David Nino Rodriguez & Alpha Breaking News 7.10.26 - They Tried To TRAP Trump... This This HAPPENED

What's up folks. Welcome to Nino's Corner.TV. I'm joined once again with Alpha Warrior and Ivan Reiglin. I don't know if we've ever had a podcast together, have we? The three of us? Yeah, us three. I don't think so, man. I don't think so. So this is, this should be pretty epic. So this should be pretty good. I got some kind of preview of what we're going to be walking in here, but Hey man, yeah, let's hit it hard. Let's hit the ground running. So Ivan, I mean, state your case. I mean, we agreed to disagree on a lot of things. I feel, you know, Alpha and I, let's start off with the foundation. Okay. Go ahead. Commie lives don't matter. Okay. Yeah. Commie lives don't matter. 100%. Remember, everybody's focusing on November, right? So November is where we go and take down the Democrats, but we got things to do before then. I want stronger Republicans to go into that fight come November and the primary season started in March and ends in September because every state runs their primaries differently. Okay. So if you understand that from the get go, which I didn't really disclose it, people don't realize the frame that I'm coming from. If you understand that my intent and all of my rhetoric, if you say I've pivoted, whatever, I'll back that up. It's in order to get inflate nutsacks in those Republicans that are incumbents, right? Let's take a look. I mean, Republicans own the House, the Senate and the White House. Name one person that's been arrested. The response is usually, oh, check this out. We have, what's his name? Got indicted. Commie. That's not an arrest. Oh, John Brennan is being investigated. That's not an arrest. Fauci is going to be subpoenaed. Actually, that's a legislative branch action. That's Rand Paul doing it, not the White House. So when you go down the laundry list of that, and then you couple that with, wait, why is Mamdani the mayor of New York, folks, if you're talking about communists? It's because Donald Trump endorsed the Democrat COVID criminal Cuomo, okay? He didn't endorse the Republican. So then who's the one betraying Republicans and the MAGA base, starting with, I would say June, and then more so in September of 2025? I think the answer is pretty clear. But I have more details. I want you guys to respond. Yeah, Alfa, you want to jump in there? I mean, obviously, I think Alfa and I both agree what we're watching here is a brilliant strategy and an operation, right, Alfa? I mean, we're watching something unfold here that's absolutely genius on so many different levels. And I think when you're playing this kind of game like Trump is, where he's in the pit of vipers, things you have to bring the public along with you with what he's doing. And just that, what I just showed here was, I'll put it up again, the communists are about to make their move, right? I think what Trump's going to do here, I think Tulsi Gabbard played her part. There's a lot of rumors out there saying that she was actually fired and given a chance to step down. I think Trump was controlling Tulsi the entire time, and now he's moving someone else into position to take a role. I think when he says communists are finally making their move, it means they're not going to pass the SAVE Act. Obviously, we know that's going to be, it's going to be very- Let me, let me say one thing on the Tulsi- Hold on, let me just, let me, I'll let you go right now. But I'm just saying that I think in the direction, the trajectory where this is all going, when he says communists are about to make their move, they're going to have no choice but to throw the entire chessboard when he gets ready to declare a national security emergency or executive orders that could be signed by Trump. They're going to make some very drastic panic moves. Alpha, if you want to jump in real quick before Ivan does. Yeah, just real quick. So I think we all understand that there's Democratic Party, there's a Republican Party at the surface, the normie level, but we all understand that's an establishment. It's an establishment. It's always been this mechanism. And so I think one thing we'll agree on is that this corruption has infiltrated our government just like it has every other government. So when we're looking at, you know, these Ds and these Rs, what does Trump have to do? He has to expose not to us, not even our audience. Our audience is pretty dialed in on the corruption, but we don't represent the majority. The majority of people are still tied into Fox and MSNBC and all that crap. So he has Fox and Facebook. Yeah. So he has exposed to these people what's going on. And if you look at the strategy of what he's done, he's he's attacked the financial institution of the deep state. He went after USAID. He went after the National Endowment for Democracy. And I consider that like the white collar money laundering, the FTX. But what else has he done? Right. And this is this is what kind of gives me more confidence in him is right in January when he came out, he one of the first things that he tasked Pam Bondi with was labeling the cartels as domestic terrorists. Now, why? Because he already knew down the line that he was going to be dropping bombs on these pieces of ----. You know what I mean? Like he knew he was going there. So that tells you that this guy's been orchestrating these moves. Why? Because the cartels, whether it's Trinidad, Uruguay, Marseille, Russia, all of them, that that's the that's the black market money laundering that that this establishment uses. So when he attacked the financial structure and then he's attacking the people that do the weapons trafficking, narcotics trafficking and the human trafficking, that hurts the establishment. So right then that tells you that he's doing the surface level stuff, but he's also operational. And then we get into what are we going to do? We're going to vote for more rhinos. All they're going to do is wait Trump out. That's what they want to do. They want to wait them out so that the next or he endorses them like Lindsey Graham, because because right now the establishment is what's in position. So he's like, I know he's leverage these people. And what he has to do is he has to show the American populace, hey, this is a mechanism that's worked against you. These people don't represent you. There's corruption, there's fraud. And so when you look at what's starting to surface, you know, you what you have with you know, the the Venezuela whistleblowers and Maduro and all this election fraud that's come to the surface. My personal opinion is the reason he's been going so hard to push the Save America Act is because he knows they're not going to pass a hundred. I agree with you a hundred percent. He's exposing them. And then look at right here to your point. Mexican officials have become informants for the Trump administration. I've been talking to people here on the border. You know, the Border Patrol, ICE, a lot of them are my friends. And I know both sides of the border, by the way, is like I know the people over there as well. Cartels are being taken here, you know, the American side, 100 percent. They're taking them down. They are in there taking these people down, dude. I mean, they are they're kicking in doors. And look