She's Going to PRISON for This...

So Hillary Clinton gave her Epstein testimony, and I don't think she's happy with how this went. Can I ask, why was Colleen Maxwell invited to the daughter of Chelsea Clinton's wedding in 2010? She'd already been mentioned in a civil lawsuit before that. Great question. Jeffrey Epstein had already been convicted before. She came as the plus one, the guest of someone who was invited. As if anyone can get within feet of a former first lady and president. I don't know how many times I had to say I did not know Jeffrey Epstein. I never went to his island, I never went to his homes, I never went to his offices. But he was at your home. So it's on the record numerous times. An hour into her testimony, it went off the rails. A photo of Hillary was leaked from inside. Oh yeah, this happened too. All hell broke loose. She was so angry. The hearing just went off the record for a moment. Because it seems, as some of you may have seen, that there were some photographs shared on social media. It leaked. Which is against chamber rules that were read at the top of the meeting. Because Hillary's a woman of rules. The hearing has been paused briefly while they figure out where the photo came from. Congresswoman Lauren Boebert texted the pic to the press and Hillary complained it was against the rules. Yeah, she's so honorable. I don't think she liked how she looked. We had a bit of a challenge in the beginning because we had agreed upon rules based on the fact it was going to be a closed hearing at their demand. What about rules like not having a private email server in your basement? Very upsetting because it suggested that they might violate others. Oh, so Hillary's the only one that can be trusted here, really. And apparently she also says, if you want to know about Epstein, you'll have to ask her husband. Isn't that an interesting answer? These are all pretty incredible in view of the fact that Jeffrey Epstein provided the seed capital for the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Global Initiative. He also was a heavy donor to Hillary's Senate race, the New York Democrat Party, and of course, his good friend, Senator Chuck Schumer. Interestingly also, the Clinton Foundation funds a non-profit called TerraMAR headed by Ghislaine Maxwell. Theoretically an environmental think tank, TerraMAR is completely and totally financed by the Clinton Global Initiative. Wow, so you've got money going both directions, but nobody knows who each other is. Hillary made a fuss to chew up clock because she didn't want to be there. She testified that she never met Epstein, even though he'd been to the White House 16 times. Oh, 16 times. It was supposed to be a co-presidency, remember? A two-for-one deal. Wow. Hillary moved her office into the West Wing, but Hillary doesn't remember. Doesn't remember? The number of times that she said, I don't know, you'll have to ask my husband, was more than a dozen. Wow. I'll put it like that. Is she throwing him under the bus? Maybe, maybe not, but we do know this. I knew Ghislaine Maxwell casually as an acquaintance, but whenever they asked me, I did my very best to respond. Wow. Epstein's accomplice. So she knew Ghislaine Maxwell and got money from Epstein and gave money to Epstein, who was at the White House where she lived. Who? Jeffrey? Who? What? When she was asked about this, she ran like the wind. She came as the plus one, the guest of someone who was invited. Oh, she snuck in. I don't understand how that happens because these are the Clintons. You don't just sneak in and get to be around them without anyone knowing who you are. They knew who everybody was. These people were all vetted in order to get into that wedding. You mean to tell me they had the same vetting at the Clinton wedding that they had at the Biden border? Come on. We do know who did spend a lot of time with Epstein. Bill Clinton. There's dozens of photos in the files. It was one of the stops they made to look at philanthropic and charitable work that my husband has done, saving literally millions of lives around the world. So he saved people. It turned out that was done long before there was any public awareness and certainly any conviction of any crime by Jeffrey Epstein. So it was a short period of time. What is this idea of public awareness? What a scam. We're supposed to think from this conversation that because there was no public awareness of what type of person Jeffrey Epstein was, that the private awareness of what type of person he was also didn't exist. Really? Is that correct? Yeah. It depends upon what the meaning of the word is. Yes. Hillary says she's not worried. Bill would never do something inappropriate. Are you 100% confident that there isn't anything that the former president knows about Epstein's crimes? I am, and I think the chronology of the connection that he had with Epstein ended several years before anything about Epstein's criminal activities came to light. Ah, there it is again. So this idea that by the time everyone else found out, that was the first time we knew that there might be anything questionable about this individual. Meanwhile, President Trump was the whistleblower that ratted Epstein out to the FBI and told them to look into him when there was only private level awareness of who he might be. Yet Bill