Meet The World's Smartest Man

Discover Your Body's Supernatural Abilities
19 followers
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedThis video profiles Terence Tao, a mathematical prodigy and influential 21st-century mathematician. It traces his journey from a child prodigy in Australia to a Fields Medalist, emphasizing his transition from innate talent to disciplined research. The narrative highlights his collaborative approach to science and his commitment to democratizing mathematics through open-source projects.
In July 1988, the International Mathematical Olympiad brought the most brilliant teenagers
from around the world to Australia. They were there to solve problems that would break the
minds of most university professors. Amidst the rows of awkward adolescents stood Terence Tao.
He looked out of place. He was small, quiet, and the youngest person in the room at just 13.
Australian Prime Minister Bob Hawke crossed the stage, clutching a gold medal. He placed the
heavy ribbon around the boy's thin neck. The audience erupted. Terence Tao had just become
the youngest gold medalist in the history of the competition. Yet the boy did not grin for
the cameras. He shook the Prime Minister's hand. A participant later remembered that Terry seemed
almost confused by the noise. At an age when other boys were learning how to throw a cricket
ball, Tao was already rewriting the rules of what a child's mind could do. At 24 years old,
Tao would go on to become a full professor at UCLA, the youngest person ever appointed to that
rank in the university's history. Students assumed he was a TA. He was even younger than
half of the students he taught. In 2006, at just 31, Tao won the Fields Medal, the highest honor
in mathematics, often described as the Nobel Prize of math, given only every four years to a few
select mathematicians under 40. He has received a MacArthur Fellowship in 2006, known as the famous
Genius Grant, the Royal Society's Royal Medal. The Crafford Prize in 2012, a prestigious
international prize awarded by the Swedish Academy for fields not covered by the Nobels,
and the $3 million Breakthrough Prize in mathematics in 2014. The story of Terence
Tao is a story of a boy who once almost failed because he thought he could outrun the work.
It is a story of a man who, despite his talents, had to completely reinvent himself to emerge as
arguably the greatest mathematician of the 21st century. The roots of this story stretch back to
Hong Kong. Billy and Grace Tao left the crowded streets of the city in 1972. They came to Adelaide
in search of open space and opportunity. Billy was a pediatrician. Grace was a teacher of physics
and mathematics. They were educated people who believed in the immigrant dream. They believed
that hard work could open doors that had been bolted shut. They did not know that their first
Terence Chi Shen Tao was born on the 17th of July 1975. The signs of his genius appeared almost
immediately. He did not play with blocks like a normal toddler. He arranged and counted them.
He taught himself to read before he was two years old. His parents faced a terrifying choice. They
had a child who could perform arithmetic before he could tie his shoes. The local schools did not
know what to do with him. A five-year-old Terry walked into a classroom and realized he was
already years ahead of the curriculum. The teachers were baffled. Billy and Grace made a decision that
would shape the rest of their lives. They created a curriculum at home. They let him move at his own
speed. Billy Tao knew that burnout was the enemy of prodigies. He knew the history of children who
shone too bright and burned to ash before they turned 20. He wanted his son to have a childhood.
Terry played video games and learned computer programming at age six because he wanted to make
things move on a screen. He taught himself the basic programming language from a manual. By day,
he was a child. By late afternoon, he was auditing university courses at Flinders University.
The room at Flinders University was filled with undergraduates in jeans and flannel shirts.
They were 18 or 19 years old. And there in the front row sat a nine-year-old boy.
His feet did not touch the floor. He listened quietly and took notes.
At age eight, Terry scored a 760 out of 800 on the math section of the SAT.
This is a test designed for American high school seniors looking to enter university.
Terry was eight. Researchers at Johns Hopkins University, who met him, thought he had the
greatest mathematical reasoning ability they had ever seen. But raw ability was not enough.
His father knew he needed mentors. He needed to see how the game was played at the highest level.
Billy Tao took his son to America when Terry was nine. They went to Princeton to the Institute
for Advanced Study. They met the gods of mathematics. They met Charles Pfefferman
and Enrico Bombieri. These were men who had won Fields Medals and defined the field.
