Beat the system with TallyMoney. Gold you can spend. To get 50% off your activation fee, use code GBN50 on the activation screen: https://bit.ly/GBNewsTallyMoney#ad
GB News' Nana Akua delivers a scathing verdict on the Duke of Sussex after Harry reconsiders plans to bring Meghan and their children to the UK next month, following the rejection of his request for police protection. Nana warns the "spoilt brat Duke" may well throw his toys out of the pram once again, as the Sussex saga takes yet another dramatic twist. With Archie and Lilibet's planned visit to Princess Diana's grave now potentially in doubt, the rift between Harry and the royal family shows no signs of healing.
The video discusses the controversy surrounding Prince Harry's request for taxpayer-funded security during a planned visit to the UK. The host and a former head of Royal Protection criticize the Duke for demanding high-level security while no longer being a working royal, suggesting he is using his children as leverage for personal and promotional gain.
The Sussexes? They're on their way to the UK. Or not, as the case may be, because guess what?
The British taxpayer doesn't fancy paying for their security. Apparently, the spoilt brat,
the Duke of Sussex, may well throw his toys out of the pram once again. After announcing his visit
to the UK, the Prince later learned that his family will not receive police protection during
what was intended to be an Invictus Games-related five-day visit. After compromising his own
security and that of his family in his book, Spare, where he revealed his kill count in
Afghanistan and whinged about how terrible it is to be the son of a king, Prince Harry has been on
what I would describe as a crusade to destroy the British press, whom it appears he blames for the
death of his mother. Harry has taken both the press and the Home Office to court, and he's
chucked in what I believe to be a dose of emotional blackmail, where he has, in my view,
used his children as a bargaining chip to demand Ravik, the highest level of protection only
afforded to working royals, a role that he and his wife turned their noses up at in their pursuit
of a worldwide privacy tour. We want privacy! We want privacy!
Hey, thanks for having us on the show. It's so awesome to be here, it's great.
So, let me start with you, sir. You've lived a life with the royal family, you've had everything
handed to you, but you say your life has been hard, and now you've written all about it in
your new book, where? The prince in the past has insinuated that without the highest levels
of protection, he couldn't possibly bring his wife and kids to the UK, although he did manage
two faux royal tours in countries which I regard as two of the most dangerous places on the earth,
Nigeria and Colombia. Hey-ho! I love the bit where they were forced to stand and join in
with the British national anthem. Awkward! If the visit goes ahead, the Duke of Sussex and
his family will only receive taxpayer-funded security when they are in a royal property,
and the king has invited them to do just that for part of their trip. The duke is apparently
desperate for Archie, who is seven, and Lilibet to see their grandfather, the king,
who they last saw four years ago. I'm sorry, but I'm not buying that. The conditions are 28 days
notice for a security request, and it's on a case-by-case basis, and of course protection
if they are in royal buildings. So here's the thought, Harry. Why don't you apply for protection
for a visit for you and your family with the sole purpose of taking the children to see the king,
not one where you swan around promoting other stuff? It's not that difficult. Whilst the
vixen is a laudable cause which you are free to support as an individual, you are no longer a
working royal, a position that you chose for yourself. Remember what the queen said? You
can't be half in and half out. Instead of combining non-royal causes with visiting your dad,
how about you privately visit your dad with the kids? I'm sure they'll give you all the protection
you need, instead of using it as, in my view, another photo opportunity to plug you and your
wife's wares. I'm joined now by the founder and CEO of Tally Money, Cameron Parry. So what is
Tally Money and what does it do? So you get an everyday account in your individual name,
you get an account number and sort code, but instead of having an account denominated in
pound sterling with your bank, you have milligrams of gold which we brand as Tally. The reason why
we chose gold, everybody understands gold, it's universally understood and accepted.
It's been increasing at over 11% on average for the last 25 years against the pound,
and the last two years it's up 60% against the pound. So if you had 10,000 pounds in a
Tally account two years ago, it's now got 16,000 pounds worth of value. The gold hasn't changed,
but the value and your purchasing power has. So banks can't keep up with that performance.
How easy is it to get a Tally Money account then?
If you're a UK resident, it's really easy. Just go to your app store, download the app.
You'll need photo ID. You can onboard yourself in a couple of minutes.
Just your passport, your driving licence?
Yep, and you're up and away. So you know what you're getting. It's very simple,
low fees. It's transparent. There's no hidden fees. There's no effect spreads depending on
the amount you put in. And you just get to go ahead and be productive in your daily life,
build up your savings again, because it's useful to do it now.
