Join celebrated London Business School entrepreneurship professor, Dr. John Mullins, in this thought-provoking TEDx talk as he shares his research on the six counter-conventional mindsets of successful entrepreneurs. Drawing from his best-selling book, Mullins provides practical strategies and insights that anyone can use to build a thriving business, regardless of size or industry. Mullins reveals the secrets of the world's most successful entrepreneurs and inspires us all to think differently about what it means to be entrepreneurial. Don't miss this eye-opening exploration of the mindsets that can help anyone change the world.
John Mullins is an Associate Professor of Management Practice at the London Business School. An award-winning teacher and scholar and one of the world’s foremost thought leaders in entrepreneurship, John brings to his teaching and research 20 years of executive experience in high-growth retailing firms, including two ventures he founded and one he took public.
Since becoming an entrepreneurship professor in 1992, John has published five books, more than 50 cases, and more than 50 articles in a variety of outlets.
John’s newest book, Break the Rules! The Six Counter-Conventional Mindsets of Entrepreneurs That Can Help Anyone Change the World (Jersey City: Wiley 2023), identifies what makes entrepreneurs “entrepreneurial” and provides a roadmap for how anyone can adopt and master these mindsets to challenge assumptions, overcome obstacles, mitigate risk, and perhaps change the world. This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community.
In 1995, a graphic design teacher named Linda Weinman,
and also an aspiring entrepreneur,
decided to get the website linda.com.
She did so because she needed a sandbox to play in
with the new graphic design tools,
the digital tools that were being developed at that time,
Photoshop, Illustrator, and many more.
And she needed a place to put her students' work
so all could see it.
Well, she put that website together
and the business began to grow.
And in 2002, she discovered it could be much, much more.
So she moved all of her teaching online.
Some 16 years later, the business was sold to LinkedIn,
who renamed it LinkedIn Learning,
sold for 1.5 billion U.S. dollars.
Linda is the poster child for what I call
the counter-conventional mindsets of entrepreneurs.
So I wanna tell you about these mindsets today,
and here we go.
So number one, why do I call them counter-conventional?
Well, first, these six mindsets run counter
to the best practices, as we call them,
that are done in big companies today.
They fly in the face of much of what we teach
at London Business School and other business schools
about strategy, about marketing,
about risk, and about much more.
Now, you might say, John, what do you mean by mindset?
A mindset, of course, is up here, right?
It's those things, attitudes, habits, thoughts,
mental inclination, which, when something comes our way,
predetermines the response we make
to that something that comes our way,
and those somethings, as we entrepreneurs call them,
are opportunities.
So I wanna tell you about these six mindsets,
and the first one I call Yes, We Can.
Now, B-School Strategy 101 says the following.
What we're supposed to do in a company
is stick to our knitting.
We've gotta figure out what we're really good at.
We call them core competencies,
and we've gotta build on them, invest in them,
nurture them, make them more robust.
And if somebody comes along and says,
can you do something different that's outside of that,
what are we supposed to say?
No, I'm sorry, we don't do that around here.
Well, a Brazilian entrepreneur named Arnold Correa
built a wonderful business that today is called Atmo Digital
by disregarding those rules.
He had already reinvented his business twice
to become a major provider of event management
and production services when one of his customers
said to him, you know, I have 260 stores
scattered all around Brazil, and Brazil's a big country,
and I'd like to be able to broadcast
training and motivational events
to the stores in real time.
So Arnold, could we put televisions in the training room
of all my stores, and could we build a satellite uplink
so we can send all this wonderful stuff to the stores?
So what did he say?
He said, yes, we could do that,
even though he knew nothing about satellite technology,
had never operated outside Sao Paulo, but he got it done.
Then several years later, some of his other customers,
one of them in particular, Walmart, said,
well, you know, it's nice that we have
all of these television screens
in the back room of the store,
but wouldn't it be cool if we had them on the sales floor,
because then we could run advertising,
so when the customer walks down the aisle for detergent,
perhaps there's an ad for Procter & Gamble's detergent
in that aisle.
And what did Arnold say to that request?
Yes, we can do that.
Over a period of years, Arnold reinvented his business
fundamentally four different times
by saying when a customer wanted something new
that lay outside his core competencies, yes, we can.
The second one I want to tell you about
I call problem first, not product first logic.
So in big companies today, it's all about the products.
So when I'm in the US, my family and I
have used Tide for many years to wash our clothes,
and we get a chuckle every now and then
because we can tell a new brand manager has come along
because what happens?
