Scaling AI in 2026: From Prototypes to Production Success | Building the AI Era Episode 4

Dev Ittycheria & MongoDB
1 follower
4 Video Views·Jun 23, 2026
AI workloads don’t just need more compute—they need the right architecture.
In Episode 4 of Building the AI Era, we look ahead at what’s possible when you design for AI‑driven workloads from the start. We cover how scale‑out architectures, unified data, and modern patterns help enterprises support AI at production scale instead of retrofitting legacy systems later.
AI Generated·May contain errors
Video Summary
AI GeneratedPete Johnson, Shilpa Kolhar, and Devin Dickerson discuss transitioning AI applications from experimental prototypes to production-ready deployments. They emphasize the importance of horizontal scaling, context engineering, and early integration of security and scale to avoid high project failure rates and maximize business value.
Hi, I'm Pete Johnson.
I'm the field CTO of AI at MongoDB,
and welcome to Building the AI Era,
a look at how organizations can use data
to build AI applications smarter, faster, and with purpose.
What does scale-out architecture mean for databases,
and how does it impact organizations' approach
to handling increasing amounts of data?
I'm joined by my colleague Shilpa Kolhar,
Senior VP of Product Engineering at MongoDB,
and Devin Dickerson, Principal Analyst at Forrester,
to answer those questions and more,
and discuss the need for building distributed architecture
that handles any data at scale.
We both just were at mongodb.local in San Francisco,
and we both had conversations with lots of people
about how you get from doing things as toys,
as experiments, to full-blown production deployments
that are providing actual business value.
What are the things that are causing leaders
to not quite get past that push
and get out of the experimental phase
and into something that's actually
returning them some value at their bottom line?
I actually think that the highest leverage skill set
that organizations, the muscle that really needs to be developed,
but also continuing to innovate on the vendor side
with product features and feature iteration on this,
is in context engineering.
Getting smart about how, when, and where
to infuse powerful business context
into agentic processes
is where so much of the business value is derived from.
And it's tricky.
There's too much data.
It's not just about loading as much as you can,
give it as much context as you can,
because sometimes the more context you add
actually just confuses the output.
There's a little bit of art, a little bit of science,
and I think organizations maturing on this
while the market matures on it
is going to lead to better outcomes
for organizations investing in AI.
The data that we are seeing
clearly says that this scale-up
of relational databases is limiting,
especially when organizations want to build
these AI-native applications,
which will need large amounts of data
reliably and correctly at scale.
What's your take on relational databases scale-up
as a limiting factor?
I think many different technologies
have a place in an architecture.
It's not that monoliths don't have a place.
Same thing with traditional databases.
The problem is the scaling mechanics
really can be a limiting factor
and don't always apply correctly
to certain types of architectures.
If we look at applications that have to live in the cloud,
vertical scaling with monoliths
has imposed severe challenges
for both cost and performance optimization.
I think the same can be true in this case.
When something is able to scale horizontally,
it actually allows us to take advantage
of the resilience characteristics of cloud computing
a little bit more natively
than with strict vertical scaling.
Yeah, I mean, that's a very good point, Devin.
MongoDB supports scale-out,
or we call it horizontal scaling,
by being able to shard the data.
We can distribute the data
and compute across commodity machines
or commodity computers and hence bringing the cost down
and also supporting the needs,
AI needs of large-scale data and information
for the agents to consume.
So let's pivot.
One of the most often cited studies in 2025
is the MIT study that showed
failure rates for AI projects in the upper 90-95%.
I have some thoughts on that and why that is.
I'm really curious what your thoughts on that are
and how we can avoid that
as you're deploying AI-based applications in 2026.
I think that it's important to start thinking about
production and scale and security
as early in the process as possible.
I think people will find that
when their actual AI workloads
make contact with the real world,
they're going to discover things,
they're going to learn things.
Learn those things during the development phase
and you won't have those costly failures
because the further we push those failures,
which are inevitable, to the right,
they will cost more money and cost more time.
I completely agree with you.
When it comes to the stack,
you've got to get it off the laptop as quickly as possible
and onto something that scales
so you can learn those lessons early in the process
and not hit them later.
The earlier the better.
What attributes and capabilities
should organizations look for in a data platform,
especially when you consider things like
scalability and performance that you need for an AI workload?
I do a lot of platform evaluations
and I tend to focus on developer experience
and when I look at features,
like in the current offering
around scalability and architecture,
I like to go in with the recognition
that this is a fast-moving space.
So I want a track record of extensibility
and feature iteration
because even if a platform
doesn't necessarily have everything today,
I want to know that the organization
that I'm partnering with can get there.
Another thing that I think is important
is this idea of friction for the developers.
How easy is it to learn this platform?
That's part of why there's three flavors of MongoDB, right?
Most people use MongoDB Atlas,
which is our managed service
that you can deploy your actual data
in a hyperscaler data center of your choice.
We also have the Enterprise Advanced version,
which you can run on-prem.
Or, if you don't want to deal with us at all,
you can use Community Edition,
which you can put wherever you want
and manage it yourself.
We like to meet our customers where they are
and give them that exact kind of flexibility
when it comes to how they deploy
and interact with the base system.
What would your advice be
to the CTOs and the leaders
who are now contemplating
to modernize or not to modernize?
I think that this is a great opportunity
to get modernization initiatives
not just in prototyping and MVP phase,
but thinking about establishing metrics,
thinking about business value.
I would also say this is a perfect time
not to neglect one of your greatest resources,
which is people.
I think that part of getting there
is also thinking about things more holistically.
Instead of thinking about just point solutions,
think about platform investments.
Instead of thinking about just one project
or one individual migration,
think about a modernization strategy.
I think that should be the difference
between how we thought about this in 2025 and 2026.
Thanks for tuning in to Building the AI Era.
Visit MongoDB.com to learn more.
