Mike King New Q Drops 3.26.2026 - No One Is Ready For What's Coming

Hi, Mike King, RealNewsInHistory.com. And I wanted to talk today about that very strange, very peculiar incident at LaGuardia Airport yesterday. It was actually Sunday night. And I did an article on this for the Anti-New York Times, which you can subscribe to, by the way, in the description box. Get the PDF package. I'll throw that in there for you. All 35 of my PDF books for just $29, including this one, Crash Course 9-11 Inside Job, which we're going to talk about today, because this story here is related, if not deliberately so. Certainly, I mean, when I get into it, you're going to see my angle here. So let me read this article to you and make some supplemental comments, show you some images. But this is what happened Sunday night. Okay. An Air Canada commercial passenger plane struck a fire truck on the runway, or so they say. But if you look at this image closely, the first thing that struck me is that the front of the plane, the cockpit, crumpled up like an aluminum can, because airplanes are made out of aluminum. They're flying soda cans, essentially, hollow soda cans. They're very light proportional to their size because they have to remain airborne. So that is very strange, the way the front of that plane just crumpled like that. And it turns out that this happened on the 22nd, okay, which happened to be the 31st anniversary, exactly 34 years to the day of another accident, a tragic accident at LaGuardia. With this incident here, I think they say two people died, two pilots died in the cockpit. But in that incident, it was 25 people died, 50 injured, and it's kind of miraculous they all didn't die. But that was exactly 34 years ago to the day. Isn't that interesting? At LaGuardia. So let me start reading this article to you here. There is not enough data available to declare this strange incident at New York's LaGuardia Airport as a white hat PSYOP of some sort. So don't misunderstand me. I'm not declaring this as a PSYOP. I'm saying this is kind of strange. That's all. But there is certainly enough to meet the standard of reasonable suspicion. At the very least, the image of the can-like crumpling of the airline cockpit clearly contradicts what we were taught on 9-11-2001. Specifically this, that hollow aluminum tubes can penetrate thick steel columns like a knife through liquefied butter. And again, look at what happened to the cockpit, completely obliterated just by striking a relatively small fire truck. Now here's an excerpt from the New York Times article. Two pilots were killed and dozens were injured when an Air Canada Express jet collided with a fire truck as it landed on a runway at LaGuardia Airport in Queens at 1137 p.m. on Sunday. The force of the crash ejected a flight attendant who was tossed from the plane and landed on a runway still strapped to her seat. That sounds kind of dubious, but be that as it may, fatal accidents at LaGuardia Airport are rare. The most recent fatal crash there happened exactly 34 years before Sunday's collision on March 22, 1992, when a U.S. airflight crashed because of ice on its wings. Of the 51 people on board, 27 of them were killed. And I remember that incident in 1992. I didn't question it then, but now looking back in retrospect, that sounds kind of dubious too. I mean, it's March, don't they spray the wings down? You know, there's ice on the wings? In this day and age, that's standard procedure. I would think in the wintertime is make sure your wings are de-iced, but that's the story of 1992. So what, this is me talking now, what are the odds of this happening on the exact anniversary of that 1992 event in which a plane skidded off the runway into icy waters, killing about half of the passengers? Isn't it interesting that this takes place 34 years later? Now we know that the number 17 is another way of expressing what? Q, 17th letter of the alphabet. 34 times, 17 times 2 is 34. And Q and various comms, they will often use 34. They use 17, but 34, which is a multiple. So that's another thing that makes you go, hmm, right? Adding further suspicion to this alleged incident are the numerous Q posts indicating that, quote, 7 out of 10, that's Q's term, not mine. Q says 7 out of 10 plane crashes are actually targeted kills designed to take out a single individual or group of individuals. As previously stated, the classification here is about reasonable suspicion of more movie psy-opery, not a definitive declaration. But there's something else, and there's something else I will get into in the next section of this article. Here's an image from that 1992 incident. The plane just toppled. It went into the bay, and it kind of, they say it toppled, somersaulted, and it landed in the water, broke apart. It's very cold water. It's kind of miraculous that most of the people survived. I think it was 27 dead, 50 survived that day. That's 1992. Here's a headline. Tragedy on takeoff. LaGuardia crash kills 25 on that exact same date. And then Q post 259, and there's other ones as well, but this one, December 5th, 2017, this is very on in the Q post and only in the second month, reads 7 out of 10 plane crashes are targeted kills. Those in the know never sleep. Q. And by the way, you may recall early in his term, 2017, or maybe in the summer, Trump starts boasting about the fact that 2017 was a very good year. There weren't any plane crashes. I think this would have been towards the end of 2017. And the media starts making fun of him. What is he taking credit for? The fact that there's no plane crashes this year, this guy's nuts. And then later on comes this Q post. So evidently, this is like, you know, because of the gravity, this type of problem is something they got a hold of right away. And you wouldn't see many crashes throughout the Trump era. Most of them are targeted kills. Yes. They will take out a whole plane just to get one individual such as Beverly Ecker, the 911 widow and truth or activist. They took that plane down. That was from Newark, the Buffalo, and that crashed and they shut her up. All right, so now we're going to go to a different angle. Maybe that's a con. Maybe this is a set up a sign up. Maybe it's not. I tend to think it is, but be that as it may. The observable evidence here is very valuable to those of us who still care about 9-11 truth is something you can show