The Only Bird That Can Fly Backwards

Secret world of hummingbirds
26 followers
A hummingbird can remain almost motionless in the air, move precisely between flowers and reverse without turning around. This video explains the mechanics behind that extraordinary control.
#Secretworldofhummingbirds #Nature #JennyVM
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedThis video explains the complex biomechanics and energetics that enable hummingbirds to achieve sustained hovering. Unlike most birds, hummingbirds use a specialized shoulder joint to rotate their wings, generating lift on both the downstroke and the upstroke. This mechanical system, powered by high-metabolism muscles and nectar, allows for precise omnidirectional movement.
A hummingbird at a flower hardly seems to be moving at all.
It hangs suspended in open air,
then shifts with uncanny precision from one bloom to the next,
sideways or backwards,
often without turning its body.
It looks less like an animal fighting gravity
than one completely unaffected by it.
Only the blur at its shoulders gives the game away.
Slow that blur down,
and the apparent stillness resolves
into one of the strangest wingbeats in the bird world.
Wings that sweep back and forth.
Turn over at every reversal
and continue supporting the body in both directions.
To understand why that is so unusual,
it helps to begin with a more ordinary bird.
For most birds flying slowly,
the downstroke does most of the useful work.
During the upstroke, the joints flex,
and the wing presents less area to the air.
That makes an efficient recovery stroke,
but gives little weight support.
A hummingbird cannot rely on that pattern while hovering.
With no forward speed to carry it between strokes,
the average upward force from its wings must equal its weight,
while the average horizontal force must be almost zero.
It has to manufacture its own airflow,
then use both halves of the wingbeat.
The transformation begins in an unusually specialised shoulder.
Instead of producing the stroke
mainly by raising and lowering the upper arm,
a hummingbird rotates the humerus,
the upper wingbone,
strongly around its long axis.
Its relatively stiff handwing
remains extended through most of the cycle,
sweeping through a broad, nearly horizontal arc.
Near each reversal,
the shoulder apparatus rapidly pitches the wing,
changing which edge meets the air
and reversing its angle of attack,
the angle at which the wing cuts into the flow.
The return stroke is not an unloaded recovery.
The working surface has been turned over
so that it can push air down while travelling the other way.
This three-dimensional motion
often gives the wingtip a shallow figure-eight path
when viewed from the side.
That description is useful,
but it is not the explanation for hovering.
The loop varies with viewpoint and flight condition,
and in faster flight,
the familiar shape can largely disappear.
What matters is the combination beneath it.
Back and forth sweep,
smaller vertical movement
and precisely timed wing rotation.
The result is useful weight support
on both halves of the cycle,
but not equal support.
Early wake measurements on hovering Rufus hummingbirds
attributed roughly three quarters of weight support
to the downstroke
and one quarter to the upstroke.
Later, direct force measurements on Anna's hummingbirds
put the upstroke contribution at about 28%.
The exact balance varies with species, kinematics and method,
but the robust finding is asymmetry.
The upstroke matters greatly,
while the downstroke remains stronger.
A bird wing is cambered and structurally asymmetric,
and the outer wing inverts more completely
than the region near the body,
so reversing the stroke does not create a perfect mirror image.
The wing also experiences profoundly unsteady airflow
as it accelerates, slows and rotates.
At the high angles used in hovering,
air rolling around the sharp leading edge can form a vortex.
By helping maintain low pressure over the wing,
it can augment force beyond a steady flow prediction.
Measurements and simulations show this vortex is important,
especially during the downstroke,
but its strength and contribution vary.
It is one contributor,
not a permanent suction tube carrying the bird.
Wing rotation and acceleration around reversal
also affect the force,
and the wing may meet air disturbed by its previous motion.
Their combined result is clearest in the wake.
Experiments reveal organised vortex loops
and fast downward flow beneath the bird.
The details differ among conditions,
but the meaning is simple.
The wings give downward momentum to air,
and the reaction on the bird is upward.
Once the bird can create that force,
manoeuvring becomes a problem of aiming it.