at it says right here, Mexican officials, which has always been what I've been suspecting, have been giving Trump administration intel on the cartels. And that's why even in you got to use the New York Slimes as your source. I was going to ask a question about so you have your analysis and thoughts on it. And, you know, and then Alpha, you have your thoughts and an analysis. And I don't know who you talk to in the admin, like which cabinet level officials or subcabinet officials throughout to help you inform your understanding of what you're saying. If you if there are then OK, then maybe you're coming from a direction that I'm not aware of. But I talk to numerous amounts of people up to and including cabinet level officials in this administration to help me and to help inform me on my message. I always shouldn't say to help inform me of what's going on so that I can assess, give my conclusions and then come up with better strategies behind it. Now, I get it. What I present is it's too much. Right. It's it's where most of these people don't have the political courage, don't have the balls to do it. But it's in order to push them to start thinking about other options so that they so that if they do, for example, if they do what I recommend, then everybody's going to say, oh, I've been came up with the idea. Well, they don't want that because let's face it, people have egos. You don't want to give credit to somebody that's pushing the envelope a little bit too much. But what that does, it forces the Overton window and strategy and ideation to then say we can't go there. But since Ivan is talking about it in such a way and it scales sometimes because it goes viral, then maybe we can do 10 percent of what is being discussed, you know, by you, me, others, etc., as opposed to the 100 percent solution, which is still 10 percent more than would have been thought about in terms of an unconventional, aggressive political maneuver. Then had I not participated in the zeitgeist or the political conversation, it does make sense. And I think what you're doing is important. I mean, you know, I disagree with some of these. I'm pushing the First Amendment to the maximum. I mean, he knows they're in person and confront these people, which I give you a lot of credit for doing. I watch some of these videos and I'm like, holy ----, he's at it again. And it's important because what's one of the things that Trump's been posting or at least one of whoever he's tasking with discombobulation, discombobulation, discombobulation. And you have them on Monday morning. The war with Iran is over. We're at peace Tuesday afternoon. We're going to bomb the ---- out of them. And you see the people that are just going back and forth. So a lot of these cabinet officials are also relying on what's being said to him. But Trump is constantly shifting the narrative and he's he's provoking people to actually have to think. But some people argue, I don't know where you guys stand in this. Trump is not the end all be all. He doesn't have full control, 100 percent control of the globe, of the United States. Other people, to include you and me, when we start to interact with people, help shape how things move. Well, I would say that the reason why you have an up and down as it relates to Epstein, as it relates to the Iran war on behalf of Israel, you're seeing that it's a back and forth because on one side over his right shoulder, he has Miriam Adelson basically whispering in his ear saying, hey, I gave you 250 million dollars. I want Bibi Netanyahu to stay in power because I'm an Israeli citizen, as Miriam says, right? She's she's she's first and foremost an Israeli citizen. She bought the seat for Trump. Obviously, Elon Musk had a significant role with this 300 million dollars as well. But she also, with Sheldon before he passed, donated in total 600 million dollars to the Republican brand. So she's got a say on what Republicans do and what this White House does. And she wants to keep Bibi Netanyahu in power. And so Bibi is in this position where there's a no confidence vote on him. If one or two more Knesset members jump ship and then have a no confidence vote. So the calculus for Bibi to convince Trump and America to go into war against Iran is not the same as ours. Ours is, hey, Iran has been messing with us for 47 years and killing American soldiers. Right. And we can surgically remove their capability from threatening us, which we've done. I think that we've done at this point and we've sent the message. But it's different than, hey, in order for Bibi Netanyahu to remain in power, he has to continue to receive American foreign aid and he has to basically have an external threat to Israel in the zeitgeist in Israel for him to focus his the political dynamics domestically in Israel against a foreign threat. So those two components he needs. And that's why he has to leverage through a digital influence, foreign influence ecosystem, meaning Israeli influence network headed up by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The chief of staff of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is Aaron Shayevich. He he he has contracts with different entities globally and then American influencers to go ahead and have these conversations that are inauthentic to convince people. Now, so right, the shills that are getting paid for Israel. Right, exactly. And so it's hard to tell who's getting paid and who's not. Because some people just agree with the policy and some people are there just specifically to push for a narrative. And I think Alex Berkowitz kind of laid out a portion of it, which a lot of what he discussed yesterday on Tucker's show, I laid it out last fall as these foreign agent registrations were being published on the DOJ's website, like the Brad Parr scale. Right, Ivan? I mean, we are seeing the worm kind of turn a little bit. That's why you're seeing 180 back and forth on one side. Like I said, the the big donors, Miriam and Bibi, has their interests and on the other side, the grassroots and the grassroots is only amplifying its message of, hey, yeah, we want to take out the capability of threats from Iran, but we're not there to fund the military industrial complex, nor did I vote to like I didn't vote to for Ballard partner to make payroll. I didn't make so that the military industrial complex made payroll and I didn't vote for Bibi Netanyahu. I voted for Donald Trump to represent America. But but to that point, though, people attribute too much power to Marianne Adelson because you look at Jeff. Yes, he's ten times more rich than Marianne Adelson and he's donated to Trump. He's donated to he's donated to mass. That may be the case. But I'm talking I'm talking about the numbers of donation. Right. But that's what I'm saying is that if she has the ability and here's the thing to Trump's in his second term so he could take money and people could think that a favor is old doesn't mean he has to follow through with it. And I think we're seeing some of that because I think maybe he started to see maybe polling came over. Some information got to him in the last couple of weeks where he finally realized that, you know, I pushed it too far. Or the other component is they the military industrial complex, Miriam and Bibi basically got all they wanted out