Standing Out in Your Law Firm Interview Our Favourite Tips

Job Search Strategies
61 followers
8 Video Views·Apr 5, 2026
Got a law firm interview coming up? We've gone through our fair share of them over the past decade, and in this week's video we're sharing with you guys our favourite tips for helping you stand out!
So, you've applied to a law firm for a job, and now they've invited you to an interview.
You're excited, but also nervous, so you start preparing,
and maybe you decide to consult everybody's favorite online resource, Google.
22.5 million search results and an avalanche of advice come up,
with a lot of tips like be presentable and dress your best,
research the law firm, or ask questions.
And while these things are all true, they're also what's already expected of applicants.
In today's competitive job market, how does one not just pass their interview,
but stand out from everyone else?
So, in today's video, we want to share with you guys our favorite tips based on
our own law firm interview experiences over the past decade,
which helped us get into top international law firms.
Make sure you stay tuned until the end for an interesting take we have on a common interview tip.
And remember, if you like this kind of content,
please hit that like button below and consider subscribing if you'd like to see more.
So, our first tip is to know your own CV inside out,
and to frame your experiences the right way when you talk about them,
which I'll explain in two parts.
First off, you should be prepared to talk about any of your experience in detail if you need to.
The more relevant your experience is to the role and the practice areas of the firm you're going for,
the more detail about that experience you should be prepared to talk about.
I've actually had an interview where a partner asked me details about a case I worked on before,
down to what certain clauses said in a several hundred page contract.
To be fair, this was just a one-off experience of mine,
but it does go to show this kind of thing does happen,
so it's best to be prepared just in case.
However, this does not mean that when you're asked about an experience in an interview,
you should right off the bat launch into a detailed explanation of what you did.
Aside from the fact that you might end up boring your interviewer a bit
with unnecessary information that they might not have wanted to know,
the way you initially describe your experience is actually super important.
This is because it can allow you to sort of control, to a certain extent,
the direction of what you and the interviewer will be talking about in relation to that experience.
What we suggest is that before an interview,
think carefully about how you would summarize an experience
and your involvement or role in a clear and concise way.
That way, when you're asked about an experience,
you're already prepared to start off with that summary.
And if there's something in particular that the interviewer wants to know more about,
they'll ask you.
The reason this is important is because the interviewer,
generally speaking, only has the information that you give them.
So how you describe and frame your experience
really helps set the stage for the interviewer,
as well as the parameters of what they'll ask you.
Now, I'll give you a personal example to show you what I mean.
In one of my interviews before,
I knew I'd be asked by the interviewers about a case I'd worked on
because it was clearly relevant to the role at the firm I was applying to.
However, that had been a really big case with almost a dozen issues
and wasn't extremely familiar with a couple of them
because they'd largely been dealt with by other members of my team.
As a result, when I was asked about the case in my interview,
I chose to only mention the issues that I was really familiar with
when I was summarizing my experience on the case.
This then led the interviewers to ask me questions about those issues,
which I was comfortable talking about in a lot of detail.
I think this also just goes to the general rule
that you should avoid bringing up concepts
that you're not familiar with in interviews.
Of course, there's a chance that those concepts
might come up anyways because of the interviewer,
and if that happens, it's best to just be honest
that you're not familiar with those issues
rather than do something like try to bluff your way out.
So next, we want to talk about being prepared
to address any possible weaknesses in your CV,
whether that's not-so-good grades or gaps in your experience.
Our approach is that if there's a good, honest explanation
for why that's the case,
it's generally just best to be upfront about it,
which we've talked about in a previous video.
For instance, as Lloyd has mentioned before,
he actually got a D-plus in commercial law
when he was still a student.
Since that was because he had some personal stuff
going on at the time,
when he was asked about it in an interview,
he was just honest about what happened.
However, sometimes you might have weak points
or things that just don't look great
that you can't just explain away.
If that's the situation, we suggest taking the time
to think about the kinds of concerns
that the interviewer might have
and how you would assuage those concerns.
For instance, when I was interviewing for my last firm,
I knew that the firm was looking for an associate
who specialized in projects and construction work.
Although I had a fair amount of experience in the area,
I wasn't a specialist,
and that was because that just wasn't my role
at my previous firm
and that wasn't something I could do anything about.
However, the way I thought about it
was that if the firm really wasn't interested
in hiring me at all and possibly having to teach me,
they wouldn't have invited me to the interview.
So instead of focusing on the experience that I didn't have
and apologizing for it
or making it sound like I'm anything but a great candidate,
I decided to draw the interviewer's attention
to the positives instead.
I decided to highlight the level of involvement and exposure
I had already gotten to that kind of work
in the cases I did,
and I also decided to emphasize
my eagerness and willingness to learn.
I think this kind of approach
has the added benefit of demonstrating a good attitude,
which is something you can never really go wrong with.
So in an interview,
there's usually an opportunity
where the interviewer asks you
if you have any questions for them.