In a steady hover, the horizontal components nearly cancel,
leaving an average force directed upward.
To accelerate forwards, the bird changes its body angle,
stroke plane and wing pitch,
so the combined force tilts forwards as well as upwards.
To retreat, it pushes air partly forwards
and receives a backward reaction.
Measurements show that backward flight uses a more upright body
and altered stroke plane geometry.
It is not simply forward flight in reverse.
The same force vectoring principle works sideways
without requiring the bird to turn first.
The two wings do not have to perform identical strokes.
A hummingbird can change their amplitudes,
stroke planes and rotations independently,
creating unequal forces that roll, pitch or yaw the body.
Its low rotational inertia helps it turn quickly,
but also makes it vulnerable to gusts.
In turbulent wind experiments,
hummingbirds varied stroke amplitude from beat to beat
and used greater left-right asymmetry.
In roll perturbation experiments,
they adjusted muscle recruitment and wing rotation
between the two sides.
These are rapid feedback corrections
guided by vision and balance organs.
Body posture and the tail refine this control.
Banking redirects both wings' forces during a turn.
The tail can spread, tilt and twist,
producing drag, some lift and stabilising moments.
In turbulence, hummingbirds fan it more widely,
which may add passive damping at the cost of extra drag.
It is an adjustable stabiliser, not the source of hovering.
The head can remain remarkably steady at a flower,
even while the body shifts beneath it.
All of this is expensive.
In hovering, the bird must accelerate a column of air downward,
simply to remain where it is.
It must also overcome wing drag
and reverse the wing's inertia at each end of the stroke.
An Anna's hummingbird commonly does this
at around 40 wing beats per second,
while frequency varies substantially among species.
Elastic tissues appear to capture some energy
as the wings decelerate and return it as they accelerate,
reducing the cost of reversal.
But the muscles still sustain an exceptional workload.
The main downstroke muscle, the pectoralis,
and the main upstroke muscle, the supracoracoidus,
are both enlarged.
Together they account for roughly a quarter of body mass
in measured hummingbirds.
These muscles are packed with mitochondria
and supplied by dense capillary networks,
allowing extremely rapid oxygen use.
During repeated feeding,
hummingbirds can switch quickly from stored fat
to newly ingested glucose and fructose,
eventually fueling almost all hovering metabolism
from recent nectar.
That is why nectar is not merely a reward
collected by this flight system.
It is the high throughput fuel that makes the system practical,
supplemented by arthropods for protein and other nutrients.
The energetic margin is still narrow.
Hummingbirds feed repeatedly while active,
often perch between feeding bouts
and store fat to bridge periods without food.
When overnight energy would otherwise run dangerously low,
many species can enter torpor.
Body temperature and metabolic rate fall sharply,
cutting the cost of surviving until feeding can resume.
Torpor use varies with species,
season, temperature, and body condition,
so it is not simply a nightly off-switch.
It is flexible energy management
for an animal whose daytime flight machinery
can consume fuel at an extraordinary rate.
Other birds may hover briefly by flapping hard,
and kestrels or seabirds can remain fixed over the ground
by flying into a headwind.
But sustained hovering in still air
demands the whole hummingbird package.
Low body mass, favourable wing area,
a stiff extended hand wing,
a shoulder capable of powerful long axis rotation,
an enlarged upstroke motor, rapid control,
and the metabolic capacity to pay for it.
Most bird wings are optimised for a forceful downstroke
and a partly folded recovery,
making prolonged still air hovering
both mechanically weaker and energetically prohibitive.
So the hummingbird's apparent stillness
is produced by continuous reversal.
Its shoulder sweeps an extended wing back and forth,
then rotates that wing,
so both strokes push air downward.
The downstroke supplies most of the support,
the inverted upstroke supplies a substantial minority,
and unsteady vortices help the wings maintain force
as their speed and orientation change.
By tilting that force and altering the two wings independently,
the bird can move forwards, backwards, or sideways
and correct disturbances almost immediately.
Hovering is not one trick drawn as a figure eight.
It is a complete mechanical system for creating, aiming,
and paying for aerodynamic force.