I was going to say, so you don't necessarily, if people are watching this going,
oh, it sounds a bit scary. You can open a Tally Money account, transfer,
is there a minimum amount you have to transfer? So you might think, I'm just going to play with
this. I'm going to put 100 quid in it that I've got this month, and I'm either going to spend it
and see if I feel like I'm getting more value for money from the things I'm buying,
or I'm going to save it and watch how that compares to maybe 100 quid in your current account.
To find out more and to get an exclusive GB News offer,
simply scan the QR code or click the link in the description.
Well, I'm joined now by former head of Royal Protection, Dye Davis. Dye Davis,
welcome to the programme. Dye, what are your thoughts? Am I being completely unfair to Prince
No, I agree with every word you actually said about the whole issue. You've taken
virtually everything I could just say out of my mouth. Professionally, I totally agree with you.
Unprofessionally, perhaps, I just think, here we go again. We've been at this for four months.
It's cost you and I over a million pounds. None of his aunts and uncles and cousins get protection.
And yet this man feels he should get protection.
Ravak have looked at this numerous times. It's been before courts, as you've said.
Yet again, here we are again. And again, if he wanted to go privately and come privately by
private plane, don't tell anybody. Go to see his father at one of his residences,
whether he's up in Balmoral or anywhere else, you and I wouldn't know if he wanted to do it
privately. So as far as I'm concerned, they're using the children yet again as part of their
ammunition, if you like, to blackmail everyone else to provide him with blue lights and two
tones. That's all he wants to facilitate his scheming and money making. So no, unless there's
an absolute risk that somebody can tell me about, he should not get it now or ever in the future,
unless the professionals tell me there is such a risk that he deserves it and needs it.
And if he does come, his dad has invited him to stay as part of the trip in one of the royal
residences. So when he is in within the royal palaces in those places, he will have all the
protection that is afforded to the royal family, the working royals. So he could always just,
as you say, come privately and stay there. There's no problem with that. So I'm sure if
he said can I stay for the entire trip, he would have full protection, as does his family,
as does his father, as does Camilla. He'd have all of that. Yes. Well, I can't imagine him being
in the same car as his stepmother. Can you, Camilla? I wonder what they'd say to each other.
No, seriously, this is all about Harry, promoting Harry. If they just kept a low profile,
and as I've said before numerous times on your programme and others, he has protection. He has
his own protection team. They are highly professional, I am told. They're former,
some of them, royalty protection officer. So I assume they are professional. He would get a
liaison officer, I am told, who any kind of issue, they would actually do it. The only reason he
wants it is because royalty protection facilitates, they act almost like butlers on wheels with
firearms. That's what they're, they're not there to do, they're there to protect. But they can
and do get people from A to B quickly and succinctly. But if he went privately, didn't
tell anybody he could do that. As you rightly say, this nonsense that he isn't safe here with his
family is absolute nonsense when he's been to Colombia, Nigeria, and various other places,
and lives in LA. And I've worked in LA, it's extremely dangerous. So this is absolute nonsense
in my professional opinion. And the other thing is, I think the King is absolutely,
well, the security team are absolutely right. If he's within royal areas within the royal palaces
and things, he'll have all the protection. But the problem with him and his wife is that they
then will use this as an opportunity if they were given protection to go and do all this sort of
touring here, going to that hospital, they're doing this, doing that. And of course, it would
be difficult for a charity or an organisation to just say, Oh, no, we don't want Prince Harry to
visit, because actually, it might help them in some way and help the people that they're supporting
within charities. So the worry is that he'll do it to do random trips to other things that are
outside his real remit. I mean, Invictus, fair enough. But again, this is his own personal cause.
Yes, well, you're absolutely right. And I don't think we still know the cost of that unofficial
tour to Australia. I am told reliably that it was several million pounds it cost the taxpayer
in Australia. Yes, others subsidised it. But the cost in real terms of security was huge.
Look, this man is no longer a working royal. We've been here so many times.
I hope he gets over it and gets on with doing whatever he does as a private citizen. And frankly,
I'd ask him to relinquish all his titles and be a plain Mr. Likely Uncle Andrew.
Well, I mean, again, the two probably no comparison there. But in terms of the fact
that they should have their titles whipped away from them, I would agree that I would,
if I were William, when William becomes king, I would do exactly that.
Di Davies, really good to talk to you. Thank you very much for your thoughts.
And that is Di Davies. He was a head of Royal Protection. Thank you very much, Di.