of this deal. First and foremost, he focused on them. And now maybe he can pivot back to you. Talked about USAID. Now, maybe he can bring Ilan back instead of J.D. doing what Ilan was supposed to originally do. Can you guys hear me on my mic? Yeah. Yeah. I'm just ignoring them. Oh, I figured I was like, all right. I think we're right on time with a worm turning. I think, you know, I think Trump is right now giving Israel the cold shoulder, which we've always expected. I've always argued that. But I argue it was forced on him. I don't think so at all. I think I was on him. I talked to so many people, I think it's going to be I think it's we've saved space for this for the last year. I've been saying he's going to turn on Israel at the right time. Give give it is we got to take out the nuclear threat of of Iran, which was going to be used by the globalists to kickstart a nuclear holocaust and activate terror cells in America simultaneously. So if you're watching phases, if you're watching, I think we'll be in a hurry. I think we would be. Let me just let me. I got you, Ivan. But let me just finish. We're watching operational phases unfold like the USAID, the defending of the Democrats, the ICE raids, taking down the terror cells, going in after the organizers, the really bad hombres, the the ones that were going to be working for the cartels, the cartel, cartel henchmen, the whole thing, then taking out Maduro, Smartmatic, all of this stuff that's happening right now, then going into Iran, deactivating the nuclear threat. And now it's coming to a time where Trump is shining a light on Obama, Hillary. Everyone's saying, hey, the communists are about to make their move as we go into midterms. I think we're getting ready to we're riding into the storm of new phases of this operation. And I think Iran needed to be neutralized. And now it's Israel's turn. And I don't know how you see that. Oh, I think it's to rewind it all the way back to his inauguration in 2016. And people say, I don't know what he's trying to do. One of the most important things he said that is we are giving it back to the people. And so now it's fast. Now, let's bring it back to where we're at right now. You're looking at three of them. And if 100 percent, if the rhinos just continue to maintain power, then the people never have it. And what he's doing through this frustration, because think about it, how many people people didn't know about tariffs. But what did he do? He showed the lawfare that was going to be weaponized against tariffs, because when the courts came after it, what did what did Scott Bessett said? Oh, well, we have these other tariff laws we could use. So this is like, well, if you knew you already had those and those were better suited, why didn't you use those? And the reason is because of what Trump's doing. He's exposing the mechanism. He knew they would come after tariffs after seeing that people were I wish he was as brilliant as you think he is. Well, I wish you here's why I think he is, because in this administration, Antifa hasn't been able to accomplish what they want. They don't have the mass effect that they did before. BLM doesn't have that. The Kings hasn't had that. And why is that? Because Trump has an actual intelligence apparatus right now that is given on actionable stuff. You just had the leader from from Antifa just got sentenced to 100 years. So when people say things aren't happening, what does that tell the other people in Antifa right now? Because we know come midterms that these are the people that they're going to want to inflame. And now they just saw, you know, the papa bear from where they got sentenced to 100 years. And I think it's coming to a choke point because if Trump would have like with Bolton, and this is a big thing, Bolton just pled guilty, you know, and I mean, that that's amazing. Now, if he was, you know, five years, we got to remember, he's what, 77, 78. So five years is, you know, anyways, but he also probably rolled on some people. So I hope he did. I do, too. And that's that's why I think midterms are very important. Midterms are going to sit in the courtroom yesterday. I'm like thinking, I wonder how many people he rolled on and if that's going to be enough for Trump to just pardon him at the end of his conviction. Right. Or right after sentencing, you know, if if he gives some big players, I think that would probably soften the blow. But if if people can't witness the outcome of whatever he did in his plea deal and Trump gives them a pardon, I think that could backfire on Trump. I think that would that would be bad. Yeah, I think what Trump's doing and this is important to remember, Bolton's a Republican. It's like Trump's going after Republicans more than he's Democrats, like I just said. Yeah, but the deep state is nose nose out of the eye. And that's important because in his first term, he exposed the Democrats, which we knew the extreme ideology is there. And what's he doing in this one? He's exposing the RINO establishment, the deep state establishment within the Republican Party to show us the people, hey, you need to get part of your precinct committee. You have to be involved locally because if you think that these people are going to vote to fix the mechanism that keeps them in power, that ain't ever going to happen. So Trump's showing that, hey, we got to secure these elections. But to the point with with the Iran war, if I think it was August or maybe it was September, whenever it was, when he had the meeting with Putin in Alaska, there was there was something that happened during that meeting in the two days following that didn't get enough attention. But there was Russian ships that started to set sail for the Persian Gulf area in Southeast Asia. But what was interesting about that is they didn't have any contracts. So you have these massive, you know, you know, these cargo ships are huge, these massive things that start going to that area with no contracts to buy or sell that. That's a huge gamble. But then we get the second portion of Operation Epic Fury and Trump does something. He's he he lightens and removes some of the sanctions on Russia. And Russia goes, well, it just so happens to be that we have some ships in the area. I don't think that's a coincidence, given the fact of when they left in that meeting. So what that tells me is Trump knew that this second 2.0 attack on Iran was going to happen. So if he knew it was going to happen, that means nobody forced them into it. Now, what I do, I agree with you here is we know the establishment, we know, you know, the Mossad unit, a 200 Israeli government, they want the big war. I think everybody understands that. And so I think if we go all the way back and granted, there's some tinfoil kind of concept to this. And and I know that gets confusing. But if we know they wanted to have this big war and we know that Trump always references that he's read the book of Sun Tzu, what he's telling us, you don't fight on their battlefield. He's he forced this conflict into a way where he had control of it, because look at it. I mean, and I guess I understand social media doesn't dictate everything, but look at the attitude shift from just the beginning of last year to now on the position of Israel and Israel as an ally. That's a big deal. And