All blame Blue Origin! NASA & Even Amazon Call On SpaceX to Help after New Glenn Trouble...

All blame Blue Origin! NASA & Even Amazon Call On SpaceX to Help after New Glenn Trouble...
===
#alphatech
#techalpha
#spacex
#elonmusk
===
0:00 Artemis Update
0:38 Mission Pivot
3:23 Habitat Comparison
7:34 Flight Readiness
===
C-bass Productions: https://www.youtube.com/c/CbassProductions
Ryan Hansen Space: https://twitter.com/RyanHansenSpace/
https://www.youtube.com/c/RyanHansenSpace
iamVisual:
https://twitter.com/visual_iam
https://www.youtube.com/@iamVisualVFX/videos
SLS (Space Launch System): https://x.com/ScottLikedSLS
Starship Gazer https://x.com/StarshipGazer
ship 25 https://x.com/Flight2Starship
Starbase Surfer https://x.com/cnunezimages
Truthful https://x.com/Truthful_ast
WAI
SpaceXvision https://www.youtube.com/c/SpaceXvision
ErcX Space https://x.com/ErcXspace
Evan Karen: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDN1X8Fz1oAXX-rBcOWjzmg
TroastedHam: https://x.com/TroastedHam/status/1928461914373320715
===
All blame Blue Origin! NASA & Even Amazon Call On SpaceX to Help after New Glenn Trouble...
Most of us have been cleverly misled by NASA. Not long ago, Artemis III was promised as the historic mission — the one that would finally return humans to the lunar surface after more than fifty years. Orion riding atop SLS, docking with a lander, and just like that… boots on the Moon again. It sounded so simple. Almost poetic.But the script has been completely flipped. Artemis 3 has quietly become something very different: a test flight in low Earth orbit, now targeted for mid-2027. Orion will carry the crew up, rendezvous with a commercial lunar lander, and perform the docking — all without leaving Earth orbit.NASA has said they might test “one or both” of the landers they’ve contracted. At first glance, it sounds like an epic showdown: Starship HLS versus Blue Moon Mark 2. But when you look closer, that narrative starts to fall apart.In reality, this isn’t a fair race between two equal competitors. It’s a clever strategy designed to push both teams harder — while quietly hiding the brutal logistics behind the scenes. Starship HLS from SpaceX is a giant — over 50 meters tall, powered by Raptor engines, and capable of carrying dozens of people plus up to 100 tons of cargo to the Moon. It’s not a fragile lunar module.
All blame Blue Origin! NASA & Even Amazon Call On SpaceX to Help after New Glenn Trouble...
It’s a full spacecraft that flies as one piece, complete with its own elevator system. SpaceX has made real progress on the cabin and Orion docking interface, but they’re running at least two years behind schedule. The biggest remaining challenge remains orbital refueling — a technology never proven at this scale.On the other side, Blue Origin’s Blue Moon Mark 2 is much smaller — around 16 meters tall — powered by BE-7 hydrogen engines. Originally planned for Artemis V, it is now being aggressively accelerated.So where’s the deception? It’s hidden in that innocent phrase: “one or both.” With only one Orion, one SLS, and one crew, trying to test both landers in a single mission would be enormously expensive and risky. One small delay could jeopardize the entire flight. NASA simply won’t bet a multi-billion-dollar SLS launch on that level of uncertainty.The reality is becoming clear: only one lander is likely to fly with Orion on Artemis III. And that single docking test will be decisive. Whichever lander gets the chance to prove itself in orbit — its docking performance, integration with Orion, and crew safety — will gain a massive advantage for Artemis 4, the mission that actually aims to land humans near the lunar South Pole. Because Artemis 3 isn’t just a test. It’s a filter.
All blame Blue Origin! NASA & Even Amazon Call On SpaceX to Help after New Glenn Trouble...
So now the question becomes unavoidable: Which lander will NASA actually choose? Blue Moon Mark 2… or Starship HLS?
To answer that, let’s go back to that long, detailed post on X from NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman. He touched on many topics, but one line really cuts to the heart of it: “Our focus must be on the immensely hard task of sending astronauts to the Moon with frequency and safely so we can land and stay.” Landing on the Moon? Both Starship HLS and Blue Moon Mark 2 are capable of that. But “stay”? That’s where only one vehicle truly stands out right now — Starship HLS. Let me explain why.Let’s start with Blue Moon Mark 2. It’s designed to carry two astronauts (with potential to scale up to four in a fully reusable setup) down to the lunar surface and support them for up to 30 days. That’s already a solid step forward compared to the Apollo missions, where surface time was measured in hours or a couple of days at most. Blue Moon brings strengths in cleanliness, precise landings near the south pole, and efficient liquid hydrogen engines that give it reliable performance.
===
Subcribe Alpha Tech: https://www.youtube.com/@alphatech4966/?sub_confirmation=1
===