Behind the Scenes: In the Line of Fire (Petersen, 1993) with Clint Eastwood and John Malkovich

Fantastic behind the scenes
10 followers
7 Video Views·Apr 29, 2026
Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan couldn't save Kennedy, but he's determined not to let a clever assassin take out this president.
Yeah.
Frank Morgan, you were JFK's favorite.
Tell us, what happened to you that day?
I see you, Frank.
I see you standing over the grave of another dead president.
That's not gonna happen.
The Darcy, the only act of evasion who ever lost a president.
Do you really have the guts to take a bullet, Frank?
Now, isn't it possible that this guy's pushed some buttons in you?
I can spot them.
I can anticipate him.
I think maybe you're too close to all this, Frank.
He's right across the street, Lafayette Park.
I have a rendezvous with death.
And so does the president.
And so do you, Frank.
Gun!
This summer, Clint Eastwood is in the line of fire.
Rated R.
If you were to ask me what is in the line of fire about, in the
beginning, I would have told you it's a secret, it's the best
secret service agent going up against the best assassin.
Later on, I began to realize that these are like two sides of the
same man and they've both been trained by the same government.
One is, is assigned to protect the other to destroy.
It was a story of redemption of this man that Clint Eastwood character
who had failed miserably in his mind.
And the whole story is driving toward, you know, can he ever
overcome this horrible burden that he's bearing his whole life?
And we also relate to it because it dealt with a very real event that,
you know, it was important event in all of our lives, you know,
the assassination of John Kennedy.
And I think it took, you know, a fictional story, placed it in
some historical context and, and it just, you know, it grabbed you
at the beginning and just, you know, I was with it all the way.
I have always been fascinated by the secret service and their
function, and I've always been fascinated with the kind of
mentality it takes to be a protectorate of officials or
government presidency.
And I think that the kind of mentality that means you're going to
sacrifice yourself if somebody makes an assault on them.
The genesis of the idea started with Jeff Apple, who was the
producer on the project and who had for years, I guess, I think
throughout the 80s, been trying to put together a film project
based on the secret service.
He'd met with various actors and directors and had come close to
putting it together, but never quite pulled it off.
He was never able to get a good script.
But he had the idea of a secret service agent who had lost
Kennedy in Dallas and who now wanted to redeem himself by
protecting the current president.
He also had the title In the Line of Fire, and he came to me in
probably around 1990 or so.
I had done another project for him and said, you know, I have
access to the secret service.
They're willing to take us in and show us around, give us access
to their facilities.
If you can come up with a story, I think we could pitch it and get
it set up at a studio.
The script for In the Line of Fire came to the secret service
about 10 years before it actually went to production.
And the the writer, Jeff McGuire and Jeff Apple came to the
secret service.
They had this proposed script.
They said, would you read it?
If he ever goes to production, would the secret service
cooperate?
And I was in a position at that time where I had to review
scripts and tell the production companies whether or not we
would cooperate.
We like this script because for a Hollywood script that really
portrayed many of the problems of the secret service.
The secret service was enormously supportive of all our
efforts.
We when we first got involved in the project, we met with them
in Washington.
We obviously toured their facility and we talked to many of
them about what they do on a daily basis, how they do it.
And they were with us all the time.
The scripts continue down.
There was a two or three rewrites.
We helped them in some of the areas in their rewrites.
And finally, at actually two months after I retired is when
the script was sold, Clint Eastwood was signed down as a
major character.
They called me and asked me if I could be the technical advisor.
I had never been on a movie set, so I had no idea what that
meant.
I figured I could tell them everything that I knew in the
side of a couple of weeks.
And once it went to production, pre-production, I went through
the entire process with them.
It was nine months of work working as the technical advisor
on the movie.
Bob was great because, I mean, he he was the real deal.
There's always that one guy on the set who's the real deal.
All of us actors are trying to play the role.
But I think with Bob, I mean, he was he was the real deal and
he kind of walked us through it and showed us what it was
really like to be a Secret Service agent.
So it's always great to have somebody like that, especially
Bob, because he was, again, you know, top notch and and right
there to show us what we should really do.
Bob Snow was invaluable.
He's you know, and I know he started a little cottage
industry in Hollywood advising people on movies that deal with
the Secret Service or anything to do with Washington, D.C.
He he was he was very important.
He he was with us every day.
He sat there and whenever there was a question, he was there
to answer it and say, well, this is how it's done.
Yeah.
You might have to change it a little bit for dramatic
purposes, and so that would be OK.
And, you know, he basically is what we're looking for in an
expert like that is to tell us exactly how it's done.
And if we felt we needed to change things dramatically,
what was within reason and would work and still come across as
being realistic to someone like him or other Secret Service
agents?
I've been able to talk to a lot of Secret Service women since
I've been here, and that's been helpful just to know what they
do and what's expected of them and how they dress and things
like that.
The agents are recruited through our field offices throughout
the country.
Then they are sent to a nine week training course in Glencoe,
Georgia, which all federal agents go to initially.
