. That's what you're saying. I'm saying that my constituents, my children in the schools that attend those schools, they were afraid because they didn't want to have a bunch of migrant men lurking around the school, harassing the children, harassing the girls. I don't want to have to tell a mother that her child was raped because we had to allow a migrant accommodation. I never want to have that. I would rather fight this tooth and nail to the end to make sure that that's not in my area. So let me just ask you this. These are not migrants. These are not family refugees. These are not groups of families fleeing war-torn areas. This is migrant men. Men. Yep. Very quickly. Sorry. These are people who have not yet been processed through the system, because of the failures of your government. No, this is why the Conservatives want to make it illegal to claim asylum, if you come here illegally, to stop this. If you were the government now, how would you be able to put people back to the country they came from immediately, as you say, within a week? You couldn't do it unless you had the cooperation of the other states. That's why the Home Secretary... Even Germany, Barry, which is part of the EU, is managing to put illegal migrants on planes and fly them back to Afghanistan. Sorry. This Home Secretary has actually concluded a number of agreements with other countries to be able to deport people. I want to see her do more, but you have to do it with cooperation. If you don't actually have that, you can't get those people back to the country that you want. Right. At the moment, you don't have the ability to do it. Hence the reason we want to leave the ECHR and we want to revoke the Human Rights Act, because we need to be able to protect our borders, protect our citizens. Japan is protecting its citizens, Singapore, many, many, many countries. And actually, the reason Spain could take so many to Morocco is they're not part of the EU Schengen Agreement. They're not part of the same agreement. So, you know, they were able to strong arm taking everybody back. We need to be able to protect our borders. We need to be able to put our citizens first. Okay, right.