Debating ACC vs. SEC vs. Big 10: College Football Rivalries

SportsGrid
3 followers
Jul 24, 2026
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedThe speakers discuss the current climate of college football conference rivalry, focusing on the \"propaganda\" used by the ACC and SEC to assert dominance over the Big 10. They analyze the validity of criticisms regarding scheduling and the potential for the SEC to break away from the NCAA, concluding that such threats are likely leverage for better rule-making.
We're sitting there and you're hearing some of the things that are
coming out of the ACC of last week.
Pat Narduzzi talking about how the big SEC is bigger, better than the big 10.
ACC is one of the best conferences.
Like it feels like these are almost just little propaganda
weekends now for the conference.
Yeah, in some ways.
And I mean, Pat's off base with that take, but Pat's also an entertainer.
You know, you, when you can say that the, the ACC is the bigger,
better conference than the, uh, the big 10.
And I, I think, uh, to me, you measure a conference in national championships
and we can talk about attendance or bull record or non-conference scheduling
or nine game schedules, which the big 10 has been doing, but, um, you know,
at the end of the day, I think, uh, the big 10 has the national championships.
And, and like we were talking about earlier this week, if Oregon were
to win a national championship and you had four different schools, when
four, four national titles in four years, I don't know how anybody could dispute
that Bobby, I don't know about you, but Eli Drinkwitz was the one that,
um, I was surprised by that.
He started, started taking shots at the big 10 scheduling model when.
Yes, it's true.
Indiana, Ohio state, Michigan, their non-conference schedules weren't
great the last three years, but.
I don't remember anybody from any of those fan bases complaining about it,
especially Ohio state and Indiana playing 16 games.
Yeah.
And what frustrated me was the fact that you look at Missouri
and they've got Kansas, I think like some kind of Presbyterian college on the
lineups, like if you're going to be talking about the big 10 and having
all these non-conference games, you got to have a couple really
good ones in your back pocket.
They just didn't have that.
Plus look at the big 10, they're beating all these sec teams
once you get into the playoffs.
So if I understand it, whenever you're on the top of the mountain,
everyone's going to take a shot at you, but you got to at least come
with a little more information, kind of sound more legit if
you're going to be doing that.
Yeah, I totally agree.
And, and, you know, well with Missouri, you know, you look at their non-con
over the last couple of years, central Arkansas was on there, uh, you know,
Murray state, yes, they played ranked teams like Kansas state and Boston
college, but it's not like they have an overwhelming, uh, non-conference
schedule and their sec schedule.
The last two years has been a little bit weak.
Now I did look this up, believe it or not.
I was surprised to see that Missouri is 12 and five against the big 10 since 2000.
So my invitation to Eli Drinkwitz in Missouri is quite easy.
You know, come play in the big 10, come play some of those Midwest rivals
like Illinois and Iowa every year.
They're in that part of the country anyway.
Um, it'd be a lot of fun to see, but yeah, I think Bobby said it best.
It is a time where it is propaganda for the conferences and we're hearing a
little bit of that from the sec this week, and I'm sure we'll hear it
on some level with the big 10.
What I've found over the years is the big 10, they find a way
to be in lockstep though.
Right?
Like, I think you'll see it here.
The coaches say whatever message it is, it'll be, uh, parroted in the same
way by all 18 coaches on some level.
And that's kind of the way Bill, it felt like the sec used to be.
And now there's some dissension within the ranks.
And like, they talk about when you, when you hear Greg Sanky come up there, Bill
and talk about like going back to 1861 and like, we're going to secede from the
NCAA, we're going to start our own conference and like, okay, well,
our own deal, that might be great for football, but like football's
not the only sport people play.
It's the only one that makes, you know, the revenue that everybody needs.
But I'm thinking like, if you do that, what is there for your baseball?
What is there for softball?
Like volleyball, there's all these other sports that need to be fed,
basketball, women's basketball.
And it's might be sound good in football.
People want to do this, but there's no way you could just peel that off and
everybody's going to be okay with it.
So it seems like it's a little bit of saber rattling to me.
Like, and I can't imagine there's any real legitimacy to it.
And I think part of it is if they, what his message is to me, it's less about
let's go do a super league and more, we kind of want to make our own rules, you
know, like we want to make the rules that benefit the SEC and one of the issues
with college football as a whole in the power four is the ACC, the big 12, the
big 10 and the power, who did I miss?
The big 12, big 10, ACC and SEC, the four of them are never on the same page.
I mean, it's taken us this long to get to nine conference games, you know?
So who says that the ACC is going to play by the same rules as the SEC, you know,
when it comes to NIL portal, you know, how you handle even things like the
Brennan Foresby case this summer.
And I think that's part of it, but you know, when they talk about breaking away,
I think it's more of a shot at the NCAA to, Hey, get your act together, get some
rules in place and you know, let's, let's get this.
So we're not talking about wild West and those kinds of things that we've been
talking about in college football the last few years.