and Hill had him over the house multiple times, got money from him, and they are as surprised as you and me to learn the things that we're learning. If anybody thinks this is some partisan witch hunt, or as the Clintons call it, a vast right-wing conspiracy, you're wrong. I think one thing that surprised the Clintons, they assumed the Democrats on the committee would vote in a partisan manner and not vote to hold the Clintons in contempt. And what they learned was a majority of the Democrats on the committee either voted to hold the Clintons in contempt or voted present. The Epstein fallout has Clinton and Obama operatives dropping like flies. But here's what you gotta understand. When you see a group of people who are all over this scandal and who are leading the charge in some way and are talking about how nonpartisan it is, remember there are people who've gone viral, elected members of Congress who are now going to be career politicians for the rest of their lives because of how much presence they've had on this and are totally in it for themselves when they were sitting members of our government for a long time and did absolutely nothing. So you have to realize that there are people who are in this for their own gain. Ladies and gentlemen, keep in mind that the Epstein files were in existence and free to have been opened during the Biden administration. Right, yeah, they were there. You were there for four years. Nobody cared. How come you didn't open it as a Democratic Party then? They didn't care. What am I missing? They knew what was in them. I'm not saying I know. It's a legitimate question. Maybe I don't remember the answer. Maybe my extraordinary producers should be able to help me during the commercial break. But from my understanding, the same files that were open or being open now with the 220 pages of documents or whatever it is, with various emails, that could have been done when Biden was in office. Well, why didn't you do it if it's so important now? Right, because it wasn't Biden. What were the Democrats doing at that particular moment in time? Right, hoping it would all go away. See, this is the kind of stuff that smells. He's 100% right. The whole thing is fishy. And the idea that there are elected officials now who are out there championing the release of this, some of them, not all of them, really goes to show you that the only reason they care is because it's Trump who's got to release the files. It's Trump who's got to put them out with redactions. And everything he redacts just makes him look guilty. And that's the scam. Larry Summers had to resign from his position at Harvard. That's crazy. Treasury secretary. And now it's come out that not only did the Ivy League take $9 million from the PERV, they gave him his own office. Wow. And Harvard faculty was accepting free flights. And Epstein was giving Larry Summers consulting gigs in places like Mongolia and Kazakhstan. Like we've been saying, it's going global. Yeah. The head of the World Economic Forum. Yep, this guy. You know, the guys who tell us to eat insects. Borge Brende suddenly resigned because of the Epstein file. That's crazy. One of the Rothschilds. Why would these people resign if there was no problem here? Right? Like if Hillary's telling the truth that, oh yeah, you know, when there was no public awareness of anything, we didn't see any reason not to have a relationship with this individual. Why are people resigning? Why aren't they using that defense? Why aren't these people who are losing their jobs, losing their CEO positions? Why aren't they saying the same thing as her? Saying, oh yeah, well, because it was only a private relationship. And, you know, this stuff wasn't out in the open. I had no idea. Like no one else is saying that. This is her defense exclusively. And ask my husband. That's the other part of her defense. You know, the European banking dynasty all over the Epstein files. And the Swiss bankers, all they're saying so far is they're monitoring the situation. Yeah, monitoring. J.B. Pritzker's cousin, Thomas, just resigned from the board of Hyatt Hotels. The governor of Chicago's cousin. I only see my cousin on holidays. A cousin of yours has been in the news with regards to the Epstein files, Thomas. Oh yeah, Pritzker's been real quietly. Resigned from the board of the Hyatt company. Look, I've said from the beginning that anyone that's done something wrong needs to be held accountable. And I really mean anyone. I'm not close to my cousin. Except for my cousin. But I can tell you that it's very important that people be held to pay the price for whatever it is that they may have done. They're hoping that it's Trump. You can just so tell when these people bring this stuff up, that when they say everyone should be held accountable, they're really trying to tie this all back to Trump. But he was never there. He was never present at the quote unquote island. He didn't have the type of relationship that we're learning other people had. People who have not been held accountable, by the way. Meanwhile, Hillary, whose story on Jeffrey Epstein keeps changing, was very upset that she was apparently asked the same questions over and over again. Listen to this. They asked literally the same questions over and over again. Did they get different answers? It didn't seem to me