Preparing good questions for an interviewer
is a common tip that you see,
but what really makes a good question?
So the first rule is that
you should only really be asking questions
that you genuinely want to know the answer to.
Way too many people ask questions
because they're the right questions to ask
to demonstrate the right version of themselves
to the interviewer.
But really, this is a great opportunity
to ask a question
that you really want to know the answer to
and probably get a genuine answer.
So it's a really big opportunity
that shouldn't be wasted.
On top of that,
interviewers can tell
when people are being genuine or not.
So the questions you ask will reflect this.
Asking a genuine question can demonstrate
that you're actually really interested in the firm
or you're interested in the partner
rather than just asking a stock question
that you'd ask any interviewer.
So what we recommend doing is picking questions
that are things that you genuinely want to know
while also being able to demonstrate your interest
in that specific firm or that specific partner.
And remember, interviews are two-way
in that the partners have to decide
whether or not they want to hire you,
but you also have to get a feel
for whether or not you want to take a job at that firm.
Open-ended questions are great too
as opposed to a simple yes or no question
because again, it's a really great opportunity
to get a very genuine and fleshed out response
from an interviewer in a face-to-face situation.
A question that I used to always ask
was to ask the interviewer
what their experience working at the firm was like.
Usually this would give me a bit of insight
into the culture of the firm
as well as a more personal spin
on the experience working there
as opposed to just something
that I could research online.
So the specific question
that we both asked in interviews before
is what do you specifically like
about working at this firm?
When I asked that question
when I was interviewing at my current job,
I got a really thoughtful response
about the culture at the firm.
In a career like law,
there's a lot of horror stories
like people working really late,
working over weekends,
canceling holidays,
or not really being able to see their family
just to name a few.
But one of the female partners who interviewed me
told me a story about
how she was really supported by the firm
when she was on maternity leave
and she didn't really have that much pressure
to come back and build her business
when she had her newborn child.
That gave me a really good insight into the firm
and the fact that they actually practiced
what they preached
which is something that I really cared about.
So for me,
being able to get into a genuine discussion
about the culture of the firm
and the fact that people's time
was valued outside of work
was a really good thing for me
and helped me make the decision
ultimately that I wanted to work at this firm.
So we definitely recommend
coming up with about two to three questions
in case any of them inadvertently get answered
during the course of the interview.
So a common tip is to be yourself
or to be your best self
which really just means not sounding scripted
and being conversational and genuine.
And while this is true
and seemingly straightforward,
it does seem kind of difficult to conceptualize
how one goes about being their best self
and putting their best foot forward.
So we think about it like this,
we all have a lot of different things
that come together to make us who we are,
our interests, hobbies,
or even just preferences
really dictate who we are
and our personalities.
That said,
an interview can often be quite short
and you most likely won't have the opportunity
to express everything
you may want to about yourself
and what sets you apart
in that short timeframe.
So while everyone has different traits,
perspectives, and personality
that make them all unique and special,
it's important to think about
which parts of your personality
or better put,
which parts of your story
you wanna share with the interviewer
in that short span of time.
For example,
very broadly speaking,
I'm personally very into fitness and nutrition,
cooking,
video games,
anime,
and tattoos.
But in the context of a law firm interview,
if I only have an hour to explain
my personality
and the things that I'm really interested in,
I might wanna raise maybe half of those things
and not the other half.
I'll let you guess which half.
But in all seriousness,
part of the interview process
is to demonstrate that you know
how to govern yourself professionally
and handle yourself in a business situation.
So it's very important in an interview setting
to first demonstrate
that you have that requisite level of professionalism
and that you can conduct yourself
as such.
This includes your communication style and tone,
the things you choose to talk about
during the interview,
and the parts of your personality
that you share in that setting.
Once you demonstrate
that requisite level of professionalism,
it's like ticking the basic boxes
and it becomes easier after that
to build rapport
and transition to other topics
during the interview.
As a personal example,
when I interviewed for my current job,
the first half of the interview
was quite a bit more serious
with detailed questions about my CV,
the work that I had done as an intern,
and my career aspirations.
I also had this whole
Wolf of Wall Street moment
where one of the partners
handed me a stapler and said,
all right, sell me the stapler.
But once we got through that initial stage,
the second half of the interview
was way more relaxed
and I got to talk more about myself,
such as how I used to work
as a bartender in university
and how I love cooking
and playing video games.
So because we were able to establish
that basic level of professionalism,
it was a lot easier to build that rapport
and talk about things
that were a bit more personal.
Now, of course,
it is also worth mentioning
that it is entirely possible
for someone to just not be
on the same wavelength as the interviewer.
At the end of the day,
if you're just not vibing
with someone,
that's really outside of your control
and all you can really do
is try to put your best foot forward
in any given situation.
Thanks a lot for checking out our video, guys.
If you'd like to see more,
we'll link up above to a video
we made on the pros and cons
of being a lawyer.
And click on this video
for a video that the YouTube algorithm
thinks that you'll like.