It's just a very basic.
And then they are brought up to our own training center at
Beltsville, Maryland, where they go through another nine or ten
weeks of training there.
And then really their first year on the job is total training.
They're returned to a field office.
They're assigned to a training agent, somebody that's an older
agent, that will then take them through some more steps through
that first year.
So really the first year on the job is considered a training
year.
Every agent begins his career in the field.
That's where he cuts his teeth.
That's where he learns how to do criminal investigations.
That's where he gains the experience and he matures into
an agent who ultimately will transfer to a protection detail.
And those skills truly serve him well because that's where you
develop what I call the knack.
You know that you can deal with any problem.
You know that you can deal with the eventual and inevitable
twists and turns in a protection assignment.
And ultimately you get your legs.
You learn from senior agents.
You also learn the culture and that's critical to the Secret
Service.
I mean what we're about is 130 year history, a tradition I think
that speaks loudly for where we've been and what we've done.
Typically once an agent has completed his training he or she
is assigned to a field office where they're exposed to a
myriad of situations.
They learn the basic to hone their investigative skills which
they've learned in school.
They're exposed to our financial crimes investigations or
counterfeit currency investigations.
And then after they've gained some experience and expertise we
work them into the protective intelligence cases.
You get an emotional attachment to the job and of course the
Kennedy assassination that was a very emotional issue for the
Secret Service.
We lost a president and we took that very emotionally as not so
much as a Kennedy that we lost but we lost the president which
was our job to protect the president.
So that was a very emotional for everybody not only the agents
that were actually assigned to the detail but to every agent in
the service.
But what we did here is there was some manipulation of
reality.
We took we took some real footage of Kennedy arriving at
the airport in Dallas and we placed you know a young Clint
Eastwood who we had given kind of a haircut to digitally into
the footage so that we could place him there realistically as
realistically as we could you know in 1963.
We also you know used the famous footage of the assassination
and you know I mean those are sort of sacred sacred events in
American history and I think we tried to be as cautious and
careful as we could about it.
This fella that I play has been involved in an assassination many
years ago and he still has very bad feelings about it and he
feels inadequacies about it so he has to overcome that plus try
to ward off a possible one that would come within the story.
We go into every every protective stop with the idea that we need
to create a safe and secure environment at every level both
in terms of logistics routes where he walks what he does
natural hazards all those things have to be considered and
ultimately we work very closely with with our law enforcement
counterparts to get the lay of the land to understand the site
to script his movements to know where he's going to go to ensure
that we've created as best we can that bubble and ultimately
to always anticipate you know where there may be a hole where
there may be a gap.
Aside from protection being our most critical mission the
responsibility of protecting the president are to make sure on a
24 hour basis that we look out for his personal safety the
safety of his family we do environmental monitoring to make
sure the air is safe the water is safe and generally just to
make sure that the president can can carry off the
responsibilities of his office.
When you're working a protective detail your mindset is such that
you're engaged in all the possibilities you have trust in
the advance agent that they've done everything they can to
prepare that site prepare the way for you but you're also
aware that we can only get at best 98 percent you've got to be
always aware of the fact that there may be mitigating factors
that situations will arise you'll have to take actions that
you may put yourself in harm.
Typically we've all made that decision long ago before we even
entered training academy.
If you have to stop and think about it when you're faced with
it it's too late.
What our role is is to ensure that we keep our democratically
elected leaders and those who visit our country safe.
And I think I speak for every man and woman in this
organization when I tell you that the job doesn't pay you
enough to do what may be required to do which ultimately
is to lay down your life for protecting.
But that's what we'll do and that's what we're committed to
do.
No matter what you feel about the president or whoever you're
protecting you sort of have to take that bullet.
That's your job.
And that's kind of a tall order.
This role was much more about the interior world of this guy
that I was playing.
You know I was much more concerned about you know who he
was and what his fears were and what his and what his life was.
You know I was much more concerned about what his inner
world was and why was he so frightened.
You know what was his what was his his darkness.
When you're a sign of the presidential detail or any time
you're protecting someone you know your your total focus and
your total ideas is to make sure that the president is this in
secure environment and you're part of establishing that secure
environment.
So it's a serious job.
The agents take it very seriously and it's the mindset
has to be total concentration on what you're doing because at
least a little bit of change at least a little bit of an
incident you have to be able to react and be you know set to do
what you have to do whatever the situation might be and you have
no idea what kind of situations come up in a motorcade for
example as you see in this in this movie the motorcade is
moving it can't go too fast because the agents have to run
alongside of it but they're looking for anybody that might
be throwing something coming out of the crowd coming at the at
the car doing what they might do that would be considered a
threat to the president and that's why they're there.
But usually they just go up alongside of the car and
eventually of course as the car speeds up in the motorcade then
they'll drop back and jump onto the running board or jump into
the follow up cars.
