המשטר הסיני הדיח שני בכירים בצבא סין ופתח נגדם בהליכי חקירות באשמת שחיתות (https://t.me/NTD_Hebrew/18143). אחד הגנרלים המודחים נחשב עד לא מזמן כמקורב ביותר לראש המשטר הסיני, שי ג'ין-פינג.
על רקע האירועים, פרשנים מעלים ספקות בנוגע ליציבות המפלגה הקומוניסטית.
מה עשויות להיות השלכות המצב לגבי העימות בטייוואן, וכיצד על ארה"ב להעריך ולנהל את יחסיה עם סין במצב הנוכחי?
מגישת חדשות NTD שוחחה בנושא עם סטיב ייטס, חוקר בכיר לענייני סין ומדיניות ביטחון לאומי ב"קרן המורשת".
Beijing has purged two top military leaders, the latest in a series of investigations.
It's leading analysts to question the stability of the party.
But what does all this mean for a Taiwan contingency?
And how should the U.S. evaluate and handle relations with China?
Joining us now to unpack what all of this means is Steve Yates, Senior Research Fellow
for China and National Security Policy at the Heritage Foundation.
Steve as always, thank you so much for joining us.
Now diving straight in.
How are you reading these latest investigations into two of the country's most senior military
figures?
What does that tell you about the state of the party?
Well, I have a number of friends who've served for many, many years watching this very, very
closely and all of them say that this is unprecedented.
At the same time, it really doesn't change a lot of the choices the U.S. government has
to make about what they're going to have to respond to or necessarily tell us what China
will do.
Ultimately, we look at China being run by Xi Jinping and this purge of the military
under normal circumstances would be dramatic.
You'd think it would take a contingency in the Taiwan Straits off the table, but you
just can't take anything off the table with Xi Jinping.
So unfortunately, it gives us a lot to watch, a lot to try to analyze and unpack.
And I would bet that the NTD audience has as good information as anybody about this.
But unfortunately, we still have a powerful government that could be irresponsible at
any time.
And they have these trials and tribulations in the military leadership that are going
to continue.
I mean, as you noted in the intro, this is not the first.
This is barely left with anybody at the top of the Central Military Commission at this
point.
So we have to see where they go politically.
And given these latest purges, some analysts are wondering about the stability of the party
apparatus inside Beijing, because this also follows recent CIA recruitment videos in Chinese
seeking those in the country to come forward with information.
In your view, how stable is the party right now?
Or is there a sense of distrust maybe among the party elite?
Yeah, I don't think that the party is that stable.
Unfortunately, though, I also have a dim view that unstable and ineffective parties in these
authoritarian regimes can linger way too long.
The searing experience of my lifetime was the North Korean regime in the 1990s, pronounced
dead by nearly every intelligence service and diplomatic service in the world.
And it's still very much around today.
And so I think we have to be cautious about how close it is.
And we had a recent experience with Iran, where there's widespread demonstrations and
the regime looks to be on the ropes.
It could still be on the ropes.
In fact, I hope it is because it's a terrible regime that I hope ends for the sake of the
Iranian people.
We have a similar situation with China, where if the economy is shrinking, they're an export
dependent economy, and if they're playing dangerous games with the United States, playing
political games with countries like Canada, and their economic drivers for low energy
like Iran and Venezuela are getting affected.
And if Russia is not a driving engine of growth or opportunity, where do they turn to have
confidence?
So I think that their options have actually gotten worse.
But unfortunately, when you have bloody regimes, they don't have to have only good options
before they're willing to take risks.
And that is just where we are.