Pfefferman gave the kid some tricky pursuit of Asian problems, way beyond simple math,
to see what he was really capable of. Terry totally nailed these complex puzzles,
which featured figures like lions chasing men in a small space. The amazing part? He didn't
use the standard methods. He came up with his own clever ways to solve them. Pfefferman was
blown away, later saying he was impressed that a nine-year-old could invent ideas you wouldn't
find in any textbook. Bombieri saw the tension in the small boy. The atmosphere at the Institute
for Advanced Study can be suffocating. It is serious business. Bombieri decided to break the
ice. At one point in their interaction, the great mathematician jumped up and roared like a lion.
He chased the nine-year-old around the office. The room exploded in laughter.
Then came Paul Erdős. The wandering Hungarian monk of mathematics visited Adelaide in 1985.
He was famous for his eccentricity and his brilliance. He called children epsilons because
they were small quantities. He sat with ten-year-old Terry. They worked on problems
together. Terry later said he looked like just another nice old man. He did not know he was
sitting with a legend. Erdős treated him like an equal. He spoke to him as an adult. He wrote
a letter later that predicted greatness. He said he was sure Terry would become a first-rate
mathematician. It was the blessing of the Pope of Mathematics. Despite his impressive collection
of medals and accolades, trouble was brewing for Terry. Terry Tao was merely coasting.
He hadn't developed study habits because he had never needed them. The solutions simply
materialized in his mind. He earned his bachelor's degree at 16 and his master's at 17. Then,
he headed to America, packing for Princeton to pursue his Ph.D. A teenager about to enter the
most rigorous mathematics program globally, he mistakenly anticipated an easy experience.
Princeton in 1992 was a cold bath. Terence Tao walked into Fine Hall and looked at the faculty
directory. He recognized half the names from the textbooks he had read. He felt a sudden shiver of
intimidation. He was 17. The other graduate students were in their mid-twenties. They had
lived lives. They had failed before. Terry had never failed. He chose to work with Elias Stein.
Stein was a legend in harmonic analysis. He literally wrote the book on the subject.
Stein was a kind man with a sharp mind, but the work was hard. The problems at Princeton
weren't like four-hour Olympiad puzzles with clear-cut solutions. They were tricky,
ongoing issues in math that really required a ton of hard work and sticking with it.
Terry did not have grit. He spent his time playing computer games like Civilization and Tetris.
He joined a film club. He played foosball in the student lounge. He avoided the library. He was
living on his own for the first time. His father had to come to New Jersey for the first week
to help him set up a bank account and learn to do laundry. The genius of the Olympiad was
struggling to function as an adult. When the time came for his general exams, he studied for
a few weeks. He walked into the oral exam room with the confidence of a prodigy. He almost
flamed out. The professors asked him questions he could not answer. He froze. He stumbled through
the solutions. He managed to pass, but it was a near thing. Elias Stein sat him down afterward.
The older man was gentle but firm. He told Terry that the performance was disappointing.
It was the wake-up call he needed. Tao realized that the magic trick was over. He could not rely
on raw processing power anymore. He had to learn the craft. He began to work and listen. He learned
that research is not a sprint. It is a marathon through a jungle at night. You do not know where
you are going. You hit dead ends. You have to backtrack. You have to hack through the vines
of confusion. Stein taught him how to see the big picture. He taught him to respect the
literature. He showed Terry that mathematics is a conversation across centuries. You cannot speak
if you do not listen to what has been said before. Tao recalled standing in line at Stein's office
hours. He would bring a thorny problem to the master. Stein would listen for five minutes.
Then he would reach into a filing cabinet and pull out an old paper. He would know exactly
what technique would crack the lock. Tao began to read. He became a researcher by absorbing the
work of others. This involved developing the rigor to write proofs and the patience to endure the
tedious task of checking details. He finished his Ph.D. at 21. He finally became a mathematician.