You may recall in the movie where Clint Eastwood is working
the rope line when the president's motorcade stops and
they have to jump out and work the rope line and we had to work
teach Clint how to actually do that how to run alongside of the
car I mean how to have to keep your hand on the car so the car
turns left you don't want to be turning right and have your car
drive away the way the agents would stay along the side of the
car how they how they operate there the way that the agents
would respond to a incident where they thought there was a
gun threat or something like that when you call out gun and
they respond in the way the agents would protect the
president you cover and evacuate the man.
Every agent assigned to a protective detail is in constant
communication with every other agent.
I mean we in a motorcade environment we have an internal
radio system in the vehicle and we also have personal radios
that each agent wears that so we keep each each of us stays in
constant contact and receives the same information about
ongoing events.
Constantly in any kind of protective mode you have to
think about what the possibilities are and what might
happen and what somebody could think up to do when you're
you're you're actually it it's almost like a locksmith I mean
you invent a lock and then somebody vents a way to thwart
that lock well it's the same way in protection no matter what
you do in protection you'd like to be able to do a little bit
more you'd like to be but it has to be politically acceptable
particularly with the president I mean the president is a person
that wears many hats he's the head of a political party he's
the commander in chief he has to be seen by the public he's a
great politician and yet we would from a protective
standpoint would like to very much house them and just take
them from point A to point B in a tank but that's not going to
happen so we have to adjust our security around that kind of a
of a an atmosphere but so we're constantly thinking what the
bad guy what somebody that might want to hurt the president or
what might want to hurt one of our protectees what they could
do and then we try to thwart that by changing our procedures
or doing this or doing that to to change what we might do so we
make sure that it's that's secure and safe for the threats
are taken seriously because threats if they translate into
action obviously will test and challenge us and that's why
we're here I mean we're here to to provide a safe and secure
environment and we would be remiss if we didn't take every
threat regardless of the source from and we don't care whether
it's you know something that someone said in jest once we get
to them or something obviously we do care about which is the
person who who says it and tends to follow it out we follow up
on every threat we investigate every individual who who
unfortunately utters those words it's a federal offense to
threaten the president in any any fashion so it's a that's a
federal offense and it's a it's prosecuted we don't make a big
issue of prosecution very often because we don't want copycats
we don't want to publicize it much of the work that Secret
Service does doesn't get publicized in the way of
thwarting an attempt on a president or doing something
because we just don't operate that way we don't want people to
know that we have these people out there that are doing the
kind of things that that might spark somebody else to want to
do the same thing one problem I think with a lot of movies is
that if you get too technological the audience
starts to feel that it's getting into science fiction and I
think that one of the the nice things about in line of fire was
that you could watch it and feel and identify with both
characters I mean it sounds a little gruesome to identify with
a killer but I think that you could watch Malkovich his
character you know what what he did in order to get close to the
president say oh yeah that could happen oh yeah I could even do
that you know and I think that if I'd gotten too much into a
scientific mastermind a guy who knew how to hack into top
secret Secret Service files and that kind of stuff then it gets
into that realm of could somebody really do that I don't
know probably our most important weapon is called the electronic
crime special agent program 144 today highly trained skilled
computer forensic experts that can know what they're looking
at when they find it they know what to do with it they know
how to preserve the evidence and how to interpret that evidence
and they provide us with the clues that ultimately will lead
us down the path hopefully to apprehension or prevention you
have to realize that when we lost Kennedy the Secret Service
was a very very small organization where I think we
only had less than 450 agents that were in the entire country
in the entire world but we now have over 2200 agents we have
the kind of resources now that we had asked for for years it
it's too bad that it has to take such a tragedy as a
Kennedy assassination to start getting some of the resources
that the Secret Service had been asking for for years and
and I think protection very often is a reaction to what
happened yesterday. The most important variable in this
agency is is the agent he or she may make the ultimate
sacrifice he or she may take an action to prevent a threat from
manifesting itself in in the face of a protectee. Today's
threats posed by technology are also offset by technology. I
mean we're very in tune with the technologies that can be
directed against us and we try to develop countermeasures that
can offset those technologies and give us the edge. Obviously
we want to be portrayed in as accurate a light as possible.
I mean I understand it's entertainment. Sometimes the
stuff we do doesn't sell but more important than these that
we're treated with dignity. I refer to the the name of this
building. I refer to the 135 year tradition and history that
we have. What we hope is that the public really gets a good
picture of what we do and how we do it and I mean I think we
owe it to the men and women of the organization to be sure
that that you know that we are what we do and how we do it as
best you can is portrayed in the most positive light. The
Secret Service is one of the few areas of law enforcement as
opposed to the FBI or the CIA that really hasn't had the kind
of scandals and the kind of problems that some of the other
agencies have had. They're pretty upright outstanding guys
and they have great senses of humor too and I think that
helped in getting their cooperation for this movie. We
basically gave Secret Service lessons to our actors and you
know talked about it with them over and over again to to make
sure that everything we were doing was as accurate as
possible. You know the public may not know it but we wanted
to make sure that the Secret Service would watch the movie
and say yeah that's the way it's done.
