Even in a record-breaking year like 2021, just a tiny, tiny fraction of companies that go public are led by women. Following years on the annual CNBC Disruptor 50 list, 23andMe is now one of the few female-led publicly traded companies, which now has something in common with many disruptors that have come to market before: the challenge of convincing investors to believe in its next act. Co-Founder and CEO Anne Wojcicki has faced challenges before as she overcame regulatory hurdles to build a strong consumer brand and make knowing one’s genetic traits affordable and even cool. She joins us to discuss what’s next and reflect on lessons learned since her company made the very first CNBC Disruptor 50 list in 2013.
Anne Wojcicki, 23andMe Co-Founder & CEO Interviewer: Julia Boorstin, CNBC Senior Media & Tech Correspondent
23andme is a public company with
Anne Wojcicki becoming part of the
less than 1% of companies that have
gone public with a FEMA leader and
we are so thrilled to have you with
us here today as we celebrate 10
years of the disrupter 50.
I want to start off by just talking
about all the odds that you have
defied, particularly when it came
to that regulatory challenge.
I remember thinking is this
company going to make it?
Does it make sense to keep trying
to navigate these waters?
What made you decide to try to
work within the FDA's restrictions
and find a way to keep operating?
That is a great question.
I, you know, for one I very persistent
and and I think that a lot of founders
when you have a vision and you have,
you know a vision for what you want
to achieve in some ways like these
things just look like small obstacles.
So for me, the FDA was obviously
a significant hurdle.
There was the Article 23 and stupid
that came out, but for me it was
always like there's the.
The world is going to evolve where people.
All of us as consumers.
We have the ability to get more direct
access to our health information and
what the most important thing that 23
me proved out in that FDA process.
Is that the consumer can actually
get complicated genetic information
without having to have a clinician
pre approve it and on the end like
help review the results that people
are in fact capable of getting
this information on their own.
So for me it was a win for 23 me,
but most importantly,
what we really fought for was like
a win for the consumer that you
are actually more capable than anyone
in the health care system believes.
Yeah, it's so interesting,
because what you're offering used
to be something that only very few
people could afford to get,
or is that sort of elite medical offering?
But you're very much interested in
having this very broadly accessible,
but lower margin business.
Talk to me about the importance of
really having that broad accessibility.
Well, I think a lot of health care.
If you want to really change health care,
it has to be accessible.
So like the core tenants of 23 me,
when you look at our mission about
help people access,
understand and benefit from the human
genome was really about like,
how do I take this incredible technology
being, you know,
access to your DNA and how am I going
to bring this broadly to individuals?
And I saw other models in countries
like India and Brazil where they
actually had direct access
businesses that were lower margins,
but they had a much higher volume.
And I realized that was something
that I think you could potentially do.
Like one thing that's very unique
about 23 me is there's no middleman
in our business.
Like I sell directly to consumers
like that's all there is.
There's no insurance company.
There's no PBM.
There's no distributor.
Like it's just a direct connection.
And so for that reason,
I can actually have a much
more affordable product.
But the goal was really to say,
how do I make something that's easy
for people to understand
and is going to be really
accessible to everybody
so that there's no
there's no insurance barriers,
there's no economic barriers
that, you know,
majority of people can afford it
and get access to it.
Yeah, it's interesting
because watching how much
the company has evolved
since you founded it,
I believe 18 years ago,
and then also how much
you have evolved as a leader
running this different kind of company.
How have you thought about
having 23 and me change
for being really a disruptor
to more of a partner
to the establishment?
Oh, that's a good question.
I mean, I think that
the number one goal I said
is like you have no chance
of really disrupting health care
until you have scale.
So I think it's one thing,
like even you look at the
the partnership between, you know,
you know, Amazon and JP Morgan,
like all these things are really hard
to significantly disrupt
until you have scale.
So the number one priority for 23
and me was like, how am I going to get
enough size and scale
that people actually have to look at us
as like a real force
and a real player in health care?
So now we have over 13 million people
who all have their genetic information.
I know, for instance,
that these people are all
taking their information
to their clinicians.
I now I'm forcing the conversation
about how is genetics going to be used
in a care setting.
And so the next phase of the company
is really the last part of our mission,
that word benefit.
How am I going to help millions
and millions of people get access
to their genetic information
and now benefit from that?
And that was precisely why
we bought the company Lemonade,
where we can now have a clinical team.
I can have a pharmacy team
and I'm going to pioneer really
how we're going to be able to connect
the 23 and me ecosystem
with the traditional health care world.