Trump has been able to do that without he himself up until recently has never said anything negative about it. He's just starting. He's just starting to. And if Israel had their way, we'd be in Turkey right now. Right. And so it's basically the response is he's now finally listening to Joe Kent. I mean, it's just not that that alpha right. We forced this is all forced. The issue has always been the strategy. No one forced anything on this guy. I think there's a firewall behind him. Just like now he's sending Alex Bruce with just like just like he was not on. Tucker did not sign the correction act on J6. It's the same thing. I believe he has a firewall behind him that he's listening. And this has been strategy the whole time. That's what I've been preaching for the last year, that he's going to turn at the right time. Well, yes, let's go back to the let's go back to the beginning. So I think this is where we're going to agree fully. We wanted all J6 was pardoned, right? That never happened. OK, Oath Keepers and Proud Boys are not pardoned. And Todd Blanche is going to try to take ownership of saying, oh, yeah, but we're moving to the dismiss the the charges against the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys, which is even better. Well, that didn't happen from the DOJ. That's because that was a Zach Rell put together a during the appeal. They built the evidence necessary to over the last several years to show that David Lazarus perjured himself. Harry Dunn perjured some. This was this was us forcing the issue. Trump had nothing to do with this. Republicans had nothing to do with this other than us getting them into office and forcing this. We had to remove Kevin McCarthy. Dude, I was instrumental in every single phase of it. When you talk about phases, I've been the planner and executor of all the phases on a lot of these wins. And I hate to say it that way because like it sounds whatever cocky, but I can assure you that I was involved in all I don't talk to all the people at the highest levels, whatever. When I identify the problem, you got to remove the problem out of the way and then come up with strategies and solutions. So we removed Kevin McCarthy, placed Mike Johnson as speaker of the House the first time in American history. And then he was then in a position to then release CCTV footage that could then be used like Steve Baker pulled it together and then show David Lazarus perjure themselves. Well, it so happens that this guy is the number one witness in the Oath Keepers trial. So all this stuff, when it comes to an appeal, the DOJ would lose on the appeal. So they were forced the the legacy DOJ were forced the deep state that's still there, like the Jocelyn Ballantyne with the Proud Boys. Right. They're still there in order to save face. They're agreeing to the dismissal because if they go and do an appeal on these cases, the entire system is proven to be bunk. It's not because the DOJ is not because Pam Bondi or Todd Blanchett, they're going to take ownership or had nothing to do with these wins. But I think that's that's the most important part. That's us doing it. That in spite of this admin not firing the right people. But that's the important part. Because here's the thing. Let's just say Trump would have came out of the gate, pardon all the J sixers. He comes out of the gate, suspends any funding, go to Israel, comes out of the gate. Well, no, everybody was pardoned except for 12, 13 Oath Keepers and Proud Boys. But I'm talking about like just who was the one that told him and whispered in his ear not to pardon them. I want to know that. Here's the point that I'm trying to make with it. Well, we know again, we know there's bad people that are that are still in this in the government. But the thing is, the point that I'm trying to make is if Trump would have went and just did everything that we want, then Trump is the savior because he's doing it. Well, so then what happens in 20, January 20, 29, when he's not here no more, what he's doing is he's forcing the dynamics of people like you and others to be like, we got to do this. We got to confront the DOJ. We got to take over the precinct. We got to do this. And that's what I mean. Through that process of exposing the mechanism, then we the people are OK. Your theory is that his inaction is forcing others to do something 100 percent. You're doing something. I mean, obviously, I mean, yeah, and I'm calling it out as he is the president. He's not a social media influencer like you can go ahead and do truth posts, but you can also have action behind it. Well, he's with Pam Bondi. He's right now. Todd Blanche has done a little bit more failure after failure. But but zoom out, zoom out. What he's doing is he's he's showing inaction in areas where you're going to make the move. But before you make that move, he sets you up for success. Because, for instance, the right now, the Democratic Party, the DNC, they don't got no ******* money. Everybody's being let me let me reiterate. Under no circumstance do I support Democrats or any of that scum. No, but he's trying to improve and strengthen those that are patriots within the Republican Party. I know you can support them. But what I'm saying is he's starting off with commies. His parents fled the Soviet Union from communism. What I'm saying is motherfuckers, if he's defunding and destabilizing the entities that normally would have stopped you guys or try to stop you guys from doing what you're doing, that that would be one thing if he just was sitting back and watching things happen. He's actively engaged in making it more difficult for us to solve these problems. Like I said, in New York, why are you going to support what's his name? Cuomo, Democrat COVID criminal, one of the key instruments of conducting mass murder of elderly in New York. And Donald Trump puts his name to it and endorses that scumbag. And that ushers in Mamdani. That is a problem for me, Alpha. And I'm sure everybody agrees that it's a problem, but they're never going to say, oh, it's Trump's fault. It is Trump's fault. But he endorsed the other guy. But here's the issue with that one. I don't like that he endorsed Cuomo any more than that. Then he brings in Albert Bourla into the White House and is like smooching and loving on him. And Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg, the guys that censored you and me, that crushed us over four or five years. But that's a problem. It is a problem. But Trump's endorsement was only half the problem. If we saw that endorsement, where were the people to show up to combat that with their vote? They didn't show up. So that same thing with Lindsey Graham endorsing him. I mean, it's numerous again. Now, there are some wins. I'm glad Bill Cassidy is on his way out. I'm glad there's especially Bill Cassidy because he was the one blocking COVID accountability. Speaking of COVID accountability, President Trump, January 19th of 2021, what did he do? And he still hasn't retracted it. He went ahead and gave an award to Anthony Fauci, Deborah Birx, Mark Milley, his son in law, Jared Kushner, for the beloved Operation Warp Speed. After what we saw with Rand Paul's disclosures and Tulsi Gabbard's disclosure with Anthony Fauci, which we all knew, that's why we're in this space now. And he still hasn't