Starship Flight 13’s New Timeline to Do Something Insane. Can They Make It Succeed??? === #greatspacex#elonmusk#spacex#nasa == 00:00: Flight 13 in days 00:33: Upgrades and changes in Flight 13 05:39: Flight 13’s timeline 12:22: Are you ready? === Advertisers who want to place ads on our channel, please contact the email manager: [email protected] === SpaceX Starship SN Be the first to sponsor us Thank you. https://www.patreon.com/GreatspaceX?fan_landing=true === Starship Flight 13’s New Timeline to Do Something Insane. Can They Make It Succeed??? Flight 13 is approaching—and just a few weeks ago, many people thought this timeline was impossible. Beyond simply flying again, this mission could set the stage for some of the biggest milestones in Starship's history. So what exactly will happen during Flight 13? And how could this mission shape everything that follows? Let's find out on today's episode of Great SpaceX. Starship Flight 13’s New Timeline to Do Something Insane. Can They Make It Succeed??? Flight 13 marks the second flight of Starship V3. Some people consider the number 13 unlucky, but if there's one company that doesn't believe in bad luck, it's SpaceX. Reaching extraordinary goals means overcoming every challenge along the way. That's a philosophy we try to follow here as well. Our next milestone is 500,000 subscribers, and getting there means continually improving our content while bringing you the fastest SpaceX and aerospace updates possible. If you enjoy these videos, consider supporting the channel by liking, sharing, and subscribing. Every bit of support helps us grow, and you'll never miss the latest developments. Now, back to Flight 13. At its core, this mission is designed to build on Flight 12. Starship Flight 13’s New Timeline to Do Something Insane. Can They Make It Succeed??? SpaceX wants to repeat the overall mission profile while fixing the issues that prevented a completely successful flight. That doesn't mean it'll be an identical mission. In fact, several important hardware upgrades and operational changes have been introduced. Let's begin with the biggest focus of all: the Raptor engines. Flight 12 exposed weaknesses on both stages. On Super Heavy, one engine failed shortly after liftoff, and the resulting anomalies likely contributed to increasingly unstable engine shutdowns and restarts before the booster was ultimately lost just before splashdown. On Ship, one of the three Raptor Vacuum engines shut down shortly after stage separation. Although the vehicle continued its mission successfully, SpaceX clearly wants to eliminate that failure before moving on to more ambitious objectives. To address those issues, SpaceX says the upcoming Super Heavy booster features hardware modifications to improve restart reliability, along with updates to engine warning and abort functions that better reflect the conditions encountered in a multi-engine flight environment.
Flight 13 marks the second flight of Starship V3, focusing on hardware refinements and reliability. The mission aims to resolve previous engine failures, test enhanced thermal protection, and achieve a critical in-space engine relight. This flight is a pivotal step in SpaceX's strategic transition from the Falcon rocket family to the more capable Starship system.
Flight 13 is approaching, and just a few weeks ago, many people thought this timeline
was impossible.
Beyond simply flying again, this mission could set the stage for some of the biggest milestones
in Starship's history.
So what exactly will happen during Flight 13, and how could this mission shape everything
that follows?
Let's find out on today's episode of Great SpaceX.
Flight 13 marks the second flight of Starship V3.
Some people consider the number 13 unlucky, but if there's one company that doesn't believe
in bad luck, it's SpaceX.
Reaching extraordinary goals means overcoming every challenge along the way.
That's a philosophy we try to follow here as well.
Our next milestone is 500k subscribers and getting there means continually improving
our content while bringing you the fastest SpaceX and aerospace updates possible.
If you enjoy these videos, consider supporting the channel by liking, sharing, and subscribing.
Every bit of support helps us grow and you'll never miss the latest developments.
Now back to Flight 13.
At its core, the mission is designed to build on Flight 12.
SpaceX wants to repeat the overall mission profile while fixing the issues that prevented
a completely successful flight.
That doesn't mean it'll be an identical mission.
In fact, several important hardware upgrades and operational changes have been introduced.
Let's begin with the biggest focus of all, the Raptor engines.
Flight 12 exposed weaknesses on both stages.
On Super Heavy, one engine failed shortly after liftoff and the resulting anomalies
likely contributed to increasingly unstable engine shutdowns and restarts before the booster
was ultimately lost just before splashdown.
On the ship, one of the three Raptor vacuum engines shut down shortly after stage separation.
Although the vehicle continued its mission successfully, SpaceX clearly wants to eliminate
that failure before moving on to more ambitious objectives.