Yeah. Talk to us a little bit
about that acquisition,
because it really seems
like you're moving towards
almost like a verticalization
of the way you're enabling people
to get the information
and then go through
every part of the process,
even ultimately getting
pharmaceuticals based on that,
based on their genetic data.
Where does Lemonade fit in?
And how important is that
for the company's evolution?
I I think it's really important,
and I think there's a really interesting
big picture question for people to ask,
like the genome was first
sequenced over 20 years ago.
So why is it not part
of part of primary care?
Like, I think it's a really
interesting question for people to ask.
Like there's an affordable,
inexpensive technology
and it's not widely accessible.
Yet there's all kinds of really valid
clinical reasons
why you potentially want to use
and look at your genetic information.
And that could be pharmacogenetics.
It could be the carrier status.
It could be, you know,
the cancer reports like the BRCA.
There's hereditary prostate cancer,
hereditary colon cancer.
There's all kinds of incredibly
meaningful, clinically
validated reports that people
should be getting access to.
And by getting access to those,
you are going to save lives
and improve lives.
So I think there's a huge question
about like why it's not being adopted.
And one thing I think 23andMe
has has recognized
over the last 16 years
is that people get their
genetic information
and then they take it
to the medical world.
And the medical world is not trained
about how to use genetic information,
exactly what are the right protocols,
what to do with it.
So we spent lots of time
developing like medical courses
and working to train physicians.
But ultimately, we realized
if we want to help our customers
really benefit
from the human genome,
we need to have our own care team.
And so 23andMe acquired Lemonade
with the idea that we're going to have
our own care team
who can answer questions,
help navigate care,
help understand what do you do
when you have a variant
for the BRCA mutation?
Who should you talk to?
How should you follow up?
Also on pharmacy,
if you have a variant
and you know you're an
ultrametabolizer
and you are taking a medication
like Lipitor, what should you do?
And so that's where the integrated system
is really important for us
to complete that entire loop.
And we decided we had to do that
because I found the rest
of the health care system
was not widely adopting
genetic information.
So we need to own that.
Yeah, it's so interesting.
Then, of course, your partnership
with GSK is another piece of this.
Explain to that how that fits
into this broader portfolio
of what you're building out.
Well, that's another whole
fascinating part of I think
about consumer empowerment
is that all of us recognize
that we go to the physician sometimes
and we go to the health care system
and that you reach a dead end.
They don't know how to treat something.
They it's like it's not
it's a lot of, you know,
side effects with a medication.
So or they just don't have answers for us.
And so the beauty for me with the genome
was this has this ability
to help us change how we predict,
prevent and treat all human disease.
And so the idea of 23andMe
from the very earliest days
was how do I give consumers
this choice and an option
about opting in to a research experience?
So how is it you can say
I want to contribute
my genetic information
and my phenotypic data,
meaning all the survey questions
that people have answered
to this community
where we are doing research
on all kinds of conditions,
thousands of different conditions.
And what you find is that you have people
who have Parkinson's
or autoimmune disease
who can help people who have cancer
or neurological conditions.
So having this database of individuals
who have all kinds
of different conditions,
we can make genetic discoveries
on all various areas of diseases.
So we now have over 200 publications
that have come out.
And we decided also in 2015
that there was enough excitement
about all that potential for discovery
that we should actually start
a therapeutics division of 23andMe.
So we hired a team from Genentech.
We brought people in.
We've been looking
at all those associations
that we can discover.
And we now have over 50 programs.
We have two that are in the clinic
to actually immuno-oncology programs
that are in the clinic.
And we've had this big
partnership now with GSK
on how can we actually look
at all this genetic data
and turn those into therapeutic programs
that will ultimately benefit our customers.
With what you're talking about with GSK
and with Lemonade,
what I'm hearing from you
is this new vision
for what personalized
health care should look like.
How do you see the health care system
evolving or how do you think
it should evolve?
So 10 years from now,
people are really able
to get personalized care.
What does that look like
and where do you fit into that?
Well, I think what's exciting
is that people now understand
this concept of personalization,
like all our experience.
If you surveyed everyone
who's listening about their Netflix account,
everyone's going to have
a different kind of Netflix experience.
So we understand this concept
that we're all different.
We all live our lives in different ways.
And you all have different
genetic predispositions.
So how is it that we can all have
a very unique health care experience?
So right now, for instance,
if you look at the preventative guidelines,
so when should you get a colonoscopy?
When should you get a mammogram?
All of that is the exact same
for every single one of us.
So when I think about the opportunities
is how is it that we can have
really like truly personalized
prevention, personalized primary care?
So when I walk in and I could say,
OK, you're higher risk
for atrial fibrillation.
How should I be living my life?