Moving to Los Angeles in 1996, he joined the faculty at UCLA. The campus, with its sunny
and bright atmosphere, offered a contrast to the gray stone of Princeton and the quiet suburbs of
Adelaide. In the chaos of the city, Tao thrived. He became a full professor at 24. He was the
youngest person ever appointed to that rank in the history of the university. He wore t-shirts,
sneakers, and rode a bike to campus with a backpack slung over one shoulder. Students in
the hallways mistook him for a teaching assistant. His office became a legend. Papers were piled in
teetering towers. Books were scattered on every surface. It looked like the aftermath of a paper
explosion. A journalist once visited him and found Tao was clad in khakis and a royal blue polo shirt.
He was friendly and unassuming, but the room around him was pure entropy. Tao developed a
reputation as a machine. He did not work on one problem at a time. He worked on ten or twenty.
He rotated through them like a chef managing pots on a stove. If he got stuck on a problem in number
theory, he would switch to a problem in partial differential equations. If he got stuck there,
he would move to harmonic analysis. Tao distinguished himself as a prolific collaborator,
in contrast to most mathematicians who tend to closely guard their ideas for fear of being scooped.
Unlike his peers, Tao freely shared his intellectual property, engaging in open
discussions with anyone interested. He would literally invite others into his thought process
at the blackboard. Word got around in math circles that if you were stuck on a problem,
you just had to get Terry interested. He would listen for a few minutes. He would stare at the
ceiling. Then he would say something that forced the door open. He could see the hidden threads
that connected everything to everything else. The results began to pour out of him. The volume
was staggering, and the quality was terrifying. He was publishing 50 papers a year. These were
major breakthroughs. His colleague John Garnett said that in a good year, he might write three
papers. Terry wrote 56 in two years. And they were all brilliant. In 2004, he teamed up with Ben
Green. They decided to tackle the prime numbers. The primes are the atoms of arithmetic. They are
the building blocks of all numbers. Two, three, five, seven, and so on. They seem to appear at
random. There is no simple formula to predict where the next one will be. As you go higher,
they get rarer. Mathematicians had wondered for centuries if there was a pattern. Could you find
a sequence of primes that were evenly spaced? This is called an arithmetic progression. Could
you find three primes in a row with the same gap? Yes. Three, five, seven. The gap is two.
Could you find four? Yes. Could you find ten? Could you find a hundred? Green and Tao tackled a
problem that had persisted for centuries. Their approach was novel, utilizing methods from both
ergodic theory and combinatorics. In doing so, they forged a connection between two
academic areas that seldom intersected. They proved that you could find a sequence of any
length you wanted. You could find a billion primes in a perfect row if you looked far enough.
They did not find the primes themselves. They proved they had to exist. The Green-Tao theorem
rocked the math world. It was a discovery of deep beauty. The New York Times ran a story on it.
They explained to the public that somewhere in the infinity of integers, there were regiments
of primes marching in perfect step. Then came compressed sensing. This discovery began at a
preschool. While picking up his son from preschool, mathematician Terence Tao encountered Emmanuel
Candesse, a fellow mathematician. Candesse was facing a challenge related to MRI machines,
determining if a high-resolution image could be rebuilt from limited data.
Conventional wisdom said no. This is known as the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem.
It says that to build a clear picture, you need a lot of samples. If you skimp on the data,
the picture will be blurry. Candesse suspected this might not always be true.
He thought that if the image had a certain structure, you might be able to guess the
missing parts. Even with all the noise from parents and kids, Tao listened carefully to
the problem and got the gist. He told Candesse he was skeptical he thought the task was impossible
before heading home. But the problem kept nagging at him. Eventually, he connected it to high
dimensional geometry, which gave him a workaround for the system. If the image was sparse, it meant
it contained less information than it appeared. Most of the data was zero or close to zero.
You could find the picture in the data if you knew how to look. He wrote to Candesse the next day.
He had solved it. Together, they built the field of compressed sensing. It changed the way doctors
take MRI scans. It allowed machines to see more while looking less that saved lives. He has also
taken on the Navier-Stokes equations, which describe fluid dynamics, the flow of water, air,
and oil. These are considered the most challenging equations in physics and are designated as one of
Millennium Prize problems. The Clay Mathematics Institute offers a $1 million prize for the
solution. The core question is straightforward. Are the governing equations always valid,
or can a fluid's movement become so intricate that the mathematics fails? Specifically,
is it possible for the fluid's velocity to reach infinity within a finite time,
a phenomenon known as a blow-up? Though Tao did not ultimately solve the problem,
he devised a thought experiment to test its boundaries. The Exploding Water Computer.