To address those issues, SpaceX says the upcoming Super Heavy booster features hardware modifications
to improve restart reliability along with updates to engine warning and abort functions
that better reflect the conditions encountered in a multi-engine flight environment.
For ship, the company says it has implemented hardware and operational adjustments to address
the causes behind the Flight 12 engine issue.
Along with additional reliability improvements planned for future Raptor engine variants.
Another major area receiving attention is the heat shield.
One of the most visible changes is the addition of white thermal protection tiles.
Although many people initially assumed the white tiles represented a stronger heat shield,
SpaceX says they actually serve two purposes, simulating missing tiles and acting as high
visibility imaging targets for the new satellite cameras flying on this mission.
The company is also testing modified tiles, new attachment mechanisms, and additional
thermal protection panels on the metallic side of Starship's aft flaps, as well as
new tile configurations around the aft skirt to collect flight data on multiple attachment
methods.
The heat shield has already shown remarkable progress.
Compared with flights 10 and 11, oxidation has been almost completely eliminated and
Flight 12 demonstrated that the vehicle remained well-protected all the way to splashdown.
That success brings SpaceX much closer to eventually catching Starship with the Mechazilla
arms.
Even so, there's still room for improvement.
Engineers are particularly focused on eliminating coolant leaks.
While the leaks seen previously weren't mission-threatening, they indicate the thermal
protection system still isn't perfect.
If SpaceX hopes to achieve rapid, fully reusable operations, those remaining weaknesses have
to be solved, and Flight 13 is expected to provide much of the data needed before attempting
the first true orbital mission.
Beyond hardware, Flight 13 also introduces several important operational changes.
SpaceX explained what happened during stage separation on Flight 12, writing,
At stage separation on Flight 12, slight differences in engine startup on the ship caused the directional
flip of the booster to be off by approximately 90 degrees.
To correct that, the company says,
The startup sequence has been modified to be more robust to timing variability and more
reliably flip in the desired direction, which is done to increase overall performance.
The boostback burn has also received attention.
During Flight 12, five of Super Heavy's 33 engines failed to relight, causing the
burn to end earlier than planned.
According to SpaceX, the new booster includes hardware modifications to improve relight
reliability together with updated engine alarms and abort logic specifically designed
for large, multi-engine operations.
Another objective returning for Flight 13 is the long-awaited in-space Raptor relight.
This demonstration was planned for previous missions but was ultimately skipped on Flight 12.
Successfully restarting a Raptor 3 engine in orbit is an essential milestone, paving
the way for orbital maneuvering, future payload deployments, orbital refueling, and eventually
deep space missions to the Moon and Mars.
Although SpaceX has demonstrated in-space engine relights before, this is a new generation
of Raptor hardware, making the test just as significant.
Which of these Flight 13 upgrades are you most excited to see?
Let me know in the comments and don't forget to like the video and subscribe so you can
follow every step of Starship's development.
Now let's walk through what we can expect on launch day.
If all goes according to plan, Flight 13 will once again lift off on a late afternoon from
Starbase, giving engineers the best lighting conditions for observing both stages throughout
the mission.
Everything begins with propellant loading.
One of the biggest improvements introduced with version 3 is a dramatically faster fueling
process.
According to SpaceX's latest countdown timeline, the flight director conducts the final pull
for propellant loading at T-50 minutes.
On previous Starship flights, fueling was already well underway by the time the live
stream began around T-30 minutes.
Now viewers will likely see fueling begin almost immediately after the broadcast starts.
That's possible because SpaceX has significantly upgraded its ground systems.
Despite holding approximately 3,650 metric tons of propellant, Starship and Super Heavy
can now be fully fueled in roughly half an hour.
The timeline is remarkably precise.
Liquid oxygen loading begins at T-37 minutes 30 seconds for ship and T-37 minutes for the
booster.
Liquid methane loading starts at T-35 minutes 25 seconds for the booster and T-34 minutes
48 seconds for ship.
Fueling is completed at T-2 minutes 50 seconds for Super Heavy and T-2 minutes 10 seconds
for Starship.
It's an astonishing pace.
Faster fueling not only shortens countdowns but also reduces operational risk, minimizes
propellant boil-off, and lays the groundwork for a much faster turnaround in the future,
perhaps eventually supporting daily or even multiple launches per day.
Other familiar milestones still occur during fueling.
Engine chill begins approximately T-21 minutes 30 seconds.
Then at T-30 seconds, the flight director conducts the final go-for-launch pull.
Once that's complete, the countdown enters its final moments.