retracted. The executive branch hasn't said a peep about Fauci. What did Tulsi Gabbard just say in that? And on our on our last day, what did she say in that video? Information that should have been given to Trump was withheld from him, which didn't allow him to make the correct decision. So you got to remember, Trump's not a doctor. Well, he just provided it. Well, she just provided it. She just she just got crickets. She just provide. Well, you know, it's not going to it's not going to happen in a week, especially that that process is going to take a while. And the other thing, too, is Tulsi Gabbard. They're not the ones that do the it's already been six years, man. Well, it's been six years that we know that we know. But you got to remember this administration now that Tulsi doesn't do the arrest, she's going to do the referral to the DOJ. Right. I get it. The DOJ to do it. And now Trump gets how many people do you talk to in the cabinet in the White House? Do you talk to any? Not in the cabinet. OK, I want to be careful what I say, because I'm not going to say it yet. But I've been tracking what's been going on with Tulsi Gabbard and all the people that have done what you've seen her do. I've been tracked. I'll just say it this way. I've been tracking that very closely, closer than any other person on this planet. OK, so when you say these things are happening and Trump did this now, I am facilitating it in spite of the inactions and the vipers and everybody else trying to block it. And if I were to name who I talked to in this admin, they would be fired within seconds. And so that's why I've had to play this public game and essentially private ball in order for us to get some of these wins that America and the world's been saying essentially the last 16 months. Dude, I'm a planner. I'm a former action guy, right? Where you're coming from completely. And I talk to everybody at the highest levels. I think Alva's going to agree with me here. This is this is at a different level right off to where I think there's people that are read in and there's not. And there's probably a dozen of them. And I think this is this game that's being played. How do I play the way it is? And I am ready to be exposed. And the other thing, too, is the one thing that this administration. One thing I can tell you some stuff like not for public consumption right now, one of the things that help you understand and increase the credibility that I bring to this discussion. One of the I believe you're very credible, but but I know what I'm looking at and I'm watching strategy, brilliant strategy. And I think this is going to welcome, I guess. I don't know what to say. I think I think I would be surprised if delayed. I wouldn't be surprised if these executive orders that Trump gets ready to sign regarding the elections because the say that won't pass. This is when the Democrats, the communists make their. We can either have a fight. So I focus on winning and not just having a fight. You guys are saying that Trump just wants to have a fight. OK, if that's what he wants, then he's going to be exposed anyway. Just have a fight and he's going to lose it every single step of the way. And the deep state is going to continue to be undefeated. I've been asked to say that it's simple. You are. If you look at the Constitution, I think it's article one, section three. President of the Senate is the vice president, the only dual branch actor in our constitutional order. Right. J.D. Vance is who it is right now. That's a senior person in the United States Senate chambers. OK, so if you want to force students hand, if you want to force that institution's hand, then J.D. Vance walks in and says, all right, I'm going to be controlling all time in this chamber at the head of the rostrum and parliamentary maneuvering. And so first order of business is here's my parliamentarian, here's my new sergeant at arms. And number three, nothing gets accomplished that you guys want from the uniparty, whether it's FISA or anything else, until you confirm every all 94 U.S. attorneys that are going to go scorched earth against the deep state, all ambassador positions instead of Marco Rubio running foreign policy on behalf of Miriam Adelson only and as the national security adviser and the secretary of state. Meanwhile, 80 percent, 70 to 80 percent of the current diplomatic corps right now are legacy holdover Biden ambassadors and charges. It's ridiculous. I mean, we're 16 months into it. And then lastly, the Save America Act is going to be passed. If not, if those things aren't done, I'm just going to bog up this entire Senate chambers and nothing gets done, meaning the deep state. I would rather have a zero budget of a government than a penny in our government weaponized against us. And that's what he could do. So if he wants to be the nominee and secure his legacy, then that would be my recommended course of action. But it requires courage. And those people around him, I again, I talk to everybody and they're like, no, that's too it's too it's too aggressive. And I told them exactly. I come up with the most aggressive, bold, unconventional solutions. And no one has the balls to do it. So collecting your losses. Here's what matters to what you're saying. It's aggressive, but it doesn't have what's what's the part that makes aggressive. It's the court of public opinion. And the thing is, is for Trump to make those moves, timing has to be perfect if he makes those moves. And I'm here to expedite that timing. Well, you are, but it's bigger than you or us, because it's it's operational. We have to think longevity censorship is real as well. We got to think beyond Trump, because remember, all they're trying to do is wait them out as much as possible. And why does the perception matter? If he doesn't have the public indictment against this institution and he makes these moves, then all the mainstream media headlines of his tyranny, he's the king, all that he feeds right into it. But if he exposes the mechanism and he shows to people like you that are bringing up these conversations and others that are doing more, if he exposes that, look, the Republicans think for you, the Democrats think for you, the courts think for you. Then when he makes the aggressive move, because he's going to make the aggressive move, he's going to he's going to declare when the SAVE Act doesn't pass, he's going to declare a national 100 percent and he's going to make a move that they're going to start calling is a constitutional crisis that he doesn't have the right to do. And this it's going to be it's you're going to be walking around like this as aggressive as it's going to be. It's just going to be that people don't. But he's going to have the court of public opinion behind him. Right. And that is why it's so important to say that does not pass it. In my opinion, it's going to be exposing all of Congress, the right and the left to where Trump can make the moves he needs to and push the Democrats into their big communist move, which is what's one of the most important things that should be in that SAVE America Act. And it's not there. And I think it was Chip Roy that wrote it, too. One of the most important things that's in it that's not there is why are we still using ******* machines? Yes. I support. Yes. The