They change the product, right?
They take the blue speckles out of it and turn them green,
and they call it new improved.
They change the scent from mountain fresh to sea breeze,
and they call it new improved.
Is this innovation, guys?
I'm not so sure.
Coca-Cola, what is there?
There was classic Coke, and then there was new Coke.
That didn't work out too well.
Then there was Diet Coke, and Coke Zero,
and vanilla Coke, and cherry Coke, lots of Cokes.
There was natural Coke or Coke natural in the green bottle.
Do you remember that one?
That's gone too.
I don't think this is what innovation is all about.
But for entrepreneurs, we don't focus on products.
We focus on problems.
So a guy named Jonathan Thorne developed a technology
that did something very useful.
This instrument you see in front of you
is called a surgical forcep.
It's the tool that almost every surgeon
in any kind of medical discipline
uses to do his or her work.
But there's a problem with these surgical forceps.
They stick to human tissue.
So imagine you're having a facelift,
and the plastic surgeon is doing the final touches,
but the tissue sticks to the forceps.
Maybe it's not going to look quite as good
as it was supposed to look.
And maybe the plastic surgeon is going
to get a little frustrated, and it's
going to take longer to do the work.
And John said, you know, that's a problem
I think I can solve with a new silver nickel alloy
that he had developed.
Well, it turned out the business didn't grow very fast,
focusing on plastic surgeons.
So he said, I wonder if there's another surgical specialty that
has an even bigger problem that I could solve.
And he discovered one, and it's neurosurgeons.
And neurosurgeons work in two places on our bodies,
in our spines and in our brain.
So I hope you never have brain surgery,
and I hope I never have it.
But if they have to take a little tumor out,
I hope the forceps don't stick to some other tissues,
because I kind of want to keep all the brain cells I can,
right?
John Thorne built a fantastic business,
sold it some years later to Stryker.
Stryker is very happy.
John and his investors are very happy too.
Why?
Because John focused on solving problems,
not on thinking about products.
The next one.
I call it think narrow, not broad.
Like John Thorne, an entrepreneur
I'm going to tell you about focused on a problem,
but thought very narrowly about a target market.
But the big company wisdom doesn't
want narrow target markets.
It wants big target markets, right?
Because you've got to move the needle.
Why would a big company mess around with something small?
But like John Thorne, Philip Knight and Bill Bowerman,
when they founded Nike, a company we all
know very well today, had identified a problem.
But it was a problem that a very narrow target market had.
Phil Knight was a runner, a distance runner.
And he could run almost not quite a four minute mile.
And Bill Bowerman was his track coach.
And there's a problem with their shoes,
because running shoes in those days
were really made for sprinters.
And when sprinters train, they run around the track.
It's a nice, smooth track.
But distance runners don't run around tracks.
Where do they run?
They run on country paths and dirt roads.
And they're always stepping on sticks and rocks.
And so they get sprained ankles.
And they run mile after mile after mile.
And they get shin splints.
Well, Knight and Bowerman said, we need better shoes,
shoes that are made especially for distance runners,
especially elite distance runners who
really train a whole lot.
So we're going to build a better shoe that's
going to have better lateral stability, a wider footbed.
It's going to have a little more cushioning in it
to protect against those shin splints.
And by the way, if it's a little bit lighter weight,
a few ounces lighter times all the steps
in running a mile or a two mile or a marathon,
it's going to make for faster race times, too.
So we know what happened with Nike, right?
Once they developed the skills to design shoes explicitly
made for a target market, a narrow one,
and once they learned to import those shoes from Asia,
and once they learned to get athletes to adopt those shoes,
what did they do?
Well, John McEnroe in tennis, Michael Jordan in basketball
came next.
And we know what the story is with Nike today.
They're the global leader in athletic footwear
and much more.
OK, the next one, asking for the cash and riding the float.
Big companies today are awash in cash,
even in these tricky times we're in today.
There's cash all over the place, right?
Merck, in 2018, spent all this money, $18 billion,
giving money back to shareholders
through stock buybacks and dividends.
And they could only find $10 billion worth of R&D
to do with all that cash.
Is something wrong here?
I think this just doesn't feel right.
But for entrepreneurs like Elon Musk and the Tesla team,
cash is the lifeblood of the entrepreneurial venture.
So when Musk joined the Tesla team,
he said, well, what's the plan here?
And the team had a plan.