Between T-17 and T-10 seconds, Pad 2's upgraded water deluge system activates.
Unlike Pad 1, water now flows from both sides of the flame trench as well as the top deck
surrounding the OLM, providing significantly greater protection for both the vehicle and
launch infrastructure.
Then comes engine ignition.
Then, for the 13th time in its development history, the world's largest and most powerful
rocket leaves Starbase.
Powered by 33 Raptor engines producing more than 9,000 metric tons of thrust, Starship
climbs away from the pad.
According to the latest NOTAM, the ascent corridor shifts farther southeast, passing
through the strait between Mexico and Cuba rather than between Florida and Cuba, likely
improving the trajectory toward the planned splashdown zone in the Indian Ocean.
The first major milestone arrives at T-45 seconds.
Max Q, the point of maximum aerodynamic pressure.
Starship has consistently handled this phase well.
Attention then shifts to main engine cutoff, or most engines cutoff in this case, and stage
separation.
Hot staging once again separates the two vehicles, but thanks to the updated startup sequence,
SpaceX expects a much cleaner booster flip than on Flight 12.
Unlike earlier Starship designs, the hot staging ring remains attached, another step toward
rapid reuse.
From here, the mission splits into two separate stories.
Super Heavy begins its return to Earth.
Following separation, 23 center and inner ring engines ignite for the boostback burn.
After Flight 12's engine issues, this burn will be watched especially closely.
If the upgraded Raptors perform as expected, the booster should complete the maneuver cleanly
before coasting toward splashdown.
Several minutes later, the grid fins take over aerodynamic guidance as the ocean comes
into view.
Then begins the landing burn.
This maneuver relies on 13 center and inner ring engines, which must simultaneously slow,
stabilize, and steer the booster.
One lesson from Flight 12 was that the landing burn likely started too late, leaving the
booster traveling at over 1,400 kilometers per hour just before impact.
Expect SpaceX to begin this burn slightly earlier on Flight 13, giving Super Heavy more
time to decelerate before reaching the water.
If everything works as intended, the engines will shut down just above the ocean, allowing
the booster to settle gently into the gulf before splashdown.
Meanwhile, Starship continues climbing into space.
Engine performance remains a major focus here because of the Raptor vacuum issue seen on
Flight 12.
Eventually, the vehicle reaches Starship engine cutoff before preparing for one of the mission's
biggest milestones, payload deployment.
Against the darkness of space, the payload door opens.
The familiar PEZ dispenser begins pushing payloads toward the opening.
This time, however, Starship isn't carrying dummy payloads.
It'll deploy 20 operational Starlink V3 satellites along with six satellites equipped
with modified cameras to photograph Starship's heat shield during flight and transmit those
images for engineering analysis.
Following deployment comes another critical objective, the long-awaited Raptor in space
relight.
This demonstration is essential for future orbital operations and represents one of Flight
13's most important technical milestones.
Afterwards, Starship begins its journey back toward Earth.
According to the latest NOTAM, splashdown is planned in the eastern Indian Ocean near
Western Australia.
During reentry, engineers will closely monitor plasma buildup across the upgraded heat shield,
paying particular attention to the new white tiles, modified attachment systems, and instrumented
thermal protection panels.
As altitude decreases, plasma gives way to blue skies, clouds, and finally, the ocean
below.
Then comes the final landing sequence.
Three sea-level Raptors ignite.
Using both engine gimballing and aerodynamic flaps, Starship performs its landing flip,
essentially rehearsing the same maneuver required for a future catch by the Mechazilla arms.
SpaceX may also throttle down by shutting off engines sequentially rather than maintaining
all three until touchdown, gathering additional data on vehicle controllability under asymmetric
thrust.
Finally, Starship reaches the ocean, the engines shut down, the vehicle settles gently onto
the water, and Flight 13 comes to an end.
If everything unfolds as planned, this mission will accomplish far more than simply repeating
Flight 12.
It'll validate critical engine upgrades, demonstrate major improvements to the heat
a long-awaited Raptor in space relight, and provide the data SpaceX needs before pushing
toward the next great milestone, a true orbital Starship mission and eventually, full reusability.
The countdown is nearly over.
Now all that's left to see is whether Flight 13 can deliver on that promise.
Everyone knew this day would eventually come, but few expected it to arrive so soon.
SpaceX is already laying the groundwork to retire Falcon 9 earlier than many anticipated.
Why make the transition now?
How will it happen?
And most importantly, is Starship truly ready to take over?