people. The day after 9-11, businessman Trump gave both a video street interview as well as a TV news call in assessment. During both discussions, he was adamant as to the impossibility of commercial airliners being able to penetrate the steel outer shell of the Twin Towers without the use of timed explosives in the building. Of course, since that time, most of us 9-11 truthers have come to the conclusion that the planes themselves were made for TV AI add-ons, although some sort of drones or missiles may have also been used to create or enhance the illusion for the folks on the ground who claimed to have saw something. Trump on September 12th, speaking to WPIX New York, quote, this was an unbelievably powerful building. When I first looked at it, I couldn't believe it because there was a hole in the steel. How could a plane, even a 767, possibly go through the steel? I happen to think they had not only a plane, but had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously. I just can't imagine anything going through that wall. And he knows he's a builder. Not that you even need to be a builder and engineer to understand that a hollow aluminum can cannot penetrate a manhole cover, which is essentially what they say happened that day. So Trump was right. How can hollow aluminum tube and its thin wings so easily penetrate a solid steel exoskeleton made up of beams as thick as oak trees? The incident at LaGuardia, real or not, rigged or not, just calmed for us how a plane crumpled upon hitting a fire truck. A very interesting event in multiple ways. And here's an image of Trump. That's him on a street interview. And then he also called into a TV news program. He's saying the exact same thing both times. He was just incredulous. This is September 12th. He's like, how could it penetrate? It's impossible. Then later on, of course, he backed off and went with the official story, but he's not done yet. He's buying his time. But we all saw that image, that plane, including its wing tips, just penetrated the solid steel columns that were on the outside of the tower like it was nothing, even the tips of the wings. And I go into this in depth in Crash Course 9-11 Inside Job. It will be linked in the description box below. It's also part of the PDF package if you get all 35 books in PDF format. And I go in and also in depth into Trump's obsession, really, with 9-11. He keeps coming back to this, all kinds of comms. Comms is short for communications. He has not forgotten 9-11. And I wonder if this was some kind of inside communication to those of us in the know, this little incident here. Here's what I'm talking about now. Here's a cannonball. This is from the Revolutionary War. A cannonball lodged in a brick wall. If a solid iron cannonball fired at about 500 miles an hour can't even penetrate brick, how does a hollow aluminum can penetrate solid steel? Now, look at this one. This is an image of a plane that apparently went off the runway a bit and the wing clipped a light pole. And it almost severs the wing. The wings are so flimsy. If you ever look out the window of an airplane, it says, do not step. Yeah, a 9-11, even the tip, the tippy tips of the wings penetrated solid steel like it was nothing. That was all AI. And, you know, if you haven't read Crash Course 9-11 Inside Job yet, you might not be aware of this. Although I've done articles on this. I pointed this out several times. But some of you newbies might not have seen this. You see this image here of Trump with the flag on his face. That's his avatar from his social media, Truth Social. That's Trump's face covered in red, white, and blue war paint. But if you look closely, it's a 9-11 right on his face. He's telling you right there. And it's nine stars. Two of them are halves. When you put them together, it's nine stars. And then you got the two columns there, stripes of the flag forms an 11. 9-11 war paint right on his face at Truth Social. So I don't want to say that these people are going to be exposed and punished because they already were. I am convinced that scum like Bibi Netanyahu, for example, were already executed for their role in 9-11. Now, what we are waiting now, as is the case with so many other major scandals, is what I call the great replay. All these evil players, dangerous players, they've been taken off the field. Now they have to put on this movie, this show for the normies. But ultimately, as we get further and further in the process, and one scandal leads to another and another and at the end of the road comes public exposure of 9-11. Both Q and Trump have essentially promised us that. In cryptic language, it's unmistakable language when you read the Q posts and the Trump tweets and the things Trump has done and said, that ultimately the public is going to learn 9-11 truth. And maybe this incident was staged for that purpose. Not so much to get people thinking, because normies don't really think, but more for like us. It's like a wink wink to us. You know, look, look what just happened. See how that plane crumbled? Contradicts 9-11. Maybe that's their way of saying, you know, hang in there, 9-11 truth is coming. I don't know. Or maybe it was an accident, but it's just so weird on the exact day. And it's 34 years later, probably a PSYOP. Not enough data to say definitively, but that's what I lean towards as a PSYOP. So that's the significance of the event. And that's why I wanted to talk about it. But if you don't have this already, you've got to get this book. It's a one hour read. It's on Amazon. It's only $14 and change. And it's a very powerful weapon to use on normies. Because once you bust open the 9-11 hoax, this does that very easy to understand terms. It can lead to so many other things. So that's the book, Amazon link. And again, it's part of the PDF package, all 35 books and booklets for just $29. Absolute steal. That's in the link below. And if you already have this stuff and you wish to continue supporting my work from time to time, there's a link for buying me a coffee. Much appreciated. We're growing and a lot of the funds get plowed back into growth so people can get this unique content because nobody else fuses together the history and the contemporary. And I think that's very important. So thanks for listening. And I'll see you soon with the next batch of 200 or so Q posts that we're going to from 2020. Thank you.