It was to build a really fancy sports car,
make a lot of money from that one,
use that money to build a somewhat lower priced car,
make some money from that one, and then
we're going to build a mass market car that more
people can afford.
And in so doing, we're going to make
a real dent in the emissions problem
that the global automobile industry creates.
Well, what Musk said is, well, let's go
see if we can sell some cars.
So they did a little road show in California,
and they invited people on this little road show
with three characteristics.
Number one, they cared about the environment.
Number two, they were wealthy.
Number three, they thought it might
be cool to have the next big thing parked in their driveway.
Well, guess what?
They sold 100 Tesla Roadsters for $100,000 each.
Cash on the barrel had paid tonight.
How much?
Do the math.
How much money have they got to start building Roadsters?
$10 million US in the bank in cash
before they had built Roadster number one.
Well, that principle has carried Tesla all the way
through its journey.
So when they introduced the Model 3 several years ago,
nearly half a million consumers put down
deposits of $1,000 each.
Do that math.
Half a million consumers, $1,000 each.
Half a billion dollars in the bank in cash
with which to begin doing the engineering,
build the tooling, fit out the factory, and more.
Wouldn't you like to build your entrepreneurial venture
with that kind of business model?
OK, the next one.
I call it beg, borrow, but please, please don't steal.
In B-School finance, we teach our students
how to analyze whether a project's any good.
So you figure out how much investment you have to do.
And then you figure out what the cash flows are
going to be going forward year after year after year
for five years or 10 years or whatever.
And then you ask yourself, well, is that return
on that investment sufficient?
And if the ROI is good enough, then you do the project.
That's the idea.
But for Tristram Mayhew and Rebecca Mayhew, his wife,
who built a wonderful business in the UK called Go Ape,
a treetop adventure business,
they didn't think that way at all.
They said, well, we want to build
a treetop adventure business here in the UK.
They'd seen one in France that they liked on a vacation.
So where can we get some trees?
Well, who's got trees in the UK?
Well, it turns out the UK Forestry Commission
has trees in the UK, lots of them,
in all these Forestry Commission sites.
And the Forestry Commission was very interested
in increasing their visitor count.
Well, what better way to increase their visitor count
than to have a Go Ape treetop adventure course
on their land?
So what Trist and Bex essentially did
was go to the Forestry Commission and say,
look, if you'll give us a chance to build five of these
and show you that it works,
we'd like an exclusive for the rest of them for 25 years.
The deal was done.
Today, there are more than 30 Go Ape adventure sites
across the UK.
There are a whole bunch of them in the US.
And how did that happen?
Because they borrowed most of the assets they needed.
They borrowed the trees, they borrowed the loos,
they borrowed the parking lots, all that stuff.
All they had to do was put their kid on the trees.
Pretty cool.
Okay.
Now, entrepreneurs and permission
are kind of like oil and water.
If you're an entrepreneur, you kind of know that, right?
But in a big company today,
if you want to get something new done,
something entrepreneurial,
something that's maybe a little different than the norm,
you've got to pass it through the lawyers first
because there are a lot of regulations everywhere
and you don't want to do something
that's going to land a top exec in jail.
So it's really hard to get a yes answer
to doing something that's new and innovative
and it takes a long time,
but it's really easy to get a no.
For entrepreneurs, however,
like Travis Kalanick and Garrett Camp, who founded Uber,
do you think they would have been wise
to ask the permission of the San Francisco regulators,
can we start a taxi company without any taxis?
No, maybe not, right?
Because had they asked,
what do you think the regulators would have said?
There's no way you're going to do that.
That's going to threaten the current taxi industry, right?
So entrepreneurs don't ask permission,
they just get on with it.
Now, I don't condone many of the things that Uber did
along the journey, many of them unethical,
some of them probably illegal,
but the principle of entrepreneurs just getting on with it
when the regulations are perhaps ambiguous
or haven't sort of considered
what could be done today digitally,
that's when you get on with it.
Okay, so I want to close with four questions for you.
Question number one,
which of these mindsets are embodied in you today?
Maybe one or two of them already.
Question number two,
which of the others can you learn?
Are these learnable?
I think they are.
Question number three,
can you teach these to somebody you work with
who has some challenges for which these mindsets might help?
And more pertinently today,
is there a challenge you face today
for which one of these mindsets or a couple of them
might help you get beyond the roadblocks
you're facing with that challenge?
Okay, so there we go.
Six counter-conventional break-the-rules mindsets
that can help anyone, maybe you, change the world.