There's no denying that Falcon has become the backbone of both SpaceX and the American
launch industry.
Its extraordinary launch cadence has placed it far ahead of every competitor, setting
monthly, quarterly, and annual launch records that the rest of the industry combined has
struggled to match.
Although most Falcon 9 missions deploy Starlink satellites, the rocket has become indispensable
across the space sector.
It launches NASA's most demanding science missions, supports continuous ISS operations,
carries critical national security payloads for the U.S. military, and serves commercial
customers ranging from startups to global corporations.
Much of that success stems from Falcon's revolutionary reusability.
By recovering and reusing the first stage, SpaceX dramatically reduced launch costs while
achieving an unprecedented flight tempo.
Falcon Heavy extended those capabilities even further, enabling the launch of some of the
heaviest payloads ever carried by a commercial launch provider.
The question is no longer whether Falcon will eventually be replaced, it's when.
For years, SpaceX has maintained that Starship would ultimately succeed the Falcon family.
Most people assumed that transition was still many years away.
After all, Falcon continues to win major government contracts, including national security space
launch phase 3 missions.
NASA still relies on Falcon and Dragon to support the ISS, particularly as other crew
transportation systems continue facing delays.
Falcon Heavy also remains the preferred vehicle for numerous deep space missions that demand
exceptional performance.
Despite all of that, SpaceX appears determined to begin the transition much sooner than expected.
Several industry sources report that at least nine SpaceX customers and launch partners
have been informed that the company is no longer accepting bookings for Falcon 9 transporter
missions scheduled for late 2028 and early 2029.
At the same time, Falcon's launch manifest for the next several years is already nearing
full capacity.
That has naturally raised concerns.
Transporter and bandwagon missions have become some of Falcon 9's most successful commercial
services, allowing multiple organizations to share a single launch and dramatically
reduce the cost of reaching orbit.
Universities, startups, research institutions, and small satellite operators have all benefited
from this rideshare model.
If those missions begin disappearing after 2028, it could represent the first clear sign
that Falcon operations are entering a gradual decline.
The evidence extends beyond the launch manifest.
SpaceX has already consolidated Falcon operations onto fewer launch pads.
Falcon 9 now flies primarily for two launch complexes after LC-39A was dedicated to Starship
development and Falcon Heavy missions.
One of the company's autonomous drone ships has also been reassigned to support future
Starship recovery options.
In many respects, Falcon has already reached peak efficiency.
After last year's record-breaking 165 launches, substantially increasing the annual flight
rate becomes increasingly difficult.
The existing launch infrastructure, recovery fleet, refurbishment pipeline, and available
boosters are already operating at an extraordinarily high level.
Meanwhile, Starlink itself is entering a new phase.
SpaceX originally envisioned a first-generation constellation of around 12,000 satellites.
More than 12,000 have now been launched, and even after accounting for satellites that
have deorbited or failed, over 10,600 remain in orbit with more than 9,400 currently operational.
That means the initial deployment phase is nearing completion.
Although the proposed expansion to 40,000 satellites remains uncertain, one trend is
becoming increasingly clear.
Future generations of Starlink are expected to rely on much larger V3 satellites specifically
designed for Starship rather than Falcon 9.
Taken together, these developments point toward an inevitable transition.
Falcon will not disappear overnight, but its golden era is gradually approaching its conclusion.
Are you concerned about Falcon 9 eventually stepping aside?
Let me know by saying yes or no in the comment section down below.
And if you enjoy following SpaceX's incredible journey, don't forget to like this video
and subscribe to our channel.
Your support means more than ever as we continue covering one of the most exciting periods
in aerospace history.
Now, let's turn our attention to the rocket preparing to inherit Falcon's throne.
Is Starship actually ready?
That's the defining question, especially as SpaceX prepares for one of the most challenging
transitions in modern aerospace.
History offers several cautionary examples.
Both ULA and Europe struggled through difficult launch vehicle transitions, with Vulcan and
Ariane 6 experiencing years of delays that created costly capability gaps as their predecessors
began retiring.
Atlas 5 helped bridge part of that gap for ULA, but even that solution had clear limitations,
resulting in years of launch backlogs, rising costs, delayed customer missions, and lost
market share.
Those experiences provide valuable lessons for SpaceX, because even as today's market
leader, a one or two year delay during the transition from Falcon to Starship could give
competitors an opportunity to narrow the gap.
Fortunately, SpaceX isn't standing still.