one day Michael and Joe Dell just defeated the he did. He did. And that's what that's why he tried to have them put the SAVE Act attached. Meanwhile, Fox, your beloved Fox News and news, Fo News and News Vax got out with Dominion. But look what he did. He tried to attach it to FISA. He tried to attach it to the recon bill. He's tried to attach it everywhere to show the American people because more evidence is going to come up just like you did with them down. Everybody's it's going to be left and it's going to be right. It's going to be like this thing has to pass. And you assholes. OK, I get. OK, I agree with you there because most people are lower IQ, like you're saying. And they need time and build to be able to kind of get take take Trump's side. I'm a nerd in this whole political game. So I'm already forecasted all this and wargamed it to this point, knowing that this is where we're going to be. And so I'm already advocating way before this of what will eventually result in a win. So. So so far, we haven't secured any. Let me ask you something, man. How big of a move was it then to go into another country, Venezuela, and take out Maduro? How big of a mess is that? Right. To set up for what? Well, this administration has not articulated that the messaging has not been there to articulate a moment. Can I just play six minutes of this, please? That's a lot. Let me just let me just play this for you guys. Just one moment, please. And let's listen to this. This is the whole reason Maduro was captured right here. Story of how a company was controlled by this group of people here. So it was created in Venezuela. Then they created a company in Delaware back in 2000. Now, this company got a contract from the Venezuelan government to do election and develop a software, that software, which is called size and that transported movement into the United States when they acquired Sequoia Boating System in 2005. And I want you to pay attention to the person in the bottom, Mark Brown, because he's going to give you an answer to how this was controlled by people that you are familiarized with. So then we found that George Soros, since 2008, has been embedded into the structure that was managing this company. And they were exporting with the help of elements of the U.S. government, the software through the world and inside the United States. And I have to tell you that in our investigation, we have found, unfortunately, people compromised from both parties. So this is not just one side of the aisle, both sides. I want to pay attention to this specific document. When S-Magnetic purchased Sequoia and installed the new software, they go to California, which was already in the portfolio of clients. Governor Schwarzenegger was in charge in California and they come with a new software. When they installed the new software, the laws in California at that time required that if you bring a new software into the state, it doesn't matter if you already have an existing contract with them, you have to provide the source code, which is equivalent to a DNA of the software, into the hands of an expert designated by the Secretary of State of California for review. That happened and those eight engineers from UC Berkeley, Pennsylvania and Davis produced a 360 page report that we got access to it. That report in 2007 established that this software was built to steal election, not to administer election. For that reason, the state of California revoked the license of Sequoia and told them you have to leave the state, which they did. But they stay in the rest of the country. But when the Republican lost the governorship in California and the Democrat took it over, they changed the law. And what company took over the election in California? Dominion with the very same software that was revoked. Not only is it even worse, because in 2018, Smartmatic came back to the United States. Where? L.A. County. Does anybody in this room believe the last election in California was fair and clean? Well, that's Smartmatic. California today is ground zero for election problem. Does Smartmatic own Dominion? No. We do have a relationship. We are competitors. Were you associated with the late Hugo Chavez? Absolutely not. Do you use a Venezuelan company's software that's been used to steal election out of the country? Absolutely not. Anderson, I can cut all of this short. We were founded in Toronto, which is where my family was from, and there was nothing to do with Venezuela. Can you flip votes in the computer system? Can you add votes that did not exist? Absolutely not. So this is in 2023. My business partner and I started exposing this and working with the Department of Justice. There were a few U.S. attorneys that were career officers during the Biden administration that were patriots who decided to take the risk to investigate this. And against all the marching order receiving from Washington, they kept an investigation open. God bless them. Because those are the people who are making this to be exposed. But Mr. Pesullo, who wrote the book, neither my business partner nor I ever have been sued by Dominion. We want to be sued. I'm waiting for the lawsuit. They haven't sent me a lawsuit, Smartmatic, because we want to bring our engineers. I said, OK, let's go. They started suing Fox News and Sidney Powell and everyone. The people they knew cannot get to the bottom of this. And here's an interesting part. At the moment, the Department of Justice in San Juan, Puerto Rico, confiscated the system of Dominion, the whole ecosystem of the election under the request of Tulsi Gabbard. Dominion got sold weeks later and they shut down the company. Dominion as a company do not exist any longer. So you cannot subpoena emails. You cannot do anything. They disappeared. So the question is, how has come that the company who controlled 30% of the electoral market of the United States abandoned the most profitable election market in the world because DOJ took over images of every component of the system? So this is a big question I ask to you guys. Why are we doing this? Why it cannot be American made? Why we have to use a Canadian company with a Venezuelan software with Chinese? What can go wrong? So that that's why I shared it. Where was that? That was at the fraud summit in Vegas, the event I hosted. So you know who that is, right? That's folk. I don't know his name. I'll go back and look at his name again. I don't know his name right off the top of my mind. But the guy was brilliant. The guy was brilliant. And I think that I may or may not have known him for a while. Okay, so you're on board with what he's saying. Obviously, to go into my point just being made that going in. He mentioned Tulsi Gabbard, right? Yeah, of course. Yeah. And I think the only one that's really been doing anything towards accountability, obviously, like, everybody's about priorities. My priority has been transparency and accountability. Right? You call it retribution, justice, etc. Well, the transparency has already been done. The criminal referrals already been done. And so now it's just like, okay, Pam Bondi F, right? If that Todd Blanche and doing a little bit better. But the key component here is there hasn't been. We don't have the US attorneys in place. Well, that requires Donald Trump to push for that. What did