He envisioned a computer constructed from water to illustrate how energy could potentially
concentrate in smaller and smaller eddies, a large whirlpool driving a small one,
which in turn drives a tiny one. If perfectly constructed, the energy would accelerate,
suggesting the equations underpinning the physics might be more fragile than previously thought.
The awards have been raining on him since that IMO Gold Medal win in 1988. In 2006,
his exceptional intellect won the MacArthur Fellowship, popularly known as the Genius Grant.
That same year, in August, the math world gathered in Madrid for its Super Bowl,
the International Congress of Mathematicians. Terry Tao, then 31, was awarded the Fields Medal.
The citation for the medal was an unprecedented catalogue of achievements,
recognizing his total dominance across disparate fields, partial differential equations,
combinatorics, harmonic analysis, and number theory. During his speech, he focused on
acknowledging his mentors and collaborators, consistently attempting to deflect the spotlight.
He is known to dislike the word genius, finding it a lazy descriptor that unfortunately creates
a barrier between the public and mathematics. He started a blog called What's New? It is the
most important website in mathematics. He once wrote an essay titled,
Does One Have to Be a Genius to Do Maths? His answer was an emphatic no.
He believes that success comes from hard work, asking questions, and making mistakes.
He posts his own rejections. He admitted that he still submits papers that get turned down.
He showed the world that even Terence Tao has bad days.
Tao initiated the Polymath Projects, recognizing the potential of the internet to transform
mathematical collaboration. This concept was tested in 2009 when Timothy Gowers questioned
the feasibility of massively collaborative mathematics. Tao eagerly participated.
They posted a challenging problem online, inviting contributions from anyone interested in
assisting with the solution. The result was electric. They solved problems in weeks that
would have taken years for a lone genius. In 2013, a mathematician named Yitang Zhang
proved that there were infinitely many pairs of primes with a gap of 70 million.
It was a huge breakthrough. But 70 million is a large number.
Mathematicians wanted to get it smaller. The world watched as the number dropped.
It went from 70 million to 60 million, then to 10,000, then to 600, then to 246.
Tao orchestrated it all. He is 50 years old now, still writing and thinking. He's a huge bike guy,
riding his cycle to work every day. He's married to Laura, who is an engineer at NASA,
and they have two kids. When he's got free time, you can find him catching up on Doctor Who or
playing board games like Settlers of Catan. He knows he's not immortal, so he makes sure to get
his rest. Colleagues say that if you met him at a party, you would never guess who he is.
He is soft-spoken and polite. He listens more than he talks.
In 2014, he won the prestigious Breakthrough Prize, known as Oscars of Science, which included a
$3 million award. The ceremony was a glitzy affair featuring movie stars. Rather than keeping
the prize money, he chose to donate part of it. He dedicated the funds to supporting the future
by establishing a fellowship program for graduate students. Is he the greatest mathematician of all
time? It is a question that people love to ask. It is a question that makes mathematicians squirm.
How do you compare him to Gauss or Euler? British mathematician Timothy Gowers has
compared Tao to David Hilbert. Hilbert was the last man to know all of mathematics.
Gowers says that it is hard to find a gap in Tao's knowledge. If you find one, it will be
filled a year later. Charles Pfefferman says that Tao is the ultimate problem solver. If you are
stuck, you call Terry. He is the breaker of logjams. So, what will he solve next?
Tao is looking at artificial intelligence these days. He is also interested in the twin prime
conjecture, which basically asks, are there an endless number of prime pairs that are only two
apart? He is also wondering if working with computers could help crack these kinds of
problems. Another thing he is mulling over is the Collatz conjecture. If you keep having an
even number or doing 3 times plus 1 to an odd number, will you always end up back at 1?
Tao has shown it works for almost all numbers, but nailing down that final,
solid proof is still a challenge. This was the story of Terence Tao, the Mozart of math,
the epsilon, the professor, the connector, the greatest of his time.
