Democratic Strategist Says Maine Senate Race Upheaval is "A Moment for Everybody fo Take Lesson"
5 Video Views·Jul 9, 2026
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedPolitical strategists Doug High and Joel Payne discuss current electoral challenges in Maine and the health and longevity of senior leadership in the U.S. Senate, specifically focusing on Mitch McConnell and the broader issue of \"gerontocracy\" in American politics.
Welcome back to the Takeout. Welcome to the Takeout Tavern. That's not Apple
Cider, folks, I assure you. Republican strategist Doug High and Democratic
strategist CBS News contributor Joel Payne. All right, news flash out of Maine.
Patrick Dempsey, otherwise known as McDreamy, not running for the Senate in
Maine. He had to put out an op-ed because there is such a desperate need for
someone not named Graham Platner who might have some appeal beyond standard
political lanes in Maine that he had to let everyone know he's not going to run.
Joel, give me your handicap on this current situation and what you think
will happen in the next 48 hours. We're in a really good place. Look, obviously, there's a lot of egg on the face of lots of people related to Graham
Platner. I think what's interesting is that- And Chuck Schumer saying, I told you so. Sure, but like Chuck
Schumer also got behind a candidate who could not defeat a very- Janet Mills. Yeah, Janet
Mills who could not defeat a clearly compromised candidate in Graham Platner.
Graham Platner's people obviously didn't do the work of vetting. I actually think
it speaks to a larger thing about the types of candidates that voters are
looking for that they would go to a compromised candidate like this. Tells
you a little bit something about the mood of the Democratic electorate and I
think it's something that Democrats are just gonna really have to wrestle with
because I know that people are trying to duck on each other in the middle and in
the left of the party. I think it's a moment for everybody to take a lesson.
Bottom line, is it a winnable seat anymore? I think it is winnable. Is it
tougher? Sure. I mean, look, in a favorable environment, Sarah Gideon was not able to
defeat Susan Collins. In a favorable environment, Shanna Bellows was not able
to defeat Susan Collins. Both very traditional candidates. So, Platner trying
something different, I think that there's wisdom in it. I still think it's winnable
if Democrats can get beyond this process and circle behind one candidate. Doug, I
want to talk to you about Kentucky because Andy Beshear, the Democratic
governor, wrote a letter today saying, Senator McConnell, you owe Kentuckians.
Not me, but me, but mostly Kentuckians, an explanation. Are you gonna return to the
Senate? What is your health status? Let us in on this. You know, politics is a long
game, so let's let's remember that Andy Beshear's father ran and lost against
Mitch McConnell in 1996. Memories. So that letter has been a long time coming. Look,
they're fair questions. It's a legitimate question. It's a legitimate question and it's a
legitimate question not just because of the substance of what we've seen with
McConnell in the past, but because of what we've seen with so many other
members of Congress and senators in the past. And so, if I'm team McConnell, I want
to put something out on video or a photo with a thumbs up rather quickly. It
doesn't have to be a response how Beshear, Beshear doesn't get to dictate
how McConnell responds, but McConnell and his team need to respond. I've got 20 minutes to talk
to Mitch McConnell right now if he wants. Yes, right, 20 minutes. I'm glad you
mentioned that because, Doug, there was a startling similarity in the way three
different people described a conversation they said they had via
telephone with Mitch McConnell. All said it was 20 minutes. All said it covered
more or less the same topics. That read to me a little too compact and
conveniently repetitive. You know, you always want everybody on the team to be
on the same page. You just don't want them to memorize the exact same words on the exact same script.
That can be a problem for you. And why is that? Because it raises
questions about whether it's true or not. Of course. Hey, even in good health, if
Mitch McConnell has 20 minutes to talk to Scott Jennings, I think Mitch McConnell
has better things to do with his time, to be honest with you. There is a
conversation. Maybe it's just in Washington, but obviously Governor
Beshear, who has appointment powers, has to do a Republican because that's what
the state legislature passed over his veto. Could Thomas Massey be the
Republican who replaces Mitch McConnell if Mitch McConnell can no longer serve
in the United States Senate? My understanding is it has to come from a
list submitted by the state party. Okay. And in that case, I don't think Thomas
Massey wouldn't be on that list. They wouldn't be promoting it unless it's a way to get him
completely out of it and say, you can be a senator for three months and then
you're done forever. Can I just pick up on something that Doug said a little bit earlier?
I do think that like us here in DC and the people who kind of run this city, I
think we got to get some religion about why are people, why is the
gerontocracy holding on so much to power? And it's not a Republican or a
Democratic party. Dianne Feinstein, the same thing happened with her years ago.
Why do you think that is? I think it's because these people think that these
seats belong to them and not to the people that they represent. And I think
it's something, frankly, that folks in both parties got to get their arms
around. It is not healthy, God bless Chuck Grassley, it's not healthy to have a 99
year old man in the Senate representing Iowans. It's not healthy to have someone
who is compromised at this level like Mitch McConnell and it wasn't healthy to
have Dianne Feinstein in the Senate. And the American people decided it wasn't a
good idea for Joe Biden, who maybe does not have the type of severe health
problems, but certainly did not show like someone who is vigorous. It's not
healthy, it's not a good idea. Doug, pick up on that point. Look, it's hard for them to-
Have you seen it on the Senate? Yeah, and it's hard for them to say no for a lot of reasons and
part of it is, it's a very good life if you have the member pin. You are called
sir or ma'am wherever you go. And if you're in the Senate, you have a vast
staff that takes care of every single need you have. Absolutely, and basically
the rules don't exist for you. And so why we see so many senators and members of
Congress getting in trouble is because the rules don't exist to them, for them.
So maybe they break them, even if they don't fully exist. But they go on CODELS,
they travel the world. Some of that is work, some of it has a lot of empty time
on their schedule to say, oh we have four hours of free time in Istanbul, but we're
going to the bazaar. Who gets screwed? It's the family in Louisville, it's the
family in Western Kentucky at Paducah, who doesn't have the type of
representation that they deserve right now. Because they become increasingly
inattentive? Yes, they become increasingly inattentive and, Major, these people, when
people elect you to office, they trust you to have good judgment. It is not good
judgment if you're not healthy to deal with issues of state and of politics
when you can't be healthy, you can't be on your feet. Joel, you get the last word
here at the Tavern. Thank you very much. Doug High, always good to have you here.
Enjoy, my brothers.