he do when it came to Ed Martin in DC? He caved. Adam, you know, Martin won't be your US attorney. Do you understand that we went and took out Maduro for this purpose for smartmatic? He's he is here in America. He's being interrogated. All of this is going to come out at the right time. Tulsi Gabbard played her part, which I tend to believe. Maybe she was fired for certain things. Uh, Tim pulled or it's a civil war between the CIA. There's a lot of great. You're right. You're right, Ivan. But Pulte goes in there and starts firing people. Many of them with connections to Tulsi Gabbard, by the way, in the DNI. So to me, I'm looking at this for that. Yeah. And it's going to it's going to keep Michael Ellis and Aaron Lucas and Alexa. Well, I like to play with Vipers. I've been I've been we're surrounded by Vipers. I agree with you, dude. So many of them. But to go in and actually take the ****** out of Venezuela, by the way, I think it's the first time I just said that Alexa Henning was one of the ones that well, I'm just saying, I mean, that's that's, you know, saying Trump's not doing anything and to go into another whole country and take out their leader and bring him back here for this reason of is a big ******* move. Do you agree, Alva? I agree. And I agree 100% with that. But the other thing, too, is to solidify the retribution that that you want and then that all of us want. It's not just you is he's going to have to have a government in place that's not going to try to pull that. And we're going to see that. I agree. I think I think the difference between people think that I'm somehow disingenuous. You guys are focused. A lot of people within the OG MAGA, if you will. They're focused on the wins. Got it. Focus on the wins. I'm focusing on I'm the future plans guy, right? Just consider me as the future plans guy. Other people can focus on the previous and the now I'm focused on where do we get our next wins? And that requires motivating people to see that there is a problem still that hasn't been addressed. And so that's kind of my space. You're always griping. Yeah, I'm trying to get the attention. You're doing an incredible job. I mean, I'm not going to lie. I mean, you are across these commies, dude. I want to castrate these motherfuckers. We just I think I think I was too aggressive for most. No, I dude, I think you're doing a brilliant. Listen, man, I'm giving you credit. I think I'll play this, too. We just see I just see a more I just see a more strategic plan unfolding with operational phases happening to where, you know, I see strategy happening. And although what you're doing is very important, I see the end result already. And this is this is about the court of public opinion. And I think, Alpha, you can agree on that. You have to bring the public with you so you don't look like that tyrannical dictator and cause civil unrest and civil strife and civil war. And I will say this. Thank you, Donald Trump, for allowing me to speak. Thank you, Elon Musk, for allowing me to speak. Well, it's right. These conversations, even though like we're ninety nine point nine percent in agreement on literally. Yeah, yeah, dude. For sure. It's just a matter of do we focus our attention on, you know, more of our attention on lauding the successes? Don't get me wrong, dude. We would be I'd be in prison. I think all three of us, maybe not, you know, but Alpha and I would be in prison, I think if Tom Harris won. And so I'm thankful for that. But at the same time, I want more and I have the strategy and the plan for more. And I'm just trying to help move that needle. And I will say this. I mean, we have we have an impact on the White House when we do these things, because when I do a little video outside the DNI earlier this week and I lay out what the problem areas are and what my recommendations are to Bill Polty, the haters are going to say you're nobody or nobody. OK, great. I'm zero. I'm four foot one. OK, I got it. But I do get feedback and I get phone calls and text messages saying, dude, that's making its rounds, bro. And so it's not about me. It's about like I have enough of a background experience and an understanding of the system to know and the names right to be able to say, hey, here's some unsolicited advice that you don't have to acknowledge that you got it. But hopefully it gets to you so so that this admin can take it, run with it and at least factor it in. As part of their decision making process, as long as that's going on, then like I'm a happy camper, bro. Trump did a truth post. I think it was last week, maybe the week before. I think it was last week. It was one of the most important ones that I think didn't get enough recognition. And it's because he kind of showed I know exactly the ******* game they're playing, because he outlined their strategy. He said with Polty because he knows he can do Polty for two posters. It was the one where he where he goes, look, I want to put Jay Clayton in. But you guys don't want to you guys don't want to confirm the SDNY lawyer that I want, which means you guys are making these arrangements with the Democrats. But if you don't get it in time, then you're going to say, well, it's too late. That I agree was a good move. And it was kind of a last minute rumble. It was Tom Cotton against Radcliffe's handlers. Aaron Lucas, Michael Ellis and that CIE ecosystem that on one hand is still loyal to Brennan, that's still there. And then on the other hand, I mean, they're doing Miriam's bidding as well. You're talking about this? As Trump is trying to decouple, Bill Polty has a maximum massive opportunity to help out Trump to kind of pivot back to the base that got him in. And maybe somewhat he's got to navigate it to where he doesn't piss off the donors too much, but at least give us a bone, right? Throw us a bone, the patriots that help put him in office. And he's and he's got a massive opportunity to cut the CIA, to cut the intel arm of the FBI so that those guys aren't content. I'll just be honest. So they're not ******* with us. All right. And that's you and me, all of us. And that's what I think. I think the one we're all in agreement on the end game. I think it's just different pathways to how we get there. But I think what we will see is when Trump declares a national emergency, that is going to change. Yeah, we've raised the alarm on that one for a year now. What we're talking about, Alpha, is more speculative and tinfoil hat. And he's grassroots. He's boots on the ground. He's really trying to get ---- done. He's getting his hands dirty. We are trusting more in a strategy and a plan here. And he's saying, **** that. I'm going in and doing this. Basically, am I right, Ivan? You nailed it. Yeah, that's where it's at. Me and Alpha are holding space for what we're watching as a strategy. You're in the game. I'm waiting. I just want to help do it. And sometimes you get paper cuts, whatever, in the process. No, I think we're all on the same team here. There's no doubt about it. It's just we see it a little differently. You're more like, **** this. Let's go in. A lot of times I'm getting ahead of the White House. Put me in, coach. I just do it without permission and authorization. And I think a lot of people get pissed that that's what I do. Now, I will say one more thing. September 