Like, are there things I could do
with how I exercise, how I eat,
how I like the environment I'm living in?
What are the things that I could do
to potentially change?
It could be high risk for something
like chronic kidney disease.
Do you better manage your blood pressure
in certain ways to try and prevent that?
So or you could have a high
risk factor for cancer
like the BRCA variant.
Do you want to then get screened
or do you want to do a prophylactic
mastectomy?
There's a lot of ways that you'll be
able to have very personalized care
based on how you're living your life
as well as what your fundamental
genetic makeup is.
And based on that genetic makeup,
we're going to be able to give you
more personalized recommendations.
Well, I do think there's a whole new
world that's coming.
I'm really excited about it because
it will mean that not everyone has to
have the exact same set of
recommendations.
I can't wait for that for that time.
I hope it comes soon.
And that's my raises my next
question. Do you think the pandemic
raised awareness and the broader
health care community and the biotech
community about the importance of
doing what you're doing?
And do you think that coming out of
the pandemic, there's going to be
faster change?
I think that the most important thing
that the pandemic did is it made
telemedicine normal.
Like when I think about all the
changes, I get it raised awareness
about, you know, diseases and
pandemics and other health related
issues.
But the most important legacy
consequence is that it made people
realize that you can get your care
in a very easy manner on
your phone in a self-service.
Like people all want instant like
I no longer ever want to go to the
grocery store. I want to deliver to
me. And guess what?
Now I can also get my health care in
that same way.
I think people saw that opportunity
and they are not going back.
So that normalization of
telemedicine, I think, is like an
absolutely chain like game
changer for the entire health care
industry. And I hope that the entire
industry really adopts that kind of
like ease and convenience and
affordability for people.
I think it definitely we saw during
the pandemic, people definitely were
aware, more interested in their
health, more interested in genetics.
And I think that's also a huge
opportunity for all of health care
participants to like leverage that
people are suddenly looking around
and saying, like, OK, what can I do
to be healthy?
And how what are those measures and
tasks? Like what is science and how
do I engage with it?
Well, Anne, we've talked so much
about the future of health care, but
I have to ask about your role running
a public company.
There are so many CEOs of the
Disruptor 50 companies that don't
stay on to run the company once
it goes public.
And oftentimes they either
hand the reins over to someone else
or they simply aren't interested in
that kind of a job of running the
company. How once it's public
and they're dealing with the
quarterly reports, how do you find
your role has changed and
what maybe would be some advice to
other disruptors looking to make
that transition as well?
I think that the most important
thing that I have this incredible
luxury and that I love what I do,
like hands down, like I
I think every single day, like I'm
lucky that I
I deal with interesting problems.
I have a really exciting
opportunity.
So like I think every day about how
lucky I am.
And but I couldn't do that without
a team that also handles some of
the things that I'm less excited
about. So having the right
team around me has
enabled me to then like really
think every day about how much I
love what I'm doing.
So the advice I would have to
individuals is like it's all about
the team around you and
really empowering and trusting
those individuals to be able to
like, you know, run with their
programs and to thrive.
It's absolutely about the team.
So I do,
you know, I have a Wall Street
background.
It has been a real pleasure for me
to now interact with my friends on
a different side.
And I think that being public is
actually it's a great honor.
So I don't mind the quarterly
earnings. It's really just about
making sure that we have the right
infrastructure in place to be able
to manage it.
But the market has plummeted so
much since you went public.
We've seen all the companies
in sectors such as yours suffer.
Has that been a hard thing to
navigate?
Well, I think my
training, so I was originally
trained as a Wall Street analyst
working for the Wallenberg family
in Sweden, and I remember them
telling me, like, and everything
goes on sale once a year and
you need to have a long term
vision. Like a lot of the
great opportunities they had were
based on sort of that long term
vision. So I try to tell people
like when we went public,
you know, we we you know, we were
doing X number of things and we're
doing even more things today.
But the markets have changed.
And so we're kind of a small ship
floating in a sea that happens to
be very turbulent right now.
So you need to keep employees
and you need to keep everyone
focused on the long term because
the unbelievable opportunity we
have with the opportunities with
genetics, with like telemedicine
care, you know, where you can go
with actually data and what you
can learn from, you know, large
data sets and involving genetics
is huge.
Like it's a really exciting
opportunity that we have in all
those areas. So keeping people
focused on the long term is really
key. And again, for me,
everything I do, like I have really
a 30 year vision for 23andMe and
I'm not going anywhere.
I'm super excited about this.
Like keep people long term on the
vision. And frankly, you know,
23andMe is an incredibly
interesting, scientific,
you know, innovative place to be.
And so that alone is what keeps my
employees really motivated.