to be very productive. And then as I said toward the end, there were other questions that were totally off subject. Wow. So if they are going to fulfill their responsibilities to- So she's trying to explain with her hands like this as she looks at them, that this was an entire waste of time. She did not want to be here. Remember the Clintons did everything they could to resist having to show up to these hearings. She didn't want to be here. She didn't want to answer these questions. She says they were all repetitive. She says they're a big waste of time. And she's trying to talk about how this investigation should go and what these hearings should actually be about. But there's a reason she was questioned repetitively. Listen. Well, she said many times under oath that she had never met Jeffrey Epstein. The reason she was asked so many times is we kept presenting new items of evidence, emails from Epstein where he implied that he was very close with the Clinton family, including Hillary. Emails that implied that he set up- Yeah. The Clinton Foundation, that he was one of the biggest donors and one of the main early seed money raisers for the Clinton Global Initiative. And when we asked about that, Hillary said she didn't have anything to do with the Clinton Global Initiative at that time because she was a US senator. So she was- This is the same guy, by the way, who's investigating Ilhan Omar. And the idea that a senator, an elected official, isn't using their private foundations and private businesses to enrich themselves or benefit in some manner. Well, he's the guy that's working on exposing that idea. Asked many times about questions with respect to Jeffrey Epstein because there were many forms of evidence in the documents that have been released by the Department of Justice and the estate that included her name in there. And she kept saying not only did she not have a relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, that he was a shockster and he was a con artist and all of that. But then why are they hanging out with him? She said many times that she had never met him. And at the exact same time, what a double standard we're seeing here. Hillary Clinton's allowed to go out there and say things that contradict actual evidence. You've got evidence of money. You've got evidence of someone's physical presence at your home. And you say, I have no idea who they are. What if Trump were to say something like that, right? Like, what if Trump, there was evidence that Trump had Epstein over to Trump Tower multiple times, right? What if that came out and he said, oh, I never hung out with him? Like there would be an earthquake and there's no earthquake here or there is, but it's being minimized. It's being defended because, oh, well, even though they're in the files, the fish we really want to get, we're still looking for evidence on Trump. That's what this whole thing is about. Off mentally. So, again, the left keeps wanting to throw Bill Clinton aside while focusing on Donald Trump. It was Jeffrey Epstein who went to the White House 17 times. Was Hillary always out of town? Bill and Hillary went to the Zorro Ranch multiple times. She never met Jeffrey Epstein there. That's his ranch. There are pictures of her with Jeffrey Epstein while she claims both apparently her sworn testimony. And afterwards, she never met the man. So are we supposed to believe our lying eyes or Hillary Clinton? I mean, Hillary says we're supposed to believe her. She's saying I don't remember meeting him. Maybe that's one of those small legalese phrases, which means that she gets off. She is an attorney. But the idea that you wouldn't recall meeting somebody of such a high profile, controversial nature is alarming. Because all of us know that if we experience something in passing, if we briefly meet a person and then we find out something about them that is just shocking and bizarre. We remember all kinds of, oh, yeah, I do remember meeting that person. It's like it all comes to the forefront of your mind. So her saying that, oh, I don't know this person at all when there's money, when there are visitation logs at multiple properties where people owned and there are guests at weddings. The idea that, oh, I have no, I don't recall. I don't remember. My memory is not good enough to remind me if I actually did any of what there is evidence about. Like, that's pretty wild. But so many of these people who write these long books detailing their time in office or as a camp, they can remember everything when they're writing a book. But when it's a tough question, they I can't remember ever writing a man. And her statement afterwards and her lawyer statement was definitive. I never met the guy. That's so wild that this can just be happening. It's a circus. This whole thing is a circus. The Clintons didn't want to be involved in it at all. We'll be able to get it. Maybe he'll incriminate himself. Maybe he'll do such a horrible job at this that it makes him look guilty, even if he hasn't done anything. And meanwhile, as we go through all of these investigations, some people have the goal of navigating landmines like the whole Clinton situation here and trying to get around it so that they can still try to point the finger at the president. What do you think about that? I'll see you in the next video.