Starship has now entered its third major generation, and unlike its predecessors, version 3 is
no longer focused primarily on radical experimentation, but instead on refining the vehicle's core
systems through upgraded Raptor engines, as well as improved heat shielding, stronger
structures, and greater operational reliability.
Even so, only a single version 3 flight has taken place so far, while Artemis deadlines
continue drawing closer, meaning SpaceX must bring Starship into reliable operational service
as quickly as possible before the first Artemis missions involving the vehicle begin, and
Falcon's eventual retirement becomes a reality.
That won't be easy, because Starship still faces an extensive list of milestones before
it can fully replace Falcon, including consistently reaching orbit, deploying payloads, performing
reliable in-space engine relights, completing successful two-stage recoveries, demonstrating
orbital fueling, and eventually supporting lunar missions.
That is an enormous amount to accomplish within a relatively short time frame, making the
real challenge one of balancing urgency with caution.
Because moving too slowly allows critical schedules to slip, while moving too quickly
increases the risk of failures, it's arguably an even greater engineering challenge than
developing Falcon itself.
Still, SpaceX has earned considerable confidence through its previous accomplishments and the
preparations already underway.
The company's manufacturing capacity continues expanding rapidly, with new gigabases rising
at both Starbase and Florida to allow multiple Starships and Super Heavy boosters to be assembled
inspected, refurbished, and stacked simultaneously.
At the same time, Starfactory is evolving into something unlike anything previously
seen in aerospace, a true mass production facility built around highly automated continuous
manufacturing, and as production accelerates, prototype turnaround times should continue
shrinking dramatically.
Launch infrastructure is expanding just as aggressively, with multiple Starship launch
pads under construction or being upgraded to lay the foundation for weekly and eventually
even daily operations that combined with full vehicle reusability could support launch
rates no other rocket system has ever achieved.
And that expansion isn't limited to Texas, as Florida is rapidly emerging as a second
Starship hub, with even greater growth expected in the years ahead.
Taken together, these investments suggest that once Starship reaches operational maturity,
its expansion could be extraordinarily rapid.
Gwynne Shotwell recently stated that Florida launches could begin only months after Flight
13, and if that timeline holds, the amount of progress SpaceX achieves in a single month
next year could surpass everything accomplished during the entire years of Starship development.
The transition could happen much faster than many people expect, would you bet on SpaceX
pulling it off?
Of course, replacing Falcon remains a delicate balancing act, reducing flights of the company's
most reliable rocket while Starship is still maturing is a calculated risk, because a single
major setback could temporarily reduce America's launch capacity while giving competitors an
opportunity to close the gap.
Successfully managing that transition will require exceptional discipline, as Falcon
9 cannot simply disappear overnight and must continue supporting national security missions,
commercial crew flights, ISS cargo missions, and commercial customers until Starship has
demonstrated comparable reliability.
SpaceX must also retain sufficient Falcon hardware, experienced personnel, and operational
infrastructure to ensure the rocket can quickly return to service whenever necessary, while
the retirement of launch pads and the reassignment of recovery assets should be guided by Starship's
demonstrated performance rather than optimistic projections.
Commercial customers deserve a clear migration path as well, and if Starship isn't fully
prepared to replace transporter missions by 2028, SpaceX may need interim solutions,
including partnerships with dedicated rideshare providers or alternative logistics services,
to ensure smaller satellite operators can continue to have affordable access to space.
Meanwhile, Starship's development should continue through progressively more demanding
missions, allowing SpaceX to steadily expand the vehicle's responsibilities through repeated
flight experience rather than attempting every complex objective all at once.
This transition will become one of the defining moments in SpaceX's history as Musk and
Shotwell must keep Falcon performing reliably, while simultaneously building Starship into
the vehicle that will ultimately replace it.
In many ways, Falcon must continue carrying today's space industry while Starship prepares
to carry tomorrow's.
SpaceX's decision to begin retiring the Falcon family earlier than many people expected
is an ambitious move that perfectly reflects the company's philosophy.
Between Artemis deadlines, national security requirements, commercial launch commitments,
and the future of the transporter program, the coming years will test the company more
than ever before it attempts to balance Falcon's proven reliability with Starship's rapid
development.
The biggest question is whether Starship can successfully usher in a new era of launch
dominance or whether Falcon 9 will need to shoulder the burden a little longer while
its successor continues to mature.
The answer is still unfolding, and whatever happens next could become one of the most
fascinating chapters in the history of spaceflight.
That brings us to the end of today's episode.
Thank you so much for tuning in.
As always, this has been Kevin from GreatSpaceX, and until next time, keep looking up!