15th is the last primary date in Delaware. And I might not even wait that long. Originally, I had planned on essentially iron sharpens iron within the Republican brand before pivoting and completely shifting fires, if you will, using military terminology, shifting fires to the left. And I originally had planned on doing it in September right after that Delaware primary so we can get as many America first candidates against the establishment candidates, even if they're endorsed by Trump, try to get them out. We've secured a winner or two here and there, like Iowa gubernatorial candidate. He's a patriot. He's a patriot, maha guy versus the endorsed Trump guy that's backed by establishment money lost in Iowa. So I'm just kind of focused on that right now. And then on September 15th, it's all hands on deck to ruin anyone affiliated with Nancy Pelosi, the Biden criminal syndicate, the Schumer syndicate, yada, yada. Because at that point, it's kind of over politically for that quote infighting to take place. Now, I didn't want to say this earlier because I don't want to tip my hand. Now I'm saying it. So you kind of know what I was doing. Well, I think August, I think August 1st is the legal deadline for them to have the Save America Act done because I think it has to be done like 90 days before November 3rd or whatever. I think I think somebody put it out there. So we're going to know. And I think when we see whatever happens to the Save America Act is either going to confirm kind of the setup that me and Nino thinks it's like. And if it happens, of course, that will rebuild the confidence. But I think the one thing that's irrefutable is come November 3rd, we are going to know the direction and speed that this is going at. And if we don't see some of the setups that meaning the thing started up in a position that's a little bit more aggressive, like the one that you have, Ivan. But I think that that's going to be critical. And I think I'm simple. I just want to be legal and ethical live stream public capital punishment of the deep state. That's the end state. So let me just say this was sent to me by Pete Santilli. This this to me makes all the sense in the world. NDA section 6805, 180 days from December 18th, expired June 16th, 2027. Law requiring penetration testing of all election systems. Not one state has been compliant. And all of the and all of them could lose their have a funds from the federal government have a federal funds are the only way states can do elections. They must be compliant with the law or they lose funds. Checkmate. They just violate the law all the time. They ignore the checkmates. Right. But I mean, imagine when Trump declares this national security emergency that we think he's going to do executive orders come in hand. And then what? I mean, who's going to implement it? Military. I mean, ****. That's what I would think. That's what I would hope for. I mean, obviously, they're not going to this is where it gets ugly. I'm not saying it's I'm not. Yeah, I'm not saying it's not going to get ugly. I mean, it's going to get ******* ugly. Do you agree, Alba? It's not going to be pretty, dude. I hope it does, because I like ugly. I like I like chaos. I prefer it. All right, guys, any last last remarks here? Yeah, give me give me a second. So a couple of things I wanted to say, just so that you know where I'm coming from. So January 20th, we started things off. Didn't get all the pardons, Oath Keepers, Proud Boys. That was kind of a slight to me, honestly. And then fast forward. Shane Lamont gets sentenced. He's the D.C. Metro Police Department head of Intel on January 6th. That could be easily the one to expose Antifa in D.C. because he already mapped it out, as well as the January 6th fed surrection. D.C.'s role in it because he was a senior official. He gets sentenced by the Democrats. He's still rotting in jail. No pardon. Again, I'm not making money off of advocating for these people. Now that we've gotten Tina Peters out finally, right? And all these other folks that are pardoned, I get I'm thankful. But like there's still people left behind. So I'm trying to get these guys up to speed because then they have their full First Amendment's back, right? Oath Keepers, Proud Boys, Shane Lamont, like I said. And then from there, we need to we would have had more escalation more quickly had we had these people in play. And so we're losing time. We're coming up on two years, right? The midterms are coming up. And it's just why is this admin still going to Fox News, the very company that facilitated the whole COVID con, right? That facilitated and bent the knee to Smartmatic, or excuse me, Dominion. And they're going on Newsvax, right? Newsvax. Meanwhile, everybody knows that it was a Fauci-funded lab incident that resulted in products that were unsafe and ineffective. And so now it's prosecution time, folks. But to get to prosecution, you got to start swinging for the fences, bringing JD to start going after these scumbags. So for me, I'm going to continue to focus primarily on COVID accountability, J6 feds direction exposure. And that's why I argue that I'm involved in the two most consequential lawsuits, civil lawsuits, as it relates to both. One, I'm in the middle of a lawsuit with the former Assistant Secretary of Defense, Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, that signed the memo to implement the vaccine mandate, unlawful, right? And then on the other side, yesterday, I announced that Michael Fanone lawsuit for defamation. Imagine the discovery. With Terria Durham, she was the senior health official at DOD, under Biden, and then later at the CIA. Then, get this? So that's the whole exposure. And then the second piece is on Michael Fanone. Discovery with him. We get to look at his communications with Jamie Raskin, Nancy Pelosi. Was it Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger? So I'm of the viewpoint. I'm going to do this in spite of the inaction or what you're saying. You're waiting on them to do something. I'm not waiting, bro. And I say that with- Fair enough, dude. I'm just going to go maximum balls to the wall. And people hate that I'm maybe getting ahead of folks. I don't know. There's stuff that I don't know that they're not. They may be doing stuff. I don't know about it. So I'm going to continue to take the initiative. And there's no complaint on me on that, bro. I totally agree with what you're doing. I just think- So how do I get more aggressive, Nino? I get it, bro. Alpha, do you- No, no. Nino, how do I get more aggressive than I am? I think it's- I think- You're doing all the right things. I'm not going to- I'm not disagreeing with you. But go ahead, Alpha. What were you- I think this administration knows there's different targeted audiences. And you need people doing different things. So all those target audiences are moving in the direction that this- Fair enough. I would agree with that, yeah. That's it. So yeah. I guess we have to violently agree at the end. Yeah. All right, fellas. Thank you so much for joining me. I love you guys. Hey, Ivan, stay with me. Alpha, stay with me. There's a stream yard. So just stay with me a moment. Yeah. So I can upload in the back end. Hold on one second. No, thanks for doing this, Nino. Alpha, appreciate